Medial sigmoid depression prevalence and association with a sigmoid notch: cone beam computed tomography and panoramic image study.

This study aims to determine whether and how the data of the medial sigmoid depression (MSD) area via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) differs from panoramic radiography. This study also aims to evaluate various sigmoid notch types and assess the relationship between sigmoid depression and notch morphology. A total of 129 individuals consisting of 258 sides were evaluated. Chi-Square/Fisher Exact tests were used to assess parameters on a categorical scale between two or more groups. McNemar's test compared the findings detected on panoramic and CBCT images. MSD was more prevalent in females than males in both techniques, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no association between the prevalence of MSD and the morphology of the sigmoid notch. The incidence of MSD shape was not significantly different between both imaging modalities. In both panoramic and CBCT, we found a high and similar prevalence of MSD. While the MSD prevalence was 66.7% for CBCT, it was 58.1% for panoramic. The shape or prevalence of MSDs in either approach did not correlate with sigmoid notch morphology. The two approaches' identical prevalence indicates that the panoramic image has adequately defines MSD. The high prevalence of MSD demonstrated how important it is for clinicians to characterize this anatomical variation accurately for the surgical treatment.

Assessment of dental anxiety levels among dental emergency patients during the COVID­19 pandemic through the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID­19) continues to affect dental emergency services worldwide. Dental anxiety (DA) is described as a common and distressing problem in terms of oral health maintenance. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate DA levels as well as the COVID­19 fear and perception of control (COVID­19 FPC) in patients attending dental emergency clinics during the COVID­19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sociodemographic, dental and medical data was obtained from the participants. A face-to-face questionnaire with questions referring to the reasons for the emergency dental visit, the visual pain scale, the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), and the COVID­19 Fear and Perception of Control Scale (COVID­19 FPCS) as well as additional questions concerning bruxism and a previous diagnosis of anxiety/panic attacks or depression was administered. The χ2 test was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 1,439 patients were included in the study. The most common reason for the dental visit was pain (47.5%). The prevalence of DA was 5.1% (74/1,439). A significant association was found between DA and gender (p = 0.020). The incidence of severe pain was higher in patients with DA than in those without DA (p = 0.002). No significant differences in the MDAS scores were found between patients with and without a chronic disease (p = 0.804), with regard to the educational status (p = 0.364), or between the age groups (p = 0.600). The prevalence of a 'strongly agree' response to all questions in COVID­19 FPCS was higher in patients with DA as compared to those without DA. CONCLUSIONS: Females and patients with severe pain were more likely to exhibit DA. In general, patients with DA strongly agreed with the statements of COVID­19 FPCS, which may indicate a correlation between the 2 scales.