Contrast-Free Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Combined With Fibrin Sealant Filling for Treating Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Technical Note.

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair using iodinated contrast agents risks contrast-induced nephropathy, especially in high-risk patients. This technical note describes a contrast-free endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) protocol using preoperative imaging measurement and fibrin sealant (FS) filling. TECHNIQUE: Preoperative imaging measurement and intraoperative guidewire manipulation facilitated anatomical identification without contrast. After endograft deployment, the aneurysm sac was filled with FS if endoleak was indicated by pressure fluctuations. RESULT: Between 2017 and 2020, 6 high-risk patients underwent contrast-free EVAR with FS filling. Complete exclusion was achieved in all cases. Over follow-up, no endoleaks, deterioration in renal function, or other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Contrast-free EVAR with FS filling shows early feasibility as an alternative technique for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) high-risk patients, while larger studies with long-term monitoring are imperative to validate outcomes. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study showcases a contrast-free EVAR technique with fibrin sealant filling for high-risk CIN patients. It offers a safer approach for those with renal challenges, reducing CIN risk. The technique's feasibility in a small cohort suggests its utility in treating AAA without iodinated contrast, crucial for patients with specific health risks. For clinicians, it introduces a method that decreases nephrotoxic risks, potentially changing practice for vulnerable patients.

A comparative study on the transbrachial and transfemoral approaches for the treatment of superior mesenteric artery lesions.

BACKGROUND: Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) lesions present a significant challenge in endovascular surgery. Both the transbrachial (TBA) and the transfemoral (TFA) approaches have been employed for the treatment of these lesions, but the comparative effectiveness of these methods remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent TBA and TFA at a tertiary center between June 2020 and February 2023. Key parameters including technical success, procedural details, and complication rates were examined. RESULTS: In a study of 99 patients, 66 underwent Transfemoral Approach (TFA) and 33 underwent Transbrachial Approach (TBA). No significant age or gender differences were noted between groups. TFA procedures were longer (90.0 vs 63.5 min, p = 0.002) and had higher fluoroscopy times (59.0 vs 43.0 min, p = 0.02) and selective SMA times (366.0 vs 245.0 min, p = 0.038) compared to TBA, especially with a smaller aortomesenteric angle (<90°). Technical success rates were high in both groups (TFA 97%, TBA 93.9%, p = 0.60). Complication rates were similar between groups, with no significant predictors for access site complications identified. CONCLUSION: Both the TBA and the TFA are effective for the treatment of SMA lesions, with TBA potentially offering advantages in terms of efficiency and patient recovery, particularly in cases with certain anatomy. No significant differences in complication rates were found between the two groups. Further research, including prospective randomized trials, is needed to confirm these findings.