RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Genetic heart diseases such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy can cause significant morbidity and mortality, ranging from syncope, chest pain, and palpitations to heart failure and sudden cardiac death. These diseases are inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion, meaning family members of affected individuals have a 1 in 2 chance of also inheriting the disease ("at-risk relatives"). The health care use patterns of individuals with a genetic heart disease, including emergency department presentations and hospital admissions, are poorly understood. By linking genetic heart disease registry data to routinely collected health data, we aim to provide a more comprehensive clinical data set to examine the burden of disease on individuals, families, and health care systems. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to link the Australian Genetic Heart Disease (AGHD) Registry with routinely collected whole-population health data sets to investigate the health care use of individuals with a genetic heart disease and their at-risk relatives. This linked data set will allow for the investigation of differences in outcomes and health care use due to disease, sex, socioeconomic status, and other factors. METHODS: The AGHD Registry is a nationwide data set that began in 2007 and aims to recruit individuals with a genetic heart disease and their family members. In this study, demographic, clinical, and genetic data (available from 2007 to 2019) for AGHD Registry participants and at-risk relatives residing in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, were linked to routinely collected health data. These data included NSW-based data sets covering hospitalizations (2001-2019), emergency department presentations (2005-2019), and both state-wide and national mortality registries (2007-2019). The linkage was performed by the Centre for Health Record Linkage. Investigations stratifying by diagnosis, age, sex, socioeconomic status, and gene status will be undertaken and reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: NSW AGHD Registry participants were linked to routinely collected health data sets using probabilistic matching (November 2019). Of 1720 AGHD Registry participants, 1384 had linkages with 11,610 hospital records, 7032 emergency department records, and 60 death records. Data assessment and harmonization were performed, and descriptive data analysis is underway. CONCLUSIONS: We intend to provide insights into the health care use patterns of individuals with a genetic heart disease and their at-risk relatives, including frequency of hospital admissions and differences due to factors such as disease, sex, and socioeconomic status. Identifying disparities and potential barriers to care may highlight specific health care needs (eg, between sexes) and factors impacting health care access and use. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48636.
RESUMEN
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a devastating event for the family and the community, especially when it occurs in a young person (<45 years). Genetic heart diseases, including cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmia syndromes, are an important cause of SCD in the young. Although cardiogenetic evaluation, that is, clinical evaluation, genetic testing, and psychological support, is increasingly performed after SCD, it is unknown how suddenly bereaved family members experience the process. We aimed to explore the experiences of family members with cardiogenetic evaluation after SCD, and their perception of the process and care received. In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 family members of young people (<45 years old) who died suddenly, including parents, siblings, and partners. The interviews were thematically analyzed by two researchers independently. In total, 18 interviews were conducted from 17 families. The following themes were identified: (1) Experiences with postmortem genetic testing including managing expectations and psychological impact, (2) appreciation of care such as access to genetic counseling and relief following cardiac evaluation of relatives, and (3) need for support including unmet psychological support needs and better coordination of care immediately after the death. Although participants appreciated the opportunity for cardiogenetic evaluation, they also experienced a lack of coordination of cardiogenetic and psychological care. Our findings stress the importance of access to expert multidisciplinary teams, including psychological care, to adequately support these families after a SCD in a young family member.
RESUMEN
The complexity of genetic variant interpretation means that a proportion of individuals who undergo genetic testing for a hereditary cancer syndrome will have their test result reclassified over time. Such a reclassification may involve a clinically significant upgrade or downgrade in pathogenicity, which may have significant implications for medical management. To date, few studies have examined the psychosocial impact of a reclassification in a hereditary cancer syndrome context. To address this gap, semi-structured telephone interviews were performed with eighteen individuals who had a BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome-related (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) gene variant reclassified. The interviews were analysed utilising an inductive, qualitative approach and emergent themes were identified by thematic analysis. Variable levels of recall amongst participants were found. Common motivations for initial testing included a significant personal and/or family history of cancer and a desire to "find an answer". No individual whose uncertain result was upgraded reported negative psychosocial outcomes; most reported adapting to their reclassified result and appraised their genetic testing experience positively. However, individuals whose likely pathogenic/pathogenic results were downgraded reported feelings of anger, shock and sadness post reclassification, highlighting that additional psychosocial support may be required for some. Genetic counselling issues and recommendations for clinical practice are outlined.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thorough investigation of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in those aged 1-40 years commonly reveals a heritable cause, yet access to postmortem genetic testing is variable. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore practices of postmortem genetic testing and attitudes of health care professionals worldwide. METHODS: A survey was administered among health care professionals recruited through professional associations, social media, and networks of researchers. Topics included practices around postmortem genetic testing, level of confidence in health care professionals' ability, and attitudes toward postmortem genetic testing practices. RESULTS: There were 112 respondents, with 93% from North America, Europe, and Australia/New Zealand, and 7% from South America, Asia and Africa. Only 30% reported autopsy as mandatory, and overall practices were largely case by case and not standardized. North American respondents (87%) more often perceived practices as ineffective compared to those from Europe (58%) and Australia/New Zealand (48%; P = .002). Where a heritable cause is suspected, 69% considered postmortem genetic testing and 61% offered genetic counseling to surviving family members. Financial resources varied widely. Half of participants believed practices in their countries perpetuated health inequalities. CONCLUSION: Postmortem genetic testing is not consistently available in the investigation of young SCD despite being a recommendation in international guidelines. Access to postmortem genetic testing, which is critical in ascertaining a cause of death in many cases, must be guided by well-resourced, multidisciplinary teams.
