Final results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial evaluating the activity of single-agent lapatinib in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells. A proof-of-concept study.

This multicenter phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of lapatinib in metastatic breast cancer patients with HER2-negative primary tumors and HER2-positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In this study MBC patients with HER2-negative primary tumors and HER2-positive CTCs previously treated with at least a first-line therapy for metastatic disease received lapatinib 1500 mg/day. The CellSearch System® was used for CTCs isolation and bio-characterization. HER2 status was assessed on CTCs by immunofluorescence. A case was defined as CTCs positive if ≥2 CTC/7.5 ml of blood were isolated and HER2-positive if ≥50% of CTCs were HER2-positive. 139 HER2-negative patients were screened, 96 patients were positive for CTCs (mean number of CTCs: 85; median number of CTCs: 19; range 2-1637). Seven of the 96 patients (7%) had ≥50% HER2-positive CTCs and were eligible for treatment with lapatinib. No objective tumor responses occurred in this population. In one patient, disease stabilization lasting 254 days (8.5 months) was observed. From the findings of this study, we concluded that a subset of patients with a HER2-negative primary tumor presents HER2-positive CTCs during disease progression, although the HER2 shift rate seems to be lower than previously reported. Despite the lack of objective response, the durable disease stabilization observed in one patient cannot rule out the hypothesis that lapatinib may have some activity in this patient population. However, considering that only 1/139 screened patients may potentially have derived benefit from this approach, future trials designed according to the presented strategy cannot be recommended.

Clinical and pharmacodynamic evaluation of metronomic cyclophosphamide, celecoxib, and dexamethasone in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the clinical activity and the pharmacodynamic profile of the novel schedule of a single i.v. standard dose of cyclophosphamide (CTX) immediately followed by an oral metronomic CTX regimen with celecoxib (CXB) and dexamethasone (DEX) in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-eight patients (68% docetaxel-resistant) received 500 mg/m2 CTX i.v. bolus on day 1 and, from day 2, 50 mg/day CTX p.o. plus 200 mg/twice a day CXB p.o. and 1 mg/day DEX p.o. until disease progression. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and thrombospondin-1 were detected by ELISA, and real-time reverse transcription-PCR of VEGF and thrombospondin-1 gene expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cell and of VE-cadherin (VE-C) in blood samples was done. RESULTS: A confirmed prostate-specific antigen decrease of > or =50% from baseline was observed in 9 of 28 patients (32%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3 months (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.2 months) and 21 months (95% confidence interval, 12.4-29.4 months), respectively. Toxicity was mild and no grade 3 to 4 toxicities occurred. A significant relationship was found between plasma VEGF and prostate-specific antigen values (r = 0.4223; P < 0.001). VEGF levels significantly increased in nonresponders, whereas the responder patients maintained significantly lower levels of VE-C gene expression after the beginning of the treatment if compared with nonresponder ones. CONCLUSION: Metronomic CTX plus CXB and DEX showed favorable toxicity and activity profile in patients. VE-C gene expression and VEGF levels represent potentially useful pharmacodynamic markers for the clinical response.

Correlation of CDA, ERCC1, and XPD polymorphisms with response and survival in gemcitabine/cisplatin-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Selecting patients according to key genetic characteristics may help to tailor chemotherapy and optimize the treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Polymorphisms at the xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), and cytidine deaminase (CDA) genes have been associated with alterations in enzymatic activity and may change sensitivity to the widely used cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Analyses of CDA, XPD, and ERCC1 polymorphisms were done on blood samples of 65 chemotherapy-naïve, advanced NSCLC patients treated with cisplatin-gemcitabine. Furthermore, CDA enzymatic activity was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Association between XPD Asp(312)Asn and Lys(751)Gln, ERCC1 C118T, and CDA Lys(27)Gln polymorphisms and response, clinical benefit, toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) was estimated using Pearson's chi(2) tests, the Kaplan-Meier method, the log-rank test, and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The CDA Lys(27)Lys polymorphism significantly correlated with better clinical benefit (P = 0.04) and grade > or =3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, as well as with longer TTP and OS (P = 0.006 and P = 0.002, respectively), whereas no significant associations were found among ERCC1 and XPD polymorphisms and both response and clinical outcome. Finally, the enzymatic activity assay showed a significant lower mean in subjects harboring the CDA Lys(27)Lys polymorphism. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggested the role of CDA Lys(27)Lys polymorphism as a possible predictive marker of activity, toxicity, TTP, and OS in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cisplatin and gemcitabine. These results may be explained by the lower enzymatic activity associated with the Lys(27)Lys CDA and offer a potential new tool for treatment optimization.

A pilot study of a day one and eight every three weeks administration of docetaxel in metastatic cancer patients.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is an active agent in metastatic cancers. The standard administration every 3 weeks frequently causes gastrointestinal toxicity and severe myelosuppression. These are rare with a weekly docetaxel regimen, which instead produces severe asthenia. To develop a new docetaxel schedule associated with mild myelosuppression and less fatigue, we conducted this pilot study to determine the feasibility and the maximum tolerated dose of a day one and eight every three weeks administration of docetaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 3 patients were treated with a dose of 40 mg/m2 on day one and eight, which was then escalated by increments of 5 mg/m2 on both days up to determine the maximum tolerated dose, defined as the dose level associated with the same dose-limiting toxicity in at least 33% of patients. RESULTS: Twenty-one metastatic cancer patients entered the study, with a median age of 57 years and a median performance status of 1. The escalation of dose continued up to 55 mg/m2, where 2 of the 6 enrolled patients presented grade 3 diarrhea, which was our dose-limiting toxicity. Myelosuppression was mild, and no febrile neutropenia was observed. None of the patients showed grade 4 non-haematological toxicity. Only 9.5% of them presented grade 3 asthenia, whereas grade 3 diarrhea and mucositis were revealed in 19% and 9.5%, respectively. All grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were observed in heavily pretreated or elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of docetaxel was 50 mg/m2, but the regimen could not be recommended in heavily pretreated patients. However, it could become an option in an outpatient setting after a phase II study that better defines its toxicity profile and evaluate its antitumor activity.

5-fluorouracil administered as a 48-hour semiintermittent infusion in combination with leucovorin, cisplatin and epirubicin: phase II study in advanced gastric cancer patients.

The main objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and the antitumor activity of a chemotherapy regimen with a 48-hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), cisplatin (CDDP), and epirubicin (EPIDX) administered every 3 weeks in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Thirty-three patients received CDDP 60 mg/m2 over 30 minutes followed by 1-LV 250 mg/m2 over 2 hours followed by EPIDX 60 mg/m2 over 5 minutes (bolus) and followed by 5-FU 3,800 mg/m2 as a 48-hour semiintermittent continuous infusion, with 67% of total daily dose administered between 4 pm and midnight. Four patients had a locally advanced disease and 29 had metastatic disease. A total of 171 cycles were administered. Most relevant toxicities were stomatitis (grade III in 2% of cycles and 12% of patients) and neutropenia (grade III-IV in 8% of cycles and 28% of patients) with 3 (9%) patients experiencing 1 episode of febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for response. In 3 patients (9.6%) a complete response and in 11 patients (35.4%) a partial response was observed, for an objective response rate of 45% (95% C.I. 27-64%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.9 and 9.8 months, respectively. In conclusion, this regimen is feasible in an outpatient setting with acceptable and manageable toxicities, and it is associated with promising antitumor activity, time to progression, and survival.