Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Ren Fail ; 46(2): 2350767, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening for depression can be challenging among hemodialysis patients due to the overlap of depressive symptoms with dialysis or kidney disease related symptoms. The aim of this study was to understand these overlapping symptoms and develop a depression screening tool for better clinical assessment of depressive symptoms in dialysis patients. METHODS: We surveyed 1,085 dialysis patients between March 1, 2018 and February 28, 2023 at 15 dialysis facilities in Northeast Ohio with the 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. To evaluate overlap across questionnaire items, we used structural equation modeling (SEM). We predicted and transformed factor scores to create a hemodialysis-adjusted PHQ-9 (hdPHQ-9). In exploratory analysis (N = 173), we evaluated the performance of the hdPHQ-9 relative to the PHQ-9 that also received a Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. RESULTS: Our study sample included a high percentage of Black patients (74.6%) and 157 (14.5%) survey participants screened positive for depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The magnitude of overlap was small for (respectively, PHQ-9 item with KDQOLTM item) fatigue with washed out, guilt with burden on family, appetite with nausea and movement with lightheaded. The hdPHQ-9 showed reasonably high sensitivity (0.81 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58, 0.95) and specificity (0.84 with 95% CI 0.77, 0.89); however, this was not a significant improvement from the PHQ-9. CONCLUSION: There is little overlap between depressive symptoms and dialysis or kidney disease symptoms. The PHQ-9 was found to be an appropriate depression screening instrument for dialysis patients.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Anciano , Ohio/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
2.
Res Involv Engagem ; 10(1): 11, 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38273412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lay health advisors (LHAs) are increasingly being used to increase patient and public involvement in research, disseminate health information, and work toward preventing health disparities within communities at risk. This research explored LHAs' experiences with training and recruiting for a hypertension research project which ended due to minimal enrollment. METHODS: The methodological design was qualitative description. One face-to-face semi-structured focus group was held with eight African American LHAs in Cleveland, Ohio, in the fall of 2019. The focus group was digitally recorded and transcribed by a professional transcriptionist and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Trainees reflected on how much they learned from the training and described feeling passionate and excited about their community work for the project. We identified three key themes from the data: (1) Systemic and Institutional Factors Affected LHAs' Experiences (subthemes: Unnecessarily Burdensome Requirements and Exploitation of Community Members for Research Gain; (2) Feeling Used Yet Unseen: Exclusion from Decision-Making Processes; (3) Worrying that Project Termination Damaged their Reputation; and (4) Disengaging from Research. We share lessons learned, including the need for LHAs' expertise to be integrated into research studies, and for projects to establish clear communication and expectations regarding research rigor and requirements. CONCLUSION: Our results have implications for future studies attempting to build equitable and strong academic-community relationships to yield rigorous and useful research to reduce health disparities.


Community health workers (CHWs) are usually community members trained broadly to help the community address health issues. Community members (including patients and the public) who have experiences with specific diseases can be important resources in health research, contributing critical on-the-ground feedback and information about and to their communities, especially those with high rates of health disparities. In this study, CHWs with personal experience as patients with hypertension were trained to become lay health advisors (LHAs) specifically to assist with a hypertension research study in Cleveland, Ohio. This study explored LHAs' experiences with their training for the research study and the study itself, which ended early because the project did not get enough participants. Eight African American LHAs participated in a focus group in the fall of 2019, sharing their experiences. The focus groups were recorded on a digital device and a professional transcriptionist transcribed them. We found that the LHA trainees learned a lot from the training. They were passionate and excited about working with the community work for the project, but also felt used by the project leadership, and not included in important decisions. When the project ended, they also felt their reputations were damaged. Finally, the experience with the project led to LHAs wanting to not participate in research anymore. We conclude that projects should include strong and clear lines of communication, better integrate LHAs into research studies as partners and honor their expertise.

3.
Health Promot Pract ; : 15248399231221157, 2023 Dec 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153025

RESUMEN

Health and human service community organizations and researchers have important insights and resources to share with each other, yet often have very little information about how to interact in meaningful and equitable ways. Conceptualized by and for community organization professionals wanting to equitably interact with academic researchers, BRACE (Building Research for Academic and Community Equity) is a toolkit easily accessible to community members which explains research information and jargon in clear terms. BRACE uses community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles to guide both community organizations and academics seeking to partner on research. The BRACE toolkit's two main sections focus on identifying ideal aspects of community-academic research partnerships and writing grant proposals. Tools such as BRACE have the potential to increase the impact of community-engaged research by providing concrete guides for building partnerships and potentially sustaining them through grant funding.

4.
Eval Program Plann ; 96: 102189, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436308

RESUMEN

Increasing research capacity in community-based organizations (CBOs) can equip the organizations to be more equal partners in academic/community partnerships and can help them be more accountable to their clients and funders. In this study, we report on findings from four years of data collected from the Community Research Scholars Initiative (CRSI) in Cleveland, Ohio. CRSI provided intensive research training over two years to two cohorts (N = 9) of frontline workers ("Scholars") from CBOs focused on health disparities. Scholars completed one year of didactic training and one year of mentoring to complete a research project based at their organization. Findings from surveys, focus groups with Scholars, and supervisor interviews indicated changes in Scholars' knowledge, confidence, and comfort with research concepts and skills. Scholars also demonstrated greater confidence in interacting with academic researchers, enhanced networks and career opportunities, and increased capacity for conducting community-based research. Scholar and organization engagement with community-based research was maintained after the program's end through a community-based research network (CBRN). Findings suggest that the intensive training program for community members with a broad curriculum, mentoring, and strong support helped changed how CBOs think about data and research and demonstrate the impact of their work.


Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Investigadores , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigadores/educación , Mentores , Curriculum , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad
5.
Kidney Med ; 4(3): 100413, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35386606

RESUMEN

Rationale & Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is common among hemodialysis patients, but treatment can add to their pill burden and may be limited by nonadherence. We sought to investigate the value of directly observed, once-weekly fluoxetine dosing in MDD. Study Design: Feasibility trial of adult hemodialysis patients with untreated MDD. The diagnosis of MDD was determined using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Setting & Participants: 16 patients at 15 hemodialysis facilities in Northeast Ohio. Intervention: Patients were initially prescribed 20 mg of fluoxetine once daily for 2 weeks to assess their tolerance. The patients took this daily fluoxetine unobserved at home. They were then transitioned to 90 mg of fluoxetine once weekly for 10 weeks. The patients took this weekly fluoxetine during hemodialysis treatment and were observed by the study staff. The dose was increased to 180 mg once weekly among patients with an inadequate response based on the judgment of the prescribing clinician. Outcomes: Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview diagnosis of MDD at the end of the trial and changes in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores over 12 weeks. Results: One patient withdrew from active treatment after 2 daily doses of 20 mg of fluoxetine because of side effects of stomach cramping, vomiting, dizziness, and lightheadedness but completed the baseline and final assessments. The remaining 15 patients received all scheduled weekly fluoxetine doses during the trial. At 12 weeks, 14 of 16 patients (87.5%) no longer met the criteria for MDD (P < 0.001). Among all participants, the mean PHQ-9 scores decreased from 11.3 to 6.6 (P = 0.002). Limitations: Small sample size, modestly elevated baseline PHQ-9 scores, no comparison group, and short treatment duration. Conclusions: Directly observed, once-weekly fluoxetine may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for hemodialysis patients. Future research should investigate longer-term health outcomes of weekly fluoxetine in this population and explore the feasibility of implementing this depression treatment model in routine clinical practice. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03390933.

