Comparison Between Intrasylvian and Intracerebral Hematoma Associated with Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Clinical Implications, Technical Considerations, and Outcome Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) due to a middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm rupture is often associated with an intracerebral hematoma (ICH) or intrasylvian hematoma (ISH). METHODS: We reviewed 163 patients with ruptured MCA aneurysms associated with pure SAH or SAH plus ICH or ISH. The patients were first dichotomized according to the presence of a hematoma (ICH or ISH). Next, we performed a subgroup analysis comparing ICH versus ISH to explore their relationship with the most relevant demographic, clinical, and angioarchitectural features. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients (52%) had a pure SAH, and 78 (48%) had presented with an associated ICH or ISH. No significant differences were observed in the demographics or angioarchitectural features between the 2 groups. However, the Fisher grade and Hunt-Hess score were higher for the patients with hematomas. A good outcome was observed in a higher percentage of patients with pure SAH compared with those with an associated hematoma (76% vs. 44%), although the mortality rates were comparable. Age, Hunt-Hess score, and treatment-related complications were the main outcome predictors on multivariate analysis. Patients with ICH appeared worse clinically compared with those with ISH. We also found that older age, a higher Hunt-Hess score, larger aneurysms, decompressive craniectomy, and treatment-related complications were associated with poor outcomes among the patients with an ISH, but not an ICH, which appeared, per se, as a more severe clinical condition. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed that age, Hunt-Hess score, and treatment-related complications influence the outcome of patients with ruptured MCA aneurysms. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients with SAH associated with an ICH or ISH, only the Hunt-Hess score at onset appeared as an independent predictor of the outcome.

Clipping versus coiling for treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a retrospective Italian multicenter experience.

Endovascular treatment has emerged as the predominant approach in intracranial aneurysms. However, surgical clipping is still considered the best treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms in referral centers. Here we compared short- and long-term clinical and neuroradiological outcomes in patients with MCA aneurysms undergoing clipping or coiling in 5 Italian referral centers for cerebrovascular surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 411 consecutive patients admitted between 2015 and 2019 for ruptured and unruptured MCA aneurysm. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between demographic, clinical, and radiological parameters and ruptured status, type of surgical treatment, and clinical outcome at discharge and follow-up were performed. Clipping was performed in 340 (83%) cases, coiling in 71 (17%). Clipping was preferred in unruptured aneurysms and in those showing collateral branches originating from neck/dome. Surgery achieved a higher rate of complete occlusion at discharge and follow-up. Clipping and coiling showed no difference in clinical outcome in both ruptured and unruptured cases. In ruptured aneurysms age, presenting clinical status, intracerebral hematoma at onset, and treatment-related complications were significantly associated with outcome at both short- and long-term follow-up. The presence of collaterals/perforators originating from dome/neck of the aneurysms also worsened the short-term clinical outcome. In unruptured cases, only treatment-related complications such as ischemia and hydrocephalus were associated with poor outcome. Clipping still seems superior to coiling in providing better short- and long-term occlusion rates in MCA aneurysms, and at the same time, it appears as safe as coiling in terms of clinical outcome.

Radiological outcomes for endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a retrospective multicenter study of the occlusion rate.

Although several innovations in techniques and implantable devices were reported over the last decades, a consensus on the best endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms originating from the posterior communicating artery is still missing. This work investigates radiological outcomes of different endovascular techniques for posterior communicating artery aneurysms treatment in a retrospective multi-centric cohort. We included patients endovascularly treated for posterior communicating artery aneurysms from 2015 through 2020 in six tertiary referral hospitals. We evaluated the relationship between patients and aneurysms characteristics, baseline neurological status, radiological outcomes, and the different endovascular techniques. Overall, 250 patients were included in this study. Simple coiling was the most frequent treatment in 171 patients (68%), followed by flow-diverter stenting in 32 cases (13%). Complete occlusion was reported in 163 patients (65%), near-complete occlusion in 43 (17%), and incomplete occlusion in 44 (18%). Radiological follow-up was available for 247 (98%) patients. The occlusion rate was stable in 149 (60%), improved in 49 (19%), and worsened in 51 (21%). No significant difference in exclusion rate was seen between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms at the last follow-up (p = 0.4). Posterior communicating artery thrombosis was reported in 25 patients (9%), transient ischemic attack in 6 (2%), and in 38 patients (15%), subsequent procedures were needed due to incomplete occlusion or reperfusion. Endovascular strategies for posterior communicating artery aneurysms represent effective and relatively safe treatments. Simple coiling provides a higher immediate occlusion rate, although recanalization has been frequently reported, conversely, flow-diversion devices provide good long-term radiological outcomes.