Diaphragm ultrasound in patients with prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation.

Background: Several publications have examined diaphragmatic ultrasound using two-dimensional (2D) parameters in the context of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) and extubation. However, the studied cohorts had rather short duration of ventilation. Examinations on patients with prolonged weaning after long-term ventilation were missing. It was the aim of this study to assess of the diaphragm and peripheral musculature of patients undergoing prolonged weaning creating a chronological sequence of ultrasonic parameters during the course of weaning. Methods: This study was carried out as a monocentric, prospective observational cross-sectional study. Patients in prolonged weaning who were transferred to a specialized weaning unit were eligible for inclusion if they were ventilated invasively by means of an endotracheal tube or tracheal cannula and if their expected treatment period was at least 5 days. Diaphragmatic function and one representative peripheral muscle were examined in 50 patients between March 2020 and April 2021. The 2D sonographic parameters of diaphragm and diaphragmatic function consisted of diaphragmatic thickness (Tdi) at the end of inspiration and expiration, the fractional thickening (FT) and the diaphragmatic excursion. Additionally, the M. quadriceps femoris was sonographically assessed at two locations. The difference of measurements between the first and the last measuring timepoint were examined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For a longer chronological sequence, the Friedman's rank sum test with subsequent Wilcoxon-Nemenyi-McDonald-Thompson test for multiple comparisons was carried out. Results: Fifty patients with prolonged weaning were included. The median duration of MV before transfer to the weaning unit was 11.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 10] days. Forty-one patients could be assessed over the full course of weaning, with 38 successfully weaned. Within these 41 patients, the sonographic parameters of the diaphragm slightly increased over the course of weaning indicating an increase in thickness and mobility. Especially parameters which represented an active movement reached statistical significance, i.e., inspiratory Tdi when assessed under spontaneous breathing [begin 3.41 (0.99) vs. end 3.43 (1.31) mm; P=0.01] and diaphragmatic excursion [begin 0.7 (0.8) vs. end 0.9 (0.6) cm; P=0.01]. The presence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pressure support did not influence the sonographic parameters significantly. The M. quadriceps femoris, in contrast, decreased slightly but constantly over the time [lower third: begin 1.36 (0.48) vs. end 1.28 (0.36) cm; P=0.054]. Conclusions: The present study is the first one to longitudinally analyse diaphragmatic ultrasound in patients with prolonged weaning. Sonographic assessment showed that Tdi and excursion increased over the course of prolonged weaning, while the diameter of a representative peripheral muscle decreased. However, the changes are rather small, and data show a wide dispersion. To allow a potential, standardized use of diaphragm ultrasound for diagnostic decision support in prolonged weaning, further studies in this specific patient group are required.

Potential Diaphragm Muscle Weakness-related Dyspnea Persists Two Years after COVID-19 and Could Be Improved by Inspiratory Muscle Training: Results of an Observational and an Interventional Trial.

RATIONALE: Diaphragm muscle weakness might underly persistent exertional dyspnea despite normal lung/cardiac function in individuals previously hospitalized for acute COVID-19 illness. OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to determine the persistence and pathophysiological nature of diaphragm muscle weakness and its association with exertional dyspnea two years after hospitalization for COVID-19, and secondly to investigate the impact of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on diaphragm and inspiratory muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea in individuals with long COVID. METHODS: ~2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19, 30 individuals (11 female, median age 58 [interquartile range (IQR) 51-63] years) underwent comprehensive (invasive) respiratory muscle assessment and evaluation of dyspnea. Eighteen with persistent diaphragm muscle weakness and exertional dyspnea were randomized to 6 weeks of IMT or sham training; assessments were repeated immediately after and 6 weeks after IMT completion. The primary endpoint was change in inspiratory muscle fatiguability immediately after IMT. RESULTS: At median 31 [IQR 23-32] months after hospitalization, 21/30 individuals reported relevant persistent exertional dyspnea. Diaphragm muscle weakness on exertion and reduced diaphragm cortical activation were potentially related to exertional dyspnea. Compared with sham control, IMT improved diaphragm and inspiratory muscle function (sniff transdiaphragmatic pressure 83 [IQR 75-91] vs. 100 [IQR 81-113] cmH2O; p=0.02), inspiratory muscle fatiguability (time to task failure 365 [IQR 284-701] vs. 983 [IQR 551-1494] sec; p=0.05), diaphragm voluntary activation index (79 [IQR 63-92] vs 89 [IQR 75-94]%; p=0.03), and dyspnea (Borg score 7 [IQR 5.5-8] vs. 6 [IQR 4-7]; p=0.03); improvements persisted for 6 weeks after IMT completion. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to identify a potential treatment for persisting exertional dyspnea in long COVID, and provide a possible pathophysiological explanation for the treatment benefit. This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Definition of the Post-COVID syndrome using a symptom-based Post-COVID score in a prospective, multi-center, cross-sectoral cohort of the German National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON).

