Do some levator avulsions improve over time?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sonographic appearance of levator avulsion after vaginal childbirth can improve significantly over the first few years postpartum. METHODS: Retrospective study of women seen in the context of two prospective perinatal imaging studies. All subjects had undergone an interview, clinical examination and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS) on average 4.3 months and 3.1 years post-partum. Volume data sets were analysed at a later date blinded against all other data. The number of abnormal slices at both time points was compared using Mann- Whitney U Test. Patients in whom findings had changed over time were reviewed separately in parallel in order to reduce the impact of differences in slice location and imaging settings. The symmetry test was used to analyse changes between the two postnatal visits. RESULTS: Of 1148 women originally recruited, 315 had had at least two postnatal visits. 42 were excluded, leaving 273 women for analysis. They were first seen on average 4.3 (2.6-9.8) months after childbirth and the last time 3.1 (1.4-8) years postpartum. Cohen's kappa for the two assessments was 0.89, with agreement in 97% (264/273) of cases. At the first visit, complete avulsion was diagnosed in 20, partial avulsion in 32, and no avulsion in 221. While seven partial avulsions appeared sonographically normal at the second visit, there were no statistically significant changes in avulsion category between visits (P=0.4). CONCLUSION: Tomographic pelvic floor imaging obtained 2.5-10 months after childbirth may be used as a proxy for long- term outcomes. Findings at a mean of 3.1 years showed 97% agreement with imaging obtained at an average of 4.3 months. There was a non-significant reduction in abnormal slices affecting at most 3/12 slices. This may be explained by compensatory hypertrophy of remaining intact muscle. Sonographic normalisation of complete avulsion was not observed. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Levator-urethra gap: is there a need for individualization of cut-offs?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether age, height, weight and BMI are associated with the levator urethra gap measurement, and whether these factors confound the relationship between LUG and symptoms and signs of POP. METHODS: Retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecology unit between January 2020 and December 2021. Postprocessing of saved ultrasound volume data was utilised to measure the levator- urethra gap, blinded against all other data. This measurement was tested for its association with organ descent and hiatal area, and height, weight and body mass index were investigated for any potential confounding effect. RESULTS: The 624 women seen during the inclusion period presented mostly with stress urinary incontinence (448, 72%), urgency urinary incontinence (469, 75%) and/ or prolapse (338, 54%). Mean age at assessment was 58 (range, 20-94) years, mean height was 163 (range, 142-182) cm, mean weight 80 (41- 153) kg, mean BMI was 30 (17-65) kg/m2. LUG measurements could be obtained in 613 women, resulting in 12*613= 7356 measurements. The average LUG in individual women was 2.35 cm on the right and 2.32 cm on the left (n.s.), for an average of 2.34 cm (SD 0.63) overall. Mean LUG was associated with symptoms and signs of prolapse, both on POPQ and on imaging, but not with height (P= 0.36), weight (P= 0.2) or BMI (P= 0.09). CONCLUSION: Levator- urethra gap measurements do not seem to be associated with height, weight or BMI in our population, obviating the need for individualisation of LUG. However, this does not exclude interethnic variability of this biometric measure. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis of maternal birth trauma by pelvic floor ultrasound.

BRIEF SUMMARY: Maternal somatic birth trauma due to vaginal delivery is more common than generally assumed and an important cause of future morbidity. Maternal birth trauma may involve both psychological and somatic morbidity, some of it long-term and permanent. Somatic birth trauma is now understood to encompass not just episiotomy, perineal tears and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), but also trauma to the levator ani muscle, termed 'avulsion'. This review will focus on recent developments in the imaging diagnosis of maternal birth trauma, discuss the most important risk factors and strategies for primary and secondary prevention. Translabial and exo-anal ultrasound allow the assessment of maternal birth trauma in routine clinical practice and enable the use of levator avulsion and anal sphincter trauma as key performance indicators of maternity services. This is likely to lead to a greater awareness of maternal birth trauma amongst maternity caregivers and improved outcomes for patients, not the least due to an increasing emphasis on patient autonomy and informed consent in antenatal and intrapartum care.

