Prognosis of Systolic Pressure 130 to 139 According to Risk. A Prospective Cohort Study Between 1992 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend pharmacological treatment for systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 130 to 139 mm Hg in secondary prevention. However, uncertainty persists in primary prevention in low cardiovascular risk patients (CVR). METHODS: Cohort study representative of the general population of Albacete/Southeast Spain. We examined 1029 participants with untreated blood pressure and free of cardiovascular disease, followed-up during 1992 to 2019. Cox regression modeled the association of SBP with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (outcome-1) and cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality (outcome-2). RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 44.8 years (53.8%, women; 77.1% at low-CVR); 20.3% had SBP 120 to 129; 13.0% 130 to 139 at low-CVR and 3.4% at high-CVR; and 27.4% ≥140 mm Hg. After a 25.7-year median follow-up, 218 outcome-1 and 302 outcome-2 cases occurred. Unadjusted hazard ratios of outcome-1 for these increasing SBP categories (versus <120) were 2.72, 2.27, 11.54, and 7.52, respectively; and 2.69, 2.32, 10.55, and 7.34 for outcome-2 (all P<0.01). After adjustment for other risk factors, hazard ratio (95% CI) of outcome-1 were 1.49 (0.91-2.44), 1.65 (0.94-2.91, P=0.08), 1.36 (0.72-2.57), and 1.82 (1.15-2.88), respectively, and 1.39 (0.91-2.11), 1.69 (1.05-2.73), 1.09 (0.63-1.88), and 1.64 (1.11-2.41) for outcome-2. Compared with 130 to 139 at low-CVR, hazard ratio for 130 to 139 at high-CVR was 4.85 for outcome-1 (P<0.001) and 4.43 for outcome-2 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this primary prevention population of relatively young average age, untreated SBP of 130 to 139 mm Hg at low-CVR had long-term prognostic value and might benefit from stricter SBP targets. High-CVR patients had nonsignificant higher risk (limited sample size) but 4-fold greater risk when compared with low-CVR. Overall, results indicate the importance of risk stratification, supporting risk-based decision-making.

Role of ambulatory blood pressure on prediction of cardiovascular disease. A cohort study.

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is associated with mortality, but it is also interesting to expand its association with cardiovascular morbidity. This study sought to evaluate association with cardiovascular morbidity and cardiovascular mortality. Patients without cardiovascular disease who had a first 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring were followed-up until the onset of the first event (a combined variable of cardiovascular mortality, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arteriopathy, or hospital admission for heart failure). Changes in antihypertensive treatment couldn't be collected. Cox regression analysis was adjusted for risk factors and office BP. We included 3907 patients (mean age, 58.0, SD 13.8 years), of whom 85.5% were hypertensive. The follow up period was 6.6 (95% CI 5.0-8.5) years. A total of 496 (12.7%) events were recorded. The incidence rate was 19.3 (95% CI 17.7-21.1) cases per 1000 person-years. The patients with an event compared to the rest of patients were mostly men, older, with higher office and ambulatory systolic BP, higher prevalence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia, and non-dipper or riser circadian profile. In the fully adjusted model, office BP loses its significant association with the main variable. Ambulatory BP association remained significant with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, HR 1.494 (1.326-1.685) and 0.767 (0.654-0.899) for 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Nighttime systolic BP also maintained this significant association, 1.270 (1.016-1.587). We conclude that nighttime systolic BP and 24-hour BP are significantly associated with cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality in patients without cardiovascular disease attended under conditions of routine clinical practice.

Prevalence of office and ambulatory hypotension in treated hypertensive patients with coronary disease.

Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) can be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive blood pressure (BP) lowering by antihypertensive treatment. The identification of hypotension is thus especially important. This study estimated the prevalence of hypotension among CHD-treated hypertensive patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in routine clinical practice. We performed a cross-sectional study with 2892 CHD-treated hypertensive patients from the Spanish ABPM Registry. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP < 120 and/or 70 mmHg according to office measurements, <115 and/or 65 mmHg according to daytime ABPM, <100 and/or 50 mmHg according to nighttime ABPM, and <110 and/or 60 mmHg according to 24 h ABPM. The participants' mean age was 67.1 years (69.8% men). A total of 19.6% of the patients had office hypotension, 26.5% had daytime hypotension, 9.0% had nighttime hypotension, and 16.1% had 24-hr ABPM hypotension. Low diastolic BP values were responsible for most cases of hypotension. Fifty-eight percent of the cases of hypotension detected by daytime ABPM did not correspond to hypotension according to office BP. The variables independently associated with daytime ambulatory systolic/diastolic hypotension and diastolic hypotension (the latter being the most frequent type of ambulatory hypotension) were age, female sex, and the number of antihypertensive medications. In conclusion, in a large ABPM registry, one out of every four CHD-treated hypertensive patients was potentially at risk because of hypotension according to daytime ABPM, and more than half of them were not identified if office BP was relied on alone. We suggest that ABPM should be performed in these patients.

Valoración del colesterol no HDL como predictor de episodios cardiovasculares no mortales en una cohorte prospectiva de origen poblacional / Evaluation of non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of non-fatal cardiovascular events in a prospective population cohort

Introducción: El colesterol no transportado por las lipoproteínas de alta densidad (c-no-HDL) está adquiriendo relevancia en su participación en la valoración del riesgo cardiovascular y como diana terapéutica. El objetivo del presente estudio ha sido valorar la capacidad predictiva independiente, tanto del c-no-HDL como del colesterol de las lipoproteínas de baja densidad (cLDL), principal prioridad en las dislipidemias para reducir el riesgo cardiovascular (RCV), en la morbilidad de causa cardiovascular, en una muestra de origen poblacional. Métodos: El diseño del estudio corresponde a una cohorte prospectiva en la que han participado 1.186 individuos en el grupo c-no-HDL y 1.177 en el grupo cLDL, seguidos durante 10,7años (DE=2,2), los cuales no habían padecido ningún episodio cardiovascular (CV) previo. Las variables predictoras incluidas en el ajuste han sido: género, edad, hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus, estado de fumador y c-no-HDL en un grupo. En el otro grupo, formado por pacientes que presentaban niveles de triglicéridos ≤400mg/dl, se sustituyó el c-no-HDL por el cLDL. Se calcularon curvas de supervivencia (Kaplan-Meier) y se aplicaron dos modelos de regresión de Cox, uno por cada grupo.Resultados: El grupo c-no-HDL presentó un 6,2% de episodios CV no mortales durante el seguimiento, y el grupo cLDL, un 6,0%. Después del ajuste, por cada aumento de 30mg/dl de c-no-HDL, la incidencia de nuevos episodios CV no mortales aumentó un 31% (HR=1,31; IC95%: 1,06-1,61; p=0,018) y en el grupo del cLDL un 27% (HR=1,27; IC95%: 0,97-1,61; p=0,068). Conclusiones: Tras un seguimiento de 10,7años, el c-no-HDL se ha mostrado en nuestra población como un factor pronóstico de enfermedad CV no mortal, pero no el cLDL, aunque su HR se encuentra próxima a la significación estadística (AU)

Introduction: Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is becoming relevant both in its participation in cardiovascular risk assessment and as a therapeutic target. The objective of the present study was to assess the independent predictive capacity of both non-HDL-C and LDL-C (the main priority in dyslipidemias to reduce cardiovascular risk), in cardiovascular morbidity in a population-based sample. Methods: A prospective cohort study involving 1186 individuals in the non-HDL-C group and 1177 in the LDL-C group, followed for 10.7years (SD=2.2), who had not had any previous cardiovascular event. The predictor variables included in the adjustment were: gender, age, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoker status and non-HDL-C in one group. In the other group, consisting of patients presenting TG levels of 400mg/dL, non-HDL-C was replaced by LDL-C. Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier) were calculated and two Cox regression models were applied, one for each group. Results: Non-HDL-C group presented 6.2% of non-fatal cardiovascular episodes during follow-up and the LDL-C group 6.0%. After adjustment, for each 30mg/dL increase in non-HDL-C, the incidence of new non-fatal cardiovascular events increased by 31% (HR=1.31, 95%CI: 1.06-1.61; P=.018) and in the LDL-C group by 27% (HR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.97-1.61, P=.068). Conclusions: After a follow-up of 10.7years, non-HDL-C has been shown in our population as a prognostic factor of non-fatal cardiovascular disease, but not LDL-C, although its HR is close to statistical significance (AU)

Evaluation of non-HDL cholesterol as a predictor of non-fatal cardiovascular events in a prospective population cohort. / Valoración del colesterol no HDL como predictor de episodios cardiovasculares no mortales en una cohorte prospectiva de origen poblacional.

INTRODUCTION: Non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is becoming relevant both in its participation in cardiovascular risk assessment and as a therapeutic target. The objective of the present study was to assess the independent predictive capacity of both non-HDL-C and LDL-C (the main priority in dyslipidemias to reduce cardiovascular risk), in cardiovascular morbidity in a population-based sample. METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving 1186 individuals in the non-HDL-C group and 1177 in the LDL-C group, followed for 10.7years (SD=2.2), who had not had any previous cardiovascular event. The predictor variables included in the adjustment were: gender, age, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoker status and non-HDL-C in one group. In the other group, consisting of patients presenting TG levels of 400mg/dL, non-HDL-C was replaced by LDL-C. Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier) were calculated and two Cox regression models were applied, one for each group. RESULTS: Non-HDL-C group presented 6.2% of non-fatal cardiovascular episodes during follow-up and the LDL-C group 6.0%. After adjustment, for each 30mg/dL increase in non-HDL-C, the incidence of new non-fatal cardiovascular events increased by 31% (HR=1.31, 95%CI: 1.06-1.61; P=.018) and in the LDL-C group by 27% (HR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.97-1.61, P=.068). CONCLUSIONS: After a follow-up of 10.7years, non-HDL-C has been shown in our population as a prognostic factor of non-fatal cardiovascular disease, but not LDL-C, although its HR is close to statistical significance.

Blood pressure variability increases with advancing chronic kidney disease stage: a cross-sectional analysis of 16 546 hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: Increased BP-variability predicts cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensives. This study aimed to examine short-term BP-variability according to renal function stage. METHODS: We included 16 546 patients [10 270 (62.1%) without/6276 (38.9%) with CKD Stage 1-5] from the Spanish Ambulatory-Blood-Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) Registry. Stages of CKD were defined according to K/DIGO criteria, based on estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated with the CKD-EPI equation and albumin-to-creatine ratio. BP-variability was assessed with standard deviation (SD), weighted SD (wSD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV). RESULTS: Compared with those without CKD, a lower proportion of CKD patients were dippers (51.9 versus 39.6%; P < 0.001). Across CKD stages, a progressive decrease in dipper (from 39.1 to 20.4%; P < 0.001) and increase in riser proportion (from 12.3 to 36.7%; P < 0.001) were noted. Patients with CKD had significantly higher SBP SD, wSD, CV and ARV and lower DBP SD compared with those without CKD (P < 0.001). Within CKD Stages, an increasing trend from Stage 1 towards Stage 5 was observed for SBP SD (from 13.8 ±â€Š3.7 to 15.6 ±â€Š5.4 mmHg), wSD (from 12.0 ±â€Š3.2 to 13.9 ±â€Š5.1 mmHg), CV (from 10.4 ±â€Š2.7 to 11.5 ±â€Š4.1%), ARV (from 9.9 ±â€Š2.3 to 11.4 ±â€Š3.2 mmHg); P < 0.001 for all comparisons. DBP SD (P < 0.001), wSD and ARV (P = 0.002) were slightly decreasing, whereas DBP CV increased from Stage 1 to Stage 4 (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, male gender, older age, abdominal obesity, diabetes, number of antihypertensive medications, and clinic SBP were independent factors for higher SBP 24-h ARV in CKD. CONCLUSION: An increase in short-term SBP-variability was present with advancing CKD stages in a large cohort. This increased SBP-variability may be involved in the sharp elevation of cardiovascular risk with worsening renal function.

Magnitude of Hypotension Based on Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring: Results From a Cohort of 5066 Treated Hypertensive Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Elderly patients can be particularly susceptible to the adverse effects of excessive blood pressure (BP) lowering by antihypertensive treatment. The identification of hypotension is thus especially important. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) is a more accurate technique than office for classifying BP status. This study examined the prevalence of hypotension and associated demographic and clinical factors among very old treated hypertensive patients undergoing ABPM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study in which 5066 patients aged 80 years and older with treated hypertension drawn from the Spanish ABPM Registry were included. MEASUREMENTS: Office BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP were determined using validated devices under standardized conditions. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as systolic/diastolic BP <110 and/or 70 mmHg with office measurement, <105 and/or 65 mmHg with daytime ABPM, <90 and/or 50 mmHg with nighttime ABPM, and <100 and/or 60 mmHg with 24-hour ABPM. RESULTS: Participants' mean age was 83.2 ± 3.1 years (64.4% women). Overall, 22.8% of patients had office hypotension, 33.7% daytime hypotension, 9.2% nighttime hypotension, and 20.5% 24-hour ABPM hypotension. Low diastolic BP values were responsible for 90% of cases of hypotension. In addition, 59.1% of the cases of hypotension detected by daytime ABPM did not correspond to hypotension according to office BP. The variables independently associated with office and ABPM hypotension were diabetes, coronary heart disease, and a higher number of antihypertensive medications. CONCLUSIONS: One in 3 very elderly treated hypertensive patients attended in usual clinical practice were potentially at risk of having hypotension according to daytime ABPM. More than half of them had masked hypotension; that is, they were not identified if relying on office BP alone. Thus, ABPM could be especially helpful for identifying ambulatory hypotension and avoiding overtreatment, in particular, in patients with diabetes, heart disease, or on antihypertensive polytherapy.

Hypotension based on office and ambulatory monitoring blood pressure. Prevalence and clinical profile among a cohort of 70,997 treated hypertensives.

We aimed to determine the prevalence of hypotension and factors associated with the presence of this condition in treated hypertensive patients undergoing ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Data were taken from the Spanish ABPM Registry. Office blood pressure (BP) and ABPM were determined using validated devices under standardized conditions. Based on previous studies, hypotension was defined as office systolic/diastolic BP <110 and/or 70 mm Hg, daytime ABPM <105 and/or 65 mm Hg, nighttime ABPM <90 and/or 50 mm Hg, and 24-hour ABPM <100 and/or 60 mm Hg. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the variables associated with the presence of hypotension. A total of 70,997 hypertensive patients on treatment (mean age 61.8 years, 52.5% men) were included in the study. The prevalence of hypotension was 8.2% with office BP, 12.2% with daytime ABPM, 3.9% with nighttime ABPM, and 6.8% with 24-hour ABPM. Low diastolic BP values were responsible for the majority of cases of hypotension. Some 68% of the hypotension cases detected by daytime ABPM did not correspond to hypotension according to office BP. The variables independently and consistently associated with higher likelihood of office, daytime, and 24 hour-based hypotension were age, female gender, history of ischemic heart disease, and body mass index <30 kg/m(2) (P < .05). In conclusion, in this large cohort of patients in usual daily practice, one in eight treated hypertensive patients are at risk of hypotension according to daytime BP. Two-thirds of them are not adequately identified with office BP. ABPM could be especially helpful for identifying ambulatory hypotension, in particular in patients who are older, women, or with previous ischemic heart disease where antihypertensive treatment should be especially individualized and cautious.

