Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Primary biliary cholangitis is a rare, chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by the destruction of interlobular bile ducts, leading to cholestasis and liver fibrosis. Whether elafibranor, an oral, dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α and δ agonist, may have benefit as a treatment for primary biliary cholangitis is unknown. METHODS: In this multinational, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with primary biliary cholangitis who had had an inadequate response to or unacceptable side effects with ursodeoxycholic acid to receive once-daily elafibranor, at a dose of 80 mg, or placebo. The primary end point was a biochemical response (defined as an alkaline phosphatase level of <1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a reduction of ≥15% from baseline, and normal total bilirubin levels) at week 52. Key secondary end points were normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level at week 52 and a change in pruritus intensity from baseline through week 52 and through week 24, as measured on the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS; scores range from 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]). RESULTS: A total of 161 patients underwent randomization. A biochemical response (the primary end point) was observed in 51% of the patients (55 of 108) who received elafibranor and in 4% (2 of 53) who received placebo, for a difference of 47 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 32 to 57; P<0.001). The alkaline phosphatase level normalized in 15% of the patients in the elafibranor group and in none of the patients in the placebo group at week 52 (difference, 15 percentage points; 95% CI, 6 to 23; P = 0.002). Among patients who had moderate-to-severe pruritus (44 patients in the elafibranor group and 22 in the placebo group), the least-squares mean change from baseline through week 52 on the WI-NRS did not differ significantly between the groups (-1.93 vs. -1.15; difference, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.99 to 0.42; P = 0.20). Adverse events that occurred more frequently with elafibranor than with placebo included abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with elafibranor resulted in significantly greater improvements in relevant biochemical indicators of cholestasis than placebo. (Funded by GENFIT and Ipsen; ELATIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04526665.).

A proposal from the liver forum for the management of comorbidities in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis therapeutic trials.

The current document has been developed by the Liver Forum who mandated the NAFLD-Associated Comorbidities Working Group - a multistakeholder group comprised of experts from academic medicine, industry and patient associations - to identify aspects of diverse comorbidities frequently associated with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) that can interfere with the conduct of therapeutic trials and, in particular, impact efficacy and safety results. The objective of this paper is to propose guidance for the management of relevant comorbidities in both candidates and actual participants in NASH therapeutic trials. We relied on specific guidelines from scientific societies, when available, but adapted them to the particulars of NASH trials with the aim of addressing multiple interacting requirements such as maintaining patient safety, reaching holistic therapeutic objectives, minimising confounding effects on efficacy and safety of investigational agents and allowing for trial completion. We divided the field of action into: first, analysis and stabilisation of the patient's condition before inclusion in the trial and, second, management of comorbidities during trial conduct. For the former, we discussed the concept of acceptable vs. optimal control of comorbidities, defined metabolic and ponderal stability prior to randomisation and weighed the pros and cons of a run-in period. For the latter, we analysed non-hepatological comorbid conditions for changes or acute events possibly occurring during the trial, including changes in alcohol consumption, in order to detail when specific interventions are necessary and how best to manage concomitant drug intake in line with methodological constraints. These recommendations are intended to act as a guide for clinical trialists and are open to further refinement when additional data become available.

Improving Information Exchange with Clinical Trial Participants: A Proposal for Industry.

BACKGROUND: Researchers are increasingly motivated to move toward patient-centric drug development. TransCelerate has identified improved "information exchange" as an important component of creating a more satisfying clinical trial experience for patients and their health care professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Patients, sponsors, sites, and HCPs were engaged through surveys, interviews, and/or advisory boards to capture the current status of information exchange and identify possible future practices between the major stakeholders within the clinical research ecosystem. RESULTS: Data suggest that patients have numerous desires and preferences for information exchange during their clinical trial journey that are not commonly met. Various opportunities exist to improve the clinical trial participants' experiences by improving information exchange practices across various stages of the participant's journey. CONCLUSIONS: A shift in industry focus toward more comprehensive information exchange with trial participants has the potential to positively impact many patients.

