Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Malar J ; 17(1): 355, 2018 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305127

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/METHODS: Insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) are the primary tool for malaria vector control in sub-Saharan Africa, and have been responsible for an estimated two-thirds of the reduction in the global burden of malaria in recent years. While the ultimate goal is high levels of ITN use to confer protection against infected mosquitoes, it is widely accepted that ITN use must be understood in the context of ITN availability. However, despite nearly a decade of universal coverage campaigns, no country has achieved a measured level of 80% of households owning 1 ITN for 2 people in a national survey. Eighty-six public datasets from 33 countries in sub-Saharan Africa (2005-2017) were used to explore the causes of failure to achieve universal coverage at the household level, understand the relationships between the various ITN indicators, and further define their respective programmatic utility. RESULTS: The proportion of households owning 1 ITN for 2 people did not exceed 60% at the national level in any survey, except in Uganda's 2014 Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS). At 80% population ITN access, the expected proportion of households with 1 ITN for 2 people is only 60% (p = 0.003 R2 = 0.92), because individuals in households with some but not enough ITNs are captured as having access, but the household does not qualify as having 1 ITN for 2 people. Among households with 7-9 people, mean population ITN access was 41.0% (95% CI 36.5-45.6), whereas only 6.2% (95% CI 4.0-8.3) of these same households owned at least 1 ITN for 2 people. On average, 60% of the individual protection measured by the population access indicator is obscured when focus is put on the household "universal coverage" indicator. The practice of limiting households to a maximum number of ITNs in mass campaigns severely restricts the ability of large households to obtain enough ITNs for their entire family. CONCLUSIONS: The two household-level indicators-one representing minimal coverage, the other only 'universal' coverage-provide an incomplete and potentially misleading picture of personal protection and the success of an ITN distribution programme. Under current ITN distribution strategies, the global malaria community cannot expect countries to reach 80% of households owning 1 ITN for 2 people at a national level. When programmes assess the success of ITN distribution activities, population access to ITNs should be considered as the better indicator of "universal coverage," because it is based on people as the unit of analysis.


Asunto(s)
Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/estadística & datos numéricos , Mosquiteros Tratados con Insecticida/estadística & datos numéricos , Malaria/prevención & control , Control de Mosquitos/estadística & datos numéricos , África del Sur del Sahara , Animales , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Composición Familiar , Humanos , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Propiedad
2.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 3(2): 137-40, 2009 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19755744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is the primary cause of peptic ulcer disease and an etiologic agent in the development of gastric cancer. A high frequency of H. pylori infection has been reported from resource-poor regions. H. pylori infection is curable with regimens of multiple antimicrobial agents. However, antibiotic resistance is a leading cause of treatment failure. In Africa, there are very little data concerning the susceptibility of H. pylori isolates to antibiotics. METHODOLOGY: H. pylori isolates from gastric biopsies from outpatients > or = 18 years old affected by a gastro-duodenal ulcer were used in this study. Susceptibility testing was performed for amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole by using the Epsilometer test (E-test) method. RESULTS: H. pylori strains were isolated from 40 patients of whom 36 were diagnosed as having duodenal ulcer, two with gastric ulcer, and two with gastro-duodenal ulcer. Thirty-six (90%) of the isolates were resistant to metronidazole (MICs > or = 8 microg/l), whereas all isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin (MICs < or = 0.5 microg/ml) and ciprofloxacin (MICs < or = 1 microg/ml). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that metronidazole should not be used therapeutically among Senegalese patients in first-line therapy, while ciprofloxacin could be recommended in association with amoxicillin and a proton pump inhibitor in Senegal.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Úlcera Duodenal/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Úlcera Gástrica/microbiología , Adulto , Amoxicilina/farmacología , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Metronidazol/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Senegal/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA