The association between a low 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test value and neonatal morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between a low 50-gram, 1-hour glucose challenge test (GCT) value and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients receiving care at a single center tertiary care academic hospital. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with a documented result of a 50-gram, 1-hour GCT performed ≥24 weeks 0 days gestation at a single tertiary care academic hospital from 2013-2021. Patients with a low GCT value, defined as cohort specific ≤10th percentile (<82 mg/dL), were compared to patients with a GCT value ≥82 mg/dL who were not diagnosed with gestational diabetes (GDM) to examine adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Additionally, these comparisons were repeated across patients with low GCT (<82 mg/dL), those with a GCT ≥82 mg/dL without diagnosis of GDM (heretofore referred to as normal glycemic screening) and patients diagnosed with GDM. Our primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity variable, inclusive of stillbirth, neonatal death, neonatal hypoglycemia with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia with NICU admission, respiratory distress with NICU admission, and/or small for gestational age (SGA). Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to examine the association of low GCT value and the composite neonatal morbidity outcome, compared to those with the normal glycemic screening. RESULTS: Of 36,342 eligible patients, 3,789 (10.4%) had a low GCT value of <82 mg/dL, 30,729 (84.6%) had a GCT value ≥82 mg/dL and were not diagnosed with GDM, and 1,824 (5.0%) had a diagnosis of GDM. Patients with a low GCT value were significantly less likely to be diagnosed with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) (12.4% vs 16.3%, p < .01), undergo cesarean delivery (22.8% vs 29.9%, p < .01), or experience postpartum hemorrhage (7.8% vs 9.4%, p < .01) as compared to patients with normal glycemic screening. Compared to newborns whose mothers had normal glycemic screening, newborns of mothers with a low GCT value were significantly more likely to experience the composite morbidity outcome (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.27); this persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (aOR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.29). CONCLUSION: A low maternal GCT value after 24 weeks gestation is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity in the newborn, driven by higher rates of SGA. Patients with a low GCT value may have underlying maternal hypoglycemia or other glycemic dysregulation affecting fetal development and may benefit from enhanced antenatal surveillance.

Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome among high-risk early-term and full-term deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) differ between early-term and full-term births. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of a large NIH-funded retrospective cohort study including patients who delivered at a tertiary-care obstetric hospital between January 2002 and March 2013 with comorbid diabetes, hypertensive disorders, and/or fetal growth restriction (FGR). Pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia and multifetal gestations were excluded. Maternal characteristics, delivery information, and neonatal information were abstracted by trained clinicians blinded to the comorbidity leading to study inclusion. In this secondary analysis of the infant health outcomes of pregnancies with one or more of the qualifying conditions, risk factors for RDS among neonates born early term (37w0d-38w6d gestation) were compared to risk factors for RDS among full-term neonates (39w0d-40w6d). RESULTS: Among 10,532 singleton newborns, there were 99 cases of early-term RDS (0.94%) and 95 cases of full-term RDS (0.90%). Maternal demographics were similar between those with and without RDS in both groups. Among early-term infants, lower gestational age, presence of meconium, non-spontaneous labor, and cesarean delivery were positively associated with RDS, whereas hypertensive disorders, diabetes, FGR, and many other comorbid delivery conditions were not. The strongest risk factor for RDS among early-term infants was delivery via cesarean (RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.31, 3.01). Among full-term neonates, cesarean delivery was also positively associated with RDS, although presence of meconium, chorioamnionitis, and endometritis were all stronger risk factors with RRs >2.0. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of high-risk term deliveries, maternal demographics and comorbidities were found not to be associated with increased risk for RDS, but novel risk factors for RDS after 37 weeks' gestation - chorioamnionitis and endometritis - were identified. A focus on preventing infectious comorbidities may help reduce incidence of RDS at full-term.Key PointsRDS risk factors vary by gestational age.Novel risk factors for RDS at full-term identified.Intrauterine inflammation associated with RDS at term.

Obstetrics and gynecology resident perception of virtual fellowship interviews.

