COVID-19 Impact on Interventional Pulmonology Training.

Background: The impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic extends beyond the realms of patient care and healthcare resource use to include medical education; however, the repercussions of COVID-19 on the quality of training and trainee perceptions have yet to be explored. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of interventional pulmonology (IP) fellows' involvement in the care of COVID-19 and its impact on fellows' clinical education, procedure skills, and postgraduation employment search. Methods: An internet-based survey was validated and distributed among IP fellows in North American fellowship training programs. Results: Of 40 eligible fellows, 38 (95%) completed the survey. A majority of fellows (76%) reported involvement in the care of patients with COVID-19. Fellows training in the Northeast United States reported involvement in the care of a higher number of patients with COVID-19 than in other regions (median, 30 [interquartile range, 20-50] vs. 10 [5-13], respectively; P < 0.01). Fifty-two percent of fellows reported redeployment outside IP during COVID-19, mostly into intensive care units. IP procedure volume decreased by 21% during COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19 volume. This decrease was mainly accounted for by a reduction in bronchoscopies. A majority of fellows (82%) reported retainment of outpatient clinics during COVID-19 with the transition from face-to-face to telehealth-predominant format. Continuation of academic and research activities during COVID-19 was reported by 86% and 82% of fellows, respectively. After graduation, all fellows reported having secured employment positions. Conclusion: Although IP fellows were extensively involved in the care of patients with COVID-19, most IP programs retained educational activities through the COVID-19 outbreak. The impact of the decrease in procedure volume on trainee competency would be best addressed individually within each training program. These data may assist in focusing efforts regarding the education of medical trainees during the current and future healthcare crises.

Advanced Diagnostic and Therapeutic Bronchoscopy: Technology and Reimbursement.

Advanced interventional pulmonary procedures of the airways, pleural space, and mediastinum continue to evolve and be refined. Health care, finance, and clinical professionals are challenged by both the indications and related coding complexities. As the scope of interventional pulmonary procedures expands with advanced technique and medical innovation, program planning and ongoing collaboration among clinicians, finance executives, and reimbursement experts are key elements for success. We describe advanced bronchoscopic procedures, appropriate Current Procedural Terminology coding, valuations, and necessary modifiers to fill the knowledge gap between basic and advanced procedural coding. Our approach is to balance the description of procedures with the associated coding in a way that is of use to the proceduralist, the coding specialist, and other nonclinical professionals.

Basic and Advanced Pleural Procedures: Coding and Professional Fees Update for Pulmonologists.

There is an evolution of pleural procedures that involve broadened clinical indication and expanded scope that include advanced diagnostic, therapeutic, and palliative procedures. Finance and clinical professionals have been challenged to understand the indication and coding complexities that accompany these procedures. This article describes the utility of pleural procedures, the appropriate current procedural terminology coding, and necessary modifiers. Coding pearls that help close the knowledge gap between basic and advanced procedures aim to address coding confusion that is prevalent with pleural procedures and the risk of payment denials, potential underpayment, and documentation audits.

Use of Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: American College of Chest Physicians/American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology/Association of Interventional Pulmonology Program Directors Expert Panel Report.

BACKGROUND: The role of tracheostomy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains unknown. The goal of this consensus statement is to examine the current evidence for performing tracheostomy in patients with respiratory failure from COVID-19 and offer guidance to physicians on the preparation, timing, and technique while minimizing the risk of infection to health care workers (HCWs). METHODS: A panel including intensivists and interventional pulmonologists from three professional societies representing 13 institutions with experience in managing patients with COVID-19 across a spectrum of health-care environments developed key clinical questions addressing specific topics on tracheostomy in COVID-19. A systematic review of the literature and an established modified Delphi consensus methodology were applied to provide a reliable evidence-based consensus statement and expert panel report. RESULTS: Eight key questions, corresponding to 14 decision points, were rated by the panel. The results were aggregated, resulting in eight main recommendations and five additional remarks intended to guide health-care providers in the decision-making process pertinent to tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: This panel suggests performing tracheostomy in patients expected to require prolonged mechanical ventilation. A specific timing of tracheostomy cannot be recommended. There is no evidence for routine repeat reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing in patients with confirmed COVID-19 evaluated for tracheostomy. To reduce the risk of infection in HCWs, we recommend performing the procedure using techniques that minimize aerosolization while wearing enhanced personal protective equipment. The recommendations presented in this statement may change as more experience is gained during this pandemic.

