Outcomes of Living-donor Liver Transplantation Using Grafts Heterozygous for α-1 Antitrypsin Gene Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Patients heterozygous for an abnormal α-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) mutation may have an increased risk of liver disease in the setting of a secondary contributing factor. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study compared donor and recipient outcomes of A1AT heterozygous versus normal phenotype adult living-donor liver transplants (LDLTs). RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2016, 11 A1AT heterozygous donors and 10 recipients were compared to 57 normal donors and 41 recipients. There were no significant differences in sex, age, or race/ethnicity by A1AT phenotype. Heterozygous donors had significantly lower serum A1AT (median 100 mg/dL versus 131 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Median liver volume at 3 months post-LDLT was not different among donors or their recipients (1164 mm in heterozygous versus 1257 mm in normal [P = 0.449] for donors; 1563 mm versus 1606 mm [P = 0.387], respectively, for recipients). Recipient serum alkaline phosphatase at 1 month and 1 year post-LDLT was significantly higher in recipients of A1AT heterozygous grafts (160 U/L versus 99.5 U/L; P = 0.025 at 1 mo) but did not persist at 2 years. In addition, there was no association between A1AT level and liver volume at 3 months posttransplant in donors or recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a heterozygous A1AT mutation should be considered for living-liver donation.

Race, Risk, and Willingness of End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Without Hepatitis C Virus to Accept an HCV-Infected Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Despite effective antiviral treatment, hundreds of kidneys from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are discarded annually. Little is known about the determinants of willingness to accept HCV-infected kidneys among HCV-negative patients. METHODS: At 2 centers, 189 patients undergoing initial or reevaluation for transplant made 12 hypothetical decisions about accepting HCV-infected kidneys in which we systematically varied expected HCV cure rate, allograft quality, and wait time for an uninfected kidney. RESULTS: Only 29% of the participants would accept an HCV-infected kidney under all scenarios, whereas 53% accepted some offers and rejected others, and 18% rejected all HCV-infected kidneys. Higher cure rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-5.24 for 95% vs 75% probability of HCV cure), younger donor (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.91-2.88 for a 20-year-old vs a 60-year-old hypertensive donor), and longer wait for an uninfected kidney (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.67 for 5 years vs 2 years) were associated with greater willingness to accept an HCV-infected kidney. Black race modified the effect of HCV cure rate, such that willingness to accept a kidney increased less for blacks versus whites as the cure rate improved. Patients older than 60 years and prior kidney recipients showed greater willingness to accept an HCV-infected organ. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients will consider an HCV-infected kidney in some situations. Future trials using HCV-infected kidneys may enhance enrollment by targeting older patients and prior transplant recipients, but centers should anticipate that black patients' acceptance of HCV-infected kidneys will be reduced compared with white patients.