Clinical assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by consecutive cough maneuver.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Staging of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is important in clinical practice and research. Pelvic organ descent on Valsalva can be confounded by levator co-activation, which may be avoided by assessment on coughing. We evaluated the performance of a three consecutive coughs maneuver in the assessment of POP compared with standardised 6-second Valsalva. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study carried out in women attending a tertiary urogynaecological service in 2017-2019. Patients underwent a standardised interview and clinical examination. Clinical assessment was performed twice, with both 6-s Valsalva and three consecutive coughs performed in random order. Main outcomes were Ba, C and Bp as defined by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q). Association between coordinates and prolapse symptoms was investigated with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) statistics. RESULTS: Datasets of 855 women were analysed. POP symptoms were reported by 447 patients (52%) with a mean bother of 6.1 (SD 3.0). On clinical assessment, relevant prolapse was found in 716 (84%) patients on Valsalva and in 730 (85%) on coughing (p=0.109). Clinically relevant prolapse in the apical compartment was more likely to be detected on Valsalva (p<0.0001). Mean POP-Q measurements were not significantly different between maneuvers, except for Ba (p=0.004). ROC curve analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.77) for maximum POP-Q stage on Valsalva and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) after three consecutive coughs, with a similar performance of both maneuvers in predicting prolapse symptoms (p=0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment of POP by consecutive coughing seems complementary to standardised Valsalva, especially if Valsalva performance is poor.

Is posterior compartment prolapse associated with anal incontinence?

OBJECTIVE: It has been claimed that manifestations of posterior compartment prolapse, such as rectocele, enterocele and intussusception, are associated with anal incontinence (AI), but this has not been studied while controlling for anal sphincter trauma. We aimed to investigate this association in women with intact anal sphincter presenting with pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1133 women with intact anal sphincter presenting to a tertiary urogynecological center for pelvic floor dysfunction between 2014 and 2016. All women underwent a standardized interview, including assessment of symptoms of AI, clinical examination and three-/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound. Descent of the rectal ampulla, true rectocele, enterocele, intussusception and anal sphincter trauma were diagnosed offline. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.1 (range, 17.6-89.7) years and mean body mass index was 29.4 (range, 14.7-67.8) kg/m2 . AI was reported by 149 (13%) patients, with a median St Mark's anal incontinence score of 12 (interquartile range, 1-23). Significant posterior compartment prolapse was seen in 693 (61%) women on clinical examination. Overall, 638 (56%) women had posterior compartment prolapse on imaging: 527 (47%) had a true rectocele, 89 (7.9%) had an enterocele and 26 (2.3%) had an intussusception. Women with ultrasound-diagnosed enterocele had a significantly higher rate of AI (23.6% vs 12.3%; odds ratio (OR), 2.21 (95% CI, 1.31-3.72); P = 0.002), but when adjusted for potential confounders, this association was no longer significant (OR, 1.56 (95% CI, 0.82-2.77); P = 0.134). CONCLUSION: In women without anal sphincter trauma, posterior compartment prolapse, whether diagnosed clinically or by imaging, was not shown to be associated with AI. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Validation of new ultrasound algorithm for estimating prevalence of anal sphincter trauma in a urogynecological population.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of major perineal trauma in a urogynecological population, to test the predictive value of sonographic tear grading (Gillor algorithm) for anal incontinence (AI), AI bother score and St Mark's score, and to compare the predictive power of the Gillor algorithm with that of the residual-defect method. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 721 women attending a tertiary urogynecology unit between February 2019 and May 2021. All women underwent a standardized interview, including determination of St Mark's score and visual analog scale (VAS) bother score for AI, as well as exoanal (translabial) ultrasound with later offline analysis. Results were reported as the presence of a residual defect of the external anal sphincter (EAS), i.e. a discontinuity of ≥ 30° in ≥ 4/6 tomographic slices, and according to the Gillor algorithm (normal, Grade 3a, Grade 3b or Grade 3c/4). RESULTS: Mean age at assessment was 57 (range, 19-93) years and mean body mass index was 30 (range, 17-57) kg/m2 . Six hundred and thirty-six (88.2%) women were vaginally parous and 161 (22.3%) had undergone at least one forceps delivery. AI was reported by 186/721 (25.8%) women, with a median St Mark's score of 10 (interquartile range (IQR), 6-14) and a median VAS score of 6.3 (IQR, 3.9-10). EAS defects were detected in 261 (36.2%) women, with a residual defect diagnosed in 88 (12.2%). On sonographic grading according to the Gillor algorithm, we identified 532 (73.8%) women with a normal sphincter, 66 (9.2%) with Grade-3a tear, 87 (12.1%) with Grade-3b tear and 36 (5.0%) with Grade-3c/4 tear. In total, the Gillor algorithm classified 189 (26.2%) women as having suffered a major perineal tear. The two grading systems were in moderate agreement (κ, 0.537 (95% CI, 0.49-0.56); P < 0.001). There were weak, albeit significant, associations between EAS defects and measures of AI (P = 0.009 to P = 0.047), both for residual defect as well as the Gillor algorithm. CONCLUSION: Neither the Gillor algorithm nor the residual-defect method of quantifying sphincter trauma on imaging is clearly superior in terms of predicting AI. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