PURPOSE: The objective examination of the Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) remains difficult due to heterogeneous definitions and clinical phenotypes. The aim of the study was to verify the functionality and correlates of a recently developed PCS score. METHODS: The PCS score was applied to the prospective, multi-center cross-sectoral cohort (in- and outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection) of the "National Pandemic Cohort Network (NAPKON, Germany)". Symptom assessment and patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires were analyzed at 3 and 12 months (3/12MFU) after diagnosis. Scores indicative of PCS severity were compared and correlated to demographic and clinical characteristics as well as quality of life (QoL, EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Six hundred three patients (mean 54.0 years, 60.6% male, 82.0% hospitalized) were included. Among those, 35.7% (215) had no and 64.3% (388) had mild, moderate, or severe PCS. PCS severity groups differed considering sex and pre-existing respiratory diseases. 3MFU PCS worsened with clinical severity of acute infection (p = .011), and number of comorbidities (p = .004). PCS severity was associated with poor QoL at the 3MFU and 12MFU (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The PCS score correlated with patients' QoL and demonstrated to be instructive for clinical characterization and stratification across health care settings. Further studies should critically address the high prevalence, clinical relevance, and the role of comorbidities. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The cohort is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov under NCT04768998.

Persistence of Diffusion Capacity Impairment and Its Relationship with Dyspnea 12 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Background: Dyspnea is a common persistent symptom after acute coronavirus disease 2019 illness (COVID-19). One potential explanation for post-COVID-19 dyspnea is a reduction in diffusion capacity. This longitudinal study investigated diffusion capacity and its relationship with dyspnea on exertion in individuals previously hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Eligible participants had been hospitalized for the treatment of acute COVID-19 and were assessed at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. Pulmonary function testing, diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO), blood gas analysis and the level of dyspnea (Borg scale; before and after a 6 min walk test [6 MWT]) were performed. Participants were divided into subgroups based on the presence or absence of dyspnea during the 6 MWT at 12 months after hospitalization. Results: Seventy-two participants (twenty-two female, mean age 59.8 ± 13.5 years) were included. At 12 months after discharge, 41/72 participants (57%) had DLCO below the lower limit of normal and 56/72 (78%) had DLCO < 80% of the predicted value. Individuals with exertional dyspnea had significantly lower DLCO than those without exertional dyspnea (p = 0.001). In participants with DLCO data being available at three timepoints over 12 months (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months) after discharge (n = 25), DLCO improved between 6 weeks and 6 months after hospital discharge, but not thereafter (p = 0.017). Conclusions: About 2/3 of the post-COVID individuals in this study had impaired diffusion capacity at 12 months after hospital discharge. There was an association between persisting dyspnea on exertion and significantly reduced DLCO. Impaired diffusion capacity improved over the first 6 months after hospitalization but not thereafter.

Effective non-invasive ventilation reduces muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD.

Increased sympathetic drive is of prognostic significance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but its determinants remain poorly understood. One potential mechanism may be chemoreflex-mediated adrenergic stimulation caused by sustained hypercapnia. This study determined the impact of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in patients with stable hypercapnic COPD. Ten patients (age 70 ± 7 years, GOLD stage 3-4) receiving long-term NIV (mean inspiratory positive airway pressure 21 ± 7 cmH2O) underwent invasive MSNA measurement via the peroneal nerve during spontaneous breathing and NIV. Compared with spontaneous breathing, NIV significantly reduced hypercapnia (PaCO2 51.5 ± 6.9 vs 42.6 ± 6.1 mmHg, p < 0.0001) along with the burst rate (64.4 ± 20.9 vs 59.2 ± 19.9 bursts/min, p = 0.03) and burst incidence (81.7 ± 29.3 vs 74.1 ± 26.9 bursts/100 heartbeats, p = 0.04) of MSNA. This shows for the first time that correcting hypercapnia with NIV decreases MSNA in COPD.

GLI-12 Reference Values versus Fixed 0.7 Ratio for the Detection of Airflow Obstruction in the Presence of Lung Hyperinflation.

Introduction: Airflow obstruction (AO) is evidenced by reduced forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) with the threshold for diagnosis often being set at <0.7. However, currently the ATS/ERS standards for interpretation of lung function tests recommend the lower limit of normal (LLN), calculated by reference equations of the Global Lung Initiative from 2012 (GLI-12), as a threshold for AO diagnosis. The present study aims to investigate phenotypes, with focus on hyperinflation, which influence AO prevalence defined by FEV1/FVC < LLN when compared to the fixed 0.7 threshold. Methods: Data from 3,875 lung function tests (56.4% men, aged 18-95) including 3,824 body plethysmography recordings performed from July 2021 to June 2022 were analysed. The difference between both classifiers was quantified, before and after stratification by sex, age, and hyperinflation. Results: AO diagnosis was significantly less frequent with the LLN threshold (18.2%) compared to the fixed threshold (28.0%) (p < 0.001) with discordance rate of 10.5%. In the presence of mild or moderate hyperinflation, there was substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa: 0.616, 0.718) between the classifiers compared to near perfect agreement in the presence of severe hyperinflation (Cohen's kappa: 0.896). In addition, subgroup analysis after stratification for sex, age, and hyperinflation showed significant differences between both classifiers. Conclusion: The importance of using the LLN threshold instead of the fixed 0.7 threshold for the diagnosis of AO is highlighted. When using the fixed threshold AO, misdiagnosis was more common in the presence of mild to moderate hyperinflation.

Effects of structured protocolized physical therapy on the duration of mechanical ventilation in patients with prolonged weaning.

PURPOSE: 20% of patients with mechanical ventilation (MV) have a prolonged, complex weaning process, often experiencing a condition of ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW), with a severe decrease in muscle function and restricted long-term prognosis. We aimed to analyze a protocolized, systematic approach of physiotherapy in prolonged weaning patients and hypothesized that the duration of weaning from MV would be shortened. METHODS: ICU patients with prolonged weaning were included before (group 1) and after (group 2) introduction of a quality control measure of a structured and protocolized physiotherapy program. Primary endpoint was the tested dynamometric handgrip strength and the Surgical Intensive Care Unit Optimal Mobilization Score (SOMS). Secondary endpoints were weaning success rate, ventilator-free days, hospital mortality, the prevalence of ICUAW, infections and delirium. RESULTS: 106 patients were included. Both the SOMS and the handgrip test were significantly improved after introducing the program. Despite no differences in weaning success rates at discharge, the total length of MV was significantly shorter in group 2, which also had lower prevalence of infection and higher probability of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Protocolized, systematic physiotherapy resulted in an improvement of the clinical outcome in patients with prolonged weaning. Results were objectifiable with the SOMS and the handgrip test.

