Tumour regression grading after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a near pathologic complete response does not translate into good clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: After preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer, clinically undetectable residual tumour deposits or pathologic lymph nodes may remain in the mesorectum. AIM: The aim of this study was to report histopathological effects of CRT and factors affecting outcome in a uniformly treated series of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, 107 patients with cT3 (threatening the mesorectal fascia or <5 cm from the anal verge), cT4 or cN2 rectal cancer were treated with preoperative CRT (25 × 2 Gy with capecitabine) and TME 6-8 weeks later. Central histopathological review followed. Tumour regression grade (TRG) was scored in pCR, near-pCR, response and no response. Cox regression was performed to identify prognosticators. RESULTS: The 3-year distant metastasis-free interval, disease-free rate and overall survival rate were 82%, 73% and 87% (median 44 months follow-up). TRG consisted of 20% pCR, 11% near-pCR, 55% response and 14% no response. 6/21 pCR patients harboured nodal metastases. 5/12 near-pCR had ypT3 disease, while 6 harboured node metastases. 5/12 near-PCR patients developed distant metastases. ypN and TRG were powerful outcome discriminators. CONCLUSION: The high number of near-pCR with ypT3 or ypN1/2 and their poor outcome demonstrates that "watch-and-wait" in LARC patients should be applied with care.

High risk of colostomy with primary radiotherapy for anal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) has become the primary treatment of choice for anal cancer in an effort to avoid colostomy. The current role of surgery appears generally to be underestimated, since diverting colostomy or abdominoperineal resection still often seems to be necessary for complications and local treatment failure after RT. METHODS: The data of 83 patients primarily treated by RT with curative intent throughout a 20-year period in our institute were analyzed regarding the need for colostomy. RESULTS: Totally, 28 patients (34%) required creation of a colostomy after primary RT for local failure or treatment-related complications during a mean follow-up period of 39 months. The 3-year actuarial colostomy-free rate was 59% (mean 85 +/- 9 months). Early stage disease, low T-score and absence of infiltration in adjacent organs were associated with a reduced need for colostomy in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis only T-score was an independent variable in predicting prolonged colostomy-free interval. In this study, no statistically significant differences were noted for gender, age, nodal status, total radiation dose, radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: In approximately one-third of the patients treated by anal sphincter saving management with curative aimed primary RT, the creation of a colostomy appeared to be necessary for RT complications and local treatment failure. Therefore, patients should be well informed regarding the considerable risk of need for colostomy after RT for anal cancer.