All or nothing? A second look at partial levator avulsion.

OBJECTIVE: To define associations between partial levator trauma and symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 3484 women attending a tertiary urogynecology unit for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction between January 2012 and February 2020. All women underwent a standardized interview, clinical pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination and tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Women with full levator avulsion were excluded from analysis. Partial levator avulsion was quantified using the tomographic trauma score (TTS), in which slices 3-8 are scored bilaterally for abnormal insertions. Binomial multiple logistic regression was analyzed independently for the outcome variables prolapse symptoms, symptom bother and objective prolapse on clinical examination and imaging, with age and body mass index as covariates. Two continuous outcome variables, prolapse bother score and hiatal area on Valsalva, were analyzed using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Of the 3484 women, ultrasound data were missing or incomplete in 164 due to lack of equipment, clerical error and/or inadequate image quality. Full levator avulsion was diagnosed in 807 women, leaving 2513 for analysis. TTS ranged from 0-10, with a median of 0. Partial trauma (TTS > 0) was observed in 667/2513 (26.5%) women. All subjective and objective measures of POP were associated significantly with TTS, most strongly for cystocele. Associations were broadly linear and similar for all slice locations but disappeared after accounting for hiatal area on Valsalva. CONCLUSION: Partial avulsion is associated with POP and prolapse symptoms. This association was strongest for cystocele, both on POP-Q and ultrasound imaging. The effect of partial avulsion on POP and prolapse symptoms is explained fully by its effect on hiatal area. © 2022 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Is age at menarche a predictor of maternal birth trauma?

OBJECTIVE: Age at menarche and the interval between menarche and age at first vaginal birth have been shown to be associated with reproductive performance; however, their association with maternal birth trauma has not been studied. We aimed to determine whether age at menarche, age at first vaginal birth and their interval are associated independently with levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and external anal sphincter (EAS) defect. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the ultrasound volume datasets of 466 vaginally parous patients attending one of two tertiary urogynecological units in Australia. All patients had undergone a standardized interview and clinical examination using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging system, followed by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Tomographic ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate the LAM for avulsion and the EAS for significant defect. RESULTS: Of the 466 women analyzed, LAM avulsion was diagnosed in 121 (26.0%) and significant EAS defect in 55 (11.8%). Logistic regression analysis showed no association between age at menarche and LAM avulsion (P = 0.67). Weak but significant associations were noted between LAM avulsion and age at first vaginal birth (odds ratio (OR), 1.070 (95% CI, 1.03-1.11); P = 0.0007) and between LAM avulsion and menarche-to-first-vaginal-birth interval (OR, 1.064 (95% CI, 1.02-1.11); P = 0.0018). No significant associations were noted between significant EAS defect and any of the evaluated variables (all P ≥ 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Age at menarche is not predictive of maternal birth trauma i.e. LAM avulsion and EAS residual defect. There was a statistically significant association between LAM avulsion and menarche-to-first-vaginal-birth interval; however, this was not stronger than the previously established association between LAM avulsion and age at first vaginal birth, arguing against any distinct effect of prolonged prepregnancy hormonal stimulation on the biomechanical properties of the pelvic floor. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Has the prevalence of levator avulsion after forceps delivery changed over the last six decades? A retrospective study in a urogynaecological population.