Value-Based Proposition for a Dedicated Interventional Pulmonology Suite: An Adaptable Business Model.

Value-based care is evolving with a focus on improving efficiency, reducing cost, and enhancing the patient experience. Interventional pulmonology has the opportunity to lead an effective value-based care model. This model is supported by the relatively low cost of pulmonary procedures and has the potential to improve efficiencies in thoracic care. We discuss key strategies to evaluate and improve efficiency in interventional pulmonology practice and describe our experience in developing an interventional pulmonology suite. Such a model can be adapted to other specialty areas and may encourage a more coordinated approach to specialty care.

Fiducial marker placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy via convex probe endobronchial ultrasound: a case series and review of literature.

Convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are valuable tools in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of thoracic malignancies. With widespread clinical adoption, novel uses of CP-EBUS beyond mediastinal diagnosis and staging continue to be discovered. SBRT is an attractive treatment strategy in early-stage lung cancer and oligo-metastatic disease of the chest when a surgical approach is either not feasible or desirable. Accurate application of SBRT is aided by the placement of radio-opaque fiducial markers (FM) to compensate for respiratory cycle movements. We describe eight patients with central thoracic lesions, either known or suspected to be malignant, who underwent EBUS bronchoscopy with lesion sampling and successful intralesional placement of modified FM via our technique, review the existing literature on this topic, and discuss the nuances of coding and billing aspects of FM placement.

Interventional Pulmonology: The Role of Simulation Training and Competency-Based Evaluation.

Medical education and training are becoming more complex endeavors as technological and research advancements lead to new tools and methods to care for patients. In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in medical education to competency-based assessments. Another important recent development in medical education has been the increasing use of simulation-based learning for procedural training. Interventional pulmonology (IP) is a relatively young and rapidly evolving procedural-based subspecialty. There are several well-validated competency-based assessment tools available to measure training adequacy in many of the most commonly performed procedures in IP. These tools have been shown to improve learning curves and training outcomes. The extent of how widely these tools are being used in clinical and educational spheres, however, remains unclear. Moreover, several commonly performed procedures in IP have no or limited validation tools currently available. Standardized training using simulation has also been shown to lead to positive training outcomes as compared with more traditional training models. However, widespread adoption of simulators has been limited due to the cost and availability.

Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions: state of the art in 2017.

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a known complication of both thoracic and extra thoracic malignancies. The presence of MPE regardless of the primary site translates into advanced stage disease. Diagnosis and management of MPE with the goals of palliation and improving quality of life poses a challenge for chest physicians. Recently, multiple studies have made attempts to answer questions regarding optimal management in various clinical scenarios. We will review the current evidence and available options for the management of MPE.

Patient evaluation for rapid pleurodesis of malignant pleural effusions.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) represent advanced stage disease with potentially significant patient discomfort due to dyspnea. Palliative management options include repetitive thoracenteses, placement of a tunneled pleural catheter (TPC), chemical pleurodesis, or some combination of these procedures. The rapid pleurodesis procedure combines thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis and insertion of a TPC at the same time with the goals of reducing both the length of hospitalization and the duration of catheter use. The rapid pleurodesis procedure has previously been described to achieve both of these goals in a pilot study of 30 patients with fully expandable lungs. Both symptoms of dyspnea and quality of life improved with few complications. Additional data on procedural effectiveness is needed to optimize patient selection for this procedure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone rapid pleurodesis protocol at two academic institutions over a 40-month period. Data was collected and analyzed on time to removal of the TPC, chemotherapy, malignancy type, complications, age, and catheter occlusion. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients underwent the rapid pleurodesis protocol with a median hospital length of stay of 2 days. Total length of hospitalization was not significantly different between patients with and without primary lung cancer. Median duration of the indwelling TPC was 10 days. Patients with primary lung cancer and those actively or recently undergoing chemotherapy maintained the catheter longer than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid pleurodesis protocol should be considered a viable treatment option for select patients with symptomatic recurrent MPEs undergoing chemical pleurodesis.

Developing an Interventional Pulmonary Service in a Community-Based Private Practice: A Case Study.

