Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 60(4-5): 230-240, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33764189

RESUMEN

An American Academy of Pediatrics State Chapter organized a 6-month, mostly online quality improvement learning collaborative to improve antibiotic prescribing and patient education for upper respiratory infection (URI) and acute otitis media (AOM). Practices submitted data on quality measures at baseline, monthly, and 4 months post-project. Fifty-three clinicians from 6 independent, private primary care pediatric practices participated. Use of first-line antibiotics for AOM increased from 63.5% at baseline to 80.4% 4 months post-project. Use of safety-net antibiotic prescriptions (SNAP) for AOM increased from 4.5% to 16.9%. Educating patients about management for URI increased from 66.1% to 88.0% and for AOM from 20.4% to 85.6%. Practices maintained high performance for not prescribing antibiotics for URI (94.4% to 96.2%). Leveraging local relationships and national resources, this replicable antibiotic stewardship project engaged independent private practices to improve patient education for URI and AOM and prescribing and use of SNAP for AOM.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Otitis Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Pediatría/educación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sociedades Médicas
2.
Pediatrics ; 140(2)2017 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28739651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pediatric medical professionals have an increasing desire for quality improvement (QI) methods that produce sustainable changes in health care delivery. Previous reports have described QI in single settings or single coordinating entities that work with multiple sites. The objectives of this project are (1) to improve care for children with asthma across multiple practice settings and (2) to develop state-level expertise to support QI projects across entities in multiple states. METHODS: Using a multiwave approach, the Chapter Quality Network of the American Academy of Pediatrics implemented statewide learning collaboratives in several states. For each cycle, a national leadership team coached multiple American Academy of Pediatrics chapter leadership teams, which, in turn, coached individual pediatric practices through 2 nested learning collaboratives. State chapters received data and reporting tools and a curriculum fostering QI learning and support change at the practice level. Practices implemented an asthma assessment tool and registry, analyzed work flows, and implemented self-management tools in plan-do-study-act cycles. Sixteen process and outcome measures, including optimal asthma care, were collected and analyzed by using run charts on a monthly dashboard. Chapter leaders provided feedback on sustainable QI change through surveys and interviews. RESULTS: Optimal asthma care improved from 42% to 81% across the 4 waves. The percentage of patients rated by physicians as well controlled rose from 59% to 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma care can be improved by supporting practice change through statewide QI learning collaboratives.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Atención a la Salud/normas , Pediatría/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Regionalización/organización & administración , Niño , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
J Contin Educ Health Prof ; 28(3): 131-9, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18712794

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite the existence of guidelines for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), clinical practices vary substantially. Practitioners can apply quality improvement (QI) strategies to adapt office processes and clinical practice towards evidence-based care. We identified facilitators and barriers to participation in a professional society-led structured collaborative to learn QI methods and improve care. METHODS: Ten chapters of the American Academy of Pediatrics participated in the effort. Support to chapter leaders included conference calls, listserv, technical support, and data aggregation. Support from the chapters to participating pediatricians included online continuing medical education modules, a workshop, chart reviews, and QI coaching. Qualitative data were obtained through interviews of 22 project leaders and reviews of project progress reports. Quantitative results were obtained from surveys of 186 physician participants. Outcomes included facilitators/barriers to program implementation, evidence for sustained chapter QI infrastructure, and participant assessment of improvements in care. RESULTS: Facilitators included physician opinion leaders, a workshop, conference calls, QI support, and opportunities for shared learning. Barriers included lack of time, competing clinical priorities, challenges of using the online module, and underutilization of listservs. Seven chapters planned ongoing activities around attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), eight had specific plans to use QI infrastructure for additional clinical topics, and three developed significant QI infrastructure. Physicians believed care improved. DISCUSSION: As requirements grow for participation in QI for maintenance of certification, national and state-level professional societies are interested in and can develop infrastructure to support quality improvement. Coaching, tools, and support from the national organization and QI experts are helpful in facilitating efforts.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Educación Médica Continua/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sociedades Médicas , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Niño , Humanos , Pediatría , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos
4.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 33(12 Suppl): 66-74, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18277640

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Partnerships for Quality project was designed to close the gap between knowledge and care for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by fostering a partnership between a major medical specialty society, a professional certifying body, a national family-based advocacy organization, and a child health improvement organization. METHODS: Ten American Academy of Pediatrics chapters conducted training workshops for practicing pediatricians and their office teams. Assistance was provided in the form of feedback of data, ongoing communication via conference calls, and a listserve. Two national workshops were conducted to disseminate learnings and promote sustainability. RESULTS: Participation in the intervention resulted in greater involvement in quality improvement activities by practice teams and improved care outcomes. The training workshops facilitated collaboration among providers, parents, and the educational, mental health, and legal systems. DISCUSSION: The partnership structure used demonstrated what professional societies can do to support improvement at the local level and what component chapters need to do to support improvement at the practice level. The integration of quality improvement infrastructure and policy changes at the national and local levels suggest that the quality efforts are likely to be sustained, providing long-term improvement in care and outcomes for children and families.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Educación Médica Continua , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/educación , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Pediatría/educación , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Sociedades Médicas , Niño , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Proyectos Piloto , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Estados Unidos , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
5.
Pediatrics ; 110(2 Pt 1): 239-48, 2002 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12165573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: State Medicaid programs are obligated by federal law to ensure that enrolled children have access to care and services to the same extent as other children in the same geographic area. Because most children in the United States receive health care from private primary care physicians, participation by private, office-based primary care pediatricians is critical to meeting this equal access obligation. The objective of this study was to document variations in Medicaid participation of private office-based primary care pediatricians across states and to examine the effects of payment levels, prevalence of capitated Medicaid payment, and paperwork concerns on participation. METHODS: Survey data collected from 3773 primary care pediatricians who practice in private office-based settings were analyzed with Medicaid physician payment data from other sources. Univariate analyses and a multiple regression were used to examine the effects of payment level, prevalence of capitated Medicaid payment, and paperwork concerns on private primary care pediatricians' participation in state Medicaid programs. RESULTS: Results revealed substantial state-to-state variation in respondents' participation in Medicaid. Univariate analyses found that participation increased with state Medicaid payment levels but decreased as the proportion of Medicaid enrollees with primary care capitated payments rose and as paperwork concerns increased. With physician workforce held constant, a regression analysis showed that pediatrician participation in Medicaid increased significantly with Medicaid payment but decreased as the proportion of capitated Medicaid patients increased and as paperwork concerns rose. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that low payment, capitation, and paperwork concerns all relate to low Medicaid participation by primary care office-based pediatricians. It behooves state policy makers to address these 3 factors to ensure sufficient primary care physician capacity to serve appropriately children who are enrolled in state Medicaid programs.


Asunto(s)
Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/economía , Administración de la Práctica Médica/economía , Práctica Privada/economía , Capitación , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño/economía , Toma de Decisiones , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración de la Práctica Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Planes Estatales de Salud/economía , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...