Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39228191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Historically, differences in timely reperfusion and outcomes have been described in females who suffer ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, there have been improvements in the treatment of STEMI patients with contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) strategies. METHODS: Comparisons between sexes were performed on STEMI patients treated with primary PCI over a 4-year period (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2020) from the Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were STEMI performance measures. The total and direct effects of gender on mortality outcomes were estimated using logistic and multinomial logistic regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 2747 (76% male) were included. Females were on average older (65.9 vs. 61.9 years; p < 0.001), had longer total ischemic time (69 min vs. 52 min; p < 0.001) and less achievement of STEMI performance targets (<90 min) (50% vs. 58%; p < 0.001). There was no evidence for a total (odds ratio [OR] 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-2.2; p = 0.35) or direct (adjusted OR 1.2 (95% CI: 0.7-2.1; p = 0.58) effect of female sex on 30-day mortality. One-year mortality was higher in females (6.9% vs. 4.4%; p = 0.014) with total effect estimates consistent with increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (Incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0-2.3; p = 0.059) and noncardiovascular mortality (IRR: 2.1; 95% CI: 0.9-4.7; p = 0.077) in females. However, direct (adjusted) effect estimates of cardiovascular mortality (IRR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.6-1.6; p = 0.94) indicated sex differences were explained by confounders and mediators. CONCLUSION: Small sex differences in STEMI performance measures still exist; however, with contemporary primary PCI strategies, sex is not associated with cardiovascular mortality at 30 days or 1 year.

2.
Europace ; 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39210643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (EV ICD) has been shown to be safe and effective for patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, but little is known about EV ICD lead removal in humans. This analysis aimed to characterize the EV ICD lead removal experience thus far. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of lead removals from the EV ICD Pilot, Pivotal, and Continued Access Studies. Patients with a successful EV ICD implant who underwent lead removal were included. The main objective was lead removal success. Ancillary objectives included characterizing technique used, procedure complications, and reimplantation status. RESULTS: An EV ICD system was successfully implanted in 347 patients across the 3 studies (25.9% female; 53.4±13.3 years; LVEF: 39.7±15.9). Of these patients, 29 (8.4%) underwent lead removal with a mean lead dwell time of 12.6±14.3 months (0.2-58.4). The main reason for lead removal was lead dislodgement (n=9, 31.0%). Lead removal was successful in 27/29 (93.1%) cases [100% (19/19) success rate <1 year and 80% (8/10) success rate >1-year post-implant]. Simple traction was used in 22/26 (84.6%) and extraction tools in 4/26 (15.4%) successful cases where technique was known. No complications were reported for any of the removal procedures. All 11 EV ICD reimplant attempts were successful. CONCLUSIONS: Complete removal of the EV ICD lead was successful in 93.1% of cases and simple traction was sufficient in most instances. Based on these results, lead removal from the substernal space was safe and achievable up to 3 years post-implant.

4.
Eur Heart J ; 45(24): 2133-2141, 2024 Jun 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter are common causes of hospitalizations but contemporary long-term outcomes following these episodes are uncertain. This study assessed outcomes up to 10 years after an acute AF or flutter hospitalization. METHODS: Patients hospitalized acutely with a primary diagnosis of AF or flutter from 2008-17 from all public and most private hospitals in Australia and New Zealand were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and flexible parametric survival modelling were used to estimate survival and loss in life expectancy, respectively. Competing risk model accounting for death was used when estimating incidence of non-fatal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 260 492 adults (mean age 70.5 ± 14.4 years, 49.6% female) were followed up for 1 068 009 person-years (PY), during which 69 167 died (incidence rate 6.5/100 PY) with 91.2% survival at 1 year, 72.7% at 5 years, and 55.2% at 10 years. Estimated loss in life expectancy was 2.6 years, or 16.8% of expected life expectancy. Re-hospitalizations for heart failure (2.9/100 PY), stroke (1.7/100 PY), and myocardial infarction (1.1/100 PY) were common with respective cumulative incidences of 16.8%, 11.0%, and 7.1% by 10 years. Re-hospitalization for AF or flutter occurred in 21.3% by 1 year, 35.3% by 5 years, and 41.2% by 10 years (11.6/100 PY). The cumulative incidence of patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF was 6.5% at 10 years (1.2/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for AF or flutter had high death rates with an average 2.6-year loss in life expectancy. Moreover, re-hospitalizations for AF or flutter and related outcomes such as heart failure and stroke were common with catheter ablation used infrequently for treatment, which warrant further actions.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Hospitalización , Humanos , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Australia/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Esperanza de Vida , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Incidencia
5.
Heart Lung Circ ; 33(1): 46-54, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065830

