Volumetric intravascular ultrasound imaging to illustrate the extent of coronary plaque burden in type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Although angiography is the gold standard for coronary imaging, its efficacy in outlining diffuse coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients remains questionable. We aimed to compare quantitative cineangiographic analysis (QCA) with three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: IVUS runs of 104 significant coronary lesions in 88 diabetic patients were performed. Arterial remodeling index was calculated as vessel area at minimal lumen area divided by mean reference vessel area. RESULTS: No difference between the two analysis modes was shown for lesion length and minimal lumen diameter, whereas a significant discrepancy between QCA and IVUS was found for diameter stenosis (10 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 8%; P<.001) and vessel diameter (3.01 +/- 0.66 vs. 4.53 +/- 0.70 mm; P<.001). A significant difference on arterial remodeling at lesion site was found between insulin-treated diabetic patients and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (remodeling index: 0.98 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.21; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiographic diagnosis in diabetic patients may be distorted due to a large plaque burden over longer vessel segments and the resulting absence of plaque-free reference segments. This distortion was found to be more pronounced in QCA analysis requiring a reference diameter, whereas volumetric IVUS imaging illustrated coronary artery dimensions more accurately according to anatomic structures. Constrictive arterial remodeling was observed more frequently in type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin.

Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy complicating left atrial radiofrequency ablation.

Two female patients undergoing left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation developed Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy. This reversible form of left ventricular dysfunction is known to occur under conditions associated with marked sympathetic nervous activation. Radiofrequency catheter ablation in the left atrium can damage autonomic ganglionated plexi, leading to vagal withdrawal, thus resulting in enhanced sympathetic tone. Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy has not been previously described following radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, and statins: no effect on ablation outcome after ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and inflammation are supposed to play a key role in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective clinical study was intended to assess the influence of drugs with antiinflammatory and/or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-modulating properties, namely angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and statins, on AF-free survival after AF ablation. METHODS: The study included 234 patients (23-80 years; 71.8% men) with drug-resistant paroxysmal (n = 165) or persistent AF (n = 69) who either underwent a Lasso-guided segmental pulmonary vein isolation (n = 83) or a CARTO-guided left atrial circumferential ablation (n = 151). Treatment with statins (n = 113), ACE-Is, or ARBs (n = 124), or a combination of a statin and an ACE-I or ARB (n = 75) was started >3 months before ablation and was continued during follow-up. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12.7 months, 64% of patients with paroxysmal and 45% of patients with persistent AF were free of AF. Statin use (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; P = .79), ACE-I or ARB use (HR, 1.12; P = .59), and their combined use (statin + ACE-I/ARB; HR, 1.17; P = .54) did not significantly influence ablation outcome as assessed by Cox regression analysis. In addition, after multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, the examined drugs did not significantly affect ablation outcome. Ablation induced an acute up-regulation of C-reactive protein levels (preablation vs 48 hours postablation, 5.9 +/- 8.1 vs 33.7 +/- 30 mg/L; P < .001) and other inflammatory markers. The examined drugs did not significantly alter baseline levels or ablation-induced up-regulation of inflammatory markers. CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of statins, ACE-Is, or ARBs did not result in an improved outcome of AF ablation.

Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) for the treatment of long diffuse in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: As recurrent ISR depends on intimal injury after coronary angioplasty, long in-stent restenotic lesions were defined as lesions with a treatment length >26 mm (lesion length >20 mm plus a treatment margin of 3 mm at each end). Seventy-eight patients with long ISR were treated at our institution with beta-brachytherapy after coronary angioplasty. Patients were irradiated with either an approximate dose of 12 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth or with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth. Clinical follow-up was available for 69 patients and angiographic follow-up for 65 patients. Late lumen loss (LLL), binary restenosis (stenosis >50%), target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were assessed for a follow-up time of 6.6+/-2.2 months. RESULTS: Mean interventional treatment length was 46+/-18 mm. TLR was performed in all 23 patients with binary restenosis (33%). Death of cardiac cause was reported for two patients, one of whom did not undergo TLR. Thus, overall MACE rate was 35%. Recurrent ISR was significantly more frequent in patients with geographic miss. Comparison of the different radiation dose regimens revealed significantly lower LLL in patients irradiated with the higher dose (0.20+/-0.68 mm compared with 0.65+/-0.96 mm, P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Intracoronary brachytherapy with beta-radiation (Sr/Y) is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the reduction of recurrent ISR in long diffuse lesions. We recommend a high-dose irradiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel wall depth.

Increased dosage during intracoronary irradiation due to overlapped source stepping shows no long-term adverse changes in vessel morphology.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate if overdosage during intracoronary irradiation due to overlapped source stepping may result in long-term morphologic changes in vessel anatomy. METHODS: Baseline angiograms of patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing coronary reintervention followed by intracoronary irradiation with source stepping were analyzed. Overlapping was considered present for the segment with overlapped reference isodose length (RIL) (RIL = segment with > or = 90% of reference dose at 1 mm vessel wall depth). Baseline and 6-months follow-up volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis were performed for the overlapped segment and for proximal and distal segments of equal length. RESULTS: Overlapping was found in six patients (three patients: (32)P treatment; three patients: (90)Sr/Y treatment); final analysis was performed in four patients. Comparison of the baseline and follow-up IVUS volumetric parameters revealed no significant change in lumen or vessel volumes at segments of overlaps in comparison to proximal and distal reference segments. CONCLUSION: Increased dosage due to overlapping during source stepping is not associated with morphologic changes in vessel anatomy at follow-up.

Prevention of stent thrombosis following brachytherapy and implantation of drug-eluting stents.

The implementation of coronary brachytherapy and especially the application of drug-eluting stents for the prevention of in-stent restenosis are of vital importance in the field of interventional cardiology. Despite undeniable benefits of these new methods a potential increased risk for the occurrence of stent thrombosis as a result of the mode of action of these new methods has to be taken into consideration. The prevention of stent thrombosis following coronary brachytherapy and implantation of drug-eluting stents is therefore of particular importance to assure the success of these forward-looking technologies. This article provides an overview of current data regarding the incidence of stent thrombosis following brachytherapy and implantation of drug-eluting stents and it's implication for clinical practice.