The development and evaluation of dose-prediction tools for allopurinol therapy (Easy-Allo tools).

AIMS: Dose escalation at the initiation of allopurinol therapy can be protracted and resource intensive. Tools to predict the allopurinol doses required to achieve target serum urate concentrations would facilitate the implementation of more efficient dose-escalation strategies. The aim of this research was to develop and externally evaluate allopurinol dosing tools, one for use when the pre-urate-lowering therapy serum urate is known (Easy-Allo1) and one for when it is not known (Easy-Allo2). METHODS: A revised population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model was developed using data from 653 people with gout. Maintenance doses to achieve the serum urate target of <0.36 mmol L-1 in >80% of individuals were simulated and evaluated against external data. The predicted and observed allopurinol doses were compared using the mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The proportion of Easy-Allo predicted doses within 100 mg of the observed was quantified. RESULTS: Allopurinol doses were predicted by total body weight, baseline urate, ethnicity and creatinine clearance. Easy-Allo1 produced unbiased and suitably precise dose predictions (MPE 2 mg day-1 95% confidence interval [CI] -13-17, RMSE 91%, 90% within 100 mg of the observed dose). Easy-Allo2 was positively biased by about 70 mg day-1 and slightly less precise (MPE 70 mg day-1 95% CI 52-88, RMSE 131%, 71% within 100 mg of the observed dose). CONCLUSIONS: The Easy-Allo tools provide a guide to the allopurinol maintenance dose requirement to achieve the serum urate target of <0.36 mmol L-1 and will aid in the development of novel dose-escalation strategies for allopurinol therapy.

The Tophus Impact Questionnaire (TIQ-20): responsiveness to change during urate-lowering therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In 2015, the 20-item Tophus Impact Questionnaire (TIQ-20) was developed as a tophus-specific patient reported outcome measure. The aim of this study was to determine whether TIQ-20 scores change during urate-lowering therapy. METHODS: We analysed data from a two-year clinical trial of allopurinol dose escalation using a treat-to-target serum urate approach. For participants with tophaceous gout, the longest diameter of up to three index tophi was measured using Vernier calipers and the TIQ-20 was recorded at study visits. Participants at the one site were invited into a dual energy CT (DECT) sub-study. Participants were included in this analysis if they had tophaceous gout and TIQ-20 scores available at baseline, Year 1, and Year 2 (n = 58, 39 with DECT data). Data were analysed using mixed model approach to repeated measures. RESULTS: Improvements were observed in all tophus measures over the two-year period. The mean (SD) TIQ-20 scores reduced over two years from 3.59 (1.77)-2.46 (1.73), P< 0.0001, and the mean (95%CI) TIQ-20 change over the two years was -1.13 (-1.54, -0.71). Effect size (Cohen's d) for the change in the sum of the index tophi diameter over two years was 0.68, for DECT urate volume was 0.50, and for the TIQ-20 was 0.71. CONCLUSION: For people with tophaceous gout treated with allopurinol using a treat to target serum urate approach, improvements in TIQ-20 occur, as well as improvements in physical and imaging tophus measures. These findings demonstrate that the TIQ-20 is a responsive patient-reported instrument of tophus impact.

Is colchicine prophylaxis required with start-low go-slow allopurinol dose escalation in gout? A non-inferiority randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether placebo is non-inferior to low-dose colchicine for reducing gout flares during the first 6 months of allopurinol using the 'start-low go-slow' dose approach. METHODS: A 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial was undertaken. Adults with at least one gout flare in the preceding 6 months, fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations for starting urate-lowering therapy and serum urate ≥0.36 mmol/L were recruited. Participants were randomised 1:1 to colchicine 0.5 mg daily or placebo for the first 6 months. All participants commenced allopurinol, increasing monthly to achieve target urate <0.36 mmol/L. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean number of gout flares/month between 0 and 6 months, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 0.12 gout flares/month. The primary safety outcome was adverse events over the first 6 months. RESULTS: Two hundred participants were randomised. The mean (95% CI) number of gout flares/month between baseline and month 6 was 0.61 (0.47 to 0.74) in the placebo group compared with 0.35 (0.22 to 0.49) in the colchicine group, mean difference 0.25 (0.07 to 0.44), non-inferiority p=0.92. There was no difference in the mean number of gout flares/month between randomised groups over the 12-month period (p=0.68). There were 11 serious adverse events in 7 participants receiving colchicine and 3 in 2 receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Placebo is not non-inferior to colchicine in prevention of gout flares in the first 6 months of starting allopurinol using the 'start-low go-slow' strategy. After stopping colchicine, gout flares rise with no difference in the mean number of gout flares/month between groups over a 12-month period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12618001179224.

