Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surgery ; 174(4): 1063-1070, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500410

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemothorax is common, and management failure leads to worse outcomes. We sought to determine predictive factors and understand the role of trauma center performance in hemothorax management failure. METHODS: We prospectively examined initial hemothorax management (observation, pleural drainage, surgery) and failure requiring secondary intervention in 17 trauma centers. We defined hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention as thrombolytic administration, tube thoracostomy, image-guided drainage, or surgery after failure of the initial management strategy at the discretion of the treating trauma surgeon. Patient-level predictors of hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention were identified for 2 subgroups: initial observation and immediate pleural drainage. Trauma centers were divided into quartiles by hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention rate and hierarchical logistic regression quantified variation. RESULTS: Of 995 hemothoraces in 967 patients, 186 (19%) developed hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention. The frequency of hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention increased from observation to pleural drainage to surgical intervention (12%, 22%, and 35%, respectively). The number of ribs fractured (odds ratio 1.12 per fracture; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.26) and pulmonary contusion (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.03-4.91) predicted hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention in the observation subgroup, whereas chest injury severity (odds ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.12) and initial hemothorax volume evacuated (odds ratio 1.10 per 100 mL; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.16) predicted hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention after pleural drainage. After adjusting for patient characteristics in the logistic regression model for hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention, patients treated at high hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention trauma centers were 6 times more likely to undergo an intervention after initial hemothorax management failure than patients treated in low hemothorax management failure requiring secondary intervention trauma centers (odds ratio 6.18, 95% confidence interval 3.41-11.21). CONCLUSION: Failure of initial management of traumatic hemothorax is common and highly variable across trauma centers. Assessing patient selection for a given management strategy and center-level practices represent opportunities to improve outcomes from traumatic hemothorax.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Traumatismos Torácicos , Humanos , Hemotórax/diagnóstico , Hemotórax/etiología , Hemotórax/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Traumatismos Torácicos/cirugía , Tubos Torácicos , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones
2.
J Surg Res ; 239: 8-13, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30782545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: St. Boniface Hospital (SBH) plays a critical role in providing safe, accessible surgery in rural southern Haiti. We examine the impact of SBH increasing surgical capacity on case volume, patient complexity, and inpatient mortality across three phases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review and geospatial analysis of all surgical cases performed at SBH between 2015 and 2017 were performed. Inpatient mortality was defined by in-hospital deaths divided by the number of procedures performed. RESULTS: Between February 2015 and August 2017, over 2000 procedures were performed. The average number of surgeries per week was 3.1 with visiting surgical teams in phase 1 (P1), 10.4 with a single general surgeon in phase 2 (P2), and 20.1 with two surgeons and a resident in phase 3 (P3). There was a six-fold increase in surgical volume between P1 and P3 and a significant increase in case complexity. The distribution of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 1, 2, 3, and 4 during P2 was 81.05%, 14.74%, 3.42%, and 0.79%, respectively, whereas in P3, the distribution was 68.91%, 22.55%, 7.70%, and 0.84%. Surgical mortality was 0%, 1.2%, and 1.67% across phases. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing resources and surgical staff at SBH allowed for greater delivery of safe surgical care. This study highlights that investing in surgery has a significant impact in regions of great surgical need.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Rural/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Niño , Países en Desarrollo , Haití/epidemiología , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/economía , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicios de Salud Rural/economía , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Centros de Atención Terciaria/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA