Sociodemographic factors linked to food allergy diagnosis among high-risk children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a known risk factor for the development of food allergy (FA). Prior work has suggested disparities in diagnosis/management of FA in urban populations. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether socioeconomic conditions, as measured by the area deprivation index and insurance status, or racial/ethnic self-identity was associated with risk of FA diagnosis (DFA), evaluation by an allergist, or objective FA testing among high-risk children with AD. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with physician-diagnosed AD who had received primary care at a single urban academic tertiary care center between 2009 and 2022. Statistical analysis in SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0, Armonk, NY) used χ2, analysis of variance, and logistic regression. RESULTS: In a total of 3365 pediatric subjects, 41.3% identified as non-Hispanic Black, 33.9% Hispanic, 6.9% Asian, and 14.9% non-Hispanic White. Hispanic children with AD and DFA were significantly less likely to be evaluated by an allergist than White or Asian children (65.9% vs 82.8% and 80.3%, P = .001 and P = .02). Non-Hispanic Black children with AD and DFA were more likely to have no objective FA testing than White children (20.9% vs 12.1%, P = .04). The White and Asian children were more likely to undergo the thorough combination of both blood and skin testing for DFA than Black or Hispanic children (15.5% and 22.4% vs 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, P = .007, P = .00005, P = .03, P = .0008). CONCLUSION: Labeling at-risk young children with FA without thorough objective testing can affect their nutrition and quality of life. Barriers to equitable evaluation of DFA should be further investigated and addressed.

Assessing Disparities in the Prevalence of Atopic Comorbidities Among Food-Allergic Children.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that Black children with food allergy (FA) have higher risk of atopic comorbidities than White children. OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to understand if disparities in the prevalence of atopic comorbidities among children with FA are driven by individual and community-level socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: We analyzed data from a prospective, multicenter cohort investigating the natural history of pediatric atopy: the Food Allergy Outcomes Related to White and African American Racial Differences (FORWARD) study. A validated, multicomponent area deprivation index (ADI) percentile score was tabulated by the census block group for each subject's home address. The association of ADI with atopic comorbidities in FA was assessed via multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 700 children in this study, the mean ADI was 37.7 (95% confidence interval: 35.6-39.7). The mean ADI was higher in children with asthma (43.3) compared with those without asthma (31.8), which remained significant after adjusting for race (P < .0001). Children with allergic rhinitis (AR) had a higher mean ADI (39.1) compared with those without (33.4) (P = .008). ADI was associated with secondhand smoking, parents' education, and household income. Black children had a higher risk for asthma after adjusting for ADI and SES-related factors. CONCLUSION: The independent association of ADI with asthma and AR, regardless of race, suggests a role of neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation in the development of these conditions among children with FA. Black children with FA remained at higher risk for asthma after adjusting for SES-related variables, which can indicate an independent risk for asthma in these children.

Elderly Medication Adherence Intervention Using the My Interventional Drug-Eluting Stent Educational App: Multisite Randomized Feasibility Trial.

BACKGROUND: A lifesaving treatment for myocardial infarction is the placement of a stent in a closed or obstructed coronary artery. The largest modifiable risk factor after receiving a stent is medication adherence to Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy, a combination of P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the acceptability of a protocol and an intervention using the My Interventional Drug-Eluting Stent Educational App (MyIDEA) and to evaluate medication adherence using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and platelet activation tests in a multisite randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Potential participants who received a post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure with a drug-eluting stent were approached. All patients older than 50 years and who spoke English were recruited. Participants were recruited, baseline demographics were collected, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form, Burden-Benefit questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and PCI knowledge questionnaire were administered. Block randomization was used to randomize participants to either usual care or MyIDEA supplementation. MyIDEA is a personalized educational intervention based on the Kolb experiential learning theory using patient narratives for education. During the visits, participants' blood was collected to measure platelet suppression from medication. During the second and third encounters, the Morisky medication adherence score and cardiology outcomes were measured. The study was conducted at the University of Illinois Hospital and John H Stroger Jr Cook County Hospital with appropriate ethical approvals. Platelet suppression was measured through aspirin reactive units and P2Y12 reactive units. Medication adherence was measured using the PDC. The analysis team was blinded to the participants' group membership. The primary outcome was a feasibility analysis of recruitment and retention. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 60.4 years (SD 7.1); the majority of patients were black and non-Hispanic. The majority of patients' reading levels were seventh grade or above, and they were not very familiar with other electronic devices for information and communication. The number of control subjects was 21, and the number of participants in the interventional arm was 24. The interventional group was able to use MyIDEA in both the hospital and outpatient setting. However, there was no significant difference in platelet suppression or medication adherence between groups. There were also differences between the groups in terms of depression and anxiety, initially, as measured by HADS. No documented adverse event associated with the intervention was found. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients are willing to use tablet devices to be educated about health conditions. Additional studies are required to measure the effectiveness and determine the most suitable timing and location for patient education. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04439864; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04439864.

Patient-Centered Tablet Application for Improving Medication Adherence after a Drug-Eluting Stent.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study's objective was to evaluate a patient-centered educational electronic tablet application, "My Interventional Drug-Eluting Stent Educational App" (MyIDEA) to see if there was an increase in patient knowledge about dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and medication possession ratio (MPR) compared to treatment as usual. METHODS: In a pilot project, 24 elderly (≥50 years old) research participants were recruited after a drug-eluting stent. Eleven were randomized to the control arm and 13 to the interventional arm. All the participants completed psychological and knowledge questionnaires. Adherence was assessed through MPR, which was calculated at 3 months for all participants who were scheduled for second and third follow-up visits. RESULTS: Relative to control, the interventional group had a 10% average increase in MPR. As compared to the interventional group, more patients in the control group had poor adherence (<80% MPR). The psychological data revealed a single imbalance in anxiety between the control and interventional groups. On average, interventional participants spent 21 min using MyIDEA. DISCUSSION: Consumer health informatics has enabled us to engage patients with their health data using novel methods. Consumer health technology needs to focus more on patient knowledge and engagement to improve long-term health. MyIDEA takes a unique approach in targeting DAPT from the onset. CONCLUSION: MyIDEA leverages patient-centered information with clinical care and the electronic health record highlighting the patients' role as a team member in their own health care. The patients think critically about adverse events and how to solve issues before leaving the hospital.