OBJECTIVE: Forceps delivery is associated with a higher risk of maternal birth trauma. It is speculated that it is due to sub-optimal use of forceps in inexperienced hands. The aim of this study was to determine the association between time of forceps birth and prevalence of levator avulsion over the last six decades. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of datasets of women with a history of forceps delivery, seen at a tertiary urogynaecological centre between January 2014 and August 2018. They had undergone a standardized interview, clinical examination and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. Archived imaging data was reviewed for levator avulsion offline at a later date, blinded against all clinical data. Associations between levator avulsion, maternal age at first vaginal birth, the weight of the first vaginally born baby, and time since forceps delivery categorised by decade were tested by univariable analysis. Factors found to be significant on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to test the association between prevalence of levator avulsion and time of forceps delivery while controlling for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 2026 patients were seen during the study period. Among them 511 (25.2%) had a history of forceps delivery. Fourteen volume datasets were incomplete or missing, leaving 497 complete datasets for analysis. Mean age at presentation was 58 ± 12 years (23-91). Mean body mass index was 29 ± 6 kg/m2. Mean age at first delivery was 25 ± 5 years. Mean birth weight of the first vaginal birth was 3454 ± 557 g. 457 women (92%) had had one forceps delivery, 31 had two forceps deliveries (6%) and 9 had three forceps deliveries (2%). Mean time interval between forceps delivery and assessment was 32 ± 13 years (0.3-64.8). 229 women (46%) were diagnosed with levator avulsion. The prevalence of avulsion after forceps increased significantly from 34% to 56% between 1950 and 2017 (P = 0.04). However this difference became insignificant when controlling for maternal age at 1st vaginal delivery and birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of a changed prevalence of levator avulsion at forceps delivery over the last 67 years.

Location of obstetric anal sphincter injury scars on translabial tomographic ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a common preventable cause of anal incontinence. Both diagnosis and primary repair of OASI are often suboptimal, partly owing to the absence of effective clinical audit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the location of scars or defects of the external anal sphincter (EAS), diagnosed by translabial ultrasound (TLUS), following primary OASI repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 309 women who were seen at a tertiary obstetric unit after primary repair of OASI between June 2012 and May 2019. All women underwent a standardized interview, including St Mark's incontinence score, followed by clinical examination and TLUS assessment within 2-9 months after OASI repair. Postprocessing of TLUS volume datasets was performed by an investigator who was blinded to all other information. Tomographic ultrasound imaging was used to evaluate the presence of a scar or defect in the proximal and distal parts of the EAS. Women were classified into four groups according to the imaging findings: (1) no visible defect or distortion (likely false positive); (2) only proximal OASI; (3) only distal OASI; and (4) both proximal and distal OASI. RESULTS: Of the 309 women seen during the study period, 34 were excluded because they were referred for reasons other than recent (< 1 year) OASI, 16 owing to missing data and four owing to poor image quality, leaving 255 patients for analysis. Women were seen on average 0.25 ± 0.1 years after the index birth, and their mean age at delivery was 29.1 ± 4.6 years. Anal incontinence was reported by 97 (38.0%) women. A scar or defect was seen only in the proximal part of the EAS in 64 (25.1%) women and only in the distal part in 19 (7.5%) (P < 0.001). In 165 (64.7%) women, the damage affected both the proximal and distal EAS. CONCLUSIONS: EAS scars after primary OASI repair commonly affect the entire length of the EAS; however, partial tears seem to be more likely to occur proximally. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Posterior compartment prolapse is commonly due to a 'true' rectocele, i.e., a diverticulum of the rectal ampulla. This condition is associated with symptoms of obstructed defecation and may contribute to prolapse symptoms. We tested the hypothesis: 'A true rectocele is an independent predictor of symptoms of prolapse.' METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to a urogynecology unit for symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction between September 2011 and June 2016. Assessment included a structured interview, POP-Q examination and 4D TLUS. Ultrasound volume data were acquired on Valsalva. Offline measurements were performed by analysis of stored volume data sets at a later date, blinded to all clinical data. RESULTS: One hundred six patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Of the remainder, Bp was the most distal point on POP-Q in 348. Statistical analysis was performed on this cohort. Mean age was 60 (33-86) years and mean BMI 31 (18-55) kg/m². One hundred fifty-three patients (44%) presented with symptoms of prolapse; 272 were diagnosed with a true rectocele on TLUS. Bp on POP-Q and true rectocele on TLUS were both significantly associated with prolapse symptoms; however, on multivariate analysis the latter became nonsignificant (p = 0.059). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis confirmed that the presence of a true rectocele on TLUS did not contribute significantly to symptoms of prolapse (AUC 0.66 for model with rectocele, AUC 0.65 without). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a true rectocele on TLUS does not seem to contribute substantially to the manifestation of clinical symptoms of prolapse.

