Removal of multiple sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: defining the "correct" node.

PURPOSE: Sentinel node biopsy is routinely used for axillary staging in patients with clinical and radiological node negative breast cancer. The number of nodes removed at surgery is highly variable. A mean of 2.4 nodes is frequently seen in the larger series. Removal of multiple (3 or more) nodes does not improve the accuracy but increases both operative time and pathological analysis. The aim of the current study was to define the correct sentinel node based on uptake of blue dye and radioactive counts. METHODS: The sentinel node was identified in 121 consecutive patients using isosulfan blue dye and radioisotope. Nodes were labelled sequentially as (i) Hot (ii) Blue or (iii) Hot and Blue and submitted for pathological analysis. Data pertaining to blue dye uptake and radioisotope counts were recorded prospectively. This was correlated with pathological and scintigraphy findings. RESULTS: Thirty eight (32%) patients had a positive sentinel node. "Hot and Blue" nodes were found in 105 cases. The number of hot and blue nodes correlated exactly with the number seen on scintigraphy. "Blue" nodes were found in one case. "Hot" nodes were found in 15 cases. In cases where a "hot and blue" node was positive there were no further "hot" or "blue" nodes found to be positive. CONCLUSION: Removal of multiple sentinel nodes can be avoided by removing all hot and blue nodes and correlating with findings on lymphoscintigraphy. When present (87% of cases), the "hot and blue" node accurately predicts the pathological burden of the axilla.

The significance of immunohistochemistry positivity in sentinel nodes which are negative on haematoxylin and eosin in breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy allows a more detailed examination of a smaller number of lymph nodes in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer. Immunohistochemistry detects small tumour burden not routinely seen on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The significance of such findings remains to be fully elucidated. AIM: To assess the axillary disease burden of patients in whom the sentinel lymph node biopsy was positive on immunohistochemistry and negative on H and E. METHODS: An analysis of patients who underwent SLN mapping for breast cancer at St Vincent's University Hospital from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2006 was conducted. All SLNs were assessed by serial H&E and IHC sections. Patients with micrometastases (0.2-2mm) underwent a completion axillary lymph node dissections (CLND). Patients with ITC (<0.2mm) were individually discussed and a CLND was performed selectively based on additional clinicopathological criteria and patient preference. Analysis of the additional nodes from CLND was performed. Patients were followed for a median of 27 months (range 12-72 months). RESULTS: 1076 patients who underwent SLN were included for analysis. 211 (20%) had a positive SLN biopsy using H&E. Forty-nine patients (5%) had a negative SLN on H&E which was positive on IHC. Of these, 15 had micrometastases and underwent a CLND. Two had further axillary nodal disease. ITC were found in the remaining 34 patients. Sixteen of these patients underwent a CLND. Five of this group had further nodal disease. CONCLUSION: Micrometastases and isolated tumour cells, detected only by immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel lymph nodes, are associated with further positive nodes in the axilla in up to 15% of patients. This upstaging of disease may impact upon patient outcome.