Manometric evaluation of the motilin receptor agonist camicinal (GSK962040) in humans.

BACKGROUND: The gut hormone motilin stimulates gastrointestinal motility by inducing gastric phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) and enhancing the rate of gastric emptying. Camicinal (GSK962040), a small molecule motilin receptor agonist, has been shown to increase gastrointestinal motility. METHODS: In this proof of concept study the effects of camicinal on MMC activity, esophageal and gastric pH was evaluated in eight healthy volunteers as a secondary endpoint. Doses of 50 and 150 mg were compared to placebo for a period of 24 hours in a double-blinded randomized crossover trial. KEY RESULTS: The 50 mg dose (n=4) of camicinal had no significant impact on gastroduodenal manometry or pH parameters. A single dose of 150 mg (n=4) induced a gastric phase III after 0:34 h (0:25-0:58), which was significantly faster compared to placebo (18:15 h (4:32-22:16); P=.03). Moreover, the high dose significantly increased the occurrence of gastric phase III contractions compared to placebo (12% vs 39%; P=.0003). This increase in gastric phase III contractions during a period of 24 hour was due to an increased occurrence of gastric phases III during the daytime (5% vs 50%; P=.0001). The same dose however did not affect small bowel manometry parameters or esophageal and gastric pH. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Considering its stimulating effect on the MMC and gastric emptying, camicinal is an attractive candidate for the treatment of gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00562848.

The effects of camicinal, a novel motilin agonist, on gastro-esophageal function in healthy humans-a randomized placebo controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A proportion of patients with foregut dysmotility fail to respond to standard interventions. Motilin agonists may be beneficial in this group. We aimed to determine the effect of camicinal, a novel motilin agonist, on gastrointestinal physiology in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Healthy male subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 125 mg camicinal or placebo in a double-blind cross-over design. Esophageal function and reflux indices were assessed using high-resolution manometry (pre and 1.5-h post dose) and 24-h ambulatory multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH. After a standardized meal, subjects ingested a wireless motility capsule from which compartmental transit times and motility indices were derived. Subjects were restudied with the alternate intervention after 7 days. KEY RESULTS: The study subjects (12 male, mean age 47.4 years, range 22-55) tolerated the drug well, except one who exhibited mild abdominal pain on both placebo and camicinal. In comparison to placebo, gastric emptying time (GET) was accelerated following camicinal (-115.4 min, 95% confidence interval -194.4, -36.4, p = 0.009). No effect was demonstrable on esophageal function, small bowel, colonic, or whole bowel transit times and motility indices. With camicinal, as part of a post hoc analysis, there was a trend association between the percentage reduction in GET and total number of acidic reflux events (r = 0.56, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Camicinal decreases GET and was generally well-tolerated. In health, the direct effects of camicinal are on accelerating GET with a potential secondary benefit of reducing reflux events, which warrant further exploration in patient cohorts.

Effect of the NK(3) receptor antagonist, talnetant, on rectal sensory function and compliance in healthy humans.

Visceral hypersensitivity is important in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome and thus a target for modulation in drug development. Neurokinin (NK) receptors, including NK(3) receptors, are expressed in the motor and sensory systems of the digestive tract. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses (25 and 100 mg) of the NK(3) receptor antagonist, talnetant (SB223412) with placebo on rectal sensory function and compliance in healthy volunteers studied at two centres. Rectal barostat tests were performed on 102 healthy volunteers, randomized to receive either oral talnetant 25 or 100 mg or placebo over 14-17 days. Studies were performed on three occasions: day 1 immediately prior to 1st dose, day 1 4 h postdose, and after 14- to17-day therapy. Compliance, and pressure thresholds for first sensation, urgency, discomfort and pain were measured using ascending method of limits, and sensory intensity ratings for gas, urgency, discomfort and pain determined during four random phasic distensions (12, 24, 36 and 48 mmHg). Talnetant had no effect on rectal compliance, sensory thresholds or intensity ratings compared with placebo. In general, the results obtained at the two centres differed minimally, with intensity scores at one centre consistently somewhat lower. At the doses tested, talnetant has no effect on rectal compliance or distension-induced rectal sensation in healthy participants.

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism in a human model of visceral hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Substance P acting via the neurokinin-1 receptor is involved in the development of hyperalgesia, although studies using neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RA) in human somatic pain have been disappointing. AIM: To evaluate whether Substance P is involved in the development of human visceral pain/hyperalgesia using a selective NK-1RA. METHODS: Using a validated human model of acid-induced oesophageal allodynia, pain thresholds to electrical stimulation (mA) were measured in the proximal oesophagus and the foot (somatic control), pre- and for 4 h postdistal oesophageal acid in 14 healthy subjects, using a double-blind, randomized, two-period, crossover study. Measurements were taken on the third day of dosing with either an oral NK-1RA or matching placebo, with 2 weeks washout between periods. RESULTS: Baseline pain threshold did not differ between treatments (proximal oesophagus 37 +/- 7.4 mA NK-1RA vs. 38 +/- 10.1 placebo P = 0.81, foot 40 +/- 15 mA NK-1RA vs. 38 +/- 14 placebo P = 0.68). NK-1RA did not attenuate the reduction in pain threshold in the proximal oesophagus postacid infusion (AUC-394 +/- 279 NK-1RA vs. -262 +/- 397 placebo P = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect of NK-1RA on oesophageal pain threshold in our model does not support a role for Substance P in the development of acid-induced oesophageal allodynia.

Barostat testing of rectal sensation and compliance in humans: comparison of results across two centres and overall reproducibility.

We assessed reproducibility of measurements of rectal compliance and sensation in health in studies conducted at two centres. We estimated samples size necessary to show clinically meaningful changes in future studies. We performed rectal barostat tests three times (day 1, day 1 after 4 h and 14-17 days later) in 34 healthy participants. We measured compliance and pressure thresholds for first sensation, urgency, discomfort and pain using ascending method of limits and symptom ratings for gas, urgency, discomfort and pain during four phasic distensions (12, 24, 36 and 48 mmHg) in random order. Results obtained at the two centres differed minimally. Reproducibility of sensory end points varies with type of sensation, pressure level and method of distension. Pressure threshold for pain and sensory ratings for non-painful sensations at 36 and 48 mmHg distension were most reproducible in the two centres. Sample size calculations suggested that crossover design is preferable in therapeutic trials: for each dose of medication tested, a sample of 21 should be sufficient to demonstrate 30% changes in all sensory thresholds and almost all sensory ratings. We conclude that reproducibility varies with sensation type, pressure level and distension method, but in a two-centre study, differences in observed results of sensation are minimal and pressure threshold for pain and sensory ratings at 36-48 mmHg of distension are reproducible.