Core cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile in anti-LGI1 encephalitis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare CSF biomarkers' levels in patients suffering from anti-Leucine-rich Glioma-Inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis to neurodegenerative [Alzheimer's disease (AD), Creutzfeldt-Jakob's disease (CJD)] and primary psychiatric (PSY) disorders. METHODS: Patients with LGI1 encephalitis were retrospectively selected from the French Reference Centre database between 2010 and 2019 and enrolled if CSF was available for biomarkers analysis including total tau (T-tau), phosphorylated tau (P-tau), amyloid-beta Aß1-42, and neurofilaments light chains (Nf L). Samples sent for biomarker determination as part of routine practice, and formally diagnosed as AD, CJD, and PSY, were used as comparators. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with LGI1 encephalitis were compared to 39 AD, 20 CJD and 20 PSY. No significant difference was observed in T-tau, P-tau, and Aß1-42 levels between LGI1 encephalitis and PSY patients. T-Tau and P-Tau levels were significantly lower in LGI1 encephalitis (231 and 43 ng/L) than in AD (621 and 90 ng/L, p < 0.001) and CJD patients (4327 and 55 ng/L, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01). Nf L concentrations of LGI1 encephalitis (2039 ng/L) were similar to AD (2,765 ng/L) and significantly higher compared to PSY (1223 ng/L, p < 0.005), but significantly lower than those of CJD (13,457 ng/L, p < 0.001). Higher levels of Nf L were observed in LGI1 encephalitis presenting with epilepsy (3855 ng/L) compared to LGI1 without epilepsy (1490 ng/L, p = 0.02). No correlation between CSF biomarkers' levels and clinical outcome could be drawn. CONCLUSION: LGI encephalitis patients showed higher Nf L levels than PSY, comparable to AD, and even higher when presenting epilepsy suggesting axonal or synaptic damage linked to epileptic seizures.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Aß40 Improves the Interpretation of Aß42 Concentration for Diagnosing Alzheimer's Disease.

The combination of decreased amyloid ß42 (Aß42) and increased total tau proteins (T-Tau) and phosphorylated tau (P-Tau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has recently been considered as a biological diagnostic criterion of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Previous studies showed significant heterogeneity in CSF Aß42 levels to discriminate AD from non-AD patients. It was also suggested that the CSF amyloid peptide ß42/ß40 ratio has better diagnostic performance than Aß42 alone. The objective of the present study was to investigate the potential added value of determining CSF amyloid ß40 peptide (Aß40) for biological diagnosis of AD when CSF Aß42 levels failed. CSF AD biomarkers were run in 2,171 samples from 1,499 AD and 672 non-AD patients. The following pathologic thresholds were used to define an AD-positive CSF biomarker profile: T-Tau ≥ 400 ng/L, P-Tau181 ≥ 60 ng/L, and Aß42 ≤ 700 ng/L. CSF Aß40 was assayed in AD patients with CSF Aß42 levels above 700 ng/L and non-AD patients with CSF Aß42 levels below 700 ng/L. CSF Aß40 levels were higher in AD than non-AD patients. The receiver operator characteristic curves of CSF Aß40 and the Aß42/Aß40 ratio defined AD cut-off values at 12,644 ng/L and 0.06, respectively. In AD patients with non-pathological CSF Aß42, CSF Aß40 concentration was able to correct 76.2% of cases when expressed as CSF Aß42/Aß40 ratio and 94.7% of cases when used alone. Using CSF Aß42 and then CSF Aß40, the percentage of misinterpreted AD patients fell to 1.0%. CSF Aß40 concentration improved interpretation of Aß42 level for the diagnosis of AD. CSF Aß40 alone showed better diagnostic performance than the amyloid peptide Aß42/Aß40 ratio. The added value of determining CSF Aß40 in AD diagnosis now needs confirming in a cohort of definite AD patients and to be completed with novel amyloid cascade biomarkers.

The workflow from post-mortem human brain sampling to cell microdissection: a Brain Net Europe study.

Brain banks manage and store fully clinically and pathologically characterised brains. The diversity of techniques used in research projects increases. These biological resource centres are made to adapt brain tissue processing. Furthermore, the development of more sensitive techniques to analyse nucleic acids and proteins offers new fields of exploration when combined with laser capture microdissection in order to decipher the physiopathology of diseases at the cell level. In this study, our goal was to evaluate procedures and set a workflow compatible with the constraints of brain banks, from brain sampling to laser capture microdissection and pre-analytical quality assessment. We compared various methods of freezing brain tissue, focused on morphological quality preservation of brain microscopical structures and on the quality of nucleic acid or protein yields. Staining protocols combined with strategies to lower neurones autofluorescence were adapted for the same purpose. Finally, we found that laser capture microdissection is possible in the setting of brain banks. However, the entire process has to be envisioned from the autopsy to the analysis. The impact on protein or nucleic acid quality is a limitation that restricts the amount of samples available for this purpose.

Association of cerebrospinal fluid prion protein levels and the distinction between Alzheimer disease and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.