Changes in Tophus Composition During Urate-Lowering Therapy: A Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Study.

OBJECTIVE: The gouty tophus is an organized structure composed of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals and chronic inflammatory soft tissue. This dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) study aimed to determine whether the composition of the tophus changes during urate-lowering therapy. METHODS: Serial DECT scans from 32 people with gout were obtained over 2 years of allopurinol therapy, dose-escalated to serum urate of <0.36 mmoles/liter. Up to 5 index tophi were selected for each patient, with 103 separate tophi included in the analysis. Using manual outlining methods of conventional CT and DECT scans, the same index tophi were serially measured for total tophus volume and urate volume. For each tophus, the soft tissue volume was then calculated by subtracting the urate volume from the total tophus volume. RESULTS: The mean ± SD serum urate reduced from 0.43 ± 0.03 mmoles/liter at baseline to 0.31 ± 0.02 mmoles/liter at year 2. The mean ± SD total tophus volume reduced over the 2-year period from 5.17 ± 5.55 cm3 to 2.61 ± 2.73 cm3 (P < 0.0001). Greater reductions in tophus urate volumes than tophus soft tissue volumes were observed; the tophus urate volume decreased by 70.6%, and tophus soft tissue volume decreased by 37.8% (P < 0.0001). The mean tophus urate:soft tissue ratio reduced from 0.15 at baseline to 0.05 at year 2 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The composition of the tophus is dynamic and changes during urate-lowering therapy for gout management. The soft tissue component of the tophus is slower to respond and may persist without measurable MSU crystal deposition.

Long-Term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Allopurinol Dose Escalation to Achieve Target Serum Urate in People With Gout.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term use of and adherence to urate-lowering therapy (ULT), serum urate (SU) control, and self-reported flares in participants from a randomized controlled trial of allopurinol dose escalation, in order to achieve target SU concentration (< 0.36 mmol/L) in people with gout. METHODS: For surviving study participants, ULT dispensing and SU testing within the preceding 12 months was obtained by medical record review. A phone interview was conducted to determine self-reported flares and adherence. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 6.5 (SD 2.5) years since enrollment, 60 out of 183 (33%) participants had died. Review of the 119 surviving participants showed that 98 (82%) were receiving allopurinol, 5 (4%) were receiving febuxostat, and 10 (8%) were not receiving ULT; for the remaining 6 (5.0%), ULT use could not be determined. In those receiving allopurinol, the mean dose was 28.1 (range -600 to 500) mg/day lower than at the last study visit; 49% were receiving the same dose, 18% were on a higher dose, and 33% were on a lower dose than at the last study visit. SU values were available for 86 of the 119 (72%) participants; 50 out of 86 (58%) participants had an SU concentration of < 0.36 mmol/L. Of the 89 participants who participated in the phone interview, 19 (21%) reported a gout flare in the preceding 12 months and 79 (89%) were receiving allopurinol; 71 (90%) of those receiving allopurinol reported 90% or greater adherence. CONCLUSION: Most of the surviving participants in the allopurinol dose escalation study had good real-world persistence with allopurinol, remained at target SU, and had a low number of self-reported flares.

Effect of omega-three supplementation on serum urate and gout flares in people with gout; a pilot randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of omega-three supplementation with fish oil on serum urate, weight and body mass index (BMI) in people with gout. METHODS: A pilot 6-month, randomized, open-label clinical trial was undertaken in people with gout with serum urate ≥ 0.36 mmol/l. Forty participants were randomized to receive 6.2 g omega-3 fish oil daily or no fish oil for 24 weeks. Blood was obtained monthly for serum urate and red cell EPA (20:5n-3) DHA (22:6n-3) were measured using a blood spot collection system. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the mean (SEM) decrease in serum urate between baseline and week 24 between randomized groups: fish oil - 0.021 (0.02) mmol/l versus control - 0.006 (0.02) mmol/l. There was no significant difference in change in weight or BMI between baseline and week 24 between randomized groups. There was a statistically significant correlation between red cell omega-three concentrations and the total number of flares per participant between week 12 and week 24; total omega-three r = - 0.75 (p ≤ 0.001), EPA r = - 0.75 (p ≤ 0.001) and DHA r = -0.76 (p ≤ 0.001). In the omega-three fish oil group four participants reported gastrointestinal adverse effects definitely or probably related to the omega-three supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of untoward effect of omega three fish oil supplementation on serum urate and BMI together with the relationship between higher omega-three concentrations and lower gout flares supports the development of further adequately powered clinical trials to determine the role of omega-three supplements as prophylaxis against gout flares in people starting urate lowering therapy. Clinical trial registration ACTRN12617000539336p Registered 13/04/2017.

