Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Content Validity and Usability of the Electronic Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Daily Diary, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Questionnaire, and Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic skin condition that causes pain and physical dysfunction, can impact significantly on quality of life. Disease-specific tools have been designed to assess the impact of HS on patients, including the HS Symptom Daily Diary (HSSDD), the HS Symptom Questionnaire (HSSQ), and the HS Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire, which have been developed into electronic instruments (eHSSDD, eHSSQ, and eHiSQOL©). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to establish the content validity of the electronic version of the HSSDD and HSSQ, and the acceptability and usability of the HSSDD, HSSQ, and HiSQOL©, using concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews. METHODS: This was a non-interventional qualitative video interview study involving participants aged ≥18 years with moderate to severe HS recruited from a single clinical site in the USA. Interviews gathered feedback on participants' symptom experience, followed by training and completion of the eHSSDD, eHSSQ, and eHiSQOL© questionnaires on electronic handheld devices. Participants were then interviewed on the content of the eHSSDD and eHSSQ and the acceptability and usability of all three instruments. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analysed. RESULTS: Twenty participants with moderate to severe HS (median age: 41.5 [range: 20.0-64.0]; n = 16/20 female) were included. All participants found the eHSSDD, eHSSQ, and eHiSQOL© instructions clear and described the instruments as "easy", "simple" and "self-explanatory". Overall understanding of individual items within the eHSSDD and eHSSQ was high; however, 6/20 participants had difficulty in understanding the average skin pain item in the eHSSDD. All participants were able to accurately recall their symptoms within the recall periods of the eHSSDD and eHSSQ, although 4/20 participants found the 24-h recall period of the eHSSDD limiting. Completion time was quick across all instruments, and usability was high, with the majority of participants reporting no difficulty in completing questionnaires on electronic devices. CONCLUSION: The concepts covered in the eHSSDD and eHSSQ are relevant and important to patients, supporting their content validity. The findings also provide evidence of acceptability and usability of the eHSSDD, eHSSQ, and eHiSQOL©. A limitation was that all participants were recruited from a single site, which may have introduced selection bias and thus limited the generalisability of results.

Patient Perspectives on Living With Severe Prurigo Nodularis.

Importance: Because of a paucity of qualitative research on prurigo nodularis (PN), the symptoms and impacts of PN that are most important to patients are poorly understood. Objective: To explore patients' perspectives on their PN symptoms and to understand the impacts of the condition. Design, Setting, and Participants: One-on-one qualitative telephone interviews were held with English-speaking US adults aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of PN, severe pruritus, and moderate to severe sleep disturbance. Participants were recruited via patient associations, patient panels, and social media posts. Interviews took place between September 10, 2020, and March 16, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main symptoms of PN and their impacts on quality of life were identified by content analysis of deidentified interview transcripts. Results: A total of 21 adults with PN (mean [SD] age, 53.1 [11.8] years; 15 [71%] female; 2 African American or Black patients [10%], 1 Asian patient [5%], and 18 White patients [86%]; of these, 1 patient [ 5%] had Hispanic or Latino ethnicity) participated in the interviews. All participants reported itch, pain associated with PN, bleeding or scabbing, and dry skin. Other frequently reported symptoms included lumps or bumps (95%), having a crust on the skin (95%), burning (90%), stinging (90%), lesions or sores (86%), skin discoloration (86%), and raw skin (81%). Of the 17 participants who indicated what their worst symptoms were, 15 (88%) identified itching as the worst or 1 of the worst symptoms. The most frequently reported impacts of PN for quality of life were changes in sleep (100%), daily life (100%), feelings or mood (95%), relationships (95%), social life (81%), and work or school (71%). Overall, the worst impact of PN was its association with impaired feelings or mood. Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study suggests the importance of itching, sleep disturbance, and other symptoms and impacts of PN. This information can be used to guide end point selection in clinical trials and to inform patient-centric decision-making in clinical practice.

Validation of the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale as a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Prurigo Nodularis.

INTRODUCTION: Validated patient report tools for quantifying patient experiences of itch in prurigo nodularis (PN) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the 11-point peak pruritus numerical rating scale (PP NRS) as a single-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for assessing itch severity in PN. METHODS: Content validity of the PP NRS was evaluated through qualitative interviews with adults with PN. The PP NRS was then psychometrically evaluated using data from a placebo-controlled trial of nemolizumab in adults with PN, during which patients completed the PP NRS daily. Meaningful within-patient change was estimated from the qualitative interviews and by anchor- and distribution-based analyses of trial data. RESULTS: The interview participants (N = 21) all understood the PP NRS and reported itch as their worst symptom overall. The PP NRS showed good test-retest reliability and demonstrated convergent validity and known-groups validity. PP NRS scores improved more in patients classified as "improved" on other clinical outcome measures than in those classified as "worsened/unchanged". Triangulation of the different estimates identified a 2- to 5-point decrease in PP NRS score as a meaningful within-patient change threshold. CONCLUSION: The PP NRS is a content-valid and reliable PRO measure for quantifying itch severity in adults with PN in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03181503.

Prurigo nodularis is a skin disease where the skin becomes inflamed and very itchy. Itching and scratching can ruin the lives of people with prurigo nodularis. For doctors to know how well treatments for prurigo nodularis are working, they need to be able measure how bad their patients' itching is. Here we tested whether a tool called the peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP NRS) can be used to reliably measure itching in patients with prurigo nodularis. The PP NRS asks patients to rate their itch "at the worst moment during the previous 24 h" on a scale from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst itch imaginable"). We interviewed 21 patients with prurigo nodularis. Overall, itch was their worst symptom. They were able to use the PP NRS with few or no problems. To further explore whether the PP NRS can be used by patients with prurigo nodularis, we also obtained data from a clinical study. In this clinical study, patients with prurigo nodularis received a drug that might one day be used to treat their disease. They completed the PP NRS daily during the time they received the drug. When we analyzed the data from the clinical study, we found that the PP NRS has the properties a tool like this needs to be useful. We also concluded that a decrease of 2­5 points on the PP NRS scale would be a meaningful improvement in itching for patients with prurigo nodularis.

The Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale: Content Validity, Psychometric Validation, and Meaningful Within-Patient Change in Prurigo Nodularis.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep is often disturbed in patients with prurigo nodularis (PN). To address the lack of validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for quantifying sleep disturbance in PN, we evaluated the Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (SD NRS) as a single-item PRO measure for quantifying sleep disturbance in PN. METHODS: Adults with PN participated in qualitative interviews, which included concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing of the SD NRS. The SD NRS was evaluated psychometrically using data from a phase 2 randomized trial in adults with PN (NCT03181503). Other PRO assessments included the Average Pruritus (AP) NRS, AP Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), peak pruritus (PP) NRS, PP VRS, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SD NRS were evaluated, and meaningful within-patient change was estimated from qualitative interview responses and quantitative trial data. RESULTS: All interview participants (N = 21) experienced sleep disturbance and most (95%) understood the SD NRS as intended. The SD NRS demonstrated test-retest reliability based on intra-class correlation coefficients for itch-stable participants of 0.87 for the AP VRS and 0.76 for the PP VRS. At baseline, Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients were moderate to strong (0.3-0.8) between the SD NRS and the AP NRS, AP VRS, PP NRS, PP VRS, and DLQI. Known-groups validity was demonstrated by higher (worse) SD NRS scores in participants with worse scores on the AP NRS, AP VRS, PP VRS, and DLQI. Improvements in SD NRS scores were greater in participants classified as "improved" versus "worsened/unchanged" on the anchor PROs. A 2- to 4-point decrease on the 11-point SD NRS scale was identified as a meaningful within-patient change. CONCLUSION: The SD NRS is a well-defined, reliable, and valid PRO measure that can be used in daily practice and clinical trials to capture sleep disturbance in adults with PN.

Patients with the skin disease prurigo nodularis often sleep badly because their skin is very itchy in the evening and at night. In assessing the effectiveness of new treatments for prurigo nodularis, it is useful to know whether patients sleep better when taking them. Here, we tested whether the "Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale" (SD NRS), a tool for measuring sleep, can be used by patients with prurigo nodularis. The SD NRS asks patients to score their sleep loss during the previous night on a scale of 0 ("no sleep loss") to 10 ("I did not sleep at all"). When we interviewed 21 patients with prurigo nodularis, 19 of them had problems falling asleep and 18 of them woke up every night. Most of the patients found the SD NRS easy to use. To further explore whether the SD NRS is suitable for patients with prurigo nodularis, we also analyzed data from a European clinical study in which patients with prurigo nodularis received nemolizumab, a new treatment being developed for the disease. Patients completed the SD NRS each morning during the clinical study. We found that the SD NRS has the necessary properties to be useful for assessing sleep on a daily basis. We also determined that a 2- to 4-point decrease on the SD NRS scale would represent a meaningful improvement in sleep for patients with prurigo nodularis. We conclude that the SD NRS is a useful tool for assessing sleep in prurigo nodularis patients participating in clinical studies.

An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design to establish thresholds of within-individual meaningful change on a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale score in atopic dermatitis.

PURPOSE: Establishing a meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) threshold is a key aspect for interpreting scores used as endpoints for evaluating treatment benefit. A new patient-reported outcome (PRO), a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (SD NRS), was developed in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This research aims to establish a MWIC threshold of the SD NRS score in the context of a drug development program. METHODS: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used to address the research objective. This mixed-methods design used phase IIb data and a stand-alone qualitative study. Quantitative anchor-based and distribution-based approaches supported by qualitative-based approaches were conducted, and results were triangulated to determine preliminary MWIC thresholds of the SD NRS score. RESULTS: Triangulation of results from both quantitative and qualitative approaches suggested that a 2- to 6-point decrease in the SD NRS score change constitutes a preliminary range of MWIC threshold estimates. CONCLUSION: This research determined MWIC threshold estimates for the SD NRS score in both adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. This mixed-methods design provides interesting insights for establishing MWIC thresholds of a PRO score in the context of a drug development program.

Measuring What Matters to Individuals with Angelman Syndrome and Their Families: Development of a Patient-Centered Disease Concept Model.

Angelman syndrome (AS) is a complex, heterogeneous, and life-long neurodevelopmental disorder. Despite the considerable impact on individuals and caregivers, no disease-modifying treatments are available. To support holistic clinical management and the development of AS-specific outcome measures for clinical studies, we conducted primary and secondary research identifying the impact of symptoms on individuals with AS and their unmet need. This qualitative research adopted a rigorous step-wise approach, aggregating information from published literature, then evaluating it via disease concept elicitation interviews with clinical experts and caregivers. We found that the AS-defining concepts most relevant for treatment included: impaired expressive communication, seizures, maladaptive behavior, cognitive impairment, motor function difficulties, sleep disturbance, and limited self-care abilities. We highlight the relevance of age in experiencing these key AS concepts, and the difference between the perceptions of clinicians and caregivers towards the syndrome. Finally, we outline the impact of AS on individuals, caregivers, and families.

Living with Stargardt disease: insights from patients and their parents.

Background: Stargardt disease (STGD), a rare, inherited macular degeneration most commonly affecting children and young adults, is a rapidly progressive disease leading to severe central vision loss. This research aimed to develop a conceptual disease model describing STGD symptoms and their impact on patients' lives.Material and Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients (juvenile and adult) and parents of children and adolescents with STGD. Interviewed subjects were enrolled through ophthalmologists from specialized eye centers in the USA and in France. Trained interviewers used semi-structured techniques to elicit concepts relevant to patients and their parents. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts led to the identification of concepts which were organized to generate a disease model.Results: A total of 21 patients (12 in the US; 9 in France) - 14 adults, 7 juveniles - and 7 parents were interviewed. The most cited ocular symptoms were photosensitivity and central vision decline. Interviewees reported limitations on Physical (e.g. difficulty with sports/physical activities), Mental (e.g. frustration and worry, reduced ability to concentrate), Social (e.g. issue with facial recognition and difficulty discussing disease) and Role (e.g. impact on driving and reading, difficulties at school/work) functioning. These impacts were, when possible, mitigated by coping strategies and support (e.g. using electronic devices, setting up routines or accepting the disease).Conclusions: This research provides an overview of symptoms experienced by patients with STGD and highlights the dramatic impact these have on patients' lives, allowing the identification of concepts of importance when evaluating new therapeutic options for STGD.

Content validity of a sleep numerical rating scale and a sleep diary in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: The intense itching associated with atopic dermatitis (AD) often causes patients to experience severe sleep disturbance. Here, we describe the results of a two-phase concept elicitation and cognitive interview study to establish the content validity of a sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (SD NRS) and a Consensus Sleep Diary adapted for adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD (CSD-AD©). RESULTS: In phase I, a concept elicitation conducted in 20 adults and 10 adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD revealed that the following sleep-related issues were important and relevant: nighttime awakening (87%), trouble falling asleep (73%), feeling unrested (53%), daytime fatigue or sleepiness (53%), and feeling as if they did not get enough sleep (33%). The frequency and extent of sleep disturbance varied substantially from day to day due to varying degrees of itching and flares, medication use, and changes in the weather. All participants understood the SD NRS question, with most finding it easy or very easy to understand (100% of adults and 90% of adolescents) and most understanding the anchors as intended (95% of adults, and 100% of adolescents). Most participants (94% of adults, and 90% of adolescents) indicated that they would consider a one- or two-point change meaningful on the SD NRS. The CSD-AD© was revised based on participant feedback, and tested during phase II in a convenience sample of six adults and four adolescents from phase I. The changes made to the CSD-AD© were confirmed to be relevant and understandable. All patients were able to provide an answer to each item in the CSD-AD©, and most were able to estimate the duration of nighttime awakenings, daytime naps, and dozing. CONCLUSIONS: The study supported the content validity of the SD NRS and CSD-AD© in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD. It also emphasized the importance of using these instruments daily when assessing the benefit of a new treatment on sleep quality in this population.

Living with Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC): Development of a Conceptual Model of MCC Based on Patient Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer with limited treatment options at advanced stages. There is a paucity of data available regarding the impact of MCC and its management on patients' lives. This study aimed to address this gap by interviewing patients with metastatic MCC entering a trial of an immunotherapy (avelumab). METHODS: In a single-arm, open-label, international, phase 2 trial in patients with stage IV, chemotherapy-refractory, histologically confirmed MCC, patients were invited to participate in semi-structured phone interviews. These were conducted before avelumab administration. Interview transcripts were analysed qualitatively to identify concepts important to patients relating to their experience of metastatic MCC and its management. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were interviewed. Most reported MCC to be painless and asymptomatic. They reported being often misdiagnosed and described a long process before receiving the correct diagnosis. They also reported a feeling of "shock" after being informed of the severity and seriousness of their cancer. Overall, patients did not report impaired physical and cognitive capacities or impact on daily lives, either before or after diagnosis. However, patients and their relatives reported feelings of "worry" and "fear" about the unknown outcome of the disease. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy negatively affected patients physically and psychologically in their everyday lives. CONCLUSIONS: MCC disease was not perceived by the interviewed patients to result in severe functional limitations or to severely impact everyday activities, but was associated with substantial negative psychological impact. In contrast, chemotherapy and radiotherapy for MCC are highly debilitating and disrupt patients' lives. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02155647.

Improving the primary care physicians' decision making for fibromyalgia in clinical practice: development and validation of the Fibromyalgia Detection (FibroDetect®) screening tool.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia diagnosis is a challenging and long process, especially among primary care physicians (PCPs), because of symptom heterogeneity, co-morbidities and clinical overlap with other disorders. The purpose was to develop and validate a screening tool in French (FR), German (DE) and English (UK) to help PCPs identify patients with fibromyalgia. METHODS: The FibroDetect questionnaire was simultaneously developed in FR, DE and UK based on information obtained from a literature review, focus groups conducted with clinicians, and face-to-face interviews with fibromyalgia patients (FR, DE and UK, n = 23). The resulting tool was comprehension-tested in patients with diagnosed or suspected fibromyalgia (n = 3 and n = 2 in each country, respectively). Acceptability and applicability were assessed and the tool modified accordingly, then assessed in clinical practice. A scoring method was created using an iterative process based on statistical and clinical considerations with American College of Rheumatology + (ACR+) patients and ACR- patients (n = 276), and validated with fibromyalgia and non-fibromyalgia patients (n = 312). RESULTS: The FibroDetect included 14 questions assessing patients' pain and fatigue, personal history and attitudes, symptoms and impact on lives. Six questions were retained in the final scoring, demonstrating satisfactory discriminative power between ACR + and ACR- patients with area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve of 0.74. The predictive accuracy of the tool increased to 0.86 for fibromyalgia and non-fibromyalgia patient detection, with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 67% for a cut-off of 6 on the score. CONCLUSIONS: The FibroDetect is a self-administered tool that can be used as a screening classification surrogate to the ACR criteria in primary care settings to help PCPs detect potential fibromyalgia patients among a population complaining of chronic widespread pain.

Development and psychometric validation of a self-administered questionnaire assessing the acceptance of influenza vaccination: the Vaccinees' Perception of Injection (VAPI) questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Influenza is among the most common infectious diseases. The main protection against influenza is vaccination. A self-administered questionnaire was developed and validated for use in clinical trials to assess subjects' perception and acceptance of influenza vaccination and its subsequent injection site reactions (ISR). METHODS: The VAPI questionnaire was developed based on interviews with vaccinees. The initial version was administered to subjects in international clinical trials comparing intradermal with intramuscular influenza vaccination. Item reduction and scale construction were carried out using principal component and multitrait analyses (n = 549). Psychometric validation of the final version was conducted per country (n = 5,543) and included construct and clinical validity and internal consistency reliability. All subjects gave their written informed consent before being interviewed or included in the clinical studies. RESULTS: The final questionnaire comprised 4 dimensions ("bother from ISR"; "arm movement"; "sleep"; "acceptability") grouping 16 items, and 5 individual items (anxiety before vaccination; bother from pain during vaccination; satisfaction with injection system; willingness to be vaccinated next year; anxiety about vaccination next year). Construct validity was confirmed for all scales in most of the countries. Internal consistency reliability was good for all versions (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.68 to 0.94), as was clinical validity: scores were positively correlated with the severity of ISR and pain. CONCLUSION: The VAPI questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool, assessing the acceptance of vaccine injection and reactions following vaccination.

Validation of the short-form REFLUX-QUAL (RQS), a gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) specific quality of life questionnaire.

INTRODUCTION: Being an easy-to-use (eight items) quality of life questionnaire specific to GERD, the Reflux-Qual Short form (RQS) was developed for use in everyday practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the RQS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The reliability of the RQS was measured by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient and its clinical validity by comparing the RQS score for increasing clinical severity groups. The RQS discriminative power was compared with that of the SF12. Sensitivity to change over time was measured by calculating effect-sizes. RESULTS: The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed on a sample of 1195 patients. Its psychometric properties were very satisfactory: Cronbach alpha = 0.84; RQS score significantly reduced for the worst-affected patients; the discriminative power was up to 5 times higher when compared with the SF-12. Sensitivity to change over time, evaluated with 362 patients, showed highly significant differences between groups with different levels of clinical progression (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The RQS is a quality of life measurement instrument specific to GERD which is short, reliable, valid, and sensitive to within and between-subject differences.