IMPORTANCE: Although typical forms of Alzheimer disease (AD) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) are clinically distinguishable, atypical AD phenotypes may pose a diagnostic challenge. The major biological diagnostic biomarker for identifying CJD, 14-3-3 protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), unfortunately lacks specificity when confronting a rapid dementia presentation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relevance of total CSF prion protein (t-PrP) levels in the differential biological diagnosis between atypical AD phenotypes and CJD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study in an autopsy-confirmed cohort of 82 patients was performed to evaluate the relevance of CSF t-PrP to distinguish 30 definite cases of AD from 52 definite cases of CJD. Next, CSF t-PrP concentration was measured in a cohort of 104 patients including 55 patients with probable AD, 26 with probable sporadic CJD, and 23 control patients for whom 14-3-3 protein, total tau, phosphorylated tau 181 (P-tau181), and Aß1-42 were available. We investigated 46 patients diagnosed as having probable AD who presented atypical phenotypes. A diagnosis strategy was proposed to classify atypical AD phenotypes with suspicion of CJD based on a decision tree combining CSF biomarkers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We determined CSF t-PrP levels for all patients. We calculated the ratio of total tau and P-tau181 and determined the diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker alone or in combination. We calculated the misclassification rate for each biomarker that corresponded to the percentage of patients within the group of atypical AD phenotypes wrongly classified as CJD. RESULTS: In patients with CJD, CSF t-PrP concentrations were decreased compared with control participants and patients with AD. When considering the differential diagnosis of CJD compared with atypical AD phenotypes, CSF t-PrP determination reached 82.1% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity. The misclassification rate of atypical AD phenotypes decreased from 43.5%, obtained when using the CSF 14-3-3 protein determination alone, to only 4.3% when calculating the ratio total tau/(P-tau181 × t-PrP). The proposed classification tree permitted correct classification of 98.4% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For unusual phenotypes of AD, especially cases presenting with a biological ambiguity suggesting CJD, determination of CSF t-PrP levels increased diagnostic accuracy. The use of CSF t-PrP levels may be beneficial in clinical practice in addition to the current classic biomarkers.

Risk factors of caregiver burden among patients with Alzheimer's disease or related disorders: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Caregivers play a major role in the care of patients with dementia and are themselves at higher risk of disease. OBJECTIVES: We investigate which factors are associated with caregivers burden of outpatients visiting a memory clinic and how functional autonomy and behavioral and psychological symptoms can influence caregiver burden. METHODS: The study population was chosen from outpatients with progressive cognitive complaint. The caregiver burden was measured with the short version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). The relationship was assessed between the ZBI and the patients characteristics, including Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale (IADL), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), etiology, and stage of the cognitive impairment. RESULTS: In a population of 548 patients, IADL, NPI, antidepressant drugs, and MMSE were found to be related to ZBI, while diagnosed etiology and disease stage were not significant: ZBI decreased by 0.34 point for every unit of IADL, and by 0.03 point for every unit of MMSE; ZBI increased by 0.03 point for every unit of NPI. From the IADL scale, the ability to handle finances, food preparation, responsibility to take medications, mode of transportation, and ability to use the telephone increased the ZBI. Five areas of the NPI increased the ZBI: apathy, agitation, aberrant motor behavior, appetite disorders (p < 0.001), and irritability (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Caregivers experience a higher burden due to disease symptoms such as impairment of functional autonomy and behavioral and cognitive impairment, whatever the etiology of the cognitive decline.

Initial memory deficit profiles in patients with a cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's disease signature.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical onset is usually characterized by a memory complaint and a progressive memory deficit. The proportion of typical medial-temporal amnesia revealing AD remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The present study explores the episodic memory impairment profiles by the Free and Cued Selective Recall Reminding Test (FCSRT) in patients with initial memory complaint and a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker signature of AD. METHODS: Seventy-three patients referred for memory complaint to the Centers for Memory, Resource and Research of Lyon and Montpellier (France) were included consecutively. All patients underwent an extensive neuropsychological examination and had a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥20 and a positive CSF AD signature. The patients were classified as having mild dementia or prodromal AD. Verbal episodic memory was assessed using the French version of the FCSRT exploring encoding, storage/consolidation, and cued delayed retrieval phases of memorization. Three different memory profiles were identified according to the results of FCSRT. RESULTS: The median age was 72 year-old [interquartiles: 65-76]. The median MMSE score was 23 [interquartiles: 21-25]. 88% of the patients (n = 64) presented with a medial temporal amnesia profile. The dysexecutive amnesia and normal verbal episodic memory profiles represented respectively 5% (n = 4) and 7% (n = 5). There were no significant differences in term of age, gender, and MMSE score between the three profile groups. CONCLUSION: In a population initially presenting with memory complaints and depicting a CSF AD signature, a high proportion of medial temporal amnesia is disclosed as expected, but also a proportion of dysexecutive amnesia and normal FCSRT.

Impact of harmonization of collection tubes on Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze differences in biomarker outcomes before and after harmonization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection tubes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from French memory centers that switched from different CSF collection tubes to a common one. A total of 1966 patients were included in the study. CSF concentrations of ß-amyloid 1-42 (Aß42), total tau, and phosphorylated tau (p-tau181) were measured in each center using the same commercial enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) kits. The diagnostic value of CSF biomarkers according to the type of tube used was then assessed using different cutoffs. RESULTS: The predictive value of Aß42 was highly affected by the type of collection tube used. The optimal cutoff value for p-tau181 appeared not to be affected by the type of collection tube whereas that of total tau was slightly changed. New optimal cutoff values were then computed. CONCLUSIONS: In a routine clinical environment, the selection of the collection tube and biomarker cutoff value makes a major difference in AD biological diagnosis. The use of a common collection tube among different centers will reduce the risk of misdiagnosis and incorrect patient stratification.