Lack of effect of tart cherry concentrate dose on serum urate in people with gout.

OBJECTIVES: Cherry concentrate has been suggested to reduce serum urate (SU) and gout flares. The aims of this study were to determine the magnitude of the effect of tart cherry concentrate on SU in people with gout, the most effective dose of tart cherry concentrate for lowering SU, and adverse effects. METHODS: Fifty people with gout and SU > 0.36 mmol/l were recruited. Half were on allopurinol and half were on no urate-lowering therapy. Participants were randomized to receive tart cherry juice concentrate: placebo, 7.5 ml, 15 ml, 22.5 ml or 30 ml twice daily for 28 days. Blood samples were taken at baseline, then at 1, 3 and 5 h post cherry and then on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. The area under the curve for SU was calculated over the 28-day study period. RESULTS: Cherry concentrate dose had no significant effect on reduction in SU area under the curve, urine urate excretion, change in urinary anthocyanin between day 0 and day 28, or frequency of gout flares over the 28-day study period (P = 0.76). There were 24 reported adverse events, with only one (hyperglycaemia) considered possibly to be related to cherry concentrate. Allopurinol use did not modify the effect of cherry on SU or urine urate excretion. CONCLUSION: Tart cherry concentrate had no effect on SU or urine urate excretion. If there is an effect of cherry concentrate on gout flares over a longer time period, it is not likely to be mediated by reduction in SU. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368887, ANZCTR 12615000741583).

Relationships Between Allopurinol Dose, Oxypurinol Concentration and Urate-Lowering Response-In Search of a Minimum Effective Oxypurinol Concentration.

The aims of this study were to determine factors that predict serum urate (SU) lowering response to allopurinol and the conversion of allopurinol to oxypurinol, and to determine a minimum therapeutic oxypurinol concentration. Data from 129 participants in a 24-month open, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial were analyzed. Allopurinol dose, SU, and plasma oxypurinol concentrations were available at multiple time points. The slope for the association between allopurinol dose and SU was calculated as a measure of sensitivity to allopurinol. The slope for the association between allopurinol dose and oxypurinol was calculated as a measure of allopurinol metabolism. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify a minimum oxypurinol concentration predictive of SU < 6 mg/dL. There was a wide range of SU concentrations for each allopurinol dose. The relationship between sensitivity to allopurinol and allopurinol metabolism for each 100 mg allopurinol dose increase varied between individuals. Body mass index (P = 0.023), creatinine clearance (CrCL; P = 0.037), ABCG2 Q141K (P = 0.019), and SU (P = 0.004) were associated with sensitivity to allopurinol. The minimum oxypurinol concentration for achieving the urate target was found to be about 104 µmol/L, but predictive accuracy was poor (ROC curve area under the curve (AUC) 0.65). The minimum therapeutic oxypurinol concentration was found to increase with decreasing renal function. Although there is a positive relationship between change in oxypurinol and change in SU concentration, a minimum therapeutic oxypurinol is dependent on CrCL and cannot reliably predict SU target. Other variables, including ABCG2 Q141K genotype, impact on sensitivity to allopurinol (ACTRN12611000845932).