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a newer ablation energy source with the potential to reduce complications and improve efficacy compared to conventional thermal atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. This study aimed to present an initial single-centre Australian experience of PFA for AF ablation. METHODS: Initial consecutive patients undergoing PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF at a single centre were included. Baseline patient characteristics, procedural data and clinical outcomes were collected prospectively at the time of the procedure. Patients were followed up at 3 months and 6-monthly thereafter. RESULTS: In total, 100 PFA procedures were performed in 97 patients under general anaesthesia. All pulmonary veins (403 of 403) were successfully isolated acutely. Median follow-up was 218 days (range, 16-343 days), and the Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 180 days was 87% (95% confidence interval 79%-95%). Median procedure time was 74 minutes (range, 48-134 minutes). Median fluoroscopy dose-area product was 345 µGym2 (interquartile range, 169-685 µGym2). Two (2%) pseudoaneurysm vascular access complications occurred. There were no cases of thromboembolic complications, stroke, phrenic nerve palsy, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-oesophageal fistula, or pericardial tamponade. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed field ablation can be performed safely and efficiently, with encouraging efficacy in early follow-up. Further data and clinical trials will be required to assess the comparative utility of PFA in contemporary AF ablation practice.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Australia/epidemiología , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recurrencia
6.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(23): e030236, 2023 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence and type of complications following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation have been extensively examined, but the impact associated with these complications on the length of stay and hospitalization costs is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This cohort study included 20 117 adult patients (mean age 62.6±11.4 years, 30.3% women, median length of stay 1 day [interquartile range 1-2 days]) undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation in financial years 2011 to 2017 in Australia with available cost data from the National Hospital Cost Data Collection, which determines government reimbursement of health services provided. The primary outcome was the costs associated with complications occurring up to 30 days postdischarge adjusted for inflation to 2021 Australian dollars. We used generalized linear models to estimate the increase in length of stay and cost associated with complications, adjusting for patient characteristics. Within 30 days of hospital discharge, 1151 (5.72%) patients experienced a complication with bleeding (3.35%) and pericardial effusion (0.75%) being the most common. On average, the occurrence of a complication was associated with an adjusted 3.3 (95% CI, 3.1-3.6) excess bed days of hospital care (totaling 3851 days), and a $7812 (95% CI, $6754-$8870) increase in hospitalization cost (totaling $9.0 million). Most of the total excess cost was attributable to bleeding ($3.8 million, 41.9% of total excess cost) and pericardial effusion ($1.6 million, 18.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Complications following atrial fibrillation ablation were associated with significant increase in length of stay and hospitalization costs, most of which were attributable to bleeding and pericardial effusion. Strategies to improve procedural safety and reduce health care costs should focus on these complications.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Derrame Pericárdico , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Derrame Pericárdico/etiología , Cuidados Posteriores , Alta del Paciente , Australia/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Hemorragia/etiología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 12(14): e029346, 2023 07 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37449585

