Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow-cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR. RESULTS: Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow-cytometric results from 150 units was -0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study. CONCLUSION: Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow-cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.

RHCE-D-CE hybrid genes can cause false-negative DNA typing of the Rh e antigen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: DNA typing of the human Rh blood groups generally shows good agreement with serologically defined phenotypes. However, in the present report we describe four individuals who were declared Rh e negative by genotyping although they express the Rh e antigen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serotyping was performed using mono- and polyclonal Rh antisera. Fluorescent multiplex sequence-specific polymerase chain reactions (PCR-SSPs) identified RHD exons and the polymorphisms usually associated with the Rh E/e or Rh C/c/C(W) antigens. Additional PCR amplification reactions, which were carried out to reveal RHCE-D-CE hybrid genes, analysed exon 5 of the RH genes, the location of the polymorphism (676C-->G) coding for the Rh E and Rh e antigens. RESULTS: Four individuals were identified who expressed Rh e antigens but were negative by PCR-SSP typing for common Rhe-coding sequences. In one family analysed in detail, an RHCE-D5-CE hybrid gene associated with Rh e antigen expression was identified. A concomitant RHcE allele accounted for a seemingly regular typing pattern by conventional RH PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of RHCE-D5-CE hybrid alleles may cause false-negative DNA-typing results for the Rh e antigen that are easily overlooked unless appropriate RH hybrid PCR-SSPs are incorporated into conventional DNA-typing protocols. These and previous data strongly caution against an uncritical interpretation of RH DNA-typing results.