Associations of Gout and Baseline Serum Urate Level With Cardiovascular Outcomes: Analysis of the Coronary Disease Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gout and serum urate (SU) levels are associated with increased risk of death, time to first readmission for any cardiovascular event, or incident heart failure in individuals with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Individuals presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were enrolled in the Coronary Disease Cohort Study. Clinical data were collected from the medical records at the index hospital admission, and clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical data were collected postdischarge. Gout was defined by self-report, use of urate-lowering therapy, or use of colchicine with evidence of gout on review of the medical record. The primary end points were all-cause mortality, time to readmission for a cardiac ischemic event, and time to readmission for heart failure. RESULTS: Data from 1,514 participants were available. During the follow-up period, 53 of 160 participants with gout (33.1%) and 298 of 1,354 participants without gout (22.0%) died. After adjustment for other factors known to be associated with mortality, there was no gout-specific increase in risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.98 [95% confidence interval 0.69-1.38]). Time to readmission for heart failure was significantly briefer in those with, compared to those without, gout (adjusted hazard ratio 1.42 [95% confidence interval 1.02-1.97]). Irrespective of whether a participant had gout or not, as SU level increased, there was an increased risk of death and readmission for either a cardiovascular event or heart failure. CONCLUSION: Survival post-ACS is similar with and without the presence of gout. People with gout are at an increased risk of readmission for heart failure and have longer hospital stays. Risk of these events increases in parallel with increases in SU levels.

Effects of Allopurinol Dose Escalation on Bone Erosion and Urate Volume in Gout: A Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Imaging Study Within a Randomized, Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether allopurinol dose escalation to achieve serum urate (SU) target can influence bone erosion or monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition, as measured by dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with gout. METHODS: We conducted an imaging study of a 2-year randomized clinical trial that compared immediate allopurinol dose escalation to SU target with conventional dosing for 1 year followed by dose escalation to target, in gout patients who were receiving allopurinol and who had an SU level of ≥0.36 mmoles/liter. DECT scans of feet and radiographs of hands and feet were obtained at baseline, year 1, and year 2 visits. DECT scans were scored for bone erosion and urate volume. RESULTS: Paired imaging data were available for 87 patients (42 in the dose-escalation group and 45 in the control group). At year 2, the progression in the CT erosion score was higher in the control group than in the dose-escalation group (+7.8% versus +1.4%; P = 0.015). Changes in plain radiography erosion or narrowing scores did not differ between groups. Reductions in DECT urate volume were observed in both groups. At year 2, patients in the control group who had an SU level of <0.36 mmoles/liter and patients in the dose-escalation group had reduced DECT urate volume (-27.6 to -28.3%), whereas reduction in DECT urate volume was not observed in control group patients with an SU level of ≥0.36 mmoles/liter (+1.5%) (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: These findings provide evidence that long-term urate-lowering therapy using a treat-to-SU-target strategy can influence structural damage and reduce urate crystal deposition in gout.

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial of High- Versus Low-Dose Weekly Folic Acid in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Methotrexate.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether reducing the dose of supplemental folic acid used in conjunction with methotrexate (MTX) therapy in people with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved disease control and/or increased MTX-related adverse effects. METHODS: A randomized double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing 5 mg/wk and 0.8 mg/wk folic acid was undertaken. Rheumatoid arthritis patients on MTX for 3 months or more at a stable dose for 1 month or more were recruited. All participants had DAS28 of 3.2 or greater or required a change in therapy determined by the treating clinician. Disease activity, full blood count, liver function tests, red blood cell (RBC) folate, and RBC MTX polyglutamates were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 along with reports of adverse events. RESULTS: Forty participants were recruited. The mean (SD) change in RBC folate between week 0 and 24 was +87.9 (57.4) nmol/L in the high-dose group and -113.3 (65.7) nmol/L in the low-dose group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change in DAS28 between the high- and low-dose groups at 24 weeks (-0.13 [95% confidence interval, -0.69 to 0.43] vs -0.25 [-0.87 to 0.37], respectively [p = 0.78]). There was no significant difference in MTX-related adverse effects between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in RBC folate secondary to reduction in folic acid dose was not associated with a change in RA disease activity or MTX-related adverse effects. The prevention of MTX-related adverse effects remains the primary reason for coprescribing folic acid with MTX. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR12610000739011).

How much allopurinol does it take to get to target urate? Comparison of actual dose with creatinine clearance-based dose.

OBJECTIVE: Allopurinol dosing has frequently been limited based on creatinine clearance (CrCL), resulting in failure to achieve target serum urate (SU). The aim of this analysis was to determine how many milligrams of allopurinol above the recommended CrCL-based dose (R+) are required to achieve target SU and to investigate the factors that influence R+. METHODS: We analysed data from participants in a 24-month open, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial. Data obtained during the 12-month dose escalation (DE) phase of the study (year 1 for DE/DE and year 2 for control/DE) were combined. R+ dose was defined as the number of milligrams of allopurinol above the CrCL-based dose at the final visit. RESULTS: Of the 132 participants, R+ allopurinol dose at the final visit was ≤ 100 mg/day in 38 (28.8%), 101-200 mg/day in 46 (34.8%) and > 200 mg/day in 48 participants (37.1%). There was no significant difference between the R+ groups in the number of participants achieving target SU. There was an increase in plasma oxypurinol and a larger percentage and absolute change in SU as R+ increased. Multivariate analysis revealed CrCL, weight, baseline SU and allopurinol dose, were significantly positively associated with allopurinol dose at 12 months. There were no significant differences across R+ groups in renal or liver function adverse events, although there were numerically more serious adverse events in the higher R+ groups. CONCLUSION: A wide range of R+ doses are required to achieve target SU. Four easily obtained clinical variables (baseline SU, CrCL, weight, and allopurinol dose) may be helpful to predict allopurinol dose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ANZCTR, ACTRN12611000845932 . Registered on 10 August 2011.

Can we predict inadequate response to allopurinol dose escalation? Analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: To determine factors that predict inadequate serum urate (SU) lowering response in a randomized controlled trial of allopurinol dose escalation (DE) in gout. Methods: Participants undergoing allopurinol DE were classified as: complete response (CR)-reached target SU at month 9 and 12 of the DE phase or if still dose escalating at month 9 reached target SU by month 12; partial response (PR)-reached target at some stage but not fulfilling criteria for CR; or inadequate response (IR)-did not reach target SU at any time. Results: IR was uncommon, occurring in 13/150 (8.7%), compared with 82 (54.7%) CR, and 55 (36.6%) PR. Mean (s.e.m.) SU was higher at the end of the 12-month DE in IR compared with both CR and PR groups; 7.6 (0.31) vs 5.01 (0.06) and 5.97 (0.17) mg/dl respectively (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, compete responders tended to be older, be receiving less allopurinol, have longer gout duration and were more likely to be New Zealand (NZ) European ethnicity, compared with IR+PR. Using multi-variate logistic regression analysis, only longer duration of gout and NZ European ethnicity remained significant independent predictors of CR. Baseline SU ⩾ 8 mg/dl had a sensitivity of 69.2% and specificity of 85.1% in predicting IR. The odds ratio for an IR if baseline SU was ⩾8 mg/dl was 11.7 (95% CI 3.3, 41.2). Conclusion: A minority of people with gout never reach target SU when allopurinol dose is increased in a treat-to-target manner. Approximately one-third of those with SU ⩾ 8mg/dl despite allopurinol ⩾300mg/d have an IR to DE. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trails Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au, ACTRN12611000845932.

The impact of diuretic use and ABCG2 genotype on the predictive performance of a published allopurinol dosing tool.

AIM: This research aims to evaluate the predictive performance of a published allopurinol dosing tool. METHODS: Allopurinol dose predictions were compared to the actual dose required to achieve serum urate (SU) <0.36 mmol l-1 using mean prediction error. The influence of patient factors on dose predictions was explored using multilinear regression. RESULTS: Allopurinol doses were overpredicted by the dosing tool; however, this was minimal in patients without diuretic therapy (MPE 63 mg day-1 , 95% CI 40-87) compared to those receiving diuretics (MPE 295 mg day-1 , 95% CI 260-330, P < 0.0001). ABCG2 genotype (rs2231142, G>T) had an important impact on the dose predictions (MPE 201, 107, 15 mg day-1 for GG, GT and TT, respectively, P < 0.0001). Diuretic use and ABCG2 genotype explained 53% of the variability in prediction error (R2  = 0.53, P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The dosing tool produced acceptable maintenance dose predictions for patients not taking diuretics. Inclusion of ABCG2 genotype and a revised adjustment for diuretics would further improve the performance of the dosing tool.

