[Prevention of infections under anesthetic breathing with breathing filters: concerted recommendations of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene e.V. (DGKH) and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. (DGAI)]. / Infektionsprävention bei der Narkosebeatmung durch Einsatz von Atemsystemfiltern: Gemeinsame Empfehlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene e.V. (DGKH) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin e.V. (DGAI).

An interdisciplinary working group from the German Society of Hospital Hygiene (DGKH) and the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (DGAI) worked out the following recommendations for infection prevention during anesthesia by using breathing system filters (BSF). The BSF shall be changed after each patient. The filter retention efficiency for airborne particles is recommended to be >99% (II). The retention performance of BSF for liquids is recommended to be at pressures of at least 60 hPa (=60 mbar) or 20 hPa above the selected maximum ventilation pressure in the anesthetic system.The anesthesia breathing system may be used for a period of up to 7 days provided that the functional requirements of the system remain unchanged and the manufacturer states this in the instructions for use. The breathing system and the manual ventilation bag are changed immediately after the respective anesthesia if the following situation has occurred or it is suspected to have occurred: Notifiable infectious disease involving the risk of transmission via the breathing system and the manual bag, e.g. tuberculosis, acute viral hepatitis, measles, influenza virus, infection and/or colonization with a multi-resistant pathogen or upper or lower respiratory tract infections. In case of visible contamination e.g. by blood or in case of defect, it is required that the BSF and also the anesthesia breathing system is changed and the breathing gas conducting parts of the anesthesia ventilator are hygienically reprocessed.Observing of the appropriate hand disinfection is very important. All surfaces of the anesthesia equipment exposed to hand contact must be disinfected after each case.

[Prevention of infection through hygiene in the home and community. The need for a family-centred approach]. / Infektionsprävention durch Hygiene zu Hause und in der Offentlichkeit. Die Notwendigkeit für eine familienzentrierte Strategie.

Over the past 20 years, infectious disease has moved back up the health agenda, prompting new emphasis on developing strategies for prevention and control, including reduction of spread of infection within the family at home and in their social and work lives outside the home. This paper reviews the various issues that have contributed to this trend. In response to the need for a science-based approach to home hygiene, the International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene has developed an approach based on risk management which involves identifying the critical control points for preventing the spread of infectious diseases in the home. If we are to be successful in achieving behaviour change in the community, we need to develop a family-centred approach which ensures an understanding of infectious disease agents and their mechanism of spread.

Household cleaning and surface disinfection: new insights and strategies.

Recently, new insights into the persistence of pathogens, their transfer from inanimate surfaces to humans and the risk of contamination and dissemination of pathogens by detergents have been gained. Furthermore, new experimental data on the interruption of chains of infection by disinfectants as well as results of outbreak-control studies are now available. Hence it has become necessary to reassess the potential benefits using disinfectants to prevent and control nosocomial infections. Based on the new findings and in view of the increasing incidence of nosocomial infections and antibiotic resistances, the German Robert-Koch-Institut has issued completely revised recommendations on Household Cleaning and Surface Disinfection. With respect to these recommendations we developed a new test method, which allows comparison of the efficacy of disinfection in reducing the microbial loads and their dissemination with that of cleaning procedures under practical conditions. In a multi-factor approach, mechanical properties (wet mop technique), utensils (different mop materials) and active agents (disinfectant, detergent) were taken into consideration. We found that under the given conditions, dissemination of the test organism Staphylococcus aureus did not take place when using aldehydes and peroxides, it did take place, however, when water, surfactants, and the disinfectants glycol derivatives, quaternary ammonium compounds and alkylamines were used.