Organization of chemotherapeutic preparations in advance: Do we save or waste money?

OBJECTIVE: The development of oncology day-hospital activities contributes to increase quality of life of patients and consequently have changed their perception about waiting. The extemporaneous preparation of antineoplastic has become difficult to achieve given the increasing activity, and hospital pharmacists have taken up the challenge by the implementation of the antineoplastic preparation in anticipation. Because anticipation can lead to an important number of preparations to be discarded, we also develop a recycled process for other patients to limit these waste extra costs. We aim to demonstrate the positive balance of anticipated preparation in this 4-year study report.Data sources: This prospective study was conducted in a major European oncology day-hospital from January, 2012 to December, 2015. The data were extracted from our software WinSimbad™ and updated as needed. The number and cost-associated of preparation ungiven chemotherapy doses (recycled or discarded) were compared to the global drug budget of our hospital in order to not exceed 2%.Data summary: 303,100 antineoplastic have been prepared. Approximately 35% of them were anticipated with an average of 5,431±984 that were finally ungiven. Two-third was recycled and the cost of the ungiven preparations finally discarded represents 1.7±0.15% of the global drug budget. CONCLUSIONS: This study assesses the drug wastage and its associated cost of this concept through a prospective study and discusses the cost of ungiven antineoplastic preparations. With prior consideration of the need to define the acceptable rate of discarded ungiven preparation, the hospitals with an high oncology day-hospital activity should implement this approach.

Stability of Melphalan in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Solutions Prepared in Polyvinyl Chloride Bags for Intravenous Injection.

Melphalan is an alkylating agent frequently used in an intravenous formulation to treat hematologic malignancies and solid tumors in both adults and children. According to the manufacturer, melphalan is stable in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride for 90 min at room temperature (RT). Several authors have studied the stability of different concentrations of melphalan; however, most were not adapted to the current manufacturing process applied in pharmaceutical centralized units. This study was conducted to determine the stability of melphalan in 0.9% sodium chloride solutions at concentrations used for intravenous injection in practice. Melphalan is commonly prepared in diluted solutions ranging from 2 to 4 mg/ml for the treatment of adult patients and at lower concentrations (down to 0.5 mg/ml) for pediatric use. Accordingly, these were the three concentrations chosen for this study. Melphalan concentrations were measured with high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC). At RT, admixtures prepared at 4 mg/ml were stable for up to 8 h without protection from light; however, at lower concentrations, such as 0.5 and 2 mg/ml, stability did not exceed 2 h. When refrigerated, melphalan was stable for 24 h at 2 mg/ml; however, at 0.5 and 4 mg/ml, the drug was not stable. Melphalan solutions present with limited stability at 0.5, 2, and 4 mg/ml and are not adapted for delayed administration in pharmaceutical centralized units. However, at 4 mg/ml and at RT, a stability of 8 h is very interesting in practice and allows sufficient time for preparation, pharmaceutical control, transport, and administration.

Application of an acceptance sampling plan for post-production quality control of chemotherapeutic batches in an hospital pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: About 26,000 chemotherapeutic batches were produced in 2003 in the Institute Gustave Roussy and 83% were qualitatively and quantitatively assessed in post-production controls via an analytical platform. The rate of non-conformity (outside the specification limits of the target concentration +/-10%) decreased from 8.9% to 2.2% between years 2001 and 2003. A cost- and time-saving acceptance sampling plan was applied to assay fewer batches whilst maintaining an accurate estimate of the quality level. METHODS: The opportunity to apply a single sampling plan by attributes with an acceptance quality level of 2.2% was evaluated. A prognostic study using a logistic regression model was performed for some drugs to identify risk factors associated with the non-conformity rate of preparations. RESULTS: Out of 26 drugs, 17 have not been sampled, since they were prepared less than 400 times per year. For six drugs, a reduction of about 50% in the number of assays was estimated. Three drugs were "at risk" of being non-conform: for these drugs, all batches were analysed. CONCLUSIONS: The sampling plan allowed a reduction of almost 8000 analyses with respect to the number of batches analysed for 6 drugs. For the 3 drugs with the higher risk to be non-conform, associated risk factors were identified to set up corrective actions.