Effects of adherence to treatment for repositioning therapy, physical therapy, and cranial remolding orthoses in infants with cranial deformation.

Deformational head shapes are most often treated through repositioning therapy (RT) and/or cranial remolding orthotic (CRO) treatment. However, there is conflicting evidence about the effectiveness of each method, and treatment compliance is suspected to affect treatment effectiveness. This study examines participant adherence with these treatment methods and explores if cranial correction is related to compliance. This study also reviews effects of developmental milestones and explores other potential impacts on compliance. A total of 45 infants with cranial deformation were consented and those with congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) concurrently received physical therapy. Infants were followed from 2 to 12 months of age and initially assigned to RT. Caregivers continued RT until the head shape corrected, caregivers chose to switch to a CRO, or infants turned 12 months of age. All participants were scheduled for a final visit at 12 months of age. Throughout treatment, caregiver surveys were used to examine compliance and developmental milestones. Results show promise for future investigation into the relationship between treatment modalities and adherence with treatment for deformational head shapes. Our findings provide preliminary support that treatment adherence may be linked with treatment success and concurrent enrollment in physical therapy increases patient compliance.

Knowledge Translation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System Among Pediatric Physical Therapists.

PURPOSE: To learn where pediatric physical therapists in the United States are in the process of knowledge translation of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). METHODS: Links to an online survey were distributed electronically. RESULTS: All 283 respondents reported hearing about the GMFCS, 95% agreed it was useful, 81% reported they were confident in their ability to use it, 77% reported they use it, and 42% reported they use it consistently. Therapists primarily used the GMFCS to predict gross motor function, set realistic goals, and anticipate need for assistive technology. The American Physical Therapy Association Section on Pediatrics members were more likely than nonmembers to agree the GMFCS is useful, they are able to use it, that they use it, and that they use it consistently. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of therapists responding use the GMFCS, but not consistently. VIDEO ABSTRACT: For more insights from the authors, see Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at http://links.lww.com/PPT/A91.