Evaluating the Impact of Medial Arterial Calcification on Outcomes of Infrageniculate Endovascular Interventions for Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Medial arterial calcification (MAC) of the tibial and pedal arteries has been associated with an increased risk of amputation among people with diabetes. Endovascular interventions on infrageniculate vessels are frequently performed with the intent of treating peripheral artery disease (PAD) and decreasing the risk of amputation in those with diabetes. This study aimed to investigate how the extent of MAC impacts outcomes of endovascular procedures in people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). METHODS: We identified all patients who had undergone infrageniculate angioplasty in the setting of DFU at our institution between 2009 and 2019. Subjects were assigned a MAC score based on the severity of MAC in each vessel visualized on plain radiographs of the ankle and foot. We evaluated the relationship between MAC and the primary outcome, major adverse limb event (MALE), using stratified Cox proportional modeling. RESULTS: Among 99 subjects with DFU who had undergone infrageniculate angioplasty, MALE occurred in 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38%-61%) of patients within 1 year of intervention. On univariate Cox regression analysis, each 1 point increment in MAC score (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% CI 1.01-1.18), the third tertile of MAC score (HR, 2.27; 95% CI 1.01-5.11), age (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99), and wound grade (HR, 5.34; 95% CI 2.17-13.14), were significantly associated with increased risk of MALE. On adjusted analysis stratified by wound grade, MAC score was found to be associated with MALE only in patients with a low wound grade. CONCLUSION: Increased severity of MAC is associated with increased risk of MALE for subjects undergoing infrageniculate angioplasty with a low wound grade. Further research is needed to better understand the complex relationships of MAC, PAD, DFU, and interventions aimed at promoting healing of DFU.

The impact of chronic kidney disease on lower extremity bypass outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Patient selection for open lower extremity revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a clinical challenge. This study investigates the impact of CKD on early graft failure, postoperative complications, and mortality in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients with critical limb ischemia from 2012 to 2015 who underwent lower extremity bypass using the targeted vascular set. The glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Study equation. CKD categories were determined from the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative staging criteria. Patients were classified into three groups: CKD stages 3 or lower (mild to moderate CKD), CKD stages 4 or 5 (severe CKD), and on hemodialysis (HD). Multiple variable analysis was used to examine graft failure, mortality, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified 6978 patients who underwent infrainguinal lower extremity arterial bypass during the study period. There were 6101 patients (87.4%) with mild to moderate CKD, 327 (4.7%) with severe CKD, and 550 (7.9%) on HD. Patients with severe CKD and on HD were more likely to have revascularization for tissue loss (54.9% vs 68.8% and 74.7%; P < .01). Patients with severe CKD and those on HD had higher rates of early graft failure, postoperative myocardial infarction, and rates of reoperation. Multiple variable analysis confirmed these results showing that HD was associated with postoperative myocardial infarction, readmission, and increased mortality. It also demonstrated that severe CKD was associated with graft failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.50; P = .01), postoperative myocardial infarction (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.35-3.45; P < .01), and readmission (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.80; P = .02). Other factors associated with graft failure include functional status (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.08-1.80; P = .01), African American race (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.39-2.13; P < .01), and distal bypass (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.09-1.61; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: CKD is a significant predictor of perioperative morbidity after lower extremity bypass. Patients with severe CKD have worse postoperative outcomes without increased mortality. Those on HD have worse survival and postoperative outcomes.

Contemporary Trends and Comparative Outcomes With Adjunctive Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement in Patients Undergoing Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep Vein Thrombosis in the United States: Insights From the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the contemporary trends and comparative effectiveness of adjunctive inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement in patients undergoing catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for treatment of proximal lower extremity or caval deep vein thrombosis. BACKGROUND: CDT is being increasingly used in the management of proximal deep vein thrombosis. Although a significant number of patients treated with CDT undergo adjunctive IVCF placement, the benefit of this practice remains unknown. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients with proximal or caval deep vein thrombosis who underwent CDT (with and without adjunctive IVCF placement) in the United States between January 2005 and December 2013. A propensity score-matching algorithm was then used to derive 2 matched groups of patients (IVCF and no IVCF) for comparative outcomes (mortality and major and minor bleeding) and resource use analysis. RESULTS: Of the 7,119 patients treated with CDT, 2,421 (34%) received IVCFs. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs 1.0%; p = 0.20), procedure-related hemorrhage (1.4% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.23), or intracranial hemorrhage (0.7% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.70) between the IVCF (n = 2,259) and no-IVCF (n = 2,259) groups, respectively. Patients undergoing IVCF placement had higher rates of hematoma (3.4% vs 2.1%; p = 0.009), higher in-hospital charges ($104,049 ± 75,572 vs. $92,881 ± 80,194; p < 0.001) and increased length of stay (7.3 ± 5.6 days vs. 6.9 ± 6.9 days; p = 0.046) compared with the no-IVCF group. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational study suggests that one-third of all patients undergoing CDT receive IVCFs. IVCF use was not associated with a decrease in in-hospital mortality but was associated with higher inpatient charges and longer length of stay.

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism after femoral vein harvest.

OBJECTIVE: The femoral vein is increasingly utilized as a conduit in major arterial and venous reconstruction. However, perioperative complications, especially venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with femoral vein harvest (FVH), are not well described. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for the development of symptomatic VTE in patients who undergo FVH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent FVH over a 5-year period at a single institution. Patient clinical characteristics, indications for surgery, postoperative venous duplex scans, and computerized tomography scans of the chest were gathered and reviewed from an electronic medical record query. Statistical analysis was performed to determine which factors correlate with development of perioperative complications after FVH. RESULTS: There were 57 patients (53% male; mean age, 62 years) who underwent 58 FVHs. Of the procedures, 53% were performed for arterial reconstruction and 47% for vascular reconstruction after cancer resection (85% portomesenteric reconstruction). Perioperative VTEs were diagnosed in 17 of 58 (29%) FVH procedures. Sixteen ipsilateral deep vein thromboses (DVTs) occurred distal to the FVH site and five (9%) occurred proximal to the FVH site. The incidence of VTE was significantly greater in patients with malignancy (52% vs 10%; P = .001), and 88% of all VTEs in this series were diagnosed in patients with cancer. All DVTs proximal to the FVH site and all DVTs in the contralateral extremity occurred in patients with malignancy. Pulmonary embolism occurred in two patients. No patients developed compartment syndrome or limb loss. Eight patients (14%) required FVH site wound debridement. CONCLUSIONS: VTE after FVH occurs more frequently in patients with malignancy. Aggressive and prolonged thromboprophylaxis and routine venous ultrasound surveillance are warranted after FVH in patients with malignancy.