Framingham risk score for prediction of cardiovascular diseases: a population-based study from southern Europe.

BACKGROUND: The question about what risk function should be used in primary prevention remains unanswered. The Framingham Study proposed a new algorithm based on three key ideas: use of the four risk factors with the most weight (cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes and smoking), prediction of overall cardiovascular diseases and incorporating the concept of vascular age. The objective of this study was to apply this new function in a cohort of the general non Anglo-Saxon population, with a 10-year follow-up to determine its validity. METHODS: The cohort was studied in 1992-94 and again in 2004-06. The sample comprised 959 randomly-selected persons, aged 30-74 years, who were representative of the population of Albacete, Spain. At the first examination cycle, needed data for the new function were collected and at the second examination, data on all events were recorded during the follow-up period. Discrimination was studied with ROC curves. Comparisons of prediction models and reality in tertiles (Hosmer-Lemeshow) were performed, and the individual survival functions were calculated. RESULTS: The mean risks for women and men, respectively, were 11.3% and 19.7% and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.789 (95%CI, 0.716-0.863) and 0.780 (95%CI, 0.713-0.847) (P<0.001, both). Cardiovascular disease events occurred in the top risk tertiles. Of note were the negative predictive values in both sexes, and a good specificity in women (85.6%) and sensitivity in men (79.1%) when their risk for cardiovascular disease was high. This model overestimates the risk in older women and in middle-aged men. The cumulative probability of individual survival by tertiles was significant in both sexes (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the proposal for "reclassification" of Framingham. This study, with a few exceptions, passed the test of discrimination and calibration in a random sample of the general population from southern Europe.

[Relationship between inflammation marker and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort study]. / Relación entre el proceso inflamatorio y la mortalidad de origen cardiovascular y por todas las causas en un estudio de cohortes prospectivo de base poblacional.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is present in every stage of the atherosclerosis process, therefore, inflammation hallmarks such as the fibrinogen can be related to the complications in which it intervenes, mortality is one of them. The objective of this study is to assess the association of the fibrinogen with all-cause mortality in men from general population sample obtained by random sampling in the Spanish region of Albacete. METHODS: A total of 506men without cardiovascular events with 10.6years (SD=2.3) of follow-up, volunteered to participate in a prospective cohort study. The assessment of the fibrinogen as a predictor variable has been calculated after adjusting it by age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol/triglycerides ratio, and smoking habit applying a Cox regression model. The adjustment has been made by adding the fibrinogen to the model, as a qualitative variable (<400 and ≥400mg/dl). RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 46.6years old (DE=16.8). After the adjustment, the hyperfibrinogenemia (≥400mg/dl) showed a hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality of 1.85 (95%CI: 1.05-3.26) and for cardiovascular mortality HR=2.69 (95%CI: 1.09-6.63). CONCLUSIONS: In men without cardiovascular events of our study, fibrinogen was showed as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality.

Control de la presión arterial en la población hipertensa española asistida en Atención Primaria. Estudio PRESCAP 2010 / Blood pressure control in hypertensive Spanish population attended in Primary Care setting. The PRESCAP 2010 study

Fundamento y objetivo: Es necesario disponer de información actualizada sobre el control de la hipertensión arterial en condiciones reales de práctica clínica. Este estudio pretende conocer el grado de control de la presión arterial (PA) en hipertensos asistidos en Atención Primaria (AP). Pacientes y método: Estudio transversal realizado en hipertensos españoles ≥18 años asistidos en AP. La PA se midió estandarizadamente 2 veces en consulta matutina o vespertina, considerándose bien controlada cuando el promedio era <140/90mmHg en general y <130/80mmHg en pacientes con diabetes, insuficiencia renal o enfermedad cardiovascular; adicionalmente se analizó el buen control en toda la población con valores tensionales <140/90mmHg. Resultados: Se incluyeron 12.961 hipertensos (52,0% mujeres) con una edad media (DE) de 66,3 (11,4) años. El 46,3% (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95%] 45,4-47,1) presentó buen control de PA sistólica y diastólica; con valores <140/90mmHg el buen control fue del 61,1% (IC 95% 60,2-61,9). El 63,6% recibía terapia combinada (44,1% 2 fármacos, 19,5% 3 o más). El porcentaje de control fue mayor (p<0,001) por las tardes (50,4%) que por las mañanas (45,1%), y en pacientes que habían tomado el tratamiento antihipertensivo el día de la visita (47,9%) frente a los que no lo habían tomado (30,5%). No tomar la medicación el día de la visita, el consumo elevado de alcohol y el antecedente de dislipidemia fueron los factores más asociados al mal control. Conclusiones: El estudio PRESCAP 2010 indica que casi 5 de cada 10 hipertensos tienen bien controlada la PA. Existen diferencias importantes según el horario de consulta y la toma previa de antihipertensivos. El control ha mejorado respecto al PRESCAP 2006 (AU)

