AT1, AT2, and AT(1-7) receptor expression in the uteroplacental unit of normotensive and hypertensive rats during early and late pregnancy.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the expression of angiotensin receptors in early pregnancy and established whether normal pregnancy or preeclampsia alters the expression and distribution of the uteroplacental AT1R, AT2R and mas/AT1-7R at late gestation. METHODS: The percentage of each receptor subtype present in tissues from virgin rats and from normotensive and RUPP hypertensive pregnant rats was established by in vitro receptor autoradiography. Receptor mRNA levels were determined by quantitative PCR at early and late pregnancy. RESULTS: AT1R mRNA levels were up-regulated in the interimplantation (IIS) site at day 7 of gestation. AT2R mRNA levels were decreased at day 5 and 7 in the IIS but increased in the implantation site (IS) at day 5 and 7 as compared to the IIS at day 5. Mas/AT1-7R mRNA was increased in early pregnancy. In normal pregnancy and RUPP the mRNA for all angiotensin receptors was reduced in the uterus at late gestation. The AT1R accounted for the majority of binding in the uterus of virgin and the placenta of pregnant and RUPP. In RUPP pregnancy there was a significant competition with d-Ala in the placenta labyrinth. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The expression of angiotensin receptors suggests their involvement in the maintenance of early stages of pregnancy. During late gestation down-regulation of Ang receptors in the uterus may arise from feedback down-regulation by Ang II. In the placenta the levels of AT1Rs are equivalent in the RUPP model. The increased binding of mas/AT1-7R at late gestation in RUPP may represent a compensatory mechanism to reduce uteroplacental vascular resistance.

Renin-angiotensin system blockers and modulation of radiation-induced brain injury.

Radiation-induced brain injury remains a major cause of morbidity in cancer patients with primary or metastatic brain tumors. Approximately 200,000 individuals/year are treated with fractionated partial or whole-brain irradiation, and > half will survive long enough (≤6 months) to develop radiation-induced brain injury, including cognitive impairment. Although short-term treatments have shown efficacy, no long-term treatments or preventive approaches are presently available for modulating radiation-induced brain injury. Based on previous preclinical studies clearly demonstrating that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers can modulate radiation-induced late effects in the kidney and lung, we and others hypothesized that RAS blockade would similarly modulate radiation-induced brain injury. Indeed, studies in the last 5 years have shown that both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (AT(1)RAs) can prevent/ameliorate radiation-induced brain injury, including cognitive impairment, in the rat. The mechanistic basis for this RAS blocker-mediated effect remains the subject of ongoing investigations. Putative mechanisms include, i] blockade of Ang II/NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, and ii] a change in the balance of angiotensin (Ang) peptides from the pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative Ang II to the anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative Ang-1-7). However, given that both ACEIs and AT(1)RAs are 1] well-tolerated drugs routinely prescribed for hypertension, 2] exhibit some antitumor properties, and 3] can prevent/ameliorate radiation-induced brain injury, they appear to be ideal drugs for future clinical trials, offering the promise of improving the quality of life of brain tumor patients receiving brain irradiation.

Oxidative damage pathways in relation to normal tissue injury.

Given the increasing population of long-term cancer survivors, the need to mitigate or treat late effects has emerged as a primary area of radiation biology research. Once thought to be irreversible, radiation-induced late effects are now viewed as dynamic multicellular interactions between multiple cell types within a particular program that can be modulated. The molecular, cellular and biochemical pathways responsible for radiation-induced late morbidity remain ill-defined. This review provides data in support of the hypothesis that these late effects are driven, in part, by a chronic oxidative stress. Irradiating late responding normal tissues leads to chronic increases in reactive oxygen/reactive nitrogen oxide species that serve as intracellular signaling species to alter cell function/phenotype, resulting in chronic inflammation, organ dysfunction, and ultimate fibrosis and/or necrosis. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system blockers in preventing or mitigating the severity of radiation-induced late effects reflects, in part, inhibition of reactive oxygen species generation and the resultant chronic oxidative stress. These findings provide a robust rationale for anti-inflammatory-based interventional therapies in the treatment of late normal tissue injury.

Angiotensin-(1-7) prevents development of severe hypertension and end-organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats treated with L-NAME.