Is pelvic floor muscle contractility an important factor in anal incontinence?

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic floor muscle contractility (PFMC) may contribute to anal continence. The aim of this study was to assess the association between clinical and sonographic measures of PFMC and anal incontinence (AI) symptoms, after controlling for anal sphincter and levator ani muscle (LAM) trauma. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1383 women assessed at a tertiary center between 2013 and 2016. All patients underwent an interview, including the St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS) in those who reported AI symptoms, a clinical examination, including assessment of PFMC using the modified Oxford scale (MOS), and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (TLUS). Sonographic measures of PFMC, i.e. cranioventral shift of the bladder neck (BN) and reduction of anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the levator hiatus, were measured offline using ultrasound volumes obtained at rest and on maximum pelvic floor contraction. The reviewer was blinded to all clinical data. RESULTS: Of the 1383 patients assessed during the study period, seven were excluded due to missing imaging data, leaving 1376 for analysis. Mean age of the participating women was 55 years and mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2 . AI was reported by 221 (16.1%) women, with a mean SMIS of 11.8. Mean MOS grade was 2.3. On TLUS, mean BN cranioventral shift was 5.9 mm and mean AP diameter reduction was 8.1 mm. LAM avulsion and significant external anal sphincter (EAS) defect were diagnosed in 24.8% and 8.7% patients, respectively. On univariate analysis, sonographic measures of PFMC were not associated with AI. Lower MOS grade was associated with symptoms of AI; however, statistical significance was lost on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Clinical and sonographic measures of PFMC were not significantly associated with AI symptoms after controlling for EAS and LAM trauma. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Ultrasound imaging of slings and meshes in urogynecology.

Imaging is used increasingly in urogynecology. One of the main applications is in the assessment of synthetic implants. Ultrasound is particularly useful for this purpose as most such implants appear highly echogenic on ultrasound but are not visible using other imaging techniques. The worldwide success of synthetic mid-urethral slings, introduced in the late 90s, led to the subsequent introduction of transvaginal mesh in 2003-2004. Widespread use of synthetic implants for both urinary incontinence and prolapse has caused a rise in implant-related complications and increasing negative publicity and litigation, with many products removed from the market. It is not surprising that there is increasing demand for the assessment and evaluation of sling and mesh implants using imaging. This review article discusses the role of translabial/transperineal ultrasound in the evaluation of synthetic implants used in the treatment of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. The discussion focuses on those applications of the technique that are useful for surgeons dealing with patients after mesh and/or sling placement. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Is location of urethral kinking a confounder of association between urethral closure pressure and stress urinary incontinence?

