Research priorities for children's cancer: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To engage children who have experienced cancer, childhood cancer survivors, their families and professionals to systematically identify and prioritise research questions about childhood cancer to inform the future research agenda. DESIGN: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership. SETTING: UK health service and community. METHODS: A steering group oversaw the initiative. Potential research questions were collected in an online survey, then checked to ensure they were unanswered. Shortlisting via a second online survey identified the highest priority questions. A parallel process with children was undertaken. A final consensus workshop was held to determine the Top 10 priorities. PARTICIPANTS: Children and survivors of childhood cancer, diagnosed before age 16, their families, friends and professionals who work with this population. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-eight people submitted 1299 potential questions. These were refined into 108 unique questions; 4 were already answered and 3 were under active study, therefore, removed. Three hundred and twenty-seven respondents completed the shortlisting survey. Seventy-one children submitted questions in the children's surveys, eight children attended a workshop to prioritise these questions. The Top 5 questions from children were taken to the final workshop where 23 questions in total were discussed by 25 participants (young adults, carers and professionals). The top priority was 'can we find effective and kinder (less burdensome, more tolerable, with fewer short and long-term effects) treatments for children with cancer, including relapsed cancer?' CONCLUSIONS: We have identified research priorities for children's cancer from the perspectives of children, survivors, their families and the professionals who care for them. Questions reflect the breadth of the cancer experience, including diagnosis, relapse, hospital experience, support during/after treatment and the long-term impact of cancer. These should inform funding of future research as they are the questions that matter most to the people who could benefit from research.

Delphi method to identify expert opinion to support children's cancer referral guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance for referral of children with suspected cancer was first published in 2005 and updated in 2015. The updated version relied on sparse primary care evidence and published without input from key stakeholders, for example, acute general paediatricians and paediatric haematologists/oncologists. This led to a document that fell short as a practical guide for referring physicians managing children with potentially life-threatening conditions. Following discussions between the Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG, the UK multidisciplinary professional body for healthcare professionals caring for children with cancer) and NICE, it was agreed that a practical supplement should be produced for the 2015 guidance. A prerequisite was evidence gathering from tertiary care to balance the existing primary care evidence, and a Delphi consensus method was therefore convened. METHODS: A CCLG NICE Guidance Committee formulated 25 draft statements for review. The CCLG emailed its paediatric haematologist/oncologist membership (n=179) and 88 responded (49%). To achieve consensus, statements required ≥70% agreement from ≥60% of actual respondents, from the denominator (n=88). RESULTS: Fifteen of 25 original statements were accepted at the first round of voting. Three of 25 statements where >50% did not support were rejected outright. One statement could not be revised without replicating a previously accepted statement. The six remaining statements were revised and a second round of voting undertaken; all six revised statements were accepted. Overall, 21 of 25 statements (84%) met consensus criteria. CONCLUSIONS: This expert opinion should help streamline suspected cancer referral in children and help optimise subsequent outcomes.

Achieving a timely diagnosis for teenagers and young adults with cancer: the ACE "too young to get cancer?" study.

BACKGROUND: Time to diagnosis (TTD) concerns teenagers and young adults (TYA) with cancer and may affect outcome. METHODS: Healthcare records from 105 TYA in a regional cancer service were assessed to document events from 1st symptom to treatment start. Detailed pathway construction was possible for 104 patients and allowed a multidisciplinary panel review of each pathway with assessment of good practice and lessons for the future. RESULTS: 1st presentation was to primary care in 86, and 93% consulted in primary care before diagnosis. Routes to Diagnosis were 45% via urgent 2 Week Wait pathways and 38% as emergency referrals. Total Interval (time from 1st presentation to treatment start) was median 63 (range 1-559) days, varying within/between diagnoses. Patient interval (time from 1st symptom to 1st presentation) was longest for lymphoma, carcinoma and bone tumour (medians: 9, 12, 20 days). Overall, time in primary care was short (median 3, range 0-537 days) compared to secondary care (median 29, range 0-195 days) and longest for lymphoma, carcinoma, brain/CNS (medians: 10, 15, 16 days). Specialist Care interval (time from 1st specialist visit to treatment start) was longest for bone, brain/CNS, lymphoma, carcinoma (medians: 30, 33, 36, 48 days). 40% pathways were rated as showing good/best practice but 16% were less than satisfactory. Continued safety-netting/support was identified from primary care but analysis suggested opportunities for improvement in transition through secondary care. CONCLUSIONS: Previous reports of prolonged TTD have focused on delay in referral from primary care but this study suggests that this might be reduced by optimising management in secondary care.

Chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate as a wound care material coating: antimicrobial efficacy, toxicity and effect on healing.

AIM: In this study, chlorhexidine hexametaphosphate (CHX-HMP) is investigated as a persistent antimicrobial coating for wound care materials. MATERIALS & METHODS: CHX-HMP was used as a wound care material coating and compared with chlorhexidine digluconate materials with respect to antimicrobial efficacy, toxicity and wound closure. RESULTS: Antimicrobial efficacy at day 1, 3 and 7 was observed with experimental and commercial materials. CHX-HMP coated materials had less toxic effect on human placental cells than commercial chlorhexidine dressings. CHX-HMP in pluronic gel did not delay healing but reduced wound colonization by E. faecalis. CONCLUSION: CHX-HMP could become a useful component of wound care materials with sustained antimicrobial efficacy, lower toxicity than chlorhexidine digluconate materials, and reduction in wound colonization without affecting closure.

The expanding role of primary care in cancer control.

The nature of cancer control is changing, with an increasing emphasis, fuelled by public and political demand, on prevention, early diagnosis, and patient experience during and after treatment. At the same time, primary care is increasingly promoted, by governments and health funders worldwide, as the preferred setting for most health care for reasons of increasing need, to stabilise health-care costs, and to accommodate patient preference for care close to home. It is timely, then, to consider how this expanding role for primary care can work for cancer control, which has long been dominated by highly technical interventions centred on treatment, and in which the contribution of primary care has been largely perceived as marginal. In this Commission, expert opinion from primary care and public health professionals with academic and clinical cancer expertise­from epidemiologists, psychologists, policy makers, and cancer specialists­has contributed to a detailed consideration of the evidence for cancer control provided in primary care and community care settings. Ranging from primary prevention to end-of-life care, the scope for new models of care is explored, and the actions needed to effect change are outlined. The strengths of primary care­its continuous, coordinated, and comprehensive care for individuals and families­are particularly evident in prevention and diagnosis, in shared follow-up and survivorship care, and in end-of-life care. A strong theme of integration of care runs throughout, and its elements (clinical, vertical, and functional) and the tools needed for integrated working are described in detail. All of this change, as it evolves, will need to be underpinned by new research and by continuing and shared multiprofessional development.

Carboplatin therapeutic monitoring in preterm and full-term neonates.

INTRODUCTION: Administration of the most appropriate dose of chemotherapy to neonates is particularly challenging and frequently not standardised based on any scientific rationale. We report the clinical utility of carboplatin therapeutic drug monitoring in preterm and full-term neonates within the first month of life. METHODS: Carboplatin therapeutic monitoring was performed to achieve target drug exposures area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC values) in nine preterm and full-term neonates diagnosed with retinoblastoma or neuroblastoma treated over an 8 year period. Carboplatin was administered over 3 days with therapeutic drug monitoring utilised to target cumulative AUC values of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml min. RESULTS: AUC values achieved were within 15% of target values for the individual courses of treatment in all but one patient (12/13 courses of treatment), with dose modifications of up to 215% required to achieve target AUC values, based on initial mg/kg dosing schedules. Carboplatin clearance determined across three consecutive chemotherapy courses in two patients increased from 3.4 to 7.1 ml/min and from 7.2 to 16.5 ml/min, representing increases of 210-230% over several weeks of treatment. Complete remission was observed in 8/9 patients, with no renal toxicity reported and only one patient experiencing ototoxicity. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the benefits of utilising therapeutic drug monitoring to achieve target carboplatin AUC values in preterm and full-term neonates treated within the first few weeks of life, particularly in view of marked increases in drug clearance observed over consecutive chemotherapy courses. In the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring, body-weight based dosing is recommended, with dosing guidance provided for both approaches to inform future treatment.

Risk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines describing symptoms in children that should alert GPs to consider cancer have been developed, but without any supporting primary-care research. AIM: To identify symptoms and signs in primary care that strongly increase the likelihood of childhood cancer, to assist GPs in selection of children for investigation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A population-based case-control study in UK general practice. METHOD: Using electronic primary care records from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1267 children aged 0-14 years diagnosed with childhood cancer were matched to 15 318 controls. Clinical features associated with subsequent diagnosis of cancer were identified using conditional logistic regression, and likelihood ratios and positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated for each. RESULTS: Twelve symptoms were associated with PPVs of ≥0.04%, which represents a greater than tenfold increase in prior probability. The six symptoms with the highest PPVs were pallor (odds ratio, OR = 84; PPV = 0.41% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12% to 1.34%), head and neck masses (OR = 17; PPV = 0.30%; 95% CI = 0.10% to 0.84%), masses elsewhere (OR = 22; PPV = 0.11%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.20%), lymphadenopathy (OR = 10; PPV = 0.09%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.13%), symptoms/signs of abnormal movement (OR = 16; PPV = 0.08%; 95% CI = 0.04% to 0.14%), and bruising (OR = 12; PPV = 0·08%; 95% CI = 0.05% to 0.13%). When each of these 12 symptoms was combined singly with at least three consultations in a 3-month period, the probability of cancer was between 11 and 76 in 10 000. CONCLUSION: Twelve features of childhood cancers were identified, each of which increased the risk of cancer at least tenfold. These symptoms, particularly when combined with multiple consultations, warrant careful evaluation in general practice.

Mannose-binding lectin genotype influences frequency and duration of infectious complications in children with malignancy.

Children with cancer receiving identical treatment differ in their experience of infection, suggesting that variations in immunity may influence susceptibility to infection. Studies of the influence of mannose-binding lectin (MBL), an important component of the innate immune system, in children with febrile neutropenia (FN) have yielded conflicting results. We examined the role of MBL in infection susceptibility in the largest cohort of children with cancer reported to date. MBL levels were measured and genotyping performed on children (≤16 y) receiving chemotherapy for cancer in London, UK. Clinical data from FN episodes were recorded prospectively. MBL status was assessed in 269 children; 513 episodes of FN were captured from 211 patients. Patients with MBL2 polymorphisms experienced more FN episodes than wildtype genotype (median 2 vs. 1, respectively; P = 0.074) and more episodes with documented infection (P = 0.045). Patients experiencing multiple FN episodes had lower MBL levels (P = 0.036). MBL genotype influenced duration of episode in some groups: high-risk MBL-deficient patients spent up to 5 nights longer/episode in hospital than equivalent wildtypes. These results indicate that MBL deficiency influences both susceptibility to and outcome of FN episodes and may be most important in those patients at higher risk of complications of FN.

The evolution towards ambulatory and day-case management of febrile neutropenia.

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is only second to chemotherapy administration as a cause of hospital admission during treatment for cancer. As FN may signify serious or life-threatening infection, management protocols have focussed on trying to prevent adverse outcomes in these patients. However, it is now possible to identify a subset of patients with FN at low risk of life-threatening complications in whom duration of hospitalisation and intensity of therapy can be reduced safely. This review discusses how the management of FN has evolved to enable patients identified as low risk to be treated on specific low risk management strategies, with an emphasis on some of the practical considerations for the implementation of such strategies.

Innate immune defence in the human gastrointestinal tract.

The mucosal surface of the gastrointestinal tract represents a major entry point and ecological niche for many microbes. It forms an important immune barrier, absorbing nutrients, whilst preventing invasion by organisms. Of the extra-ordinarily diverse species that comprise the microbial world, relatively few organisms are able to succeed in breaching this barrier in an otherwise healthy host. The production and secretion of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from surface epithelia and circulating immune cells are likely to play a key role in host protection and homeostasis. A number of these peptides are constitutively produced providing resident protection, whereas others are induced during infection and inflammation. In addition to directly eradicating microorganisms, it is becoming increasingly apparent that AMPs are multi-functional with diverse immuno-modulatory properties. This review focuses on three families of AMPs, defensins, cathelicidins, and lysozyme, and discusses their role in mucosal defence.