Efficacy and safety of the glycine transporter type-1 inhibitor AMG 747 for the treatment of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of AMG 747, an oral inhibitor of glycine transporter type-1 (GlyT1), as an add-on to antipsychotic therapy in clinically stable people with schizophrenia with enduring negative symptoms. METHOD: Analysis of pooled data from two phase 2 studies. Adults diagnosed with schizophrenia stabilized on antipsychotic medication randomized (2:2:2:3) to orally receive daily AMG 747 (5mg, 15mg, or 40mg) or placebo. Primary endpoint was Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA)-16 total score change from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: Studies were terminated early after a report of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (SJS/TEN) in one participant (40-mg AMG 747). At termination, 232 participants had enrolled and 153 completed 12weeks of treatment. At week 12, change from baseline NSA-16 total score showed no differences between groups. Mean decrease in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Symptom Factor Score (NSFS) and NSA-16 global score were greater with 15-mg AMG 747 than placebo (p<0.05). Changes in PANSS-Positive Symptom Factor Scale were not significantly different for any group. Changes in patient-reported outcomes (Sheehan Disability Scale and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire) showed trends consistent with greater efficacy of 15-mg AMG 747 compared with placebo (p≤0.1). Adverse event rates were similar among all groups, with no clear differences observed. CONCLUSIONS: Significant treatment effects of 15-mg AMG 747, but not higher or lower doses, were observed on secondary endpoints but not on the primary outcome. These results replicate previous reports of an inverted-U dose response curve and suggest further evaluation of GlyT1 inhibitors in schizophrenia negative symptoms is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT01568216 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01568216) and NCT01568229 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01568229?term=NCT01568229&rank=1); EudraCT number 2011-004844-23 and 2011-004845-42.

Safety and efficacy of AMG 334 for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway is a promising target for preventive therapies in patients with migraine. We assessed the safety and efficacy of AMG 334, a fully human monoclonal antibody against the CGRP receptor, for migraine prevention. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial, patients aged 18-60 years with 4 to 14 migraine days per month were enrolled at 59 headache and clinical research centres in North America and Europe, and randomly assigned in a 3:2:2:2 ratio to monthly subcutaneous placebo, AMG 334 7 mg, AMG 334 21 mg, or AMG 334 70 mg using a sponsor-generated randomisation sequence centrally executed by an interactive voice response or interactive web response system. Study site personnel, patients, and the sponsor study personnel were masked to the treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days from baseline to the last 4 weeks of the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. The primary endpoint was calculated using the least squares mean at each timepoint from a generalised linear mixed-effect model for repeated measures. Safety endpoints were adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, and anti-AMG 334 antibodies. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01952574. An open-label extension phase of up to 256 weeks is ongoing and will assess the long-term safety of AMG 334. FINDINGS: From Aug 6, 2013, to June 30, 2014, 483 patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=160), AMG 334 7 mg (n=108), AMG 334 21 mg (n=108), or AMG 334 70 mg (n=107). The mean change in monthly migraine days at week 12 was -3·4 (SE 0·4) days with AMG 334 70 mg versus -2·3 (0·3) days with placebo (difference -1·1 days [95% CI -2·1 to -0·2], p=0·021). The mean reductions in monthly migraine days with the 7 mg (-2·2 [SE 0·4]) and the 21 mg (-2·4 [0·4]) doses were not significantly different from that with placebo. Adverse events were recorded in 82 (54%) patients who received placebo, 54 (50%) patients in the AMG 334 7 mg group, 54 (51%) patients in the AMG 334 21 mg group, and 57 (54%) patients in the AMG 334 70 mg group. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis, fatigue, and headache. Serious adverse events were reported for one patient in the AMG 334 7 mg group (ruptured ovarian cyst) and one patient in the AMG 334 70 mg group (migraine and vertigo); these events were judged to be unrelated to AMG 334 treatment. Nine (3%) of 317 patients had neutralising antibodies. No apparent association was recorded between patients with positive anti-AMG 334 antibodies and adverse events. No clinically significant vital signs, laboratory, or electrocardiogram findings were recorded. INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that AMG 334 70 mg might be a potential therapy for migraine prevention in patients with episodic migraine and support further investigation of AMG 334 in larger phase 3 trials. FUNDING: Amgen.