Lack of Evidence that Soluble Urate Directly Influences Bone Remodelling: A Laboratory and Clinical Study.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous observational studies have reported that serum urate concentration positively correlates with bone density and reduced risk of fractures. The aim of this study was to examine whether soluble urate directly influences bone remodelling. METHODS: In laboratory studies, the in vitro effects of soluble urate were examined in osteoclast, osteoblast and osteocyte assays at a range of urate concentrations consistent with those typically observed in humans (up to 0.70 mmol/L). The clinical relevance of the in vitro assay findings was assessed using serial procollagen-1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and Month 12 bone density data from a randomised controlled trial of allopurinol dose escalation in people with gout. RESULTS: Addition of urate in the RAW264.7 cell osteoclastogenesis assay led to small increases in osteoclast formation (ANOVA p = 0.018), but no significant difference in bone resorption. No significant effects on osteoclast number or activity were observed in primary cell osteoclastogenesis or resorption assays. Addition of urate did not alter viability or function in MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblast, primary human osteoblast, or MLO-Y4 osteocyte assays. In the clinical trial analysis, reducing serum urate over a 12 month period by allopurinol dose escalation did not lead to significant changes in P1NP or differences in bone mineral density. CONCLUSION: Addition of soluble urate at physiological concentrations does not influence bone remodelling in vitro. These data, together with clinical trial data showing no effect of urate-lowering on P1NP or bone density, do not support a direct role for urate in influencing bone remodelling.

The effect of kidney function on the urate lowering effect and safety of increasing allopurinol above doses based on creatinine clearance: a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of allopurinol in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains one of the most controversial areas in gout management. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of baseline kidney function on safety and efficacy of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve serum urate (SU) <6 mg/dl. METHODS: We undertook a post hoc analysis of a 24-month allopurinol dose escalation treat-to-target SU randomized controlled trial, in which 183 people with gout were randomized to continue current dose allopurinol for 12 months and then enter the dose escalation phase or to begin allopurinol dose escalation immediately. Allopurinol was increased monthly until SU was <6 mg/dl. The effect of baseline kidney function on urate lowering and adverse effects was investigated. RESULTS: Irrespective of randomization, there was no difference in the percentage of those with creatinine clearance (CrCL) <30 ml/min who achieved SU <6 mg/dl at the final visit compared to those with CrCL ≥30 to <60 ml/min and those with CrCL ≥60 ml/min, with percentages of 64.3% vs. 76.4% vs. 75.0%, respectively (p = 0.65). The mean allopurinol dose at month 24 was significantly lower in those with CrCL <30 ml/min as compared to those with CrCL ≥30 to <60 ml/min or CrCL ≥60 ml/min (mean (SD) 250 (43), 365 (22), and 460 (19) mg/day, respectively (p < 0.001)). Adverse events were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Allopurinol is effective at lowering urate even though and accepting that there were small numbers of participants with CrCL <30 ml/min, these data indicate that allopurinol dose escalation to target SU is safe in people with severe CKD. The dose required to achieve target urate is higher in those with better kidney function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical trials Registry, ACTRN12611000845932 . Registered on 10 August 2011.

Allopurinol dose escalation to achieve serum urate below 6 mg/dL: an open-label extension study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term safety and efficacy of allopurinol dose escalation (DE) to achieve target serum urate (SU) in gout. METHODS: People, including those with chronic kidney disease, who completed the first 12 months of a randomised controlled trial continued into a 12-month extension study. Participants randomised to continue current dose for the first 12 months began allopurinol DE at month 12 if SU was ≥6 mg/dL (control/DE). Immediate DE participants who achieved target SU maintained allopurinol dose (DE/DE). The primary endpoints were reduction in SU and adverse events (AEs) at month 24. RESULTS: The mean (SE) change in SU from month 12 to 24 was -1.1 (0.2) mg/dL in control/DE and 0.1 (0.2) mg/dL in DE/DE group (p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in the percentage of individuals having a gout flare in the month prior to months 12 and 24 compared with baseline in both groups and in mean tophus size over 24 months, but no difference between randomised groups. There were similar numbers of AEs and serious adverse events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of people with gout tolerate higher than creatinine clearance-based allopurinol dose and achieve and maintain target SU. Slow allopurinol DE may be appropriate in clinical practice even in those with kidney impairment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12611000845932.