We examined the influence of chronic treatment with ANG-(1-7) on development of hypertension and end-organ damage in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) chronically treated with the nitric oxide synthesis inhibitor L-NAME (SHR-L-NAME). L-NAME administered orally (80 mg/l) for 4 wk significantly elevated mean arterial pressure (MAP) compared with SHR controls drinking regular water (269 +/- 10 vs. 196 +/- 6 mmHg). ANG-(1-7) (24 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) or captopril (300 mg/l) significantly attenuated the elevation in MAP due to L-NAME (213 +/- 7 and 228 +/- 8 mmHg, respectively), and ANG-(1-7) + captopril completely reversed the L-NAME-dependent increase in MAP (193 +/- 5 mmHg). L-NAME-induced increases in urinary protein were significantly lower in ANG-(1-7)-treated animals (226 +/- 6 vs. 145 +/- 12 mg/day). Captopril was more effective (96 +/- 12 mg/day), and there was no additional effect of captopril + ANG-(1-7) (87 +/- 5 mg/day). The abnormal vascular responsiveness to endothelin-1, carbachol, and sodium nitroprusside in perfused mesenteric vascular bed of SHR-L-NAME was improved by ANG-(1-7) or captopril, with no additive effect of ANG-(1-7) + captopril. In isolated perfused hearts, recovery of left ventricular function from 40 min of global ischemia was significantly better in ANG-(1-7)- or captopril-treated SHR-L-NAME, with additive effects of combined treatment. The beneficial effects of ANG-(1-7) on MAP and cardiac function were inhibited when indomethacin was administered with ANG-(1-7), but indomethacin did not reverse the protective effects on proteinuria or vascular reactivity. The protective effects of the ANG-(1-7) analog AVE-0991 were qualitatively comparable to those of ANG-(1-7) but were not improved over those of captopril alone. Thus, during reduced nitric oxide availability, ANG-(1-7) attenuates development of severe hypertension and end-organ damage; prostaglandins participate in the MAP-lowering and cardioprotective effects of ANG-(1-7); and additive effects of captopril + ANG-(1-7) on MAP, but not proteinuria or endothelial function, suggest common, as well as different, mechanisms of action for the two treatments. Together, the results provide further evidence of a role for ANG-(1-7) in protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and suggest dissociation of factors influencing MAP and those influencing end-organ damage.

AT(1) antisense distinguishes receptors mediating angiotensin II actions in solitary tract nucleus.

Angiotensin (Ang) II receptors in the solitary tract nucleus (nTS) are located on vagal sensory-afferent fiber terminals as well as on neuronal cell bodies. Results from in vitro slice preparations indicate that approximately 50% of the neuronal excitatory actions of Ang II result from actions at presynaptic receptors. The differential contribution of actions on fiber terminals versus neuronal cell soma to the cardiovascular effects of Ang II in the nTS is not known. We used antisense oligonucleotides to the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor, which should reduce receptors on neurons within the injection site but not those on fiber terminals projecting to the nTS. Ang II injections (250 fmol/30 nL) into the nTS reduced blood pressure by 14+/-1 mm Hg and heart rate by 13+/-1 bpm (n=8) in male Sprague-Dawley rats anesthetized with chloralose/urethane. Although there was still a significant fall in pressure that was induced by Ang II at 90 and 150 minutes after AT(1) antisense (164 pmol/120 nL) was injected into the nTS, the response was blunted 50% (P<0.01). Heart rate responses were completely blocked at the 150-minute time point. Scrambled sequence oligonucleotides did not alter Ang II responses at any time. There was a 40% reduction in (125)I[Sar(1)Thr8]-Ang II binding when antisense-injected and noninjected sides of the nTS were compared with receptor autoradiography. This finding is consistent with the continued presence of AT(1) receptors on afferent fibers. This unique strategy illustrates that both presynaptic fiber terminals and nTS neurons are involved in the blood pressure lowering actions of Ang II, whereas heart rate responses are largely due to actions directly on nTS neurons and activation of vagal efferent pathways.

The angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist irbesartan prevents thromboxane A2-induced vasoconstriction in the rat hind-limb vascular bed in vivo.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the vasoconstrictor effects of the thromboxane A2 (TxA2) analogue U46619 in the perfused hind limb of rats under constant flow before and after intravenous injection of irbesartan, an angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonist, to test whether irbesartan interacts in vivo with the thromboxane A2/prostaglandin endoperoxidase H2 (TxA2/PGH2) receptor. DESIGN: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 15, body weight 350-420 g) were anesthetized with thiobutabarbital sodium (Inactin, 100 mg/kg intraperitoneally). Regional vascular responses to U46619 (0.5 and 1.0 microg) were investigated in the rat hind quarter under conditions of controlled flow before and after administration of irbesartan (10 mg/kg, intravenously). In addition, to test the specificity of the effect of irbesartan on U46619, phenylephrine (0.5, 1.0 microg) and another AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan CV11974 (0.3 mg/kg, intravenously) were used. RESULTS: The dose-dependent increases in hind-limb perfusion pressure produced by U46619 were significantly attenuated by prior injection of irbesartan, at a dose that blocked the angiotensin II (Ang II) pressor responses. The specificity for the response was shown with the demonstrations that the increase in vascular resistance produced by phenylephrine was unchanged by irbesartan and, furthermore, that the increase in vascular resistance produced by U46619 was unchanged by another AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that irbesartan interacts at the TxA2/PGH2 receptor in the rat's hind limb in vivo, to modify changes in local regional vascular resistance. The dual antagonistic actions of irbesartan, acting at both AT1 and TxA2 receptors in blood vessels, may overall enhance its therapeutic profile in the treatment of hypertension.

Angiotensin-(1-7) downregulates the angiotensin II type 1 receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7) is a biologically active peptide of the renin-angiotensin system that has both vasodilatory and antiproliferative activities that are opposite the constrictive and proliferative effects of angiotensin II (Ang II). We studied the actions of Ang-(1-7) on the Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor in cultured rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells to determine whether the effects of Ang-(1-7) are due to its regulation of the AT(1) receptor. Ang-(1-7) competed poorly for [(125)I]Ang II binding to the AT(1) receptor on vascular smooth muscle cells, with an IC(50) of 2.0 micromol/L compared with 1.9 nmol/L for Ang II. The pretreatment of vascular smooth muscle cells with Ang-(1-7) followed by treatment with acidic glycine to remove surface-bound peptide resulted in a significant decrease in [(125)I]Ang II binding; however, reduced Ang II binding was observed only at micromolar concentrations of Ang-(1-7). Scatchard analysis of vascular smooth muscle cells pretreated with 1 micromol/L Ang-(1-7) showed that the reduction in Ang II binding resulted from a loss of the total number of binding sites [B(max) 437.7+/-261.5 fmol/mg protein in Ang-(1-7)-pretreated cells compared with 607.5+/-301.2 fmol/mg protein in untreated cells, n=5, P<0.05] with no significant effect on the affinity of Ang II for the AT(1) receptor. Pretreatment with the AT(1) receptor antagonist L-158,809 blocked the reduction in [(125)I]Ang II binding by Ang-(1-7) or Ang II. Pretreatment of vascular smooth muscle cells with increasing concentrations of Ang-(1-7) reduced Ang II-stimulated phospholipase C activity; however, the decrease was significant (81.2+/-6.4%, P<0.01, n=5) only at 1 micromol/L Ang-(1-7). These results demonstrate that pharmacological concentrations of Ang-(1-7) in the micromolar range cause a modest downregulation of the AT(1) receptor on vascular cells and a reduction in Ang II-stimulated phospholipase C activity. Because the antiproliferative and vasodilatory effects of Ang-(1-7) are observed at nanomolar concentrations of the heptapeptide, these responses to Ang-(1-7) cannot be explained by competition of Ang-(1-7) at the AT(1) receptor or Ang-(1-7)-mediated downregulation of the vascular AT(1) receptor.

Downregulation of the AT1A receptor by pharmacologic concentrations of Angiotensin-(1-7).

Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7), the amino terminal heptapeptide fragment of Ang II, is an endogenous Ang peptide with vasodilatory and antiproliferative actions. Because Ang II causes vasoconstriction and promotes growth through activation of Ang type 1 (AT1) receptors, we investigated whether the actions of Ang-(1-7) are due to its regulation of these receptors. Studies were performed in CHO cells stably transfected with the AT1A receptor. Ang-(1-7) competed poorly with [125I]-Ang II for the AT1A binding site and was ineffective at shifting the IC50 for Ang II competition with [125I]-Ang II for binding to the AT1A receptor. However, if CHO-AT1A cells were pretreated with Ang-(1-7) and then treated with acidic glycine to remove surface-bound ligand, the heptapeptide caused a concentration-dependent reduction in Ang II binding, with a maximal inhibition to 67.8 +/- 4.6% of total (p < 0.05) at 1 microM Ang-(1-7) compared with a reduction to 24% of total by 10 nM Ang II. Ang-(1-7) pretreatment caused a small but significant decrease in the affinity of [125I]-Ang II for the AT1A receptor and a significant reduction in the total number of binding sites. The Ang-(1-7)-induced reduction in binding was rapid (occurring as early as 5 min after exposure to the peptide), was maintained for 30 min during continued exposure of the cells to Ang-(1-7), and rapidly recovered after removal of the heptapeptide. The AT1 receptor antagonist L-158,809 reduced the Ang-(1-7)-induced downregulation of the AT1A receptor, suggesting that interactions with AT1A receptors mediate the regulatory events. Pretreatment with 1 microM or 10 microM Ang-(1-7) significantly reduced inositol phosphate production in response to 10 nM Ang II. The decrease in binding and responsiveness of the AT1A receptor after exposure to micromolar concentrations of Ang-(1-7) suggests that the heptapeptide downregulates the AT1A receptor to reduce responses to Ang II. Because downregulation of the receptor only occurred at micromolar concentrations of the heptapeptide, our findings suggest that Ang-(1-7) is not a potent antagonist at the AT1A receptor. However, when the balance between Ang II and Ang-(1-7) is shifted in favor of Ang-(1-7), such as during inhibition of Ang-converting enzyme, some contribution of this mechanism may come into play.

Analysis of RNA by northern-blot hybridization.

Northern-blot hybridization, also referred to as Northern blotting, is one of several methods developed to detect the presence, to determine the size, and to quantify specific cellular mRNAs. By this method, total RNA or poly(A)(+)mRNA, prepared from the cells or tissue of interest, is fractionated by size on a denaturing agarose gel. The separated RNAs are transferred to a membrane by capillary action or under a vacuum and hybridized to a labeled probe with a base sequence complementary to all or part of the target mRNA. Analysis of hybridization signals determines whether the gene of interest is expressed in the cells or tissue, as well as the size and relative quantity of the target mRNA, if appropriate markers are used.

The renin-angiotensin system and the exocrine pancreas.

An accumulating body of evidence strongly indicates a local tissue renin-angiotensin system in the pancreas of a various species. In contrast to the majority of tissues that primarily express the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor, the pancreas is one of the few tissues that contain a significant proportion of the AT2 subtype. Moreover, our findings indicate a greater distribution angiotensin II binding sites in the exocrine pancreas. Although the physiological aspects of a local pancreatic renin-angiotensin system remain largely unexplored, recent studies in our laboratory utilizing an acinar cell model demonstrate both functional AT1 and AT2 receptors. Indeed, we show that the AR42J cell line expresses all components of an angiotensin system including the mRNA for renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), AT1a, AT1b and AT2 receptors. Thus, these cells may be of particular value to study the interplay of the AT1 and AT2 receptors to regulate cell growth and potentially exocrine function.

Pathways for angiotensin-(1---7) metabolism in pulmonary and renal tissues.

Two of the primary sites of actions for angiotensin (ANG)-(1---7) are the vasculature and the kidney. Because little information exists concerning the metabolism of ANG-(1---7) in these tissues, we investigated the hydrolysis of the peptide in rat lung and renal brush-border membrane (BBM) preparations. Radiolabeled ANG-(1---7) was hydrolyzed primarily to ANG-(1---5) by pulmonary membranes. The ANG-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril abolished the generation of ANG-(1---5), as well as that of smaller metabolites. Kinetic studies of the hydrolysis of ANG-(1---7) to ANG-(1---5) by somatic (pulmonary) and germinal (testes) forms of rat ACE yielded similar values, suggesting that the COOH-domain is responsible for the hydrolysis of ANG-(1---7). Pulmonary metabolism of ANG-(1---5) yielded ANG-(3---5) and was independent of ACE but may involve peptidyl or dipeptidyl aminopeptidases. In renal cortex BBM, ANG-(1---7) was rapidly hydrolyzed to mono- and dipeptide fragments and ANG-(1---4). Aminopeptidase (AP) inhibition attenuated the hydrolysis of ANG-(1---7) and increased ANG-(1---4) formation. Combined treatment with AP and neprilysin (Nep) inhibitors abolished ANG-(1---4) formation and preserved ANG-(1---7). ACE inhibition had no effect on the rate of hydrolysis or the metabolites formed in the BBM. In conclusion, ACE was the major enzymatic activity responsible for the metabolism of ANG-(1---7) in the lung, which is consistent with the ability of ACE inhibitors to increase the half-life of circulating ANG-(1---7) and raise endogenous levels of the peptide. An alternate pathway of metabolism was revealed in the renal cortex, where increased AP and Nep activities, relative to ACE activity, promote conversion of ANG-(1---7) to ANG-(1---4) and smaller fragments.

Differential actions of renal ischemic injury on the intrarenal angiotensin system.

The present study determined the effect of either occlusion of the left renal artery for 60 min (ischemia) or sham operation on angiotensin (ANG) receptors and tissue and urinary levels of ANG peptides between 24 and 72 h recovery in male Sprague-Dawley rats. At 24 h postischemia, urinary concentrations of ANG I and ANG-(1-7) rose by an average of 83 and 64%, respectively (P < 0.05) but had declined to control levels by 72 h. Tissue ANG II rose at 24 h in postischemic kidneys by an average of 63% compared with the contralateral nonischemic kidney (P < 0.05). Whereas the enzymatic activity of angiotensin-converting enzyme and neprilysin was reduced after ischemia, renal renin activity in ischemic kidneys rose by 74% compared with sham-operated kidneys. Receptor autoradiography using (125)I-labeled [Sar(1),Thr(8)]ANG II ((125)I-Sarthran) (0.8 nM) revealed a decreased apparent density of ANG receptors (>80% AT(1)) in ischemic kidneys with a trend for a decrease in the contralateral nonischemic kidneys compared with the kidneys from sham-operated rats. Twenty-four hours after ischemia, ANG II receptors decreased by 68% in glomeruli (P < 0.05), 49% in the outer cortical tubulointerstitial area (P < 0.05), and 48% in the inner cortical-outer medullary area of the vasa recta (P < 0.05). Medullary binding decreased approximately 50% in both the ischemic kidney and the contralateral nonischemic kidney compared with sham. In all regions of the ischemic kidney, receptors recovered by 72 h to levels not different from sham control rats. The marked change in urinary ANG I and ANG-(1-7) at 24 h following occlusion indicates these peptides may be potential urinary markers for acute renal ischemia. The reduction of receptors in vascular and tubular regions of the ischemic kidney provides a mechanism for the loss of vasoconstrictor responses to ANG II following ischemia previously reported by others.

Evidence that prostaglandins mediate the antihypertensive actions of angiotensin-(1-7) during chronic blockade of the renin-angiotensin system.

Prostaglandins are known to participate in the antihypertensive actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and angiotensin type 1 (AT1)-receptor antagonism. Because angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] is markedly elevated after prolonged ACE-inhibitor treatment, we determined whether the antihypertensive effects of Ang-(1-7) were mediated by release of prostaglandins. Male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs, 10 weeks) were treated for 9 days with either lisinopril (20 mg/kg) or losartan (10 mg/kg) or a combination of both drugs. Rats were implanted with catheters in the carotid artery and jugular vein to record blood pressure and to infuse drug solutions, respectively. Neutralization of circulating Ang-(1-7) by monoclonal antibody resulted in a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure in SHRs treated with either lisinopril or losartan. Administration of CGS 24592 to block Ang-(1-7) formation also resulted in an increase in blood pressure that was comparable to antibody infusion. However, Ang-(1-7) blockade evoked a greater elevation in blood pressure in the lisinopril and lisinopril/losartan-treated rats in comparison to those treated with losartan alone. Acute treatment with the cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor indomethacin increased blood pressure to a similar extent to that of CGS 24592, as well as blocked the increase in pressure with the neprilysin inhibitor in the lisinopril/losartan group. In the losartan-treated animals, however, indomethacin increased blood pressure by a larger extent than that of the Ang-(1-7) antibody or CGS 24592, and CGS 24592 did not abolish the subsequent pressor response to indomethacin in these animals. In contrast to the antibody or neprilysin inhibitor, administration of the Ang-(1-7) antagonist D-[Ala7]-Ang-(1-7) increased blood pressure to a similar extent in lisinopril or losartan treatments. Moreover, D-[Ala7]-Ang-(1-7) increased blood pressure to a comparable extent as indomethacin and blocked any further increase with the COX inhibitor in the losartan-treated SHRs. High-resolution emulsion autoradiography revealed 125I-[Sarcosine1, Threonine8]-Ang II (Sarthran) binding in the mesenteric artery and thoracic aorta in the presence of both LOS and the AT2 antagonist PD123319. The non-AT1/non-AT2 Sarthran binding was displaced by Ang-(1-7), DALA, or Ang II. These studies suggest that vasodilatory eicosanoids mediate the antihypertensive effects of endogenous Ang-(1-7) in both LIS and LIS/LOS therapies. Furthermore, in the presence of AT1-receptor blockade, Ang II may interact with a DALA-sensitive site to promote eicosanoid release.

