Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 39(7): e69-e84, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28625296

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications. OPTIONS: The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems. OUTCOMES: Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy. EVIDENCE: English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. VALUES: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Agujas
3.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 120(1): 102-7, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23390643

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review current knowledge about emergency contraception (EC), including available options, their modes of action, efficacy, safety, and the effective provision of EC within a practice setting. OPTIONS: The combined estradiol-levonorgestrel (Yuzpe regimen) and the levonorgestrel-only regimen, as well as post-coital use of copper intrauterine devices, are reviewed. OUTCOMES: Efficacy in terms of reduction in risk of pregnancy, safety, and side effects of methods for EC and the effect of the means of access to EC on its appropriate use and the use of consistent contraception. EVIDENCE: Studies published in English between January 1998 and March 2010 were retrieved though searches of Medline and the Cochrane Database, using appropriate key words (emergency contraception, post-coital contraception, emergency contraceptive pills, post-coital copper IUD). Clinical guidelines and position papers developed by health or family planning organizations were also reviewed. VALUES: The studies reviewed were classified according to criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, and the recommendations for practice were ranked according to this classification (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: These guidelines are intended to help reduce unintended pregnancies by increasing awareness and appropriate use of EC. SPONSOR: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción Postcoital/métodos , Anticonceptivos Poscoito/administración & dosificación , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre , Anticoncepción Postcoital/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Poscoito/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Etinilestradiol/administración & dosificación , Etinilestradiol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos de Cobre/efectos adversos , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Levonorgestrel/efectos adversos , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado
5.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 31(6): 514-520, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19646316

RESUMEN

The goal of any skin closure technique is to produce appropriate skin approximation and adequate healing while minimizing pain, wound complications, cost, and scarring; the technique should be quick, cost-effective, and simple, while maximizing wound cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Although many studies have shown the superiority of staples for speed of closure, it is unclear if staples give a superior cosmetic result or reduce pain. Several randomized controlled trials have found that sutures are superior for cosmesis and that they decrease postoperative pain and are more cost-effective. There remains a paucity of data on wound infections and complications associated with closure technique. This review summarizes studies to date evaluating outcomes associated with wound closure using staples and sutures in repairing abdominal incisions and, in particular, assesses outcomes in the obstetric population with a Pfannenstiel incision.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Cesárea , Estética , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Suturas , Cicatrización de Heridas
6.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 29(5): 433-447, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés, Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17493376

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications. OPTIONS: The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems. OUTCOMES: Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy. EVIDENCE: English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. VALUES: The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: 1. Left upper quadrant (LUQ, Palmer's) laparoscopic entry should be considered in patients with suspected or known periumbilical adhesions or history or presence of umbilical hernia, or after three failed insufflation attempts at the umbilicus. (II-2 A) Other sites of insertion, such as transuterine Veress CO(2) insufflation, may be considered if the umbilical and LUQ insertions have failed or have been considered and are not an option. (I-A) 2. The various Veress needle safety tests or checks provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veress needle. It is therefore not necessary to perform various safety checks on inserting the Veress needle; however, waggling of the Veress needle from side to side must be avoided, as this can enlarge a 1.6 mm puncture injury to an injury of up to 1 cm in viscera or blood vessels. (II-1 A) 3. The Veress intraperitoneal (VIP-pressure

Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Laparoscopía , Canadá , Femenino , Ginecología , Humanos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obstetricia , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...