Fructose malabsorption in people with and without gout: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Higher fructose intake has been associated with hyperuricaemia and gout. Some individuals malabsorb fructose in the small intestine. The aims of this study were to determine the rate of fructose malabsorption and the effects of gout and fructose malabsorption on serum urate in people with and without gout. METHODS: A total of 100 people with gout (cases) were age and gender matched with one control without gout. After a low fructose diet, fructose malabsorption was measured using a hydrogen and methane breath test with a 35g fructose load. In a subgroup of 35 cases and 35 controls, serum urate response to the fructose load over 240 minutes was measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of fructose malabsorption between cases and controls (48% vs. 52%; p = 0.67). Cases had a significantly lower mean (SEM) serum urate cumulative incremental concentration from baseline-240 minutes (iAUC0-240) compared to controls 0.97 (0.56) vs. 4.78 (0.55); p < 0.001. Cmax was significantly lower in cases compared to controls [0.38 (0.003) vs. 0.40 (0.003); p < 0.001]. 95% of cases were receiving allopurinol. There was no significant difference between iAUC0-240 or Cmax for malabsorbers compared to normal absorbers irrespective of case-control status. The mean (SEM) increase in serum urate between baseline and 30 minutes was 0.04 (0.004)mmol/l in the controls compared to 0.009 (0.002) in the cases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The rates of fructose malabsorption are similar in people with and without gout. Allopurinol inhibits the increase in serum urate induced by a fructose load suggesting that people with gout receiving allopurinol may not need to restrict dietary intake of fructose.

A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation to achieve target serum urate in people with gout.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of allopurinol dose escalation using a treat-to-target serum urate (SU) approach. METHODS: A randomised, controlled, parallel-group, comparative clinical trial was undertaken. People with gout receiving at least creatinine clearance (CrCL)-based allopurinol dose for ≥1 month and SU ≥6 mg/dL were recruited. Participants were randomised to continue current dose (control) or allopurinol dose escalation for 12 months. In the dose escalation group, allopurinol was increased monthly until SU was <6 mg/dL. The primary endpoints were reduction in SU and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: 183 participants (93 control, 90 dose escalation) were recruited. At baseline, mean (SD) urate was 7.15 (1.6) mg/dL and allopurinol dose 269 mg/day. 52% had CrCL<60 mL/min. Mean changes in SU at the final visit were -0.34 mg/dL in the control group and -1.5 mg/dL in the dose escalation group (p<0.001) with a mean difference of 1.2 mg/dL (95% CI 0.67 to 1.5, p<0.001). At month 12, 32% of controls and 69% in the dose escalation had SU <6 mg/dL. There were 43 serious AEs in 25 controls and 35 events in 22 dose escalation participants. Only one was considered probably related to allopurinol. Five control and five dose escalation participants died; none was considered allopurinol related. Mild elevations in LFTs were common in both groups, a few moderate increases in gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) were noted. There was no difference in renal function changes between randomised groups. CONCLUSIONS: Higher than CrCL-based doses of allopurinol can effectively lower SU to treatment target in most people with gout. Allopurinol dose escalation is well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTR12611000845932; Results.

Development of a patient-reported outcome measure of tophus burden: the Tophus Impact Questionnaire (TIQ-20).

BACKGROUND: Tophus burden is currently measured using physical examination and imaging methods. The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) tool to assess tophus burden in people with gout. METHODS: The responses from interviews with 25 people with tophaceous gout were used to generate items for a preliminary PRO tool. Following cognitive testing of each item, a preliminary 34-item questionnaire was administered to 103 people with tophaceous gout. Rasch analysis generated a 20-item Tophus Impact Questionnaire (TIQ-20). Test-retest reproducibility and construct validity of the TIQ-20 were assessed. RESULTS: The TIQ-20 responses fit the Rasch model and demonstrated unidimensionality, adequate precision, absence of differential item functioning and adequate person separation index. The TIQ-20 included items related to pain, activity limitation, footwear modification, participation, psychological impact and healthcare use due to tophi. In the 103 patients with tophaceous gout, floor effects were observed in 4.9% and ceiling effects in 1%. The TIQ-20 test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.85). All predicted correlations for construct validity testing were observed, including weak correlation with serum urate concentrations (r<0.30), moderate correlation with subcutaneous tophus count and dual energy CT urate volume (r=0.30-0.50), and stronger correlation with Health Assessment Questionnaire scores (r>0.50). CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a tophus-specific PRO in patients with tophaceous gout. The TIQ-20 demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties. Initial results show internal, face and construct validity, reproducibility and feasibility. Further research is required to determine responsiveness to change.