Background and objective: This study was aimed at determining the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients attended in primary care (PC) settings. Patients and method: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. Hypertensive patients ≥18 years under antihypertensive treatment attended in Spanish PC settings were included. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were <140/90mmHg in general population and <130/80mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. BP control was also calculated for all patients when it was <140/90mmHg. Results: A total of 12,961 hypertensive patients (52.0% women) with a mean age of 66.3 (±11.4) years were included. A percentage of 46.3 (95% CI: 45.4-47.1) presented good systolic BP and diastolic BP control; 61.1% (IC 95%: 60.2-61.9) of patients presented good BP control <140/90. A percentage of 63.6% was treated with combination therapy (44.1% with 2 drugs, 19.5% with 3 or more). BP control was significantly higher in evening measurements (50.4%) than in morning measurements (45.1%), and in patients who had taken the treatment before the visit (47.9%) compared with those who had not (30.5%). Factors such as not taking the medication before the visit, heavy alcohol consumption and dyslipemia were the risk factors mostly associated with a poor BP control (P<0.001). Conclusions: Five out of 10 hypertensive patients treated in PC settings have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved with respect to the PRESCAP 2006 study (AU)

[Blood pressure control in hypertensive Spanish population attended in primary care setting. The PRESCAP 2010 study]. / Control de la presión arterial en la población hipertensa española asistida en atención primaria. Estudio PRESCAP 2010.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed at determining the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients attended in primary care (PC) settings. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. Hypertensive patients ≥18 years under antihypertensive treatment attended in Spanish PC settings were included. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were <140/90mmHg in general population and <130/80mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. BP control was also calculated for all patients when it was <140/90mmHg. RESULTS: A total of 12,961 hypertensive patients (52.0% women) with a mean age of 66.3 (±11.4) years were included. A percentage of 46.3 (95% CI: 45.4-47.1) presented good systolic BP and diastolic BP control; 61.1% (IC 95%: 60.2-61.9) of patients presented good BP control<140/90. A percentage of 63.6% was treated with combination therapy (44.1% with 2 drugs, 19.5% with 3 or more). BP control was significantly higher in evening measurements (50.4%) than in morning measurements (45.1%), and in patients who had taken the treatment before the visit (47.9%) compared with those who had not (30.5%). Factors such as not taking the medication before the visit, heavy alcohol consumption and dyslipemia were the risk factors mostly associated with a poor BP control (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Five out of 10 hypertensive patients treated in PC settings have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved with respect to the PRESCAP 2006 study.

[Trends in prevalence of risk factors and global cardiovascular risk in general population of albacete, Spain (1992-94 a 2004-06)]. / Evolución de la prevalencia de los factores de riesgo y del riesgo cardiovascular global en población mayor de 18 años de la provincia de Albacete (1992-94 a 2004-06).

BACKGROUND: To establish strategies for prevention of cardiovascular disease implies to know its epidemiology and evolution in time. The objective of this study is to know the prevalence of risk factors and cardiovascular risk in two moments during the following of a grownup general population. METHODS: Study of cohorts, followed at random selected general population during 12 years (1992-94 to 2204-06). Two transversal studies were made, one at the beginning and the other one at the end of this follow-up. The population in this study was 18 years and older registered in the province of Albacete. Random sampling, stratified and two-stage. The sample size for the first cut was 2121 subjects and for second one 1577. One specific anamnesis was made, physical examination, measurement of blood pressure, electrocardiogram and extraction of venous blood. The studied variables were: age, sex, personal and familiar antecedents, risk factors and global cardiovascular risk. RESULTS: 1322 subjects went to the appointment for the first examination (mean age 48.2 years. 53.6% women) and 997 for the second (mean age 52.8 years. 56.7% women). Has Increased the prevalence of hypertension (32.7% to 41,2%), diabetes (9,8 to 11,4%), obesity (27,8 to 34,3%) and hypercolesterolemia (47,5 to 53,5%), whereas smokers have decreased (32,6 to 23,7%) and have handicapped the average values of arterial pressure (132/81 to 129/73 mmHg), glycaemia (100,8 to 92,8 mg/dl) and LDL-cholesterol (128,7 to 116,7 mg/dl) and also a lowering of cardiovascular risk with Framingham (10,8% to 8,2%) and Score (2,3% to 1,6%). CONCLUSIONS: In the last years an increasing prevalence of risk factors has been seen (hypertension, diabetes and hypercolesterolemia), a better control of them, and lower prevalence of smoking and cardiovascular risk in the population has also be seen.

