RESUMEN
Arthritis is the leading cause of musculoskeletal pain and disability worldwide. Nearly 50% of individuals over the age of 65 have arthritis, which contributes to limited function, articular pain, physical inactivity, and diminished quality of life. Therapeutic exercise is often recommended in clinical settings for patients experiencing arthritic pain, however, there is little practical guidance regarding the use of therapeutic exercise to alleviate arthritic musculoskeletal pain. Rodent models of arthritis allow researchers to control experimental variables, which cannot be done with human participants, providing an opportunity to test therapeutic approaches in preclinical models. This literature review provides a summary of published findings in therapeutic exercise interventions in rat models of arthritis as well as gaps in the existing literature. We reveal that preclinical research in this field has yet to adequately investigate the impact of experimental variables in therapeutic exercise including their modality, intensity, duration, and frequency on joint pathophysiology and pain outcomes.
RESUMEN
CONTEXT: Opioid related deaths are at epidemic levels in many developed nations globally. Concerns about the contribution of prescribed opioids, and particularly high-dose opioids, continue to mount as do initiatives to reduce prescribing. Evidence around opioid tapering, which can be challenging and potentially hazardous, is not well developed. A recent national guideline has recognized this and recommended referral to multidisciplinary care for challenging cases of opioid tapering. However, multidisciplinary care for opioid tapering is not well understood or defined. OBJECTIVE: Identify the existing literature on any multidisciplinary care programs that evaluate impact on opioid use, synthesize how these programs work and clarify whom they benefit. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic rapid realist review. DATASET: Bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library), grey literature, reference hand search and formal expert consultation. RESULTS: 95 studies were identified. 75% of the programs were from the United States and the majority (n = 62) were published after 2000. A minority (n = 23) of programs reported on >12 month opioid use outcomes. There were three necessary but insufficient mechanisms common to all programs: pain relief, behavior change and active medication management. Programs that did not include a combination of all three mechanisms did not result in opioid dose reductions. A concerning 20-40% of subjects resumed opioid use within one year of program completion. CONCLUSIONS: Providing alternative analgesia is insufficient for reducing opioid doses. Even high quality primary care multidisciplinary care programs do not reduce prescribed opioid use unless there is active medication management accomplished by changing the primary opioid prescriber. Rates of return to use of opioids from these programs are very concerning in the current context of a highly potent and lethal street drug supply. This contextual factor may be powerful enough to undermine the modest benefits of opioid dose reduction via multidisciplinary care.