OBJECTIVES: Intact urethral support and normal sphincter function are deemed important for urinary continence. We aimed to test whether the location of urethral kinking (as the probable anatomical correlate of maximal pressure transmission) is associated with stress urinary incontinence and/or urodynamic stress incontinence. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of women seen at a tertiary urogynecological center in 2017. Patients had undergone an interview, multichannel urodynamic testing and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound examination. Those with a history of anti-incontinence surgery, absence of urethral kinking on ultrasound and/or missing or inadequate ultrasound volume data were excluded. Volume data were used to assess urethral mobility using a semi-automated Excel® urethral motion profile program. Mobility vectors were calculated using the formula √((x valsalva - x rest )2 + (y valsalva - y rest )2 ), where x and y are the coordinates of six equidistant points along the length of the urethra from the bladder neck to the external urethral meatus. The location of urethral kinking was identified as a concave contour of the urethra on the vaginal side in the midsagittal plane on maximum Valsalva maneuver. The distance between the center of the kink and the bladder neck was measured and expressed as a centile in relation to the total length of the urethra, using the formula: (distance from bladder neck/total length of urethra) × 100. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test the associations of stress urinary incontinence and urodynamic stress incontinence with age, maximum urethral pressure, urethral mobility vectors and location of urethral kinking. RESULTS: Of 450 women seen during the study period, 61 were excluded owing to previous incontinence surgery and 82 owing to absence of urethral kinking, inadequate volume data or missing data, leaving 307 women included, of whom 227 (74%) complained of stress urinary incontinence and 211 (69%) complained of urgency urinary incontinence. 190 (62%) of the women were diagnosed with urodynamic stress incontinence. On multivariate analysis, maximum urethral pressure (36 vs 50 cmH2 O; P < 0.001), mid-urethral mobility (2.27 vs 2.03 cm; P = 0.003) and location of urethral kinking (63.1st vs 59.7th centile; P = 0.002) were associated significantly with urodynamic stress incontinence. The location of urethral kinking was associated with stress urinary incontinence on univariate analysis (P = 0.026) but not on multivariate analysis (P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: The location of urethral kinking is associated with urodynamic stress incontinence. The further urethral kinking is from the mid urethra, the more likely is urodynamic stress incontinence. This provides circumstantial evidence for the pressure-transmission theory of stress urinary continence. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Levator avulsion and vaginal parity: do subsequent vaginal births matter?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Tears of the levator ani muscle are common after vaginal birth and associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Although such trauma is usually attributed to the first vaginal birth, epidemiological evidence suggests an additional effect of subsequent vaginal deliveries. Our hypothesis was: "The prevalence of avulsion increases with the number of vaginal births". METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who presented to a tertiary urogynaecology clinic. Assessment included a physician-directed interview, POP-Q and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS), supine, after voiding, at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC) and Valsalva. Offline analysis of levator integrity was undertaken by tomographic imaging (TUI) at a later date, blinded against all other data. RESULTS: A total of 1,124 patients had been seen between 1 January 2014 and 30 June 2016, on average 33 (0.32-69.7) years after their first birth. Mean age was 56 (19-90) years. 1,012 (90%) were vaginally parous with a median vaginal parity of 2 (1-8). On TUI, avulsion was diagnosed in 257 (23%) women, all of whom were vaginally parous. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion on comparing vaginally primiparous and multiparous women (P = 0.6), nor was there any difference between vaginal parity groups (one, two, three, and ≥4 births; p = 0.7). This remained true after controlling for potential confounding factors using multivariate regression (p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the prevalence of avulsion between vaginally primiparous and multiparous women. Vaginal deliveries after a first vaginal birth are unlikely to cause avulsion.

How comparable is clinical grading of obstetric anal sphincter injury with that determined by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the agreement between grading of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) on translabial ultrasound (TLUS), using a newly developed algorithm, and grading on postpartum examination. A secondary aim was to assess the correlation between tear severity, as defined on ultrasound, and symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients seen at a perineal clinic between 2012 and 2018, after recent primary repair of OASI. All patients underwent a standardized interview including the St Mark's anal incontinence test and four-dimensional TLUS. Post-processing of ultrasound volume data was performed blinded to all other data. Using tomographic ultrasound imaging, a set of eight slices was obtained, and the central six slices were evaluated for sphincter abnormalities. Slices with distortion, thinning or defects were rated as abnormal. The following algorithm was used to grade OASI: a Grade-3a tear was diagnosed if the external anal sphincter (EAS) was abnormal in < 4/6 slices; a Grade-3b tear was diagnosed if the EAS was abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices; and a Grade-3c/4 tear was diagnosed if both the EAS and internal anal sphincter were abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices. Clinical grading of OASI was determined according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines. Agreement between clinical and TLUS diagnosis of OASI was evaluated using weighted κ. RESULTS: Of the 260 women seen during the study period, 45 (17%) were excluded owing to missing data or a repeat OASI, leaving 215 complete datasets for analysis. The average follow-up interval was 2.4 months (range, 1-11 months) after OASI and the mean age of the women was 29 years (range, 17-42 years). One hundred and seventy-five (81%) women were vaginally primiparous. OASI was graded clinically as Grade 3a in 87 women, Grade 3b in 80, Grade 3c in 29 and Grade 4 in 19. On imaging, full agreement between clinical and TLUS grading was noted in 107 (50%) women, with a weighted κ of 0.398. In 96 (45%) women, there was disagreement by one category, with a weighted κ of 0.74 and in 12 (6%) there was disagreement by two categories. Twenty-four (11%) women were found to have a normal anal sphincter on imaging. Overall, potential clinical over-diagnosis was noted in 72 (33%) women and potential under-diagnosis in 36 (17%). The seniority of the diagnosing obstetrician did not significantly alter agreement between clinical and sonographic OASI grading (κ 0.44, 0.43, and 0.34, for specialists and senior and junior residents, respectively). The association between symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency and TLUS grading did not reach significance (P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and TLUS-based grading of OASI showed fair agreement. Clinical over-diagnosis may be increasingly common in our population, although under-diagnosis may still occur in a significant minority. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Is levator trauma an independent risk factor for anal incontinence?

AIM: To determine the role of levator ani trauma in anal incontinence (AI), whilst controlling for anal sphincter injury. METHODS: The records of 1273 patients who had attended a tertiary urogynaecology unit between 1st of January to 31st December 2016 were reviewed. AI was assessed using St Mark's score and visual analogue scale (VAS). Levator muscle and anal sphincter trauma were examined by translabial ultrasound using tomographic imaging, with archived data sets investigated blinded against all clinical data. A complete avulsion was diagnosed if at least three central tomographic slices showed an abnormal muscle insertion, rated separately for each side. A significant anal sphincter defect was diagnosed if at least four out of six slices showed a defect of ≥ 30°. RESULTS: Avulsion was associated with St Mark's score (P = 0.005) and VAS bother of AI (P = 0.022) both on univariate analysis and when controlling for external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma on translabial imaging, forceps, body mass index (BMI) and age (P = 0.011 and P = 0.04, respectively). AI expressed as a binary variable was significantly associated with avulsion on univariate analysis (P = 0.011), although the association became nonsignificant after controlling for anal sphincter trauma, age, BMI and forceps delivery (P = 0.084). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective observational study, we found a weak association between levator ani avulsion and measures of AI, which largely remained significant when controlling for anal sphincter trauma. However, given the large data set, any clinical effect of levator trauma on AI is likely to be minor.

What is a significant defect of the anal sphincter on translabial ultrasound?

OBJECTIVE: The anal sphincter is commonly evaluated with endoanal ultrasound. Recently, translabial ultrasound imaging has been proposed for sphincter imaging, with moderate to good correlation between the methods. An endosonographic defect is defined as one with a radial extension of > 30° in at least two-thirds of the length of the anal sphincter. This is equivalent to defining significant anal sphincter trauma on translabial tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) as a defect in at least four of six slices, a definition which has been validated. This study was designed to validate a residual defect angle of > 30° for the definition of significant anal sphincter trauma on translabial ultrasound. METHODS: This was a retrospective study involving 399 women attending a tertiary urogynecology unit in 2014. All underwent a standardized interview, including determination of St Mark's fecal incontinence score (SMIS), clinical examination and 3D/4D translabial ultrasound examination with the woman at rest and on pelvic floor muscle contraction (PFMC). External (EAS) and internal (IAS) anal sphincter defect angles were measured in individual TUI slices and associations with anal incontinence symptoms, bother score and SMIS were analyzed. RESULTS: There were weak but significant correlations of anal incontinence symptoms, bother score and SMIS with EAS and IAS defect angle, measured on images acquired with the woman at rest and on PFMC. The predictive value of single-slice defect angle on TUI was low, and areas under the receiver-operating-characteristics curves were too low to determine a distinct cut-off value for defect angle. CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter residual defects on single translabial TUI slices are weakly associated with measures of anal incontinence. Single-slice defect angle is too poor a predictor to allow validation of the 30° defect angle cut-off used in endoanal ultrasound. Larger studies in populations with a higher prevalence of anal incontinence are needed before we can disregard anal sphincter defects smaller than 30° on translabial ultrasound. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.