Discrete terminal ileal ulcers in patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis: clinical significance and natural course.

BACKGROUND: Terminal ileal (TI) ulcers are occasionally detected in asymptomatic individuals and mostly resolve without any treatment. In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), TI ulcers are infrequently observed without evidence of backwash ileitis. However, the clinical significance and natural course of the lesions are unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency and clinical implications of TI ulcers in patients with UC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 397 patients with UC via successful TI intubation during colonoscopy. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients manifesting TI ulcers with those who did not. The natural course of TI lesions was also investigated during the follow-up periods. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (10.3%) showed TI ulcers without evidence of inflammation in the right colon. The patients with and without TI ulcers were not different in terms of baseline characteristics, disease activity and extent at the time of the UC diagnosis, proximal extension, Mayo endoscopic score at the last endoscopic examination, medication history, UC-related hospitalization, and relapse during follow-up periods. Of the 30 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy in patients with TI ulcers, 23 (76.7%) showed resolution of TI ulcer. In addition, patients with remaining TI ulcers did not differ in disease activity and biopsy results compared with those with resolving TI ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: Discrete TI ulcers are more common in patients with UC, compared with the healthy cohort. No significant clinical impact on disease extension and severity is found.

Doppler Ultrasonographic Anatomy of the Midline Nasal Dorsum.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to identify a safe method for filler injection to prevent blood vessel damage, by means of checking the location and depth of the blood vessels on the midline of the nose using Doppler ultrasonographic imaging. METHODS: Ultrasonographic images of the nasal areas of patients for filler injection rhinoplasty were reviewed. The location and depth of the dorsal nasal arteries and the intercanthal vein in each part on the midline of the nose were checked. RESULTS: The intercanthal vein was detected in the midline of the radix in 22 patients and the midline of the rhinion region in two patients. There were no patients in whom the intercanthal vein was observed in the midline of the supratip region. The dorsal nasal artery was detected in the rhinion region in six patients and in the supratip region in two patients. There were no patients in whom the dorsal nasal artery was observed in the midline of the radix. The dorsal nasal artery was located within 1.2 mm from the perichondrium or periosteum in three patients in whom it was detected in the rhinion. CONCLUSIONS: When performing dorsal augmentation, the injection of filler into the preperiosteal layer in the rhinion region should be avoided for the prevention of vascular embolism. During dorsal augmentation in patients with a nasal hump, the filler can be injected into the preperiosteal space in the radix by introducing a needle perpendicular to the periosteum from the skin. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.