Angiotensin peptides and baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow: pathways and mechanisms of the medulla oblongata.

The baroreceptor reflex is a relatively high gain control system that maintains arterial pressure within normal limits. To a large extent, this is accomplished through central neural pathways responsible for autonomic outflow residing in the medulla oblongata. The circulating renin-angiotensin system also contributes to the regulation of blood pressure, predominantly through its effects on the control of hydromineral balance and fluid volume. All the components of the renin-angiotensin system are also found in the brain. One of the principal products of the renin-angiotensin system cascade (brain or blood), angiotensin II, modulates the baroreceptor reflex by diminishing the sensitivity of the reflex and shifting the operating point for regulation of sympathetic outflow to higher blood pressures. This paper reviews our current knowledge about the neuronal pathways in the medulla oblongata through which angiotensin peptides alter the baroreceptor reflex control of sympathetic nerve activity. Emphasis is placed on the probable components and neural mechanisms of the medullary baroreflex arc that account for the ability of angiotensin peptides to change the sensitivity of the baroreceptor reflex and to shift the baroreceptor reflex control of sympathetic outflow to higher blood pressures in a pressure-independent manner.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme expression in human carotid artery atherosclerosis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduce the progression of atherosclerosis in animal models and reinfarction rates after myocardial infarction in humans. Although expression of components of the renin-angiotensin system has been reported in human coronary arteries, no data regarding their presence in carotid arteries, a frequent site for the occurrence of atherosclerosis plaques, are available. The following study sought to determine whether ACE mRNA and protein can be detected in human carotid atheromatous lesions. Twenty-four intact endarterectomy specimens were obtained from patients with severe carotid occlusive disease (17 males and 7 females, aged 68+/-1 years) and fixed within 30 minutes. Carotid artery specimens contained advanced Stary type V and VI lesions, and human ACE mRNA expression and protein were localized in cross sections by the combination of in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Cell type-specific antibodies were used to colocalize ACE to smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells, macrophages, or lymphocytes. ACE protein was localized in the intima, whereas the overlying media was largely free of ACE staining. In less complicated lesions, ACE staining was modest and could be visualized in scattered clusters of macrophages and on the luminal side of carotid artery vascular endothelium. Smooth muscle cells were largely negative. ACE staining increased as lesions became more complex and was most prominent in macrophage-rich regions. The shoulder regions of plaques contained numerous ACE-positive macrophage foam cells and lymphocytes. In these areas, microvessels were positive for endothelial cell and smooth muscle cell ACE expression. However, microvessels in plaques free of inflammatory cells were stained only faintly for ACE expression. Labeling for ACE mRNA mirrored the pattern of protein expression, localizing ACE mRNA to macrophages and microvessels within the intima. In conclusion, atherosclerosis alters carotid artery ACE production, increasing transcription and translation within regions of plaque inflammation. These data provide another important mechanism by which inflammation associated with increased ACE expression may contribute to the progression of atherosclerosis.

Novel angiotensin II AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan prevents thromboxane A(2)-induced vasoconstriction in canine coronary arteries and human platelet aggregation.

This study was conducted to investigate whether the novel orally active nonpeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan interacts with the thromboxane A(2)/prostaglandin endoperoxide H(2) (TxA(2)/PGH(2)) receptor in canine coronary arteries and human platelets. Coronary artery rings were isolated from male dog hearts (n = 18) and isometric tension of vascular rings was measured continuously at optimal basal tension in organ chambers. Autoradiographic binding of [(3)H]SQ29,548, a TxA(2) receptor antagonist, in canine coronary sections was determined. Blood for platelet aggregation studies was collected by venous puncture from healthy human volunteers (n = 6) who were free of aspirin-like agents for at least 2 weeks. Vascular reactivity and platelet aggregation in response to the TxA(2) analogs U46619 and autoradioagraphic receptor binding to the TxA(2) receptor antagonist [(3)H]SQ29,548 were studied with and without irbesartan. The TxA(2) analog U46619 produced dose-dependent vasoconstriction in coronary rings (EC(50) = 11.6 +/- 1.5 nM). Pretreatment with irbesartan inhibited U46619-induced vasoconstriction, and the dose-response curve was shifted to the right in a dose-dependent manner. The EC(50) of U46619 was increased 6- and 35-fold in the presence of 1 and 10 microM of irbesartan without a change of maximal contraction. At 1 microM, irbesartan is 2-fold more potent than the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan in the inhibition of U46619-induced vasoconstriction in canine coronary arteries. In contrast, neither AT(1) receptor antagonists (CV11974 and valsartan), the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319, nor the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril had any effect on U46619-induced coronary vasoconstriction. Irbesartan did not change potassium chloride-induced vasoconstriction; however, irbesartan did inhibit the vasoconstriction mediated by another TxA(2)/PGH(2) receptor agonist prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)). Neither the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester nor the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin had any effect on irbesartan's attenuation of U46619-induced vasoconstriction. Irbesartan specifically reversed U46619-preconstricted coronary artery rings with and without endothelium in a dose-dependent manner. Irbesartan at high concentrations significantly competed for [(3)H]SQ29,548 binding in canine coronary sections. U46619 stimulated dose-dependent human platelet aggregation of platelet-rich plasma. Preincubation with irbesartan significantly inhibited platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. In conclusion, the dual antagonistic actions of irbesartan by acting at both the AT(1) and TxA(2) receptors in blood vessels and platelets may overall enhance its therapeutic profile in the treatment of hypertension, atherosclerosis, and arterial thrombosis.

State-of-the-Art lecture. Antiproliferative actions of angiotensin-(1-7) in vascular smooth muscle.

Hemodynamic factors, circulating hormones, paracrine factors, and intracrine factors influence vascular smooth muscle growth and plasticity. The well-characterized role of angiotensin II in the modulation of vascular tone and cell function may be critically involved in the mechanisms by which vascular smooth muscle responds to signals associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction and increases in oxidative stress. Studies from this laboratory suggest that the trophic actions of angiotensin II may be intrinsically regulated by angiotensin-(1-7), a separate product of the angiotensin system derived from the common substrate, angiotensin I. Exposure of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells to angiotensin-(1-7) inhibited the trophic actions of angiotensin II and reduced the expression of the mitogenic effects of both normal serum and platelet-derived growth factor. The growth-inhibitory actions of angiotensin-(1-7) were blocked by the selective D-alanine(7)-angiotensin-(1-7) antagonist and the nonselective angiotensin receptor blocker sarcosine(1)-threonine(8)-angiotensin II. In contrast, subtype-selective antagonists for the AT(1) and AT(2) receptors had no effect on the inhibitory actions of angiotensin-(1-7), a finding that is consistent with the pharmacological characterization of a high-affinity (125)I-labeled angiotensin-(1-7) binding site in the vasculature by use of selective and nonselective angiotensin II receptor antagonists. The relevance of these findings to the proliferative response of vascular smooth muscle cells after endothelial injury was confirmed by assessment of the effect of a 12-day infusion of angiotensin-(1-7) on neointimal formation. In these experiments, the proliferative response produced by injuring the carotid artery was inhibited by angiotensin-(1-7) through a mechanism that could not be explained by changes in arterial pressure. Because plasma angiotensin-(1-7) increased to levels comparable to those found in animals and human subjects given therapeutic doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-(1-7) may be one factor participating in the reversal of vascular proliferation during inhibition of angiotensin II formation or activity.

