Clinical Experience, Characteristics, and Performance of an Acetaminophen Absorption Test in Critically Ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Altered drug and nutrient absorption presents a unique challenge in critically ill patients. Performing an acetaminophen absorption test (AAT) has been used as a marker for gastric motility and upper small bowel absorption; thus, it may provide objective data regarding enteral absorptive ability in critically ill patients. STUDY QUESTION: What is the clinical experience with AAT when used as a surrogate marker for enteral absorption in critically ill patients? STUDY DESIGN: This single-center, retrospective, cohort study evaluated serum acetaminophen concentrations within 180 minutes following 1-time enteral administration of an AAT. Patients admitted to the surgical and medical intensive care units and medical intensive care units over a 7-year period were evaluated. Groups were defined as positive (acetaminophen concentration of ≥10 mg/L) or negative (acetaminophen concentration of <10 mg/L) AAT. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: The outcomes were to describe the clinical experience, characteristics, and performance of AAT. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. Patients were 58.5 ± 14 years of age, mostly male (58.3%), and admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (66.7%). Median hospital length of stay was 47.5 (27-78.8) days. Thirty-four patients (70.8%) had a positive AAT [median concentration, 14 (12-18) mg/L]. Median time to first detectable concentration was 37 (33-64) minutes. AAT characteristics were similar between the groups including total dose, weight-based dose, time to first and second assays, drug formulation, and site of administration between groups. There were no independent risk factors identified on regression analysis for negative AAT. CONCLUSIONS: An acetaminophen dose of 15 mg/kg with 2 coordinated serum concentrations approximately 30 and 60 minutes after administration is a reasonable construct for AAT. Future research is needed to assess AAT utility, safety, and clinical outcomes for predicting patient ability to absorb enteral feeds and medications.

Evaluating the Utility of High Sensitivity Troponin in Blunt Cardiac Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for blunt cardiac injury (BCI) includes obtaining a serum troponin level and an electrocardiogram for patients diagnosed with a sternal fracture. Our institution has transitioned to the use of a high sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI). The aim of this study was to determine whether hsTnI is comparable to troponin I (TnI) in identifying clinically significant BCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center over a 24-mo period with the diagnosis of sternal fracture were screened for BCI. Any initial TnI more than 0.04 ng/mL or hsTnI more than 18 ng/L was considered positive for potential BCI. Clinically significant BCI was defined as a new-bundle branch block, ST wave change, echocardiogram change, or need for cardiac catheterization. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty five patients with a sternal fracture were identified, 161 underwent screening with TnI and 104 with hsTnI. For TnI, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant BCI was 0.80 and 0.79, respectively. For hsTnI, the sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant BCI was 0.71 and 0.69, respectively. A multivariate analysis demonstrated the odds ratio for significant BCI with a positive TnI was 14.4 (95% confidence interval, 3.9-55.8, P < 0.0001) versus an odds ratio of 5.48 (95% confidence interval 1.9-15.7, P = 0.002) in the hsTnI group. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of hsTnI is comparable to TnI for detection of significant BCI. Additional investigation is needed to determine the necessity and interval for repeat testing and the need for additional diagnostic testing.

Ketamine in Critically Ill Patients: Use, Perceptions, and Potential Barriers.

Objective: To evaluate practitioner use of ketamine and identify potential barriers to use in acutely and critically ill patients. To compare characteristics, beliefs, and practices of ketamine frequent users and non-users. Methods: An online survey developed by members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Section was distributed to physician, pharmacist, nurse practitioner, physician assistant and nurse members of SCCM. The online survey queried SCCM members on self-reported practices regarding ketamine use and potential barriers in acute and critically ill patients. Results: Respondents, 341 analyzed, were mostly adult physicians, practicing in the United States at academic medical centers. Clinicians were comfortable or very comfortable using ketamine to facilitate intubation (80.0%), for analgesia (77.9%), procedural sedation (79.4%), continuous ICU sedation (65.8%), dressing changes (62.4%), or for asthma exacerbation and status epilepticus (58.8% and 40.4%). Clinicians were least comfortable with ketamine use for alcohol withdrawal and opioid detoxification (24.7% and 23.2%). Most respondents reported "never" or "infrequently" using ketamine preferentially for continuous IV analgesia (55.6%) or sedation (61%). Responses were mixed across dosing ranges and duration. The most common barriers to ketamine use were adverse effects (42.6%), other practitioners not routinely using the medication (41.5%), lack of evidence (33.5%), lack of familiarity (33.1%), and hospital/institutional policy guiding the indication for use (32.3