Three-generation reproductive toxicity study of dietary bisphenol A in CD Sprague-Dawley rats.

Bisphenol A (BPA) was evaluated at concentrations of 0, 0.015, 0.3, 4.5, 75, 750, and 7500 ppm ( approximately 0.001, 0.02, 0.3, 5, 50, and 500 mg/kg/day of BPA) administered in the diet ad libitum to 30 CD((R)) Sprague-Dawley rats/sex/dose for 3 offspring generations, 1 litter/generation, through F3 adults. Adult systemic toxicity at 750 and 7500 ppm in all generations included: reduced body weights and body weight gains, reduced absolute and increased relative weanling and adult organ weights (liver, kidneys, adrenals, spleen, pituitary, and brain), and female slight/mild renal and hepatic pathology at 7500 ppm. Reproductive organ histopathology and function were unaffected. Ovarian weights as well as total pups and live pups/litter on postnatal day (PND) 0 were decreased at 7500 ppm, which exceeded the adult maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Mating, fertility, gestational indices; ovarian primordial follicle counts; estrous cyclicity; precoital interval; gestational length; offspring sex ratios; postnatal survival; nipple/areolae retention in preweanling males; epididymal sperm number, motility, morphology; daily sperm production (DSP), and efficiency of DSP were all unaffected. At 7500 ppm, vaginal patency (VP) and preputial separation (PPS) were delayed in F1, F2, and F3 offspring, associated with reduced body weights. Anogenital distance (AGD) on PND 0 was unaffected for F2 and F3 males and F3 females (F2 female AGD was increased at some doses, not at 7500 ppm, and was considered not biologically or toxicologically relevant). Adult systemic no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) = 75 ppm (5 mg/kg/day); reproductive and postnatal NOAELs = 750 ppm (50 mg/kg/day). There were no treatment-related effects in the low-dose region (0.001-5 mg/kg/day) on any parameters and no evidence of nonmonotonic dose-response curves across generations for either sex. BPA should not be considered a selective reproductive toxicant, based on the results of this study.

Two-generation reproduction study and immunotoxicity screen in rats dosed with phenol via the drinking water.

This study evaluated the potential reproductive toxicity of phenol in a rat two-generation reproduction study, which included additional study endpoints, such as sperm count and motility, developmental landmarks, histological evaluation of suspect target organs (liver, kidneys, spleen, and thymus), weanling reproductive organ weights, and an immunotoxicity screening plaque assay. Phenol was administered to 30 Sprague-Dawley rats/sex/group in the drinking water at concentrations of 0, 200, 1000, or 5000 ppm. Parental (P1) animals were treated for 10 weeks prior to mating, during mating, gestation, lactation, and until sacrifice. The F1 generation (P1 offspring) was treated using a similar regimen, while the F2 generation was not treated. After mating, 10 P1 males/group were evaluated using standard clinical pathology parameters and an immunotoxicity screening plaque assay. Significant reductions in water and food consumption were observed in the 5000-ppm group in both generations; corollary reductions in body weight/body weight gain were also observed. Mating performance and fertility in both generations were similar to controls, and no adverse effects on vaginal cytology or male reproductive function were observed. Vaginal opening and preputial separation were delayed in the 5000-ppm group, and were considered to be secondary to the reduction in F1 body weight. Litter survival of both generations was reduced in the 5000-ppm group. Absolute uterus and prostate weights were decreased in the F1 generation at all dose levels; however, no underlying pathology was observed and there was no functional deficit in reproductive performance. Therefore, these findings were not considered to be adverse. No evidence of immunotoxicity was noted in the 5000-ppm group. The effects noted at the high concentration were presumed to be associated with flavor aversion to phenol in the drinking water. Based on a comprehensive examination of all parameters, the no-observable-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for reproductive toxicity of phenol administered in drinking water to rats is 1000 ppm. The corresponding daily intake of phenol for an adult rat at the NOAEL of 1000 ppm is equivalent to about 70 mg/kg/day for males and 93 mg/kg/day for females.

Two-week (ten-day) inhalation toxicity and two-week recovery study of phenol vapor in the rat.

The toxicity of phenol vapor was evaluated in male and female Fischer 344 rats (20/sex/group) via flow-past nose-only inhalation exposure. The test animals were exposed to target concentrations of 0 (air control), 0.5, 5.0, or 25 parts per million (ppm) of phenol in air for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 2 weeks. High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurement of phenol test atmospheres determined mean (+/- standard deviation) analytical concentrations of 0.0 +/- 0.0, 0.52 +/- 0.078, 4.9 +/- 0.57, and 25 +/- 2.2 ppm, respectively. After 2 weeks of exposure, 10 test animals/sex/group were sampled for clinical chemistry and hematology parameters, and then sacrificed. Histopathological examination included the nasopharyngeal tissues, larynx, trachea, lungs with mainstem bronchi, kidney, liver, and spleen. The remaining 10 animals/sex/group were retained for a 2-week recovery period. Recovery groups of animals were evaluated as described previously and then sacrificed. No signs of toxicity in clinical observations (including overt neurological signs), body weights, food consumption, clinical pathology, organ weights, macroscopic pathology or microscopic pathology were seen during the exposures or at either sacrifice interval. In conclusion, 2-week inhalation exposures to phenol vapor at concentrations up to and including 25 ppm did not produce any adverse effects.

