Playing in the "Gutter": Cultivating Creativity in Medical Education and Practice.

In comics, "gutters" are the empty spaces between panels that readers must navigate to weave disjointed visual sequences into coherent narratives. A gutter, however, is more than a blank space--it represents a creative zone for making connections and for constructing meaning from disparate ideas, values, and experiences. Over the course of medical training, learners encounter various "gutters" created by the disconnected subject blocks and learning experiences within the curriculum, the ambiguity and uncertainty of medical practice, and the conflicts and tensions within clinical encounters. Navigating these gutters requires not only medical knowledge and skills but also creativity, defined as the ability to make connections between disparate fragments to create meaningful, new configurations. To cultivate medical students' creative capacity, the authors developed the Integrated Clinical Arts (ICA) program, a required component of the first-year curriculum at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. ICA workshops are designed to place students in a metaphorical gutter, wherein they can practice making connections between medicine and arts-based disciplines. By playing in the gutter, students have opportunities to broaden their perspectives, gain new insights into both medical practice and themselves, and explore different ways of making meaning. Student feedback on the ICA program highlights an important role for creativity and the arts in medicine: to transform gutters from potential learning barriers into opportunities for discovery, self-reflection, and personal growth.

Health disparity curriculum at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

There is increasing recognition that, in addition to acquiring knowledge of basic sciences and clinical skills, medical students must also gain an understanding of health disparities, and develop a defined skill set to address these inequalities. There are few descriptions in the literature of a systematic, longitudinal curriculum in health disparities. Using Kern's six-step approach to curriculum development along with principles of experiential and active learning, student champions and the Office of Medical Education developed a multimodal health disparities curriculum. This curriculum includes required experiences for medical students in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd year, along with elective experiences throughout medical school. Students are examined on their knowledge, skills and attitudes towards health disparities prior to graduation. It is our hope this curriculum empowers students with the knowledge, skills and attitudes to care for patients while helping patients navigate the socioeconomic and cultural issues that may affect their health.

Future health disparity initiatives at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

As the United States embarks on health care reform through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary to practice medicine will change. Education centered on health disparities and social determinants of health will become increasingly more important as 32 million Americans receive coverage through the ACA. In this paper, we describe future initiatives at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University in training medical students on health disparities and social determinants of health through mechanisms such as the Primary Care-Population Medicine Program, the Rhode Island Area Health Education Center, the Scholarly Concentration program and other mechanisms.

A new clinical skills clerkship for medical students.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The transition to clinical clerkships can be challenging for medical students. In the context of a formal clinical curriculum redesign, a curriculum team led by family physicians systematically planned and implemented a 3-week course to prepare new third-year students for specialty-specific clerkships. METHODS: Informed by a formal needs assessment, we developed a classroom-based Clinical Skills Clerkship (CSC) with varied instructional approaches. The three major curriculum components are (1) specialty-specific, longitudinal clinical care of a three-generation virtual family that is taught in lectures and small groups and assessed with an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), (2) clinical skills including procedure stations and interprofessional education experiences, and (3) a series of professional development activities. The CSC has 90 hours of curriculum taught by more than 120 faculty members from a wide variety of specialties and disciplines. A cohort of senior medical students teach in the course as part of a medical education elective. RESULTS: The CSC was first delivered to 98 students in 2012 who performed well on the course's OSCE. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of both the curriculum components and the senior medical student teachers were positive. Performance on comparable CSC and Internal Medicine Clerkship OSCE stations and a series of student focus groups demonstrate longer-term impact. CONCLUSIONS: A successful curriculum redesign requires considerable planning and coordination. We designed and implemented a comprehensive CSC that was both well received and effective. Peer teaching programs can provide medical education leadership experiences with benefits for learners, teachers, and medical educators.

Assessing medical students for non-traditional competencies.

Assessing medical student competence in non-traditional domains can be challenging. Conventional methods of assessment are generally unsatisfactory. The authors discuss the approach taken at the Brown Medical School, USA to assess students at the beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels in the social and community contexts of health care - one of the nine abilities that comprise Brown's competency-based curriculum. At the beginner level, faculty use weekly field notes written by students about their experiences in community practice placements as the means for assessment. At the intermediate level, faculty assess students based on their completion of a project focused on a community health problem. At the advanced level, a screening process is used in which students first meet individually with a member of the assessment committee who determines if the student's efforts appear to meet the expected standards. If success seemed likely, then the student was encouraged to appear before the whole committee. The authors discuss the common use of subjective judgments at all three levels and the importance of diverse perspectives in achieving a consensus. Allowing students wide latitude in expressing themselves and their accomplishments helps to ensure success.

Assessing students' performances in a competency-based curriculum.

Brown Medical School embarked on planning a competency-based curriculum in 1989. The curriculum was fully implemented in 1996, effective for the MD class of 2000. To graduate, a student must (1) demonstrate mastery of the medical knowledge base, (2) achieve beginning and intermediate levels of proficiency in nine key abilities, and (3) attain an advanced level in the ability called "problem solving" and three other abilities that the student chooses based on his or her interests. The nine abilities are effective communication; basic clinical skills; using basic science in the practice of medicine; diagnosis, management, and prevention; lifelong learning; self-awareness, self-care, and personal growth; the social and community contexts of health care; moral reasoning and clinical ethics; and problem solving. As a major educational innovation, the new competency-based curriculum has been successfully woven into the fabric of the medical school learning environment. In this article, the authors describe how faculty go about assessing students' performances relative to the nine abilities.