The influence of implant design and limb alignment on in vivo wear rates of fixed-bearing and rotating-platform knee implant retrievals.

Analysis of polyethylene (PE) wear in knee implants is crucial for understanding the factors leading to revision in total knee arthroplasty. Importantly, current experimental and computational methods for predicting insert wear can only be validated against true in vivo measurements from retrievals. This study quantitatively investigated in vivo PE wear rates in fixed-bearing (FB) (n = 21) and rotating-platform (n = 53) implant retrievals. 3D surface geometry of the retrievals was measured using a structured light scanner. Then, a reference surface that included the deformation, but not the wear that the retrievals had experienced in vivo, was constructed using a fully automatic surface reconstruction algorithm. Finally, wear volume was calculated from the deviation between the worn and reconstructed surfaces. The measurement and analysis techniques were validated and the algorithm was found to produce errors of only 0.2% relative to the component volumes. In addition to quantifying cohort-level wear rates, the effect of mechanical axis limb alignment on mediolateral wear distribution was examined for a subset of the retrievals (n = 14 + 26). Our results show that FB implants produce significantly (p = 0.04) higher topside wear rates (24.6 ± 10.1 mm3/year) than rotating-platform implants (15.3 ± 8.0 mm3/year). This effect was larger than that of limb alignment, which had a smaller and nonsignificant influence on overall wear rates (+4.5 ± 11.6 mm3/year, p = 0.43). However, increased varus alignment was associated significantly with greater medial compartment wear in both the FB and rotating-platform designs (+1.7 ± 1.3%/° and +1.8 ± 1.6%/°). Our findings emphasize the importance of implant design and limb alignment on wear outcomes, providing reference data for improving implant performance and longevity.

Knee kinematics are primarily determined by implant alignment but knee kinetics are mainly influenced by muscle coordination strategy.

Implant malalignment has been reported to be a primary reason for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In addition, altered muscle coordination patterns are commonly observed in TKA patients, which is thought to alter knee contact loads. A comprehensive understanding of the influence of surgical implantation and muscle recruitment strategies on joint contact mechanics is crucial to improve surgical techniques, increase implant longevity, and inform rehabilitation protocols. In this study, a detailed musculoskeletal model with a 12 degrees of freedom knee was developed to represent a TKA subject from the CAMS-Knee datasets. Using motion capture and ground reaction force data, a level walking cycle was simulated and the joint movement and loading patterns were estimated using a novel technique for concurrent optimization of muscle activations and joint kinematics. In addition, over 12'000 Monte Carlo simulations were performed to predict knee contact mechanics during walking, considering numerous combinations of implant alignment and muscle activation scenarios. Validation of our baseline simulation showed good agreement between the model kinematics and loading patterns against the in vivo data. Our analyses reveal a considerable impact of implant alignment on the joint kinematics, while variation in muscle activation strategies mainly affects knee contact loading. Moreover, our results indicate that high knee compressive forces do not necessarily originate from extreme kinematics and vice versa. This study provides an improved understanding of the complex inter-relationships between loading and movement patterns resulting from different surgical implantation and muscle coordination strategies and presents a validated framework towards population-based modelling in TKA.

A novel method to accurately recreate in vivo loads and kinematics in computational models of the knee.

Despite availability of in vivo knee loads and kinematics data, conventional load- and displacement-controlled configurations still can't accurately predict tibiofemoral loads from kinematics or vice versa. We propose a combined load- and displacement-control method for joint-level simulations of the knee to reliably reproduce in vivo contact mechanics. Prediction errors of the new approach were compared to those of conventional purely load- or displacement-controlled models using in vivo implant loads and kinematics for multiple subjects and activities (CAMS-Knee dataset). Our method reproduced both loads and kinematics more closely than conventional models and thus demonstrates clear advantages for investigating tibiofemoral contact or wear.

European Society of Biomechanics S.M. Perren Award 2022: Standardized tibio-femoral implant loads and kinematics.

Knowledge of both tibio-femoral kinematics and kinetics is necessary for fully understanding knee joint biomechanics, guiding implant design and testing, and driving and validating computational models. In 2017, the CAMS-Knee datasets were presented, containing synchronized in vivo implant kinematics measured using a moving fluoroscope and tibio-femoral contact loads measured using instrumented implants from six subjects. However, to date, no representative summary of kinematics and kinetics obtained from measurements at the joint level of the same cohort of subjects exists. In this study, we present the CAMS-Knee standardized subject "Stan", whose reference data include tibio-femoral kinematics and loading scenarios from all six subjects for level and downhill walking, stair descent, squat and sit-to-stand-to-sit. Using the peak-preserving averaging method by Bergmann and co-workers, we derived scenarios for generally high (CAMS-HIGH100), peak, and extreme loading. The CAMS-HIGH100 axial forces reached peaks between 3022 and 3856 N (3.08-3.93 body weight) for the five investigated activities. Anterior-posterior forces were about a factor of ten lower. The axial moment around the tibia was highest for level walking and squatting with peaks of 9.4 Nm and 10.5 Nm acting externally. Internal tibial rotations of up to 8.4° were observed during squat and sitting, while the walking activities showed approximately half the internal rotation. The CAMS-HIGH100 loads were comparable to Bergmann and co-workers', but have the additional benefit of synchronized kinematics. Stan's loads are +11 to +56% higher than the ISO 14243 wear testing standard loads, while the kinematics exhibit markedly different curve shapes. Along with the original CAMS-Knee datasets, Stan's data can be requested at cams-knee.orthoload.com.