RESUMEN

Background Prehospital activation of the cardiac catheter laboratory is associated with significant improvements in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) performance measures. However, there are equivocal data, particularly within Australia, regarding its influence on mortality. We assessed the association of prehospital activation on performance measures and mortality in patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the Queensland Cardiac Outcomes Registry (QCOR). Methods and Results Consecutive ambulance-transported patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 from the QCOR. The total and direct effects of prehospital activation on the primary outcomes (30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality) were estimated using logistic regression analyses. Secondary outcomes were STEMI performance measures. Among 2498 patients (mean age: 62.2±12.4 years; 79.2% male), 73% underwent prehospital activation. Median door-to-balloon time (34 minutes [26-46] versus 86 minutes [68-113]; P<0.001), first-electrocardiograph-to-balloon time (83.5 minutes [72-98] versus 109 minutes [81-139]; P<0.001), and proportion of patients meeting STEMI targets (door-to-balloon <60 minutes 90% versus 16%; P<0.001), electrocardiograph-to-balloon time <90 minutes (62% versus 33%; P<0.001) were significantly improved with prehospital activation. Prehospital activation was associated with significantly lower 30-day (1.6% versus 6.6%; P<0.001) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (2.9% versus 9.5%; P<0.001). After adjustment, no prehospital activation was strongly associated with increased 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 3.6 [95% CI, 2.2-6.0], P<0.001) and 1-year cardiovascular mortality (OR, 3.0 [95% CI, 2.0-4.6]; P<0.001). Conclusions Prehospital activation of cardiac catheterization laboratory for primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with significantly shorter time to reperfusion, achievement of STEMI performance measures, and lower 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía , Cateterismo Cardíaco
8.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 9(5): 447-458, 2023 08 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37336617

RESUMEN

AIMS: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is now a mainstream procedure although long-term outcomes are uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of procedural outcomes at 5 years and beyond. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched PubMed and Embase and after the screening, identified 73 studies (67 159 patients) reporting freedom from atrial arrhythmia, all-cause death, stroke, and major bleeding at ≥5 years after AF ablation. The pooled mean age was 59.7y, 71.5% male, 62.2% paroxysmal AF, and radiofrequency was used in 78.1% of studies. Pooled incidence of freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years was 50.6% (95%CI 45.5-55.7%) after a single ablation and 69.7% [95%CI (confidence interval) 63.8-75.3%) after multiple procedures. The incidence was higher among patients with paroxysmal compared with non-paroxysmal AF after single (59.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.002) and multiple (80.8% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001) ablations but was comparable between radiofrequency and cryoablation. Pooled incidences of other outcomes were 6.0% (95%CI 3.2-9.7%) for death, 2.4% (95%CI 1.4-3.7%) for stroke, and 1.2% (95%CI 0.8-2.0%) for major bleeding at 5 years. Beyond 5 years, freedom from arrhythmia recurrence remained largely stable (52.3% and 64.7% after single and multiple procedures at 10 years), while the risk of stroke and bleeding increased over time. CONCLUSION: Nearly 70% of patients having multiple ablations remained free from atrial arrhythmia at 5 years, with the incidence slightly decreasing beyond this period. Risk of death, stroke, and major bleeding at 5 years were low but increased over time, emphasizing the importance of long-term thromboembolism prevention and bleeding risk management.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos
9.
Heart Lung Circ ; 32(8): 993-999, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37236845

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Left-bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a relatively new technique for conduction system pacing. Australian safety and efficacy data is currently lacking. We aim to evaluate the learning curve, medium-term safety, and lead performance in a high-volume Australian setting. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 200 consecutive LBBAP procedures performed by a single operator at two centres between January 2019 and May 2020. Left bundle branch area pacing was performed predominantly via left subclavian access using a 69 cm Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing lead and a preformed non-steerable C315-His sheath. Procedural success was defined as evidence of left septal or left bundle branch area capture as evidenced by a right bundle branch block-like paced morphology. Procedural characteristics, and follow-up (including lead performance) data were collected. Procedural efficiency over time, as well as safety data, were collected. RESULTS: Median age was 78.26 years (interquartile range [IQR] 71-85), 37% were female. Atrial fibrillation was present in 22%. The left ventricular ejection fraction <50% in 24%, atrioventricular (AV) block was present in 43.5%, left bundle branch block in 22.5% and right bundle branch block in 24.5%. Acute procedural success was 91.5%. Implant threshold was 0.6V @ 0.5 ms, and 0.75V @ 0.5 ms at 11.9 months of follow-up. The QRS was significant reduced (baseline 134 ms vs implant 114 ms, p<0.001) There was a reduction in procedural time and X-ray dose over the course of the study. There were no complications specific to LBBAP. CONCLUSION: LBBAP appears to be a safe and effective pacing strategy. The QRS duration was significantly reduced compared to baseline. There appears to be an early learning curve with LBBAP.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , Bloqueo de Rama , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Bloqueo de Rama/epidemiología , Bloqueo de Rama/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico , Australia/epidemiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Electrocardiografía , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 9(2): 150-160, 2023 02 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35700131

RESUMEN

AIMS: Population studies reporting contemporary long-term outcomes following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are sparse.We evaluated long-term clinical outcomes following AF ablation and examined variation in outcomes by age, sex, and the presence of heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 30 601 unique patients (mean age 62.7 ± 11.8 years, 30.0% female) undergoing AF ablation from 2008 to 2017 in Australia and New Zealand using nationwide hospitalization data. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and rehospitalizations for AF or flutter, repeat AF ablation, and cardioversion. Secondary outcomes were rehospitalizations for other cardiovascular events. During 124 858.7 person-years of follow-up, 1900 patients died (incidence rate 1.5/100 person-years) with a survival probability of 93.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.6-93.4%) by 5 years and 84.0% (95% CI 82.4-85.5%) by 10 years. Rehospitalizations for AF or flutter (13.3/100 person-years), repeat ablation (5.9/100 person-years), and cardioversion (4.5/100 person-years) were common, with respective cumulative incidence of 49.4% (95% CI 48.4-50.4%), 28.1% (95% CI 27.2-29.0%), and 24.4% (95% CI 21.5-27.5%) at 10 years post-ablation. Rehospitalizations for stroke (0.7/100 person-years), heart failure (1.1/100 person-years), acute myocardial infarction (0.4/100 person-years), syncope (0.6/100 person-years), other arrhythmias (2.5/100 person-years), and new cardiac device implantation (2.0/100 person-years) occurred less frequently. Elderly patients and those with comorbid heart failure had worse survival but were less likely to undergo repeat ablation, while long-term outcomes were comparable between the sexes. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing AF ablations had good long-term survival, a low incidence of rehospitalizations for stroke or heart failure, and about half remained free of rehospitalizations for AF or flutter, including for repeat AF ablation, or cardioversion.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Aleteo Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Aleteo Atrial/cirugía , Aleteo Atrial/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones
11.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 100(4): 520-529, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35971748

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We assessed sex differences in treatment and outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Historically, delays to timely reperfusion and poorer outcomes have been described in women who suffer STEMI. However, whether these sex discrepancies still exist with contemporary STEMI treatment remains to be evaluated. METHODS: Consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary PCI patients over a 10-year period (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019) from a tertiary referral center were assessed. Comparisons were performed between patient's sex. Primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were STEMI performance measures. RESULTS: Most patients (n = 950; 76%) were male. Females were on average older (66.8 vs. 61.4 years males; p < 0.001). Prehospital treatment delays did not differ between sexes (54 min [IQR: 44-65] females vs. 52 min [IQR: 43-62] males; p = 0.061). STEMI performance measures (door-to-balloon, first medical contact-to-balloon [FMCTB]) differed significantly with longer median durations in females and fewer females achieving FMCTB < 90 min (28% females vs. 39% males; p < 0.001). Women also experienced greater rates of initial radial arterial access failure (11.3% vs. 3.1%; p < 0.001). However, there were no significant sex differences in crude or adjusted mortality between sexes at 30-days (3.6% male vs. 5.1% female; p = 0.241, adjusted OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.5-2.2, p = 0.82) or at 1-year (4.8% male vs. 6.8% female; p = 0.190, adjusted OR: 1.0, (95% CI: 0.5-1.8; p = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Small discrepancies between sexes in measures of timely reperfusion for STEMI still exist. No significant sex differences were observed in either 30-day or 1-year mortality.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Caracteres Sexuales , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Heart Lung Circ ; 31(7): 974-984, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227611

