Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Frailty Aging ; 12(2): 97-102, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36946704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Frailty Index (FI) is used to quantify and summarize vulnerability status in people. In Chile, no development and assessment of a FI have been explored. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a FI using representative data from Chilean adults aged 40 years and older stratified by sex. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National representative data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017 (CNHS 2016-2017). PARTICIPANTS: 3,036 participants older than 40 years with complete data for all variables. MEASUREMENTS: A 49-item FI was developed and evaluated. This FI included deficits from comorbidities, functional limitations, mental health status, physical activity, anthropometry, medications, and falls. A score between 0 and 1 was calculated for each person. Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were employed to evaluate the FI's performance in the population. Comparative analyses were carried out to evaluate the FI score by age (1<60 and ≥ 60 years). RESULTS: The mean FI score was 0.15 (SD:0.09), with a 99% upper limit of 0.46. Scores were greater in women than men (0.17 [SD:0.09]) vs. 0.12 [0.08]); in people older than 80 years (0.22 [0.11]), and in people with ≤8 years of education (0.18 [0.10]) compared with those with >12 years (0.12 [0.08]). The average age-related increase in the FI was 2.3%. When a cut-off point ≥ 0.25 was applied, the prevalence of frail individuals was 11.8% (95% CI: 10.0 to 13.8) in the general population. The prevalence was higher in women 15.9% [95% CI: 13.3 to 18.9] than men 7.4% [95% CI: 5.3 to 10.1]. In a comparative analysis by age, higher FI mean scores and prevalence of frail were observed in people ≥ 60 than younger than 60. CONCLUSIONS: The mean FI score and frailty prevalence were higher in women than men, in people with fewer years of formal education, and incremented markedly with age. This FI can be used for early detection of frailty status focusing on women and middle-aged people as a strategy to delay or prevent frailty-related consequences.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Evaluación Geriátrica , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Chile/epidemiología , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Sociodemográficos , Estudios Transversales , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos
2.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 26(11): 987-993, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36437766

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Older adults with poor oral health may be at higher risk of being pre-frail or frail. However, very few studies have examined this association in Latin American countries and middle-aged individuals. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between oral health and frailty status among Chilean adults ≥40 years. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included 3,036 participants ≥40 years from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017. METHODS: Frailty status was assessed with a 49-item frailty index, while the number of teeth, self-reported oral health, tooth decay, use of prostheses, and oral pain were the oral health conditions included. To assess the association between oral health conditions and frailty, we used multinomial logistic regression models status adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables. RESULTS: Overall, 40.6% and 11.8% of individuals were classified as pre-frail and frail, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, individuals with ≤20 teeth had a higher likelihood of being frail (odds ratio (OR): 1.94 [95% CI: 1.18-3.20]) than people with >20 teeth. Moreover, people with bad or very bad oral health, as well as oral pain, had a higher likelihood of being pre-frail (OR: 2.04 [95% CI: 1.40-2.97] and OR: 2.92 [95% CI: 1.58-5.39], respectively). Middle-aged individuals with fewer teeth and poor self-reported oral health had a higher likelihood of being pre-frail and frail than people ≥60. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Individuals with poor global oral health were more likely to be pre-frail or frail. This association seems to be stronger in people <60 years old. Our results are consistent with previously published reports.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Salud Bucal , Oportunidad Relativa , Dolor
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...