Diagnostic performance of endorectal ultrasound combined with shear wave elastography for rectal tumors staging.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the performance of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) for rectal tumor staging. METHODS: Forty patients with rectal tumors who had surgery were enrolled. They underwent ERUS and SWE examinations before surgery. Pathological results were used as the gold standard for tumor staging. The stiffness values of the rectal tumor, peritumoral fat, distal normal intestinal wall, and distal perirectal fat were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of ERUS stage, tumor SWE stage, ERUS combined with tumor SWE stage, and ERUS combined with peritumoral fat SWE stage were compared and evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to select the best staging index. RESULTS: From T1 to T3 stage, the maximum elasticity (Emax) of the rectal tumor increased gradually (p < 0.05). The cut-off values of adenoma/T1 and T2, T2 and T3 tumors were 36.75 and 85.15kPa, respectively. The diagnostic coincidence rate of tumor SWE stage was higher than that of ERUS stage. Overall diagnostic accuracy of ERUS combined with peritumoral fat SWE Emax restaging was significantly higher than that of ERUS. CONCLUSIONS: ERUS combined with peritumoral fat SWE Emax for tumor restaging can effectively distinguish between stage T2 and T3 rectal tumors, which provides an effective imaging basis for clinical decisions.

Application value of conventional ultrasound and real-time shear wave elastography in patients with type 2 diabetic polyneuropathy.

PURPOSE: To explore the application value of conventional ultrasound and real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) to the tibial nerve (TN) and the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three healthy volunteers, 33 diabetic patients without DPN, and 30 diabetic patients with DPN were enrolled in this study. The anteroposterior diameter (APD), the cross-sectional area (CSA), and the perimeter of the TN and the CPN were measured by conventional ultrasound, and the stiffness of the nerves was measured by SWE. RESULTS: The conventional ultrasound parameters and stiffness of the TN in patients with DPN were significantly larger than those of the other two groups (P < 0.01). The conventional ultrasound parameters of the CPN were significantly higher in patients with DPN than in the other two groups (P < 0.01).The patients with DPN demonstrated a greater stiffness of the CPN compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The comparison of all parameters for the left and right TNs and CPNs among the three groups showed no significant difference. The area under the curve (AUC) of TN stiffness for the diagnosis of DPN was significantly greater than that of conventional ultrasound parameters. CONCLUSION: The conventional ultrasound parameters and the stiffness of the TN and the CPN were significantly higher in patients with DPN. The stiffness of the TN could better diagnose DPN than conventional ultrasound parameters. In short, conventional ultrasound and SWE of nerves are of good application value in the diagnosis of DPN.