Interventional pulmonology (IP) is a field that uses minimally invasive techniques to diagnose, treat, and palliate advanced lung disease. Technology, formal training, and reimbursement for IP procedures have been slow to catch up with other interventional subspecialty areas. A byproduct of this pattern has been limited IP integration in private practice settings. We describe the key aspects and programmatic challenges of building an IP program in a community-based setting. A philosophical and financial buy-in by stakeholders and a regionalization of services, within and external to a larger practice, are crucial to success. Our experience demonstrates that a successful launch of an IP program increases overall visits as well as procedural volume without cannibalizing existing practice volume. We hope this might encourage others to provide this valuable service to their own communities.

The effect of flow trigger on rapid shallow breathing index measured through the ventilator.

BACKGROUND: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) has the best predictive value to assess readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation. At many institutions, this index is conveniently measured without disconnecting the patient from the ventilator, but this method may be inaccurate. Because modern ventilators have a base flow in the flow trigger mode that may provide a substantial help to the patient, we hypothesized that the RSBI is significantly decreased when measured through the ventilator with flow trigger even without continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and pressure support (PS). METHODS: The RSBI was calculated using the values of minute ventilation and respiratory rate obtained either through the digital display of the ventilator or from a digital ventilometer. The RSBI was measured using 3 different methods: method 1, CPAP and PS both 0 cm H2O with flow trigger; method 2, CPAP and PS both 0 cm H2O without flow trigger; and method 3, using digital ventilometer. RESULTS: A total of 165 measurements per method were obtained in 80 adult patients in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). The RSBI (breaths/min/L) values were 70.2 ± 26.5 with method 1, 85.4 ± 30.3 with method 2, and 80.1 ± 30.3 with method 3. The RSBI was significantly decreased using mechanical ventilation with flow trigger as compared with mechanical ventilation without flow trigger (P < .0001) or digital ventilometer (P < .0001). When method 1 was compared with methods 2 and 3, the RSBI decreased by 17% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The RSBI measurement is significantly decreased by the base flow delivered through modern ventilators in the flow trigger mode. If RSBI is measured through the ventilator in the flow trigger mode, the difference should be considered when using RSBI to assess readiness for weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Comparison of 3 different methods used to measure the rapid shallow breathing index.

PURPOSE: Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is conveniently measured through the ventilator. If continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is used, it may change the RSBI value. We measured the RSBI with a handheld spirometer and through the ventilator, with and without CPAP, to assess differences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rapid shallow breathing index was measured in 3 ways: (1) CPAP 0 cm H(2)O and fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio(2)) 0.4, (2) CPAP 5 cm H(2)O and Fio(2) 0.4, and (3) ventilator disconnected and Fio(2) 0.21. Tidal volume and respiratory frequency were recorded from ventilator monitor values in methods 1 and 2, and from a handheld spirometer and observed respiratory frequency, in method 3. RESULTS: A total of 170 measurements, each using all 3 methods, were obtained from 80 patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit. The mean RSBI values for methods 1, 2, and 3 were 98.1 ± 58.7, 87.6 ± 51.2, and 108.3 ± 65.3, respectively (P < .001). The RSBI decreased by 9.4% when using CPAP 0 cm H(2)O and by 19.1% when using CPAP 5 cm H(2)O. CONCLUSIONS: The RSBI values measured through the ventilator with CPAP 5 cm H(2)O are much lower than the values measured with a handheld spirometer. Even the RSBI values measured with CPAP 0 cm H(2)O are significantly lower. This is attributable to the base flow delivered by some ventilators. The difference must be taken into account during weaning assessment.

Coccidioidomycosis in nonendemic area: case series and review of literature.

Four cases of coccidioidomycosis, diagnosed in New Orleans, are described to illustrate the varied clinical presentation of this infection. The first is an immunocompromised elderly patient presenting with a cavitary lung lesion after travel to Utah. The second, a young immunocompetent patient presenting with acute respiratory distress syndrome after moving from Arizona. The third and fourth, young Hispanic immigrants with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome presenting with respiratory distress and sepsis. These are examples of different presentations, depending on immune competency, and illustrate the challenges in making this diagnosis in non-endemic areas. For two of the three patients who died an autopsy was obtained. We present the cases, show radiographic and pathological findings, and review the current literature on coccidioidomyocosis.