Supplemental oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: is less is more? How much is too much?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Currently available evidence supporting the use of supplemental oxygen therapy (SOT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is complex, and data on the mortality reduction associated with SOT usage in patients with severe daytime resting hypoxemia have not been updated since the development of other treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: No reduction in mortality was found when SOT was used in patients with moderate resting daytime, isolated nocturnal, or exercise-induced hypoxemia. However, some of these patients obtain other significant benefits during SOT, including increased exercise endurance, and a mortality reduction is possible in these 'responders'. The adverse effects of long-term oxygen therapy also need to be considered, such as reduced mobility and social stigma. Furthermore, conservative SOT could improve outcomes in the setting of COPD exacerbations compared with higher concentration oxygen regimens. Compared with usual fixed-dose SOT, automated oxygen administration devices might reduce dyspnea during exercise and COPD exacerbations. SUMMARY: Current recommendations for SOT need to be revised to focus on patients who respond best and benefit most from this therapy. A conservative approach to SOT can reduce side effects compared with higher concentration oxygen regimens, and automated oxygen administration devices may help to optimize SOT.

Stepwise management of COPD: What is next after bronchodilation?

Inhaled bronchodilator therapy with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) in combination is currently the mainstay of treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment guidelines recommend the addition of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to LABA/LAMA only in patients with a history of frequent/severe exacerbations and high blood eosinophil counts, or in those with concomitant asthma. Despite this, real-world data suggest that clinicians are not adhering to this guidance and that ICS are frequently overused. This is possibly due to the incorrect assumption that when LABA/LAMA therapy is not sufficient, adding an ICS to the treatment regimen is the logical next step. In this narrative review, we describe global and country-specific guideline recommendations from Germany, Spain, and Japan and compare these with real-world data on LABA/LAMA and ICS use in clinical practice. We also provide a clinical guide to the use of add-on therapies with LABA/LAMA for different patient phenotypes, including (1) patients still symptomatic (but not exacerbating) despite LABA/LAMA treatment; (2) patients still exacerbating despite LABA/LAMA treatment who have high blood eosinophil counts; and (3) patients still exacerbating despite LABA/LAMA treatment who do not have high blood eosinophils or concomitant asthma.

What are the options for patients with COPD when LABA/LAMA is not enough?Treatment guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recommend dual bronchodilator therapy for the majority of patients, consisting of an inhaled combination of long-acting ß₂-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Patients whose COPD is not well controlled on LABA/LAMA require further clinical intervention, which may or may not involve treatment with additional drugs.Data from observational studies reflecting routine clinical practice suggest that inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are often added to LABA/LAMA, even though treatment guidelines recommend only adding ICS in a specific group of patients with a history of exacerbations and high levels of eosinophils (a type of inflammatory cell) in the blood, or in those with current asthma. As long-term ICS use may be associated with an increased risk of side effects such as pneumonia, it is important to avoid overuse of ICS. When a patient's COPD is not well controlled on LABA/LAMA, other treatable conditions should first be ruled out, and factors such as medication adherence, inhaler technique, and co-existing health conditions should also be considered.This review gives advice on what follow-up options physicians should consider when LABA/LAMA is not providing adequate control of a patient's COPD. Specifically, recommendations are given for three different patient profiles:1. Patients who still have symptoms of COPD (but no acute/sudden worsenings of symptoms, known as exacerbations).2. Patients who have exacerbations, as well as high levels of eosinophils in the blood.3. Patients who have exacerbations, but without high levels of eosinophils in the blood or current asthma.

[Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure. Clinical Practice Guidelines - on behalf of the German Society of Pneumology and Ventilatory Medicine]. / S2k-Leitlinie Nichtinvasive Beatmung als Therapie der akuten respiratorischen Insuffizienz.

