Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.

Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids. Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019. Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use. Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.

Reproductive Outcomes following Use of Barbed Suture during Laparoscopic Myomectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy with the use of barbed suture. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study and follow-up survey. SETTING: Single, large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy with the use of barbed suture for myometrial closure between 2008 and 2016. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic myomectomy and a follow-up survey regarding pregnancy outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 486 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy between 2008 and 2016. Of the 428 with viable contact information, 240 agreed to participate (56%). Of those who responded to the survey, 101 (42%) attempted to get pregnant, and there were 4 unplanned pregnancies. There were 110 pregnancies among 76 survey respondents. In total, of the women attempting a postoperative pregnancy, 71% had at least 1 pregnancy. Comparing the women who did and did not conceive postoperatively, the group who got pregnant was on average younger, 33.8 ± 4.5 years vs 37.5 ± 6.5 years (p = .001); had fewer myomas removed, median = 2 (range 1-9) vs median = 2 (range 1-16) myomas (p = .038); and had a longer follow-up period, 30 months ( vs 30 (11-93 months) ± 20 (p <.001). The mean time to first postoperative pregnancy was 18.0 months (range 2-72 months). Of the 110 reported postoperative pregnancies, there were 60 live births (55%), 90% by means of cesarean section. The mean gestational age at birth was 37.8 weeks. In the cohort, there were 8 preterm births, 3 cases of abnormal placentation, 2 cases of fetal growth restriction, 3 cases of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and 2 cases of myoma degeneration requiring hospitalization for pain control. There were no uterine ruptures reported. CONCLUSION: According to our findings, pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed suture are comparable with available literature on pregnancy outcomes with conventional smooth suture.

Laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis and predictors of major complications: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced endometriosis may be at an increased risk of surgical complications following laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis; however, this relationship has not been examined. We sought to identify predictors of major complications following laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who underwent laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis between 2009 and 2016 within the Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Predictors of major perioperative complications were assessed by comparing the characteristics of women who had any major intraoperative or postoperative complication with those of women who had no complication. RESULTS: A total of 397 women underwent laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis including excision of superficial endometriosis (55.4%), excision of deep-infiltrating endometriosis (24.9%), fulguration of endometriosis (38.3%), hysterectomy (23.2%), ovarian cystectomy (35.5%), salpingectomy (18.6%), oophorectomy (15.1%), and bowel resection (1.0%). Women were followed for 60 days following surgery, over which time 18 women (4.5%) had a major perioperative complication. Patient characteristics and preoperative imaging were similar between women with and without complications. Women with advanced endometriosis, including stage III or IV endometriosis, deep-infiltrating endometriosis, or rectovaginal disease, were more likely to have a complication, though this did not reach statistical significance (77.8% of women with a complication versus 56.7% of women without a complication had advanced endometriosis, P = 0.077). Women who had a complication were more likely to have undergone adhesiolysis or ureterolysis (88.9% of women with a complication versus 52.5% without a complication underwent adhesiolysis, P = 0.002; and 61.1% of women with a complication versus 28.8% without a complication underwent ureterolysis, P = 0.003). The total number of procedures was greater for women who had a complication (4.3 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 1.5, P = 0.003). All other procedure characteristics were similar between women with and without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Complications following laparoscopic treatment of suspected endometriosis could not be predicted by preoperative patient characteristics or surgical findings of advanced endometriosis. Adhesiolysis, ureterolysis, and an increased number of total procedures may be predictive of perioperative complications, suggesting that surgical complexity as measured by the procedures performed, rather than the disease severity, may increase the risk of a complication compared with women who do not undergo these procedures.

Perioperative Outcomes of Myomectomy for Extreme Myoma Burden: Comparison of Surgical Approaches.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the perioperative outcomes of various modes of myomectomy (abdominal [AM], laparoscopic [LM], or robotic [RM]) in cases of extreme myoma burden. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A tertiary academic center in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENTS: All women who underwent an AM, LM, or RM for extreme myoma burden, defined as representing the upper quartile for specimen weight (≥434.6 g) or myoma count (≥7 myomas), between 2009 and 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes were collected from review of medical records, including estimated blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and complications. Univariate linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period 659 women underwent myomectomy for extreme myoma burden; 47.2% of cases were AM, 28.1% LM, and 24.7% RM. Overall myoma burden differed across the 3 routes and was greatest in the AM group (mean weight: 696.2 ± 784.5 g for AM vs 586.6 ± 426.1 g for LM and 586.6 ± 426.1 g for RM; mean number: 16.8 ± 15.0 for AM vs 7.2 ± 7.0 for LM and 6.7 ± 4.7 for RM; p <.001 for both). The 3 routes differed in operative time and length of stay, with RM having the longest operative time (mean, 239.7 minutes; p <.001) and AM the longest length of stay (mean, 2.2 ± .9 days; p <.001). Other perioperative outcomes were similar across the surgical approaches. Increasing myoma burden was associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications for all surgical approaches, with a threshold of 13 myomas associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications (odds ratio, 1.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.70; p = .009). Cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing specimen weight was greater in the RM cases as compared with AM (p = .002) or LM (p = .020), whereas the cumulative incidence of perioperative complications with increasing myoma count was lowest with AM compared with LM (p <.001) or RM (p <.001). CONCLUSION: Myomectomy for extreme myomas is feasible using an abdominal, laparoscopic, or robotic approach. Increased myoma burden is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications. A threshold of 13 myomas was associated with an almost 2-fold higher risk of perioperative complications for all modes. Perioperative complication outcomes were more favorable in AM or LM over RM with increased myoma weight and AM over LM or RM with increased myoma number.