Neuroendocrine effects of dehydration in mice lacking the angiotensin AT1a receptor.

Angiotensin (Ang) type 1a (AT1a) receptors are critical in the control of blood pressure and water balance. Experiments were performed to determine the influence of dehydration on brain Ang receptors and plasma vasopressin (VP) in mice lacking this receptor. Control or AT1a knockout (AT1aKO) male mice were give water ad libitum or deprived of water for 48 hours. Animals were anesthetized with halothane, blood samples were collected by heart puncture, and brains were processed for Ang-receptor autoradiography with 125I-sarthran (0.4 nmol/L). Dehydration produced an increase in AT1 receptors in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and anterior pituitary (AP) in control mice (PVN: 70+/-16 versus 146+/-10 fmol/mg protein; AP: 41+/-7 versus 86+/-15 fmol/mg protein). No changes were noted in the median preoptic nucleus. The majority of the brain receptors were of the AT1 subtype. There was little or no specific Ang binding in AT1aKO mice and no effect of dehydration. Plasma VP levels were elevated in the halothane-anesthetized animals (>200 pg/mL) with no significant effect of dehydration. A separate experiment was performed with decapitated mice anesthetized with pentobarbital. Dehydration increased plasma VP in control mice, from 3.3+/-0.6 to 13.3+/-4.7 pg/mL, whereas no change was noted in the AT1aKO mice, 5.1+/-0.3 versus 6.1+/-0.7 pg/mL (water versus dehydration). These results demonstrate a differential response to dehydration in mice lacking AT1a receptors. There was no evidence for AT1 receptors of any subtype in the brain regions examined and no effect of dehydration on VP secretion or brain Ang receptors.

Differential actions of angiotensin-(1-7) in the kidney.

Angiotensin-(1-7) is a bioactive component of the renin-angiotensin system that is endogenously formed in the circulation and various tissues by several enzymatic pathways from either angiotensin (Ang) I or Ang II. Initial studies indicated that Ang-(1-7) mimicked some of the effects of Ang II, including stimulation of release of prostanoids and vasopressin. However, Ang-(1-7) is devoid of the vasoconstrictor, central pressor, or thirst-stimulating actions associated with Ang II. In fact, new findings reveal depressor, vasodilator, and antihypertensive actions that may be more apparent in hypertensive animals or humans. Thus, increasing evidence suggests that Ang-(1-7) may oppose the actions of Ang II directly or as a result of increasing prostaglandins or nitric oxide. In this review, we examine recent studies to address whether the kidney is a target organ for antihypertensive actions of Ang-(1-7).

Vasodepressor actions of angiotensin-(1-7) unmasked during combined treatment with lisinopril and losartan.

Blockade of angiotensin II (Ang II) function during 8 days of oral therapy with lisinopril (20 mg/kg) and losartan (10 mg/kg) normalized the arterial pressure (112+/-3/70+/-3 mm Hg) and raised the plasma concentrations of the vasodilator peptide angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] of 21 male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Treated animals were then given a 15-minute infusion of either mouse immunoglobulin G1 or a specific monoclonal Ang-(1-7) antibody while their blood pressure and heart rate were recorded continuously in the awake state. The concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) in arterial blood were determined by radioimmunoassay. Infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody caused significant elevations in mean arterial pressure that were sustained for the duration of the infusion and were accompanied by transient bradycardia. Although the hemodynamic effects produced by infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody had no effect on plasma levels of Ang II, they caused a twofold rise in the plasma concentrations of Ang-(1-7). A pressor response of similar magnitude and characteristics was obtained in a separate group of SHR treated with the combination of lisinopril and losartan for 8 days during an infusion of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II. The pressor response induced by the administration of this competitive, non-subtype-selective Ang II receptor blocker was not modified by pretreatment of the rats with an angiotensin type-2 (AT2) receptor blocker (PD123319). Plasma concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) were not changed by the administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II either in the absence or in the presence of PD123319 pretreatment. These results are the first to indicate an important contribution of Ang-(1-7) in mediating the vasodilator effects caused by combined inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptors. The comparable results obtained by administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II suggest that the vasodepressor effects of Ang-(1-7) during the combined treatment is modulated by a non-AT1/AT2 angiotensin subtype receptor.