RESUMEN
Background: Pituitary abscess (PA), a rare complication following transsphenoidal (TS) surgery for pituitary adenoma with an incidence of 0.2%, poses a significant risk; carrying potential morbidity, recurrence, and the necessity for reoperation. Timely suspicion, diagnosis, and treatment are imperative. Patients and Methods: We present two cases and provide a literature review on the symptoms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes associated with secondary PAs following TS surgery for adenoma. Results: We identified 12 articles reporting a total of 45 cases, in addition to our 2 cases. The primary symptoms were headache and visual impairment, with no fever or specific infectious parameters observed. Predominant risk factors identified included cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and prior radiotherapy (RT). Our first patient, a 45-year-old male, presented 10 weeks after TS surgery with sudden-onset symptoms, whereas our second patient, a 64-year-old female, presented 22 years postoperatively. In the first case, intraoperative CSF leakage, with the patient's history of allergic rhinitis and frequent nasal irrigation possibly contributed to the development of abscess. In the second case, RT was considered a potential risk factor. Severe headache and subclinical signs of infection associated with a cystic lesion of the pituitary gland were common findings. Both patients underwent endoscopic TS drainage and received appropriate antibiotic therapy, resulting in complete recovery without recurrence. Conclusions: When faced with severe headaches in a patient with a history of TS surgery for a pituitary adenoma, coupled with radiological evidence showing a cystic appearance with peripheral enhancement, taking a proactive approach to promptly identify and intervene in secondary PAs is essential for mitigating potential complications and optimizing patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve injury can result in significant clinical complications that have uncertain prognoses. Currently, there is a lack of effective pharmacological interventions for nerve damage, despite the existence of several small compounds, peptides, hormones, and growth factors that have been suggested as potential enhancers of neuron regeneration. Despite the objective of achieving full functional restoration by surgical intervention, the persistent challenge of inadequate functional recovery remains a significant concern in the context of peripheral nerve injuries. AIM: To examine the impact of exosomes on the process of functional recovery following a complete radial nerve damage. METHODS: A male individual, aged 24, who is right-hand dominant and an immigrant, arrived with an injury caused by a knife assault. The cut is located on the left arm, specifically below the elbow. The neurological examination and electrodiagnostic testing reveal evidence of left radial nerve damage. The sural autograft was utilized for repair, followed by the application of 1 mL of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosome, comprising 5 billion microvesicles. This exosome was split into four equal volumes of 0.25 mL each and delivered microsurgically to both the proximal and distal stumps using the subepineural pathway. The patient was subjected to a period of 180 d during which they had neurological examination and electrodiagnostic testing. RESULTS: The duration of the patient's follow-up period was 180 d. An increasing Tinel's sign and sensory-motor recovery were detected even at the 10th wk following nerve grafting. Upon the conclusion of the 6-mo post-treatment period, an evaluation was conducted to measure the extent of improvement in motor and sensory functions of the nerve. This assessment was based on the British Medical Research Council scale and the Mackinnon-Dellon scale. The results indicated that the level of improvement in motor function was classified as M5, denoting an excellent outcome. Additionally, the level of improvement in sensory function was classified as S3+, indicating a good outcome. It is noteworthy that these assessments were conducted in the absence of physical therapy. At the 10th wk post-injury, despite the persistence of substantial axonal damage, the nerve exhibited indications of nerve re-innervation as evidenced by control electromyography (EMG). In contrast to the preceding. EMG analysis revealed a significant electrophysiological enhancement in the EMG conducted at the 6th-mo follow-up, indicating ongoing regeneration. CONCLUSION: Enhanced comprehension of the neurobiological ramifications associated with peripheral nerve damage, as well as the experimental and therapy approaches delineated in this investigation, holds the potential to catalyze future clinical progress.