Advancing Universal Health Coverage in the WHO South-East Asia Region with a focus on Human Resources for Health.

The identification in 2014 of Universal Health Coverage, including focus on human resources for health, as a flagship priority for the WHO South-East Asia Region marked critical departure from the prior period of the Millennium Development Goals. The last decade witnessed strong political commitment and action to advance UHC across the Region. At regional level, UHC service coverage index improved from 47 in 2010 to 62 in 2021. Improved availability of human resources for health has been an important contributor, with the regional average of doctors, nurses and midwives increasing by approximately a third between 2014 and 2020. Progress on financial protection has been mixed: proportion of population impoverished declined significantly but catastrophic expenditure did not reduce. Despite important gains, progress is insufficient to achieve UHC targets by 2030. Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent economic challenges have created further urgency to accelerate progress towards UHC, with attention to strengthening primary health care.

Health practitioner regulation and national health goals.

The role of health practitioner regulation in ensuring patient safety is well recognized. Less recognized is the role of regulation in addressing broader health system priorities. These goals include managing the costs, capacities and distribution of health professional education institutions; ensuring the competence and equitable distribution of health workers; informing workforce planning and mobilization; enabling the use of digital technologies; and addressing challenges related to the international mobility of health workers. Even where health practitioner regulation is designed to advance these goals, important gaps exist between the potential of regulatory systems and their performance. The response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led many countries to introduce regulatory changes to allow more flexibility and innovations in the mobilization of health practitioners. Building on this experience, we need to critically re-examine health practitioner regulatory systems to ensure that these systems support rather than impede progress towards national health goals. We discuss the role of health practitioner regulation in contemporary health systems, highlighting recent regulatory reforms in selected countries, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. We identify the importance of dynamic, effective and flexible health practitioner regulatory systems in progress towards universal health coverage and health security.

Le rôle qu'exerce la réglementation relative aux professionnels de la santé pour la sécurité du patient est bien connu. En revanche, celui qu'elle joue dans la définition des grandes priorités du système de santé l'est moins. Elle comporte ainsi plusieurs objectifs, notamment: assurer la gestion des coûts, des capacités et de la distribution des établissements de formation des professionnels de la santé; garantir une répartition équitable d'agents de santé compétents; guider la planification et la mobilisation de la main-d'œuvre; permettre l'intégration des technologies numériques; et enfin, relever les défis liés à la mobilité internationale des acteurs du secteur. Même dans les endroits où une telle réglementation est conçue pour atteindre ces objectifs, des écarts considérables subsistent entre le potentiel des systèmes de réglementation et leurs performances réelles. La lutte contre la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) a encouragé de nombreux pays à modifier les règles en vigueur en vue d'offrir une plus grande flexibilité et davantage d'innovations en matière de mobilisation des agents de santé. En nous fondant sur cette expérience, nous devons impérativement réexaminer les systèmes de réglementation propres aux praticiens afin qu'ils constituent un moteur, et non un frein, à la poursuite des objectifs nationaux en matière de santé. Dans le présent document, nous évoquons le rôle de la réglementation relative aux professionnels de la santé dans les systèmes de santé actuels, en mentionnant les récentes réformes entreprises par une série de pays dans ce domaine, y compris durant la pandémie de COVID-19. Nous soulignons également l'importance d'instaurer des systèmes de réglementation dynamiques, efficaces et flexibles pour les praticiens sur la voie menant à la sécurité sanitaire et à une couverture sanitaire universelle.

La función de la reglamentación de los profesionales sanitarios para garantizar la seguridad de los pacientes es bien conocida. Sin embargo, se reconoce menos la función de la reglamentación para atender prioridades más amplias del sistema sanitario. Estos objetivos incluyen: gestionar los costes, las capacidades y la distribución de las instituciones de formación de profesionales sanitarios; asegurar la competencia y la distribución equitativa de los trabajadores sanitarios; informar la planificación y movilización del personal; permitir el uso de tecnologías digitales; y abordar los retos relacionados con la movilidad internacional de los trabajadores sanitarios. Incluso en los casos en que la reglamentación de los profesionales sanitarios está concebida para promover estos objetivos, existen diferencias considerables entre el potencial de los sistemas de reglamentación y sus resultados. La respuesta a la pandemia de enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) llevó a muchos países a introducir cambios en la reglamentación para permitir una mayor flexibilidad e innovaciones en la movilización de los profesionales sanitarios. A partir de esta experiencia, es necesario volver a examinar de forma crítica los sistemas de reglamentación de los profesionales sanitarios para garantizar que estos sistemas apoyen y no impidan el progreso hacia los objetivos sanitarios nacionales. En este artículo se analiza la función de la reglamentación de los profesionales de la salud en los sistemas sanitarios contemporáneos y se destacan las recientes reformas reglamentarias introducidas en algunos países, en particular durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Asimismo, se destaca la importancia de que los sistemas de reglamentación de los profesionales sanitarios sean dinámicos, eficaces y flexibles para avanzar hacia la cobertura sanitaria universal y la seguridad sanitaria.