Evolución de la prevalencia de los factories de riesgo y del riesgo cardiovascular global en población mayor de 18 añor de la provincia de Albacete (1992-94 a 2004-06) / Trends in prevalence of risk factors and global cardiovascular risk in general population of Albacete, Spain (1992-94 a 2004-06)

Fundamento: Establecer estrategias de prevención de la enfermedad cardiovascular implica conocer su epidemiología y evolución en el tiempo. El objetivo del estudio es conocer las prevalencias de los factores de riesgo y del riesgo cardiovascular en dos momentos de seguimiento de una población general adulta. Métodos: Dentro de un estudio longitudinal y prospectivo con población general seleccionada al azar seguida durante 12 años (1992-94 a 2004-2006) se hacen dos análisis trasversales al inicio y en el último corte de seguimiento. La población objeto de estudio fueron personas mayores de 18 años censadas en la provincia de Albacete. Muestreo aleatorio, estratificado y bietápico. Tamaño muestral 2.121 y 1.577 sujetos en cada uno de los cortes. Se hizo anamnesis, exploración física, medida de presión arterial, electrocardiograma y extracción de sangre venosa. Las variables estudiadas fueron: edad, sexo, antecedentes personales y familiares, factores de riesgo y riesgo cardiovascular global. Resultados: En el primer examen acudieron a la cita 1.322 sujetos (edad media 48,2 años. 53,6% mujeres) y 997 en el segundo (edad media 52,8 años. 56,7% mujeres). Hubo un aumento en la prevalencia de hipertensión (32,7% a 41,2%) diabetes mellitus (9,8 a 11,4%), obesidad (27,8 a 34,3%) e hipercolesterolemia (47,5 a 53,5%), una disminución de fumadores (32,6 a 23,7%), de valores medios de presión arterial (132/81 a 129/73 mmHg), glucemia (100,8 a 92,8 mg/dl) y col-LDL (128,7 a 116,7 mg/dl) y un descenso del riesgo cardiovascular con Framingham (10,8% a 8,2%) y Score (2,3% a 1,6%). Conclusiones: En los últimos años se observa un aumento en la prevalencia de factores de riesgo (hipertensión, diabetes e hipercolestrerolemia), un mejor control de los mismos, una menor prevalencia de fumadores y menor riesgo cardiovascular en la población(AU)

Background: To establish strategies for prevention of cardiovascular disease implies to know its epidemiology and evolution in time. The objective of this study is to know the prevalence of risk factors and cardiovascular risk in two moments during the following of a grownup general population. Methods: Study of cohorts, followed at random selected general population during 12 years (1992-94 to 2204-06). Two transversal studies were made, one at the beginning and the other one at the end of this followup. The population in this study was 18 years and older registered in the province of Albacete. andom sampling, stratified and two-stage. The sample size for the first cut was 2121 subjects and for second one 1577. One specific anamnesis was made, physical examination, measurement of blood pressure, electrocardiogram and extraction of venous blood. The studied variables were: age, sex, personal and familiar antecedents, risk factors and global cardiovascular risk. Results: 1322 subjects went to the appointment for the first examination (mean age 48.2 years. 53.6% women) and 997 for the second (mean age 52.8 years. 56.7% women). Has Increased the prevalence of hypertension (32.7% to 41,2%), diabetes (9,8 to 11,4%), obesity (27,8 to 34,3%) and hypercolesterolemia (47,5 to 53,5%), whereas smokers have decreased (32,6 to 23,7%) and have handicapped the average values of arterial pressure (132/81 to 129/73 mmHg), glycaemia (100,8 to 92,8 mg/dl) and LDL-cholesterol (128,7 to 116,7 mg/dl) and also a lowering of cardiovascular risk with Framingham (10,8% to 8,2%) and Score (2,3% to 1,6%). Conclusions: In the last years an increasing prevalence of risk factors has been seen (hypertension, diabetes and hypercolesterolemia), a better control of them, and lower prevalence of smoking and cardiovascular risk in the population has also be seen(AU)

Índice tobillo-brazo e incidencia de la mortalidad por todas las causas y morbilidad cardiovascular en una cohorte prospectiva de origen poblacional / Ankle-brachial index and the incidence of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in a prospective cohort study of a general population