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pre-hospital activation and direct cardiac catheterisation laboratory (CCL) transfer of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has previously been shown to improve door-to-balloon (DTB) times yet there is limited outcome data in the Australian context. We aimed to assess the impact of pre-hospital activation on STEMI performance measures and mortality. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of consecutive ambulance transported STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients over a 10-year period (1 January 2008-31 December 2017) at The Prince Charles Hospital, a large quaternary referral centre in Brisbane, Queensland Australia. Comparisons were performed between patients who underwent pre-hospital CCL activation and patients who did not. STEMI performance measures, 30-day and 1-year mortality were examined. RESULTS: Amongst 1,009 patients included (mean age: 62.8 yrs±12.6), pre-hospital activation increased over time (26.6% in 2008 to 75.0% in 2017, p<0.001). Median DTB time (35 mins vs 76 mins p<0.001) and percentage meeting targets (DTB<60 mins 92% vs 27%, p<0.001) improved significantly with pre-hospital activation. Pre-hospital activation was associated with significantly lower 30-day (1.0% vs 3.5%, p=0.007) and 1-year (1.2% vs 7.7%, p<0.001) mortality. After adjusting for confounders and mediators, we observed a strong total effect of pre-hospital activation on 1-year mortality (OR 5.3, 95%CI 2.2-12.4, p<0.001) compared to patients who did not have pre-hospital activation. False positive rates were 3.7% with pre-hospital activation. CONCLUSION: In patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI, pre-hospital activation and direct CCL transfer is associated with low false positive rates, significantly reduced time to reperfusion and lower 30-day and 1-year mortality.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Australia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Hospitales , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Front Neurol ; 13: 1110934, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36726751

RESUMEN

The DES gene encodes desmin, a key intermediate filament of skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle. Pathogenic DES variants produce a range of skeletal and cardiac muscle disorders collectively known as the desminopathies. We report three desminopathy cases which highlight the phenotypic heterogeneity of this disorder and discuss various factors that may contribute to the clinical differences seen between patients with different desmin variants and also between family members with the same variant.

15.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(13): e019212, 2021 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34169736

RESUMEN

Background Leadless pacemaker is a novel technology, and evidence supporting its use is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers implanted in the right ventricle. Methods and Results We searched PubMed and Embase for studies published before June 6, 2020. The primary safety outcome was major complications, whereas the primary efficacy end point was acceptable pacing capture threshold (≤2 V). Pooled estimates were calculated using the Freedman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Of 1281 records screened, we identified 36 observational studies of Nanostim and Micra leadless pacemakers, with most (69.4%) reporting outcomes for the Micra. For Micra, the pooled incidence of complications at 90 days (n=1608) was 0.46% (95% CI, 0.08%-1.05%) and at 1 year (n=3194) was 1.77% (95% CI, 0.76%-3.07%). In 5 studies with up to 1-year follow-up, Micra was associated with 51% lower odds of complications compared with transvenous pacemakers (3.30% versus 7.43%; odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70). At 1 year, 98.96% (95% CI, 97.26%-99.94%) of 1376 patients implanted with Micra had good pacing capture thresholds. For Nanostim, the reported complication incidence ranged from 6.06% to 23.54% at 90 days and 5.33% to 6.67% at 1 year, with 90% to 100% having good pacing capture thresholds at 1 year (pooled result not estimated because of the low number of studies). Conclusions Most studies report outcomes for the Micra, which is associated with a low risk of complications and good electrical performance up to 1-year after implantation. Further data from randomized controlled trials are needed to support the widespread adoption of these devices in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 6(12): 1525-1536, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33213813

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of an extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Limitations of existing transvenous and subcutaneous ICD systems include lead reliability and morbidity issues associated with ICD lead implantation in the vasculature or lack of pacing therapies (e.g., antitachycardia pacing) in subcutaneous systems. The EV defibrillator uses a novel substernal lead placement to address these limitations. METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized, chronic pilot study conducted at 4 centers in Australia and New Zealand. Participants were 21 patients referred for ICD implantation. Patients received EV ICD systems. Data collection included major systemic and procedural adverse events, defibrillation testing at implantation, and sensing and pacing thresholds. RESULTS: Among 20 patients who underwent successful implantation, the median defibrillation threshold was 15 J, and 90% passed defibrillation testing with a ≥10-J safety margin. Mean R-wave amplitude was 3.4 ± 2.0 mV, mean ventricular fibrillation amplitude was 2.8 ± 1.7 mV, and pacing was successful in 95% at ≤10 V. There were no intraprocedural complications. Two patients have undergone elective chronic system removal since hospital discharge. In the 15 patients presently implanted, the systems are stable in long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human evaluation of an EV ICD demonstrated the feasibility of substernal lead placement, defibrillation, and pacing with a chronically implanted system. There were no acute major complications, and pacing, defibrillation, and sensing performance at implantation were successful in most patients. (Extravascular ICD Pilot Study [EV ICD]; NCT03608670).