Ensuring quality of health workforce education and practice: strengthening roles of accreditation and regulatory systems.

Regulation of the health workforce and accreditation of educational institutions are intended to protect the public interest, but evidence of the impact of these policies is scarce and occasionally contradictory. The body of research that does exist primarily focuses on policies in the global north and on the major health professions. Stress on accreditation and regulatory systems caused by surges in demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, privatization of education, rising patient expectations, and emergence of new health worker categories has created urgency for innovation and reform. To understand and evaluate this innovation, we look forward to receiving manuscripts which contribute to the evidence base on the implementation, management, and impact of health worker education and practice regulation, including the intersection of education accreditation and workforce regulation policy. We particularly look forward to manuscripts from underrepresented parts of the globe and underrepresented health workforce sectors that address policy effectiveness, explore different models of regulation, and present innovations that we can all learn from.

Health workforce demography: a framework to improve understanding of the health workforce and support achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals.

The ambition of universal health coverage entails estimation of the number, type and distribution of health workers required to meet the population need for health services. The demography of the population, including anticipated or estimated changes, is a factor in determining the 'universal' needs for health and well-being. Demography is concerned with the size, breakdown, age and gender structure and dynamics of a population. The same science, and its robust methodologies, is equally applicable to the demography of the health workforce itself. For example, a large percentage of the workforce close to retirement will impact availability, a geographically mobile workforce has implications for health coverage, and gender distribution in occupations may have implications for workforce acceptability and equity of opportunity. In a world with an overall shortage of health workers, and the expectation of increasing need as a result of both population growth in the global south and population ageing in the global north, studying and understanding demographic characteristics of the workforce can help with future planning. This paper discusses the dimensions of health worker demography and considers how demographic tools and techniques can be applied to the analysis of the health labour market. A conceptual framework is introduced as a step towards the application of demographic principles and techniques to health workforce analysis and planning exercises as countries work towards universal health coverage, the reduction of inequities and national development targets. Some illustrative data from Nepal and Finland are shown to illustrate the potential of this framework as a simple and effective contribution to health workforce planning.

Health workers' strikes in low-income countries: the available evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the characteristics, frequency, drivers, outcomes and stakeholders of health workers' strikes in low-income countries. METHODS: We reviewed the published and grey literature from online sources for the years 2009 to 2018. We used four search strategies: (i) exploration of main health and social sciences databases; (ii) use of specialized websites on human resources for health and development; (iii) customized Google search; and (iv) consultation with experts to validate findings. To analyse individual strike episodes, pre-existing conditions and influencing actors, we developed a conceptual framework from the literature. RESULTS: We identified 116 records reporting on 70 unique health workers' strikes in 23 low-income countries during the period, accounting for 875 days of strike. Year 2018 had the highest number of events (17), corresponding to 170 work days lost. Strikes involving more than one professional category was the frequent strike modality (32 events), followed by strikes by physicians only (22 events). The most commonly reported cause was complaints about remuneration (63 events), followed by protest against the sector's governance or policies (25 events) and safety of working conditions (10 events). Positive resolution was achieved more often when collective bargaining institutions and higher levels of government were involved in the negotiations. CONCLUSION: In low-income countries, some common features appear to exist in health sector strikes' occurrence and actors involved in such events. Future research should focus on both individual events and regional patterns, to form an evidence base for mechanisms to prevent and resolve strikes.

An international legal strategy for alcohol control: not a framework convention--at least not yet.

AIMS: The perceived success of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in influencing national and global public health policies has led to growing interest in promulgating new international legal instruments to address global health issues-including calls for a Framework Convention on Alcohol Control (FCAC). METHODS: Despite broad support in the public health community, the authors caution that an analysis of the value of lawmaking for alcohol control cannot rest solely on the character of the underlying public health challenge and the similarities between alcohol control and tobacco control. Other factors must be considered, including the relative political feasibility for global health lawmaking. The potential contribution of non-binding international legal instruments to advancing global alcohol control, in particular, deserves strong consideration. RESULTS: The authors propose a gradual international legal strategy for alcohol control, starting with a non-binding code of practice focusing on areas of critical concern with wide political consensus, leading over time to a comprehensive binding treaty. Although often dismissed as ineffective relative to treaties, non-binding international legal instruments have particular strengths and can create both norms and processes that impact the behavior of states and other actors, overcoming a number of limitations of more rigid legally binding strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, the authors contend that the negotiation and adoption of a non-binding international legal instrument as a first step in a long-run legal strategy offers a more politically realistic, and potentially superior, alternative to immediate efforts to achieve a Framework Convention on Alcohol Control.