R-mandelonitrile-lyase, homolog to Pru d 10, is a major peach allergen in peach allergic Spanish population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Peach allergy is a prevalent cause of food allergy. Despite the repertoire of allergens available for molecular diagnosis, there are still patients with undetectable IgE levels to peach allergens but presenting symptoms after its ingestion. The objective of this study was to investigate the allergenic profile in a patient population with symptoms produced by peach. METHODS: An exploratory retrospective study was performed with patients presenting symptoms after the ingestion of peach. Forty-two patients were included in the study. The allergenic profile of individual patients was investigated by immunoblot. A serum pool was prepared with the sera that recognized a 70 kDa band. This pool was used to detect this protein in peach peel and pulp and to identify the 70 kDa protein in 2D immunoblot. Spots recognized in the 2D immunoblot were sequenced by LC-MS/MS. Inhibition studies were performed between peach peel and almond. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (52.4%) recognized the 70 kDa protein in immunoblot. This protein was recognized in peel and pulp. Two different spots were observed in 2D-PAGE, both were identified as (R)-mandelonitrile lyases (RML) with high amino acid similarity with Pru du 10. Peach RML were partially inhibited with an almond extract. No association was found between any reported symptom and sensitization to RML. RML-sensitized patients were older and reported pollen associated respiratory symptoms more frequently than negative patients. CONCLUSION: A new peach allergen, a RML, homologous of Pru du 10, recognized by 52% of the population has been identified.

Positioning of Tezepelumab in Severe Asthma.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and is estimated to be severe in 3%-10% of affected patients. There is a need for additional biologic treatments that are highly efficacious across the spectrum of severe uncontrolled asthma. Currently available drugs inhibit 1 or 2 specific cytokines or IgE antibodies and thus only partially suppress the complex type 2 (T2) inflammatory cascade. Biologics targeting more upstream molecules in the pathophysiological pathway of asthma could treat asthma more effectively. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2λ antibody that targets the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is the first marketed biologic against an epithelial cell-derived cytokine, preventing binding of TSLP to its receptor and reducing the immune stimuli that TSLP can trigger in different asthma endotypes. Tezepelumab reduces downstream biomarkers of inflammation, such as blood and airway eosinophils, FeNO, IgE, IL-5, and IL-13. Tezepelumab provides a clinical benefit in severe asthma, reducing the annualized asthma exacerbation rate in patients with either high or low levels of biomarkers of T2 inflammation, although the effect is greater among those with high levels. The drug has been shown to improve asthma control, quality of life, and lung function and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, tezepelumab can be used across the spectrum of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, especially in T2-high patients. This review includes a positioning statement by the authors, all of whom are members of the SEAIC Asthma Committee.

Positioning of Tezepelumab in Severe Asthma / Posicionamento do Tezepelumabe na Asma Grave

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and is estimated to be severe in 3%-10% of affected patients. There is a need for additional biologic treatments that are highly efficacious across the spectrum of severe uncontrolled asthma. Currently available drugs inhibit 1 or 2 specific cytokines or IgE antibodies and thus only partially suppress the complex type 2 (T2) inflammatory cascade. Biologics targeting more upstream molecules in the pathophysiological pathway of asthma could treat asthma more effectively. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2λ antibody that targets the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is the first marketed biologic against an epithelial cell–derived cytokine, preventing binding of TSLP to its receptor and reducing the immune stimuli that TSLP can trigger in different asthma endotypes. Tezepelumab reduces downstream biomarkers of inflammation, such as blood and airway eosinophils, FeNO, IgE, IL-5, and IL-13. Tezepelumab provides a clinical benefit in severe asthma, reducing the annualized asthma exacerbation rate in patients with either high or low levels of biomarkers of T2 inflammation, although the effect is greater among those with high levels. The drug has been shown to improve asthma control, quality of life, and lung function and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, tezepelumab can be used across the spectrum of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, especially in T2-high patients. This review includes a positioning statement by the authors, all of whom are members of the SEAIC Asthma Committee (AU)

A asma é uma das doenças crônicas mais comuns e estima-se que seja grave em 3% a 10% dos pacientes afetados. Há necessidade de tratamentos biológicos adicionais que sejam altamente eficazes em todo o espectro da asma grave não controlada. Os medicamentos atualmente disponíveis inibem 1 ou 2 citocinas específicas ou anticorpos IgE e, portanto, suprimem apenas parcialmente a cascata inflamatória complexa tipo 2 (T2). Os produtos biológicos que visam moléculas mais a montante na via fisiopatológica da asma poderiam tratar a asma de forma mais eficaz. Tezepelumab é um anticorpo monoclonal humano imunoglobulina G2λ que tem como alvo a citocina linfopoietina estromal tímica (TSLP). É o primeiro produto biológico comercializado contra uma citocina derivada de células epiteliais, impedindo a ligação da TSLP ao seu receptor e reduzindo os estímulos imunológicos que a TSLP pode desencadear em diferentes endótipos de asma. Tezepelumabe reduz biomarcadores de inflamação a jusante, como eosinófilos no sangue e nas vias aéreas, FeNO, IgE, IL-5 e IL-13. O tezepelumab proporciona um benefício clínico na asma grave, reduzindo a taxa anualizada de exacerbação da asma em pacientes com níveis elevados ou baixos de biomarcadores de inflamação T2, embora o efeito seja maior entre aqueles com níveis elevados. Foi demonstrado que o medicamento melhora o controle da asma, a qualidade de vida e a função pulmonar e reduz a hiperresponsividade das vias aéreas. Portanto, o tezepelumabe pode ser usado em todo o espectro de pacientes com asma grave não controlada, especialmente em pacientes com T2 elevado. Esta revisão inclui uma declaração de posicionamento dos autores, todos membros do Comitê de Asma da SEAIC (AU)

Quality indicators in the rational management of severe asthma: A Spanish multidisciplinary consensus.

AIM: Severe asthma is a complex, heterogeneous condition that can be difficult to control despite currently available treatments. Multidisciplinary severe asthma units (SAU) improve control in these patients and are cost-effective in our setting; however, their implementation and development can represent an organizational challenge. The aim of this study was to validate a set of quality care indicators in severe asthma for SAU in Spain. METHODS: The Carabela initiative, sponsored by SEPAR, SEAIC, SECA and SEDISA and implemented by leading specialists, analyzed the care processes followed in 6 pilot centers in Spain to describe the ideal care pathway for severe asthma. This analysis, together with clinical guidelines and SEPAR and SEAIC accreditation criteria for asthma units, were used to draw up a set of 11 quality of care indicators, which were validated by a panel of 60 experts (pulmonologists, allergologists, and health-policy decision-makers) using a modified Delphi method. RESULTS: All 11 indicators achieved a high level of consensus after just one Delphi round. CONCLUSIONS: Experts in severe asthma agree on a series of minimum requirements for the future optimization, standardization, and excellence of current SAUs in Spain. This proposal is well grounded on evidence and professional experience, but the validity of these consensus indicators must be evaluated in clinical practice.