Anticoagulant activity and pleiotropic effects of heparin.

The recognized therapeutic effect of heparins is an anticoagulant activity (anti-Xa and anti-IIa) acting in an indirect manner (cofactor of antithrombin) but which is carried by only 20% at best of the glycan chains composing any commercial preparation of heparin, whether unfractionated or low molecular weight. However, the effects of glycan chains that participate in the therapeutic but also potentially adverse effects of heparin preparations must also be considered. These specific effects of glycans are potentially different for each commercial preparation of heparins and, in particular, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and LMWH between them. The glycanic nature of heparin is responsible for its very particular pharmacology: exchange with the glycocalyx of cells in particular endothelial. Exchanges which depend on the length and structure of the glycan chains therefore different between UFH and LMWH between the different heparin preparations between them but also according to the state of glycocalyx differently altered according to the underlying diseases and their degree of evolution. If the anticoagulant effects of heparins can potentially be replaced with those of new oral anticoagulants, the glycan effects of heparins cannot be replaced by synthetic non-glycan molecules. This replacement will undoubtedly limit certain risks such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) but other beneficial effects participating to the overall efficacy of heparin (whose relative importance remains to be ascertained), will also disappear: effects on surfaces, anti-inflammatory effects, antineoplastic and anti-metastatic effects, ancillary anticoagulant effects (not dependent on antithrombin), effect on endothelial dysfunction. This review will be focused on all of these related/pleiotropic effects of heparins that are in fact the effects of the glycan nature of heparin. Among the antithrombotic effects not dependent on antithrombin one has been more recently highlighted: the passivation/neutralization of the positively charged fibrils of Netosis, by the negatively charged glycan chains of heparin. This also has clinical implications: in the era of generics and biosimilars where biosimilar heparins begin to appear, it is important to know that accordingly to FDA and EMEA rules: their biosimilarity is judged only on the "classical" anticoagulation effect cofactor of antithrombin (anti-IIa/anti-Xa) but that all glycan effects that are potentially beneficial or potentially deleterious are not taken into consideration in their assessment.

Determinants of aspirin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Numerous patients with T2DM show resistance to aspirin treatment, which may explain the higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events observed compared with non-diabetes patients, and it has recently been shown that aspirin resistance is mainly related to accelerated platelet turnover with persistent high platelet reactivity (HPR) 24h after last aspirin intake. The mechanism behind HPR is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the precise rate and mechanisms associated with HPR in a population of T2DM patients treated with aspirin. METHODS: Included were 116 consecutive stable T2DM patients who had attended our hospital for their yearly check-up. HPR was assessed 24h after aspirin intake using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with arachidonic acid (AA) and serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2) measurement. Its relationship with diabetes status, insulin resistance, inflammatory markers and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, using calcium scores, were investigated. RESULTS: Using LTA, HPR was found in 27 (23%) patients. There was no significant difference in mean age, gender ratio or cardiovascular risk factors in patients with or without HPR. HPR was significantly related to duration of diabetes and higher fasting glucose levels (but not consistently with HbA1c), and strongly related to all markers of insulin resistance, especially waist circumference, HOMA-IR, QUICKI and leptin. There was no association between HPR and thrombopoietin or inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-10, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity, TNF-α, C-reactive protein), whereas HPR was associated with more severe CAD. Similar results were found with TXB2. CONCLUSION: Our results reveal that 'aspirin resistance' is frequently found in T2DM, and is strongly related to insulin resistance and severity of CAD, but weakly related to HbA1c and not at all to inflammatory parameters. This may help to identify those T2DM patients who might benefit from alternative antiplatelet treatments such as twice-daily aspirin and thienopyridines.

[ST elevation myocardial infarction in young adults: Is there an interest for thrombophilia screening?] / Syndrome coronarien aigu avec sus-décalage du segment ST chez les jeunes adultes : le bilan de thrombophilie a-t-il un intérêt ?

BACKGROUND: Coronary lesions characteristics as well as patient thrombogenicity can explain coronary events manifestation. In young patient, local conditions are usually less important and thrombogenicity could play a significant role. Assessing thrombophilia could be justified in young patients and may induce an adapted therapeutic management. PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the prevalence of thrombophilia and therapeutic modification in young adults aged≤55 years admitted in our department for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: From January 2013 to January 2017, data on all patients aged≤55 years with STEMI admitted in emergency were retrospectively retrieved from our database. Thrombophilia investigation was made regarding clinical (with or without cardiovascular risk factors [CVRF]), biological and/or angiographic evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients aged≤55 years with STEMI were included. Cardiac arrest occurred in 15 patients (11%). One or less CVRF were found in 47 patients (35%). Smoking was reported in 93 patients (70%) and drug addiction (cannabis, cocaine) in 19 patients (14%). A subset of 51 patients (38%) were screened for thrombophilia. Patients with thrombophilia assessment were younger, less active smokers and presented less CVRF than patients without investigation (P<0.001). Single vessel diseased was found in 88 patients (66%). No differences regarding coronary procedural characteristic were found between the two groups. The most frequently encountered aetiology, found in 122 patients (92%), was de novo intra-arterial thrombosis related to atherosclerosis. In patients with thrombophilia assessment (n=51), one or more abnormal biological results was found in 22 patients (43%) and a therapeutic adjustment was made in 6 patients (12%). CONCLUSION: Thrombophilia screening in young STEMI adults showed an abnormality in 43% of cases. Antithrombotic treatment can be modified after its demonstration.

Prognostic value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with severe cardiotoxic drug poisoning.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Cardiotoxic drug poisoning can lead to severe cardiac shock (CS) and death. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a well-established diagnostic and prognostic marker in heart failure but has never been assessed in patients with cardiotoxic drug poisoning. The aim of the study was to determine whether BNP could be useful for early stratification of patients admitted to intensive care unit. METHODS: 30 consecutive patients experiencing shock and cardiotoxic drug exposure were enrolled in a prospective monocentric study and underwent at least two BNP measurements within the first 24 h after admission. RESULTS: While BNP values on admission were poorly informative, subsequent BNP measurements (11 ± 6 h after admission) were significantly increased in patients with CS compared to those with non-CS (756; [364-1130] versus 24; [15-65] pg/ml respectively; P = 0.008). This second BNP level was also significantly increased in non-survivor patients compared to survivor patients (784; [654-1028] versus 29; [15-104] pg/ml respectively; P = 0.05): BNP levels above 360 pg/ml predicted in-hospital mortality (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 92%). In a multivariate analysis, BNP, SAPS II score and lactate blood level were associated with death. CONCLUSIONS: Serial BNP measurements after admission for cardiotoxic drug poisoning are useful to identify patients at the highest risk of CS as well as in-hospital death.