Normal reproductive organ development in Wistar rats exposed to bisphenol A in the drinking water.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical used primarily as a monomer in the manufacture of numerous chemical products, such as epoxy resins and polycarbonate. The objective of this study was to evaluate potential effects of BPA on sexual development of male rats and was designed to clarify low-dose observations reported as preliminary results by Sharpe et al. (1996). The protocol for the present study followed the same treatment schedule as reported by Sharpe et al. (1995, 1996), but included more treatment groups, a greater number of animals per group, and a more comprehensive number of reproductive endpoints. Groups of 28 female Han-Wistar albino rats were exposed to drinking water that contained 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, or 10 ppm BPA or 0.1 ppm diethylstilbestrol (DES), 7 days per week, for a total of 10 weeks. Treatment of the females began at 10 weeks of age and continued throughout a 2-week premating period, 2 weeks of mating (to untreated males), 21-22 days of gestation, and 22 days of lactation. Offspring weanling males were given untreated drinking water and maintained until 90 days of age when evaluations were made of various reproductive organs. Consistent with Sharpe et al. (1996) the female offspring were not evaluated. No treatment-related effects on growth or reproductive endpoints were observed in adult females exposed to any concentration of BPA. Similarly, no treatment-related effects were observed on the growth, survival, or reproductive parameters (including testes, prostate and preputial gland weights, sperm count, daily sperm production, or testes histopathology) of male offspring from dams exposed to BPA during gestation and lactation. DES administered in the drinking water at 0. 1 ppm resulted in decreased body weight, body weight change, and food consumption in adult females. In addition, an increase in the duration of gestation and a decrease in the number of pups delivered and number of live pups were also observed in animals exposed to DES. In conclusion, these results do not confirm the previous findings of Sharpe et al. (1996) and show that low doses of BPA had no effects on male sexual development in the rat.

Normal reproductive organ development in CF-1 mice following prenatal exposure to bisphenol A.

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a monomer used in the manufacture of a multitude of chemical products, including epoxy resins and polycarbonate. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of BPA on male sexual development. This study, performed in CF-1 mice, was limited to the measurement of sex-organ weights, daily sperm production (DSP), epididymal sperm count, and testis histopathology in the offspring of female mice exposed to low doses of BPA (0, 0.2, 2, 20, or 200 microg/kg/day), by deposition in the mouth on gestation days 11-17. Male sexual development determinations were made in offspring at 90 days-of-age. Since this study was conducted to investigate and clarify low-dose effects reported by S. C. Nagel et al., 1997, Environ. Health Perspect. 105, 70-76, and F. S. vom Saal et al., 1998, Toxicol. Indust. Health 14, 239-260, our study protocol purposely duplicated the referenced studies for all factors indicated as critical by those investigators. An additional group was dosed orally with 0.2 microg/kg/day of diethylstilbestrol (DES), which was selected based on the maternal dose reported to have maximum effect on the prostate of developing offspring, by F. S. vom Saal (1996, personal communication), vom Saal et al. (1997, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 94, 2056-2061). Tocopherol-stripped corn oil was used as the vehicle for BPA and DES, and was administered alone to control animals. No treatment-related effects on clinical observations, body weight, or food consumption were observed in adult females administered any dose of BPA or DES. Similarly, no treatment-related effects on growth or survival of offspring from dams treated with BPA or DES were observed. The total number of pups born per litter was slightly lower in the 200-microg/kg/day BPA group when compared to controls, but this change was not considered treatment-related since the litter size was within the normal range of historical controls. There were no treatment-related effects of BPA or DES on testes histopathology, daily sperm production, or sperm count, or on prostate, preputial gland, seminal vesicle, or epididymis weights at doses previously reported to affect these organs or at doses an order of magnitude higher or lower. In conclusion, under the conditions of this study, the effects of low doses of BPA reported by S. C. Nagel et al., 1997 (see above) and F. S. vom Saal et al., 1998 (see above), or of DES reported by F. S. vom Saal et al., 1997 (see above) were not observed. The absence of adverse findings in the offspring of dams treated orally with DES challenges the "low-dose hypothesis" of a special susceptibility of mammals exposed perinatally to ultra-low doses of even potent estrogenic chemicals. Based on the data in the present study and the considerable body of literature on effects of BPA at similar and much higher doses, BPA should not be considered as a selective reproductive or developmental toxicant.