The guideline update outlines the advantages as well as the limitations of NIV in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in daily clinical practice and in different indications.Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has a high value in therapy of hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, as it significantly reduces the length of ICU stay and hospitalization as well as mortality.Patients with cardiopulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oxygen in addition to necessary cardiological interventions. This should be done already prehospital and in the emergency department.In case of other forms of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with only mild or moderately disturbed gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 > 150 mmHg) there is no significant advantage or disadvantage compared to high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). In severe forms of ARDS NIV is associated with high rates of treatment failure and mortality, especially in cases with NIV-failure and delayed intubation.NIV should be used for preoxygenation before intubation. In patients at risk, NIV is recommended to reduce extubation failure. In the weaning process from invasive ventilation NIV essentially reduces the risk of reintubation in hypercapnic patients. NIV is regarded useful within palliative care for reduction of dyspnea and improving quality of life, but here in concurrence to HFNO, which is regarded as more comfortable. Meanwhile NIV is also recommended in prehospital setting, especially in hypercapnic respiratory failure and pulmonary edema.With appropriate monitoring in an intensive care unit NIV can also be successfully applied in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.

Significance of Hypocapnia in the Risk Assessment of Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Blood gas analysis is part of the diagnostic work-up for pulmonary hypertension (PH). Although some studies have found that the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) is an independent marker of mortality in individuals with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH Group 1), there is a lack of data regarding the significance of PaCO2 in individuals with different types of PH based on the new 2022 definitions. Therefore, this study analyzed data from 157 individuals who were undergoing PH work-up, including right heart catheterization, using PH definitions from the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines. At diagnosis, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels were significantly higher, but the time-course of NT-pro-BNP levels during treatment was significantly more favorable in individuals with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH Group 1) who did versus did not have hypocapnia (p = 0.026 and p = 0.017, respectively). These differences based on the presence of hypocapnia were not seen in individuals with PH Groups 2, 3, or 4. In conclusion, using the new definition of PH, hypocapnia may correlate with worse risk stratification at diagnosis in individuals with pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, hypocapnic individuals with pulmonary arterial hypertension may benefit more from disease-specific therapy than those without hypocapnia.

Extracorporeal Artificial Lungs: Co-Creating Future Technology - A Qualitative Analysis.

Background: Terminal lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in progression cause a large reduction in quality of life and may lead to bilateral lung transplantation (bLTx). An artificial portable lung could provide a bridge to lung transplantation, allowing patients to remain at home and mobile for longer. To advance the development of such an artificial lung, patient feedback is essential. The aim of this study is to analyze patient acceptance about an extracorporeal artificial lung and to implement these findings into the development. Methods: In collaboration with a medical device developer, we presented a portable dummy oxygenator to patients with advanced lung disease, as potential end users. Data collection in Germany and France was based on two different methods: an online questionnaire and face-to-face interviews (F2F). Results: A total of 604 participants answered the online questionnaire and 17 participants were included in the F2F interviews. The majority of participants (COPD n=140, PH n=17) were able to walk more than 1 km with a mean suffering pressure of 2.87 and 3, respectively. Six of the 17 F2F participants who could walk <1 km were interested in an assistive device. The statistical value of Fisher's exact test for suffering pressure and desire for a portable oxygenator was 0.45. Conclusion: In patients with advanced lung disease, there is no statistically significant association between subjectively increased suffering pressure and desire for a portable oxygenator, so market introduction may be difficult. Potential end users should be implemented early in device development. Data collection via an online questionnaire combined with personal interviews has proven to be a successful approach here.