Introducción El objetivo del estudio ha sido valorar la capacidad predictiva del índice tobillo-brazo (ITB) en la mortalidad por todas las causas y en el criterio compuesto de valoración morbilidad de causa cardiovascular (CV) y mortalidad total en una muestra de origen poblacional. Métodos Estudio de cohortes prospectivo en el que han participado 1.143 individuos seguidos durante 10,8 años (DE=2,2) libres de eventos CV. El ITB se estratificó en 2 niveles: menos de 0,9 y entre 0,9 y 1,4. Las variables predictoras incluidas en el ajuste fueron: sexo, edad (corte en 50 años), hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus, obesidad, hipercolesterolemia (corte en 200mg/dl), cociente cHDL/triglicéridos, fumador e hiperfibrinogenemia. Se calcularon curvas de supervivencia (Kaplan-Meier) y se aplicó un modelo de regresión de Cox.ResultadosLa edad media de los participantes (56,8% mujeres) fue de 47,1 años (DE=17,4), rango 18-91 años. Un 6,9% de la muestra presentó un ITB menor de 0,9. Tras el ajuste, un ITB menor de 0,9 presentó para la mortalidad por todas las causas una hazard ratio (HR) de 1,90, intervalo de confianza (IC) del 95%: 1,10-3,26, y para el combinado morbilidad CV y mortalidad por todas las causas una HR de 1,69 (IC del 95%: 1,07-2,67). Conclusiones Un ITB<0,9 ha demostrado ser un factor de riesgo independiente de mortalidad por todas las causas y del combinado morbilidad CV y mortalidad global tras un seguimiento de 10,8 años en la muestra procedente de nuestra población (AU)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the ankle-brachialindex (ABI) in all-cause mortality and composite end-point all-cause mortality and cardiovascularmorbidity in a sample of a general population. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study of 1143 individuals free of cardiovascularevents followed up for 10.8 years (SD = 2.2). The ABI was stratified in two levels: less than 0.9and between 0.9 and 1.4. The predictive variables included in the adjustment were sex, age(cut-off: 50 years), hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hypercholesterolemia (cut-off: 200 mg/dl),high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc)/triglyceride ratio, smoking and hyperfibrinogenemia. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis wereused. Results: The mean age of the participants (56.8% female) was 47.1 years (SD = 17.4), range 18-91years. An ABI value < 0.9 was found in 6.9% of the sample. After adjustment, an ABI of < 0.9 hada hazard ratio (HR) of 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-3.26] for all-cause mortality, andan HR of 1.69 (95% CI 1.07-2.67) for composite all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity.Conclusions: In our population, an ABI < 0.9 was a risk factor independent of all-cause mortalityand of composite all-cause mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after a follow-up of 10.8years (AU)

Cardiovascular risk and blood pressure control in a Spanish hypertensive population attended in a Primary Care setting. Data from the PRESCAP 2006 study.

AIMS: To analyse the cardiovascular risk of a broad sample of hypertensive patients and to examine whether there are differences in blood pressure control and associated factors according to the different cardiovascular risk categories. MAJOR FINDINGS: A total of 10,520 patients > or = 18 years old were included (mean age 64.6+/-11.3 years; 53.7% women). In this cohort, 3.3% were average risk, 22.6% low added risk, 22.2% moderate added risk, 33.5% high added risk and 18.4% very high added risk. Blood pressure was controlled in 41.4% (95% CI 40.5-42.4) of the total population, in 91.7% of patients with low added risk, in 19.4% with moderate added risk, in 27.4% with high added risk and in 6.8% with very high added risk. Diabetes was the factor most strongly associated with poor blood pressure control in patients with high to very high added risk (OR=7.2; p<0.0001). PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION: More than half of the hypertensive patients treated in primary health care have a high or very high added cardiovascular risk. In these patients, blood pressure control is inadequate and diabetes is associated with a sevenfold increase in the likelihood of poor blood pressure control.

[Control of blood pressure in Spanish hypertensive population attended in primary health-care. PRESCAP 2006 Study]. / Control de la presión arterial en la población hipertensa española atendida en atención primaria. Estudio PRESCAP 2006.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: More information is needed on hypertension control and its evolution in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in Spanish hypertensive patients attended in primary care (PC) and to determine the factors associated with poor BP control. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study, carried out in PC settings throughout Spain. Hypertensive patients >or= 18 years, with antihypertensive treatment (>or= 3 months) were consecutively recruited. BP measurement was performed in surgery hours (morning and evening) following standardized methods and averaging 2 consecutive readings. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were < 140/90 mmHg in general population and <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: 10,520 hypertensive patients were included (53.7% women), mean age (SD) 64.6 (11.3) years. 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.4) presented good systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) control, 46.5% (95% CI, 45.5-47.4) only SBP control and 67.1% (95% CI, 66.2-68.0) only DBP control. 55.6% of patients were treated with combination therapy (41.2% 2 drugs, 11.7% 3 and 2.8% more than 3). BP control was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the evening measurement (48.9%) than in the morning measurement (40.5%), and if patients had taken the treatment before measurement (42.0%) compared with those who had not taken it (38.8%). Factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption and surgery hour were associated with poor BP control (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PRESCAP 2006 study indicate that 4 out of 10 hypertensive patients treated in PC in Spain have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved remarkably with respect to the PRESCAP 2002 study.

