Selection and Identification of a DNA Aptamer for Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Using an In-House Cell-SELEX Methodology.

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii are a worldwide health concern with high mortality rates. Rapid identification of this infectious agent is critical as it can easily spread with difficult or no options for treatment. In this context, the development of reliable and economically viable detection and therapeutic methodologies are still challenging. One of the promising solutions is the development of nucleic acid aptamers capable of interacting with bacteria. These aptamers can be used for specific recognition of infectious agents as well as for blocking their functions. Cell-SELEX technology currently allows the selection and identification of aptamers and is flexible enough to target molecules present in an entire bacterial cell without their prior knowledge. However, the aptamer technology is still facing many challenges, such as the complexity of the screening process. Here, we describe the selection and identification of a new aptamer A01, using an in-house whole-cell SELEX-based methodology, against multi-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, with rapid execution and low cost. In addition, this protocol allowed the identification of the aptamer A01 with the whole A. baumannii cell as a target. The aptamer A01 demonstrated a binding preference to A. baumannii when compared to K. pneumoniae, C. albicans, and S. aureus in fluorescence assays. Although the time-kill assay did not show an effect on bacterial growth, the potential bactericidal or bacteriostatic cannot be totally discarded. The new categorized aptamer (A01) displayed a significant binding affinity to MDR A. baumannii.

Risk factors for bloodstream infection by multidrug-resistant organisms in critically ill patients in a reference trauma hospital.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms are responsible for significant mortality in critically ill trauma patients. Our objective is to identify the risk factors for BSI by MDR agents and their resistance mechanisms in a trauma reference hospital. METHODS: During 18 months, all patients admitted in our Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were enrolled in this prospective cohort. We included the first episode of BSI by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin resistant enterococcus. Demographic and clinical data were compared among patients with and without BSI and variables with P < .05 were tested in a multivariate analysis. We performed PCR for identification of carbapenemase and SCC mec genes and Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for clonality. RESULTS: Out of 1,528 patients, 302 (19.8%) were trauma and 66 (4.3%) had a MDR-BSI (19.5% were trauma). The multivariate analysis showed that mechanical ventilation (OR3.16; 95% CI 1-8; P = .02), hemodialysis (OR3.16; 95% CI 1-5; P = .0003) and surgery (OR1.76; 95% CI 1-3; P = .04) were independent risk factors for MDR-BSI. The most frequent MDR were Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 26) and MRSA (n = 27). Regarding K pneumoniae strains (n = 24), 20 (83.8%) harbored bla KPC gene and 1 bla NDM. The majority of KPC isolates belonged to a predominant clone; while the MRSA were polyclonal and SCC mec type II. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation, surgery and hemodialysis were independent risk factors for MDR-BSI in our cohort, but trauma was not. KPC was the main mechanism of resistance among carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae that belonged to a predominant clone which could indicate cross-transmission.