A Potential Association between Ribonuclease 1 Dynamics in the Blood and the Outcome in COVID-19 Patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the new SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is the most recent and well-known outbreak of a coronavirus. RNase 1 is a small endogenous antimicrobial polypeptide that possesses antiviral activity against viral diseases. In this study, we investigated a potential association between ribonuclease 1 and the outcome in COVID-19 patients and the impact of increased and decreased RNase 1 levels serum during the course of the disease. Therefore, two patient populations, Cohort A (n = 35) and B (n = 80), were subclassified into two groups, in which the RNase 1 concentration increased or decreased from time point one to time point two. We show that the RNase 1 serum levels significantly increased in the increasing group of both cohorts (p = 0.0171; p < 0.0001). We detect that patients in the increasing group who died had significantly higher RNase 1 serum levels at both time points in Cohort A (p = 0.0170; p = 0.0393) and Cohort B (p = 0.0253; p = 0.0034) than patients who survived. Additionally, we measured a significant correlation of RNase 1 serum levels with serum creatinine as well as creatinine clearance in the increasing and decreasing group at both time points of Cohort A. Based on these results, there is now good evidence that RNase 1 may play a role in renal dysfunction associated with ICU COVID-19 patients and that increasing RNase 1 serum level may be a potential biomarker to predict outcome in COVID-19 patients.

EVELUT®: A Real-World, Observational Study Assessing Dyspnoea and Symptom Burden in COPD Patients Switched from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS.

INTRODUCTION: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2023) no longer recommends a long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combination for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In patients treated with LABA/ICS, who continue to experience symptoms without frequent or severe exacerbations, GOLD now recommends switching to long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/LABA instead of escalating to triple therapy (TT; LAMA/LABA/ICS), which previously was also a recommended option. EVELUT®, a real-life, observational study, compared these two treatment strategies in terms of symptom relief and health status improvement. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic COPD at low exacerbation risk (GOLD B) were switched, at their physicians' discretion, from LABA/ICS to either fixed-dose LAMA/LABA (tiotropium/olodaterol, Respimat® [Tio/Olo]) or fixed or free TT. Primary endpoints were change in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) and COPD Assessment Test™ (CAT™) scores after 12 weeks. RESULTS: The safety set contained 463 patients (Tio/Olo, n = 329; TT, n = 134). In a propensity score-matched set (Tio/Olo, n = 121; TT, n = 121), improvement in mMRC score was similar in patients on Tio/Olo (-0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.11, -0.36) and TT (-0.25; 95% CI -0.13, -0.38). Improvement in total CAT score was slightly larger in patients on Tio/Olo (-3.45; 95% CI -2.45, -4.45) versus TT (-2.51; 95% CI -1.62, -3.40). In both groups, Physician's Global Evaluation scores increased, with 69-89% of patients satisfied with their treatment overall. Marginally more patients on Tio/Olo responded to treatment versus TT (Δ mMRC score ≥ 1; 25% vs. 22%; Δ CAT score ≥ 2, 68% vs. 56%). CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic COPD at low exacerbation risk, treatment can be switched from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA without compromising clinical benefit, compared with escalating to LAMA/LABA/ICS. Switching from LABA/ICS to LAMA/LABA can provide symptom relief and improve health status without exposure to the risks associated with ICS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03954132.

Bioimpedance based determination of cardiac index does not show enough trueness for point of care use in patients with systolic heart failure.

Cardiac output (CO) is a key parameter in diagnostics and therapy of heart failure (HF). The thermodilution method (TD) as gold standard for CO determination is an invasive procedure with corresponding risks. As an alternative, thoracic bioimpedance (TBI) has gained popularity for CO estimation as it is non-invasive. However, systolic heart failure (HF) itself might worsen its validity. The present study validated TBI against TD. In patients with and without systolic HF (LVEF ≤ 50% or > 50% and NT-pro-BNP < 125 pg/ml, respectively) right heart catheterization including TD was performed. TBI (Task Force Monitor©, CNSystems, Graz, Austria) was conducted semi-simultaneously. 14 patients with and 17 patients without systolic HF were prospectively enrolled in this study. In all participants, TBI was obtainable. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean bias of 0.3 L/min (limits of agreement ± 2.0 L/min, percentage error or PE 43.3%) for CO and a bias of -7.3 ml (limits of agreement ± 34 ml) for cardiac stroke volume (SV). PE was markedly higher in patients with compared to patients without systolic HF (54% vs. 35% for CO). Underlying systolic HF substantially decreases the validity of TBI for estimation of CO and SV. In patients with systolic HF, TBI clearly lacks diagnostic accuracy and cannot be recommended for point-of-care decision making. Depending on the definition of an acceptable PE, TBI may be considered sufficient when systolic HF is absent.Trial registration number: DRKS00018964 (German Clinical Trial Register, retrospectively registered).

[Weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation on a specialised weaning unit: a retrospective comparison of patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection]. / Entwöhnung von der Langzeitbeatmung nach ARDS auf einer spezialisierten Weaning-Einheit ­ ein retrospektiver Vergleich von Patienten mit und ohne SARS-CoV-2 Infektion.

BACKGROUND: Available data on patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation due to severe COVID-19 are sparse. Here we compare patients with ARDS related or not related to SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in a specialised weaning unit. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation associated with an ARDS admitted from the 21st November 2013 to the 23rd July 2021 to the weaning unit of the University Hospital RWTH Aachen was performed. ARDS patients with COVID-19 (cARDS) were compared to patients with ARDS not related to COVID-19 (ncARDS). RESULTS: In total, n=129 patients in prolonged need for mechanical ventilation after ARDS were treated in the weaning unit, of whom n=38 had been suffering from ARDS related to COVID-19. Both patients groups were similar in terms of demographic parameters, underlying chronic illnesses, severity of ARDS and the duration of mechanical ventilation before being admitted to the weaning unit. During ICU stay, prone positioning and therapy with systemic corticosteroids was used more frequently in cARDS patients. Furthermore, therapy with vasoconstrictors was needed more often (cARDS: 42.1% vs. ncARDS 12.1%; p=0.0003) and urinary output was lower (cARDS: 1980 ml vs. ncARDS: 2600 ml; p=0.0037) in this patient group. The clinical course of the weaning process was similar in patients with cARDS and ncARDS, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and the duration of mechanical ventilation. There were n=5 deaths (13.2%) in the cARDS and n=15 deaths (16.5%) in the ncARDS group. After hospital discharge, n=4 patients required non-invasive ventilation whereas out-of-hospital invasive ventilation was only necessary in one patient (all in the ncARDS group). CONCLUSION: After having survived the acute phase, the disease prognosis of patients with severe COVID-19 is favourable and most patients can be successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation. In addition, there were only minor differences compared to patients with ARDS unrelated to COVID-19.

Diaphragm Muscle Weakness Might Explain Exertional Dyspnea 15 Months after Hospitalization for COVID-19.

Rationale: Dyspnea is often a persistent symptom after acute coronavirus disease (COVID-19), even if cardiac and pulmonary function are normal. Objectives: This study investigated diaphragm muscle strength in patients after COVID-19 and its relationship to unexplained dyspnea on exertion. Methods: Fifty patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 (14 female, age 58 ± 12 yr, half of whom were treated with mechanical ventilation, and half of whom were treated outside the ICU) were evaluated using pulmonary function testing, 6-minute-walk test, echocardiography, twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure after cervical magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve roots, and diaphragm ultrasound. Diaphragm function data were compared with values from a healthy control group. Measurements and Main Results: Moderate or severe dyspnea on exertion was present at 15 months after hospital discharge in approximately two-thirds of patients. No significant pulmonary function or echocardiography abnormalities were detected. Twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure was significantly impaired in patients previously hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with control subjects, independent of initial disease severity (14 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in mechanically ventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.02], and 15 ± 8 vs. 21 ± 3 cm H2O in nonventilated patients vs. control subjects [P = 0.04]). There was a significant association between twitch transdiaphragmatic pressure and the severity of dyspnea on exertion (P = 0.03). Conclusions: Diaphragm muscle weakness was present 15 months after hospitalization for COVID-19 even in patients who did not require mechanical ventilation, and this weakness was associated with dyspnea on exertion. The current study, therefore, identifies diaphragm muscle weakness as a correlate for persistent dyspnea in patients after COVID-19 in whom lung and cardiac function are normal. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04854863).