The risk of preeclampsia beyond the first pregnancy among women with type 1 diabetes parity and preeclampsia in type 1 diabetes.

AIM: To estimate the incidence of preeclampsia (PE) among nulliparous and multiparous patients with type 1 diabetes and to study predictors of PE. METHODS: We prospectively collected data on all pregnancies of patients with pregestational type 1 diabetes, followed at our Prenatal Medicine Unit between 1993 and 2008. Medical records were prospectively reviewed by two obstetricians for maternal demographics, pregnancy data, maternal and fetal outcomes. Data were analyzed according to the development of PE and parity. RESULTS: We identified and collected data on 291 eligible pregnancies (195 among nulliparae and 96 among multiparae). The incidence of PE was 9.2% (95% CI: 5.6-14.2) among nulliparae and 9.4% (95% CI: 4.4-17.0) among multiparae. Patients who developed PE had higher HbA1c during pregnancy compared to patients who did not (p=0.026 among nulliparae and p=0.032 among multiparae). Chronic hypertension [OR 17.12 (3.22, 91.00)], microalbuminuria at the beginning of the pregnancy [OR 3.77 (1.22, 11.61)], weight gain during pregnancy [OR 1.13 (1.04, 1.23)] and HbA1c in the first trimester [2.81 (1.12, 7.05)], but not parity, were significant predictors of PE. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 1 diabetes the incidence of PE was similar among nulliparae and multiparae, unlikely in the general population where PE is a disease of the first pregnancy. An increased risk of PE should be assumed for both nulliparous and multiparous women with pregestational diabetes.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Insulin resistance is recognized as the pathophysiological hallmark of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A relation between insulin sensitivity and left ventricular morphology and function has been reported in essential hypertension, where a high prevalence of NAFLD has been recently found. We investigated the inter-relationship between left ventricular morphology/function, metabolic parameters and NAFLD in 86 never-treated essential hypertensive patients subdivided in two subgroups according to the presence (n = 48) or absence (n = 38) of NAFLD at ultrasonography. METHODS AND RESULTS: The two groups were similar as to sex, age and blood pressure levels. No patient had diabetes mellitus, obesity, hyperlipidemia, or other risk factors for liver disease. Body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, glucose, insulin, homeostasis model of assessment index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were higher and adiponectin levels were lower in patients with NAFLD than in patients without NAFLD, and were associated with NAFLD at univariate analysis. Patients with NAFLD had similar prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy compared to patients without NAFLD, but a higher prevalence of diastolic dysfunction (62.5 vs 21.1%, P < 0.001), as defined by E/A ratio <1 and E-wave deceleration time >220 ms. Diastolic dysfunction (P = 0.040) and HOMA-IR (P = 0.012) remained independently associated with NAFLD at backward multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was associated with insulin resistance and abnormalities of left ventricular diastolic function in a cohort of patients with essential hypertension, suggesting a concomitant increase of metabolic and cardiac risk in this condition.

[25 years old woman with nocturia]. / Donna di 25 anni con nicturia.

A 25 years old lady presented to our outpatient clinic complaining nicturia, polyuria and polydipsia. On the basis of clinical assessment and the results of a simple test, a diagnosis of Nephrogenic Diabetes Insipidus (NDI) was made. The diagnosis of NDI is often missed, and appropriate treatment therefore delayed, with severe consequences especially in elderly and bed restricted people.

Dizziness and vertigo in a department of emergency medicine.

Dizziness is a common and vexing diagnostic problem in emergency departments. The term is rather undefinite and often misused, but can in practice be classified into four categories: fainting, disequilibrium, vertigo and miscellaneous syndromes. Vertigo is the most common category of dizziness. Classification of vertigo can be based either on chronological criteria (acute, recurrent or chronic vertigo) or on topographical criteria (peripheral or central vertigo). Physicians working in emergency departments must be able to rapidly identify patients with potentially serious forms of vertigo, which could cause death or disability, and patients with mild conditions, that can be effectively treated. Previous studies and the experience of the authors have shown that reliable diagnostic hypotheses can be generated by taking a proper clinical history (focused on the onset and duration of the disease, the circumstances causing the vertigo and associated otological or neurological symptoms) and performing an accurate physical examination (evaluation of neurological defects and spontaneous or provoked nystagmus), supplemented by few laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. Therapy of vertigo in emergency settings is mainly symptomatic and based on sedation and use of vestibulosuppressant drugs (antihistamines, phenothiazines).