Control de la presión arterial en la población hipertensa española atendida en atención primaria. Estudio PRESCAP 2006 / Control of blood pressure in Spanish hypertensive population attended in primary health-care. PRESCAP 2006 Study

Fundamento y objetivos: Es necesario tener mayor información sobre el grado de control de la hipertensión arterial (HTA) en condiciones reales de la práctica clínica. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron conocer el grado de control de presión arterial (PA) en pacientes hipertensos en atención primaria (AP) y determinar los factores asociados al mal control. Pacientes y método: Estudio transversal y multicéntrico que incluyó a individuos hipertensos de 18 o más años, que seguían tratamiento farmacológico antihipertensivo desde hacía al menos 3 meses, y que fueron seleccionados consecutivamente en consultas de AP de España. La medida de PA se realizó siguiendo normas estandarizadas según el horario de consulta (matutina o vespertina) y se calculó la media aritmética de 2 tomas sucesivas. Se consideró que había buen control cuando el promedio era inferior a 140/90 mmHg en general, y menor de 130/80 mmHg en pacientes con diabetes, insuficiencia renal o enfermedad cardiovascular. Resultados: Se incluyó a 10.520 hipertensos (53,7% mujeres), con edad media (desviación estándar) de 64,6 (11,3) años. El 41,4% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 40,5-42,4) presentó un buen control de PA sistólica (PAS) y PA diastólica (PAD), el 46,5% (IC del 95%, 45,5-47,4) sólo de PAS y el 67,1% (IC del 95%, 66,2-68,0) sólo de PAD. El 55,6% recibía tratamiento combinado (41,2% 2 fármacos, 11,7% 3 fármacos, y 2,8% más de 3). El porcentaje de pacientes controlados fue significativamente mayor (p < 0,001) por las tardes (48,9%) que por las mañanas (40,5%), y en pacientes que habían tomado tratamiento antihipertensivo el día de la visita (42,0%) frente a los que no lo habían tomado (38,8%). La diabetes, la enfermedad cardiovascular, el sedentarismo, el consumo elevado de alcohol y el horario de consulta fueron los factores más asociados al mal control de la HTA (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: Los resultados del estudio PRESCAP 2006 indican que 4 de cada 10 pacientes hipertensos tratados y atendidos en AP en España tienen controlada óptimamente su HTA. Hay diferencias importantes en el grado de control según el horario de consulta y la toma previa de antihipertensivos. El control de la HTA ha mejorado apreciablemente respecto al PRESCAP 2002

Background and objectives: More information is needed on hypertension control and its evolution in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the degree of blood pressure (BP) control in Spanish hypertensive patients attended in primary care (PC) and to determine the factors associated with poor BP control. Patients and method: Cross-sectional, multicenter study, carried out in PC settings throughout Spain. Hypertensive patients $ 18 years, with antihypertensive treatment ($ 3 months) were consecutively recruited. BP measurement was performed in surgery hours (morning and evening) following standardized methods and averaging 2 consecutive readings. BP control was regarded as optimum when BP values were < 140/90 mmHg in general population and < 130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease. Results: 10,520 hypertensive patients were included (53.7% women), mean age (SD) 64.6 (11.3) years. 41.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.5-42.4) presented good systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) control, 46.5% (95% CI, 45.5-47.4) only SBP control and 67.1% (95% CI, 66.2-68.0) only DBP control. 55.6% of patients were treated with combination therapy (41.2% 2 drugs, 11.7% 3 and 2.8% more than 3). BP control was significantly (p < 0,001) higher in the evening measurement (48.9%) than in the morning measurement (40.5%), and if patients had taken the treatment before measurement (42.0%) compared with those who had not taken it (38.8%). Factors such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol consumption and surgery hour were associated with poor BP control (p < 0,001). Conclusions: The results of the PRESCAP 2006 study indicate that 4 out of 10 hypertensive patients treated in PC in Spain have an optimal BP control. The degree of control of arterial hypertension has improved remarkably with respect to the PRESCAP 2002 study

[Blood pressure control in Spanish hypertensive patients in Primary Health Care Centres. PRESCAP 2002 Study]. / Control de la presión arterial en la población hipertensa española atendida en atención primaria. Estudio PRESCAP 2002.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More information is needed on hypertension control in clinical practice, which includes taking at least two blood pressure (BP) readings and taking into account surgery times and previous antihypertensive drug intake. Our study aimed to assess the optimum degree of BP control in a broad sample of Spanish hypertensive patients in primary care and to determine factors associated with a poor control. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional, multicenter study of hypertensive patients aged over 18 years and treated with drugs during the preceeding three months, who were recruited by general practitioners through consecutive sampling in primary care settings throughout Spain over 3 consecutive days. BP measurements were performed in surgery hours (morning and evening) following standardized methods and averaging two consecutive readings. An average BP lower than 140/90 mm Hg (values lower than 130/85 mm Hg in diabetics) was regarded as optimum BP control. RESULTS: 12 754 patients were included, mean age 63.3 years (10.8), 57.2% women. 36.1% (95% CI, 35.2-36.9) had good systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) controls, 39.1% (95% CI, 38.3-40.0) had good SBP control only, and 73.1% (95% CI, 72.3-73.9) had good DBP control only. BP control was significantly (*2, p < 0.001) better during evening than during morning measurements (43.6% vs 37.1%) and in patients who had taken antihypertensive treatment before measurement (37.2%) vs. those who had not taken it (21.0%). Factors such as alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle, obesity and age were all associated with poor BP control (Wald's (chi 2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the PRESCAP 2002 study indicate that approximately 4 out of 10 hypertensive patients treated pharmacologically by primary health care centers in Spain have optimal BP control. Significant differences were found in the degree of control depending on surgery hours and the previous intake of antihypertensive medication.