BACKGROUND: Travel restrictions amidst the COVID-19 pandemic reshaped interviewing for fellowships into a predominantly virtual process. How this impacts Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) resident approaches to fellowship application and Match navigation is largely unknown. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey study of fourth year OB/GYN residents in the United States who participated in at least one virtual fellowship interview in 2020. We collected information regarding demographics, application strategy, perceived strengths and weaknesses of virtual interviews, and confidence with rank list creation. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical variables and responses pre- and post-Match were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Seventy-five out of an estimated 490 applicants (~ 15% response rate) completed the survey. Of the respondents, 65.3% felt they interviewed at more programs virtually than they would anticipate completing in person, but perceived less confidence in having the necessary information (n = 45, 60%) or understanding the culture of programs (n = 59, 78.7%) to create a rank list. Cost savings were the main benefit of virtual interviews (n = 50, 66.7%), and inability to get a true "feel" for a program was the biggest limitation (n = 43, 57.3%). A majority (46.7%) advocate for a future hybrid interview process. CONCLUSIONS: OB/GYN residents pursuing fellowship reported interviewing at more programs during the virtual season, but had less confidence with rank list creation. Cost savings benefits are weighed against difficulty getting a "feel" for programs virtually. Most would advocate for a future hybrid interview process.

Lactation Consultation by an International Board Certified Lactation Consultant Improves Breastfeeding Rates for Mothers With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

BACKGROUND: In patients with gestational diabetes, breastfeeding decreases the lifetime risk of Type 2 diabetes by half. Lactation consultation has been shown to increase breastfeeding rates in the general population but has not been assessed in a gestational diabetes population. RESEARCH AIMS: To determine if (1) a postpartum International Board Certified Lactation Consultant (IBCLC) consultation during delivery hospitalization improved inclusive (any) or exclusive breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum in participants with GDM; and if (2) obstetrical providers' acknowledgement of maternal feeding preference affected the rates of IBCLC consultation for patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, comparative, secondary analysis of a prospective cohort (N = 517) study of women gestational diabetes. Participants who received a IBCLC consultation (n = 386; 74.5%) were compared to those who did not (n = 131; 25.5%). Baseline demographics, antepartum characteristics, neonatal information, mode of infant feeding at hospital discharge and 3 months postpartum, and IBCLC consultation during postpartum hospitalization were measured. RESULTS: After adjusting for baseline differences, participants who received an IBCLC consultation were more likely to report any breastfeeding at postpartum discharge (aOR 4.87; 95% CI [2.67, 8.86]) and at 3 months postpartum (aOR 5.39; 95% CI [2.61, 11.16]) compared to participants who did not. However, there was no difference in exclusive breastfeeding rates between those who did and did not receive IBCLC consultation. CONCLUSION: Inpatient IBCLC consultation during the immediate postpartum period was associated with improved rates of any breastfeeding in participants with GDM.

Breastfeeding Success Among Women with Gestational Diabetes Managed by Diet Only Compared with Those Requiring Medications.

Objective: Breastfeeding is known to have a positive impact on maternal and neonatal health. Some have suggested that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with lower breastfeeding rates, but it is not known whether rates are further impacted by glucose control in pregnancy. Thus, we examined whether patients with GDM requiring medication (A2 GDM) were more likely to not initiate or discontinue breastfeeding compared with patients with GDM well controlled by diet (A1 GDM). Research Design and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 600 patients with GDM. Eligible patients were enrolled during their delivery hospitalization and followed prospectively postpartum. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding at hospital discharge and secondary outcomes included breastfeeding rates at 3 months postpartum. Patients classified as A2 GDM were compared with those classified as A1 GDM. Results: Of the 600 patients enrolled, 301 had A2 GDM and 299 had A1 GDM. Patients who needed medication were observed to be older and more likely to be parous and obese. There were no significant differences in labor outcomes or neonatal complications. After adjusting for baseline differences between the two groups, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar in mothers with A2 GDM compared with those with A1 GDM at hospital discharge (aOR 0.83 [0.54-1.28]) and 3 months postpartum (aOR 0.58 [0.34-1.01]). Additionally, any breastfeeding rates were similar in mothers with A2 GDM compared with those with A1 GDM, both at hospital discharge (aOR 0.72 [0.44-1.16]) and 3 months postpartum (aOR 0.63 [0.34-1.17]). Conclusions: After adjusting for baseline differences, there was no difference in any or exclusive breastfeeding rates at hospital discharge or 3 months postpartum among patients with A2 GDM compared with those with A1 GDM.