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
17.
Heart Lung Circ ; 28(1): 65-75, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389367

RESUMEN

Defibrillator technology for sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention now includes the transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD), subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) and wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD). ICD use improves survival in patients who survived previous sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) due to ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), as well as in patients who experienced haemodynamically significant VT. It is also currently indicated for primary prevention in ischaemic/non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies, certain congenital heart disease conditions and inherited channelopathies. In this review article, we hope to present an updated review on ICD use for SCD prevention, with a focus on contemporary issues affecting ICD selection. These include: the role of primary prevention ICD in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) in light of the 2016 DANISH (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs in Patients with Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) trial; the role of defibrillator component (CRT-D) in patients receiving cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT-P); and the emerging role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in particular, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), as an important SCD risk predictor. The current use of S-ICD and WCD, including clinical indications, evidence for efficacy and limitations, will also be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos
18.
Heart Lung Circ ; 28(11): 1677-1682, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30392985

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To describe the performance and clinical outcomes of consecutive patients having a leadless pacemaker (LP) implanted at a single institution. METHODS: Clinical data and device parameters were prospectively collected on all patients undergoing LP implantation from November 2015 to April 2018. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients (52 male), median age of 78 years, was included. Leadless pacemaker implantation was successful in 76 patients (96%). Implantation failed in two patients due to excessive venous tortuosity and due to inadequate sensing in another. Seventy-three (73) patients (96%) had chronic atrial fibrillation and all had a Class I or II indication for pacing. Procedure time was 29minutes (IQR 21-43) and fluoroscopy time was 8minutes (IQR 5-13). The median R wave at implant was 11.2mV (IQR 6.9-15.0). The median capture threshold at 0.24ms was 0.5V (IQR 0.4-0.9) and impedance was 754Ω (IQR 680-880). Intraprocedural acute dislodgement occurred in one patient following cutting of the tether but successful snaring and reimplantation was performed. During a median follow-up of 355days (range 9-905), overall electrical performance has been excellent. No patients have been readmitted for device revision or complications. Five (5) patients (7%) died during follow-up from unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Leadless pacemakers can be implanted safely and effectively in the majority of patients. Device electrical performance was excellent over a median follow-up of 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Australia , Electrocardiografía , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Heart Lung Circ ; 28(3): 379-388, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29482954

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ectopy-mediated cardiomyopathy (EMC) is a potentially reversible form of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Various risk factors for the development of EMC have been proposed in the literature. We aim to assess medium term outcomes of focal ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation in the setting of cardiomyopathy (CMP) and to validate published risk factors for EMC. METHODS: Medium term recovery of left ventricular (LV) function and freedom from VA recurrence was assessed and compared between patients undergoing focal VA ablation in the setting of CMP and a control group with normal LV function. Univariate and multivariate analyses for CMP risk factors were performed and compared against prior published risk factors. RESULTS: Of 152 patients who underwent 170 focal VA ablation procedures, 54 (36%) had CMP and the remaining 98 patients had normal LV systolic function. At medium term follow-up, 85% of patients with CMP were free of VA recurrence and median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from 40 to 52%. Age, male gender, premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden, non- right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) sites of origin, PVC QRS duration and PVC minimum coupling interval were predictive of CMP on univariate analysis, but only gender persisted on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Medium term outcome in patients undergoing focal VA in the setting of CMP are satisfactory with improvement in LV function achievable in most patients. Prior risk factors described in the literature are variable and inconsistent, likely reflecting heterogeneous study populations.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Ventrículos Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/etiología , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/cirugía , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Cinemagnética/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sístole , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/diagnóstico , Complejos Prematuros Ventriculares/cirugía
20.
J Arrhythm ; 34(3): 312-314, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29951152

RESUMEN

Concealed accessory pathways (APs) are considered benign as they can only sustain orthodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia (ORT). We describe a unique case of a concealed posteroseptal AP where longitudinal surveillance following repeated failed ablation attempts due to abnormal coronary sinus (CS) anatomy revealed spontaneous development of manifest pre-excitation. The pathway was ultimately ablated via the percutaneous epicardial approach. The potential for development of Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome in patients with concealed APs has implications for ongoing surveillance in these patients.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA