Correlates of Subjective Caregiver Strain in Caregivers of Youth Evaluated in a Pediatric Psychiatric Emergency Room.

BACKGROUND: Although caregiver burden is relevant to the outcome for psychiatrically ill youth, most studies have focused on caregiver burden in the community or research settings. Therefore, we aimed at evaluating the subjective caregiver strain (SCS) at the time of presentation of youth to a pediatric psychiatric emergency room (PPER), assessing potential correlates to provide leads for improvements in formal support systems. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the internalized, externalized, and total SCS were assessed in caregivers of youth <18 years of age consecutively evaluated at a PPER during a 1 year period using the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire. Sociodemographic and a broad range of clinical data were collected during the PPER visit using a 12-page semistructured institutional evaluation form. The Appropriateness of Pediatric Psychiatric Emergency Room Contact scale, incorporating acuity, severity and harm potential, was used to rate appropriateness of the visit. RESULTS: In caregivers of 444 youth, the internalized SCS was significantly higher than the externalized SCS (p < 0.001). Multivariable analyses indicated that higher total and externalized SCS were associated with disruptive behavior or substance abuse/dependent disorder diagnosis, presenting complaint of aggression, and discharge plan to the police. Higher total and internalized SCS were associated with lower child functioning, whereas total and internalized SCS were lower in adopted children. In addition, higher externalized SCS was associated with investigator-rated inappropriateness of the emergency visit, presenting complaint of defiance, and a lack of prior psychiatric ER visits. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of CS in PPER highlight the necessity to adhere to existing guidelines regarding the inclusion of caregivers' perceptions into comprehensive psychiatric assessments. The particularly high strain in caregivers of children with externalizing disorders and in families with low-functioning youth may need to prompt PPER staff to provide efficient information on appropriate treatment options for these children and on support facilities for the parents.

Suicidality and hospitalization as cause and outcome of pediatric psychiatric emergency room visits.

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of suicidality in youth presenting to a pediatric psychiatric emergency room service (PPERS). To this end, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of youth aged <18 years consecutively assessed by a PPERS 01.01.2002-12.31.2002, using a 12-page semi-structured institutional evaluation form and the Columbia Classification Algorithm for Suicide Assessment. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted to identify correlates of suicidal thoughts and attempts/preparation and their relationship to outpatient/inpatient disposition. Of 1,062 youth, 265 (25.0%) presented with suicidal ideation (16.2%) or attempt/preparation (8.8%). Suicidal ideation was associated with female sex, depression, adjustment disorder, absent referral by family/friend/self, school referral, precipitant of peer conflict, and no antipsychotic treatment (p < 0.0001). Suicidal attempt/preparation was associated with female sex, depression, lower GAF score, past suicide attempt, precipitant of peer conflict, and no stimulant treatment (p < 0.0001). Compared to suicidal attempt/preparation, suicidal ideation was associated with school referral, and higher GAF score (p < 0.0001). Of the 265 patients with suicidality, 58.5% were discharged home (ideation = 72.1% vs. attempt/preparation = 33.7%, p < 0.0001). In patients with suicidal ideation, outpatient disposition was associated with higher GAF score, school referral, and adjustment disorder (p < 0.0001). In patients with suicidal attempt/preparation, outpatient disposition was associated with higher GAF score, lower acuity rating, and school referral (p < 0.0001). Suicidality is common among PPERS evaluations. Higher GAF score and school referral distinguished suicidal ideation from suicidal attempt/preparation and was associated with outpatient disposition in both presentations. Increased education of referral sources and establishment of different non-PPERS evaluation systems may improve identification of non-emergent suicidal presentations and encourage more appropriate outpatient referrals.

Anhedonia and pessimism in hospitalized depressed adolescents.

This longitudinal study investigates whether anhedonia and pessimistic attributional style represent a clinical state or a trait in hospitalized depressed adolescents. 81 consecutive adolescent inpatients were screened with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the clinician-rated Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) criteria sheet. 51 patients with BDI score ≥10 and/or ≥4 symptoms on MDD criteria sheet were assessed at Time 1 upon admission, with 39 patients (78%) assessed at discharge (Time 2) with the Pleasure Scale for Children and Children's Attributional Style Questionnaire-Revised. Anhedonia and pessimism at admission were associated with BDI scores at admission and discharge as well as number of depressive symptoms and depression severity. MDD diagnosis was associated with anhedonia, but not with pessimism. Pessimism-but not anhedonia-improved significantly by discharge. Results suggest that while some adolescents exhibit enduring anhedonia, pessimistic attributional style appears to be a concomitant feature of an acute depressive state.

Frequency and correlates of inappropriate pediatric psychiatric emergency room visits.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing pediatric psychiatric emergency room service (PPERS) visits, data are lacking regarding visit characteristics and appropriateness. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study consecutively assessed youngsters aged < 18 years between January 1 and December 31, 2002, utilizing data from a 12-page semistructured institutional evaluation form. Appropriateness, severity, acuity, and harm potential of PPERS visits were rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 1,062 PPERS patient visits (mean +/- SD age: 13.5 +/- 3.1 years, 51.1% male, and 51.2% white), 305 (28.7%) led to hospitalization. Although most patients (68.7%) were in outpatient care, only 21.9% sought and 11.5% completed an outpatient evaluation prior to reaching the emergency room. As many as 34.4% of PPERS visits were somewhat/very inappropriate (optimal care: outpatient evaluation/treatment, even if delayed), 26.6% were somewhat appropriate/neutral (best served by outpatient evaluation/treatment, but timely appointment unavailable), and only 39.0% were fully appropriate. Main reasons for inappropriate PPERS visits were direct emergency room referral from school (P = .0056) or mental health provider (P = .0438) without prior psychiatrist evaluation, or unavailable appointment (P = .0304). Multivariate predictors of inappropriate PPERS visits (r(2) = .296, P < .0001) included current Global Assessment of Functioning score > 48 (P < .0001), absent suicidal ideation/attempt (P < .0001), low harm potential (< 4.4, P < .0001) and severity (< 4.8, P = .0136) (1- to 7-point scale) of presenting complaint, and absent psychosis (P = .0008). CONCLUSIONS: Over one third of PPERS visits were inappropriate, characterized by better functioning, low harm potential or severity of presenting complaint, and absent suicidality or psychosis. Development of and improved access to urgent child and adolescent psychiatric outpatient care services in the community and referral agent educational programs may minimize inappropriate PPERS visits.

Lithium treatment of acute mania in adolescents: a placebo-controlled discontinuation study.

OBJECTIVE: There are no published placebo-controlled studies of any agent in the treatment of acute mania in children or adolescents. This is the first placebo-controlled study of lithium's efficacy in the treatment of acute mania in adolescents. METHOD: In this discontinuation study, participants received open treatment with lithium at therapeutic serum levels (mean 0.99 mEq/L) for at least 4 weeks. Responders were randomly assigned to continue or discontinue lithium during a 2-week double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. This study had 80% power to detect a 40% difference in exacerbation rates between groups (10% on lithium versus 50% on placebo). RESULTS: Twenty-three of 40 protocol participants (57.5%) experienced a clinically significant symptom exacerbation during the 2-week double-blind phase. However, the slightly lower exacerbation rate in the group maintained on lithium (10/19 or 52.6%) versus the group switched to placebo (13/21 or 61.9%) did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support a large effect for lithium continuation treatment of adolescents with acute mania, mostly due to the unexpectedly high rate of exacerbations in the group that continued on lithium. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether acute mania in adolescents is lithium responsive.

Lithium treatment of acute mania in adolescents: a large open trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine initial response to treatment in a large sample of acutely manic bipolar I adolescents and to examine potential predictors of nonresponse, such as the presence of prominent depressive features, psychosis, or psychiatric comorbidity. METHOD: Adolescents, 12 to 18 years of age, with an acute manic episode were treated with open lithium. Response was defined as a decline in Young Mania Rating Scale total score of >or=33% and a rating of "much improved" or "very much improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions Improvement item at week 4. Remission of mania was defined as a Young Mania Rating Scale score of