Two unique BAP1 pathogenic variants identified in the same family by panel cascade testing.

Germline pathogenic variants in the tumor suppressor gene BAP1 are associated with the hereditary tumor predisposition syndrome with susceptibility to uveal melanoma, mesothelioma, cutaneous melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and other cancers. Germline BAP1 pathogenic variants are rare in the non-cancer general population with an estimated carrier frequency of 1:19,898 but more common in cancer patients with a carrier frequency of 1:1299. In the following we present the first report of a family with two unique BAP1 pathogenic variants. Retrospective case report of a family with two unique pathogenic variants in BAP1. A male (proband) was referred to our ocular oncology clinic for second opinion for his multiple independent uveal melanomas at ages 65, 68 and 71. Given his personal history of squamous cell carcinoma at age 61, renal cell carcinoma at age 63, and family history of atypical meningioma, basal cell carcinoma, pancreatic and prostate cancers he was assessed for germline pathogenic variants in BAP1 through our ongoing research study. Sanger sequencing identified the American founder pathogenic variant, c.1717delC, pL573Wfs*3, that was confirmed in a clinical laboratory. Both the proband's brother and nephew tested negative for the familial variant through single site cascade genetic testing. However, based on the personal history of multiple basal cell carcinoma in the nephew and family history of pancreatic and laryngeal cancers (both not known to be associated with BAP1-TPDS), a large cancer panel testing was recommended for the nephew. His panel testing revealed a different BAP1 pathogenic variant, c.605G>A, p. Trp202*. This variant was not detected in the proband or the proband's brother. Based on the frequency of germline BAP1 variants in the cancer population, the chance of occurrence of two different BAP1 variants in a family with cancer history is 5.9 × 10-7. This case report provides support for the importance of offering large panel cascade genetic testing, rather than single site testing for only the family pathogenic variant, for all at risk family members especially when the family variant cannot explain all the cancers in the family.

Application of the ACMG/NSGC genetic referral guidelines for hereditary renal cell carcinoma at the University of Miami, from 2014 to 2017.

Identifying hereditary syndromes among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is essential for surveillance of affected individuals and their at-risk family members and for treatment optimization. We conducted a chart review to determine the percentage of patients with RCC who were seen at the University of Miami Health System (UHealth), and met the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) genetic referral criteria at the University of Miami. Subsequently, we determined the percentage of those who went on to receive genetic evaluation. Patients selected by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/10 codes corresponding to kidney cancer who were at least 18 years of age at the time of diagnosis were included in the study. We included a total of 1443 patients in the final analysis, and after exclusion of charts with incorrect ICD codes, insufficient clinical data, unknown pathology, and patients who were not seen. We used chi-square analysis, ANOVA, and t-test. Of 1443 charts reviewed, 65.7% were male and 34.3% were female. 47.7% self-identified as White, 39.2% as Hispanic, 9.1% as Black, and 4.0% as "other." The mean age of RCC diagnosis was 60.0 ± 12.4 years old. In total, 47.0% of patients met ACMG/NSGC referral criteria for genetic evaluation. Of those, only 4.2% had documented genetic assessment. This study showed a low adherence to ACMG/NSGC genetic referral guidelines at our institution and a need for increasing patients' and practitioners' awareness about the significance of genetic assessment for RCC patients and their family members.

Characterization of a recurrent germ line mutation of the E-cadherin gene: implications for genetic testing and clinical management.

PURPOSE: To identify germ line CDH1 mutations in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) families and develop guidelines for management of at risk individuals. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We ascertained 31 HDGC previously unreported families, including 10 isolated early-onset diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) cases. Screening for CDH1 germ line mutations was done by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and automated DNA sequencing. RESULTS: We identified eight inactivating and one missense CDH1 germ line mutation. The missense mutation conferred in vitro loss of protein function. Two families had the previously described 1003C>T nonsense mutation. Haplotype analysis revealed this to be a recurrent and not a founder mutation. Thirty-six percent (5 of 14) of the families with a documented DGC diagnosed before the age of 50 and other cases of gastric cancer carried CDH1 germ line mutations. Two of 10 isolated cases of DGC in individuals ages <35 years harbored CDH1 germ line mutations. One mutation positive family was ascertained through a family history of lobular breast cancer (LBC) and another through an individual with both DGC and LBC. Occult DGC was identified in five of six prophylactic gastrectomies done on asymptomatic, endoscopically negative 1003C>T mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to families with a strong history of early-onset DGC, CDH1 mutation screening should be offered to isolated cases of DGC in individuals ages <35 years and for families with multiple cases of LBC, with any history of DGC or unspecified GI malignancies. Prophylactic gastrectomy is potentially a lifesaving procedure and clinical breast screening is recommended for asymptomatic mutation carriers.