6.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc ; 27(2): 148-155, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examined interview data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005 to 2016. AIM: To determine national trends in self-reported depressive symptoms. METHOD: Depressive symptoms were assessed using self-reported data on the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with a total score ≥10 and an individual item score of 2 or 3, indicating greater severity. RESULTS: A total of 31,191 individuals contributed PHQ-9 data from 2005 to 2016. The absolute proportion of individuals with total PHQ-9 score ≥10 increased from 6.2% to 8.1%. After adjustment for participant demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions, the odds ratio for high PHQ-9 score at the end versus the beginning of the study interval was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI: 1.07, 1.50]). Anhedonia, guilt/worthlessness, appetite, and hypoactivity/hyperactivity had the largest increases in individual item risk after adjusting for demographic and comorbid characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: There were sizeable increases in the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms in the United States over an 11-year period. Further work is needed to understand the reasons for and implications of this increase. However, the results suggest greater efforts should be made by health care providers to screen for depressive symptoms that may warrant further assessment, treatment, or referral to mental health services as needed.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Adulto , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Prevalencia , Autoinforme , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 56(1): 3-13, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216496

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The antidepressant medication fluoxetine at 90 mg dosed weekly is as effective and safe as standard formulation fluoxetine 20 mg dosed daily in patients with major depressive disorder. Weekly fluoxetine has not been well studied in hemodialysis patients, and doses beyond 90 mg/week have not been described in this population. This case series, derived from a larger study on depression in hemodialysis patients, describes the use of weekly fluoxetine at dosages beyond 90 mg/week. METHOD: Hemodialysis patients with depressive symptom severity scored ≥10 on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and major depressive disorder confirmed with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview were initially prescribed daily fluoxetine for two weeks and then transitioned to weekly fluoxetine. Dosage titration was made at the discretion of the prescribing clinician. Fluoxetine was continued for a total of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Four women, aged 24 to 65 years, on hemodialysis for 1 to 18 years, were started on weekly fluoxetine that was increased over several weeks up to 180 mg. Side effects included restlessness, dry mouth, sedation, and lightheadedness. Two patients ultimately had their weekly fluoxetine decreased back to 90 mg. However, all four continued weekly fluoxetine as part of poststudy aftercare and no longer met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder, current episode. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly fluoxetine at doses of 180 mg may be a reasonable treatment consideration for hemodialysis patients who have partial or insufficient antidepressant response. Side effects may limit tolerance of the 180 mg dose in some individuals. Future research should investigate longer term health outcomes of weekly fluoxetine in this population.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Fluoxetina , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Diálisis Renal , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Psychiatry Res ; 286: 112872, 2020 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32151848

RESUMEN

Major depression consists of multiple phenotypic traits. Our objective was to characterize depressive phenotypes in the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9 using the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) research framework. Cross-sectional data were examined from the 2013-2014 (N = 5397) and 2015-2016 (N = 5164) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a large, nationally representative U.S. sample. Using both factor analysis and qualitative analysis in mapping scale items along RDoC domains, a four factor model was found to be theoretically appropriate and had an excellent model fit for the PHQ-9. The factor structure consisted of phenotypes describing Negative Valence Systems and Externalizing (anhedonia and depression), Negative Valence Systems and Internalizing (depression, guilt and self-harm), Arousal and Regulatory Systems (sleep, fatigue and appetite) and Cognitive and Sensorimotor Systems (concentration and psychomotor). High correlation between these phenotypes did indicate screening and monitoring for depression study population using a single depression score is likely useful in most circumstances. In multiple indicator multiple cause analysis, differences in the means of the phenotypic traits were found by age, race/ethnicity, sex, and number of comorbidities. Future research should explore whether phenotype expression derived from readily available self-rated depression scales can help to inform more personalized care.

9.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork ; 12(3): 9-15, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31489058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Communication between massage therapy patients and their medical providers has not been widely described, especially with respect to health care in the United States. PURPOSE: To examine which type of medical providers recommend massage therapy (MT), and how often massage therapy patients tell their providers about their treatment. SETTING: Independent massage therapy practices in a Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) in Northeast Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: 21 licensed massage therapists (LMT). RESEARCH DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study. For consecutive, nonrepeating visits to their practices, each LMT completed up to 20 cards with information on the patient and visit. Analysis compared visits for patients based on whether they reported telling their health provider about their use of MT or being recommended for massage by a health provider. RESULTS: Among 403 visits to 21 LMTs, 51% of patients had told their primary care clinician about seeing an LMT, and for 23%, a health-care provider had recommended visiting an LMT for that visit. Patients who told their primary care provider that they use massage therapy were more likely to be established patients, or to be seen for chronic pain complaints. Visits recommended by a physician were more likely to be for chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: Patients who are established in the massage practice and those receiving massage for a specific condition are more likely to tell their primary care provider that they use massage and are also more likely to have been recommended for massage by a health-care provider. This information will help LMTs target and inform patients about the importance of talking with their health-care providers about their use of massage, and provide LMTs with a starting point of which types of health-care providers already recommend massage. This information will further open the dialogue about the integration of massage therapy in conventional health care.

10.
Prog Transplant ; 29(3): 225-229, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31146633

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Organ donation and other altruistic behaviors may be influenced by multiple factors, such as demographic characteristics, religious beliefs, and social norms. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the role of genetic factors on altruism in identical and fraternal twin pairs? DESIGN: Twins attending a twin festival (N = 296) completed an organ donation and altruistic behavior survey. RESULTS: Concordance for stage of change for organ donation was 65% among identical twin pairs versus 33% among fraternal twin pairs (P = .004). Concordance was higher among identical versus fraternal twin pairs for several altruistic behaviors, including giving directions to a stranger (63% vs 24%, P < .001), giving money to a stranger (51% vs 29%, P = .048), donating goods to charity (46% vs 16%, P = .005), and offering a seat on the bus (46% vs 24%, P = .04). DISCUSSION: We conclude that genetic factors may play a role in decisions about organ donation and other altruistic behaviors.


Asunto(s)
Altruismo , Organizaciones de Beneficencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Gemelos Dicigóticos/psicología , Gemelos Monocigóticos/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Gemelos Dicigóticos/genética , Gemelos Monocigóticos/genética , Adulto Joven
11.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 13(10): 1550-1555, 2018 10 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30135171

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many patients with ESKD face barriers in completing the steps required to obtain a transplant. These eight sequential steps are medical suitability, interest in transplant, referral to a transplant center, first visit to center, transplant workup, successful candidate, waiting list or identify living donor, and receive transplant. This study sought to determine the effect of navigators on helping patients complete these steps. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Our study was a cluster randomized, controlled trial involving 40 hemodialysis facilities and four transplant centers in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. Four trained kidney transplant recipients met regularly with patients on hemodialysis at 20 intervention facilities, determined their step in the transplant process, and provided tailored information and assistance in completing that step and subsequent steps. Patients at 20 control facilities continued to receive usual care. Primary study outcomes were waiting list placement and receipt of a deceased or living donor transplant. An exploratory outcome was first visit to a transplant center. RESULTS: Before the trial, intervention (1041 patients) and control (836 patients) groups were similar in the proportions of patients who made a first visit to a transplant center, were placed on a waiting list, and received a deceased or living donor transplant. At the end of the trial, intervention and control groups were also similar in first visit (16.1% versus 13.8%; difference, 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -0.8% to 5.5%), waitlisting (16.3% versus 13.8%; difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval, -1.2% to 6.1%), deceased donor transplantation (2.8% versus 2.2%; difference, 0.6%; 95% confidence interval, -0.8% to 2.1%), and living donor transplantation (1.2% versus 1.0%; difference, 0.1%; 95% confidence interval, -0.9% to 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Use of trained kidney transplant recipients as navigators did not increase first visits to a transplant center, waiting list placement, and receipt of deceased or living donor transplants.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Trasplante de Riñón , Navegación de Pacientes , Listas de Espera , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
12.
Int J Ther Massage Bodywork ; 11(3): 4-9, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30108667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic localized pain and decreased upper extremity mobility commonly occur following breast cancer surgery and may persist despite use of pain medication and physical therapy. PURPOSE: We sought to determine the value of myofascial massage to address these pain and mobility limitations. SETTING: The study took place at a clinical massage spa in the U.S. Midwest. The research was overseen by MetroHealth Medical Center's Institutional Review Board and Case Center for Reducing Health Disparities research staff. PARTICIPANTS: 21 women with persistent pain and mobility limitations 3-18 months following breast surgery. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial where intervention patients received myofascial massages and control patients received relaxation massages. INTERVENTION: Intervention participants received 16 myofascial massage sessions over eight weeks that focused on the affected breast, chest, and shoulder areas. Control participants received 16 relaxation massage sessions over eight weeks that avoided the affected breast, chest, and shoulder areas. Participants completed a validated questionnaire at the beginning and end of the study that asked about pain, mobility, and quality of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures include change in self-reported pain, self-reported mobility, and three quality-of-life questions. RESULTS: At baseline, intervention and control participants were similar in demographic and medical characteristics, pain and mobility ratings, and quality of life. Compared to control participants, intervention participants had more favorable changes in pain (-10.7 vs. +0.4, p < .001), mobility (-14.5 vs. -0.8, p < .001), and general health (+29.5 vs. -2.5, p = .002) after eight weeks. All intervention and control participants reported that receiving massage treatments was a positive experience. CONCLUSIONS: Myofascial massage is a promising treatment to address chronic pain and mobility limitations following breast cancer surgery. Further work in several areas is needed to confirm and expand on our study findings.

13.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 13(7): 993-1001, 2018 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previous studies suggest that tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use is associated with CKD. We examined the associations of substance use with CKD progression and all-cause mortality among patients with CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study is a prospective, longitudinal cohort study among 3939 participants with CKD in the United States. Self-reported tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, marijuana use, and hard illicit drug (cocaine, heroin, or methamphetamine) use were obtained at baseline and annual follow-up visits. CKD progression was defined as incident ESKD or halving of eGFR. Substance use was modeled as the cumulative average exposure to capture both recent and long-term use in multivariable time-dependent Cox regression. RESULTS: Over a median 5.5-year follow-up, 1287 participants developed CKD progression, and 1001 died. Baseline proportions of tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, marijuana use, and hard illicit drug use were 13%, 20%, 33%, and 12%, respectively. Compared with nonsmoking throughout follow-up, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for persistent tobacco smoking were 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.21) for CKD progression and 1.86 (95% confidence interval, 1.54 to 2.24) for all-cause mortality. Compared with nondrinking throughout follow-up, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for persistent alcohol drinking were 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.29) for CKD progression and 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.91) for all-cause mortality. Compared with nonuse throughout follow-up, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for persistent marijuana use were 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.07) for CKD progression and 1.11 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.30) for all-cause mortality. Compared with nonuse throughout follow-up, multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for persistent hard illicit drug use were 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.55) for CKD progression and 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.81) for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hard illicit drug use is associated with higher risk of CKD progression and all-cause mortality, tobacco smoking is associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality, and alcohol drinking is associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality among patients with CKD.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Autoinforme , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos
14.
Child Welfare ; 95(5): 79-95, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30147115

RESUMEN

This descriptive study examines the prevalence of comorbid physical and mental health issues among young clients at a large mental health agency. Health status data was collected from the intake process of youth seeking mental health services at a Northeast Ohio agency (n = 1,076). The results show a higher prevalence of asthma and obesity among clients with known mental health diagnoses at this agency compared to national averages. The results could help the agency develop strategies for implementation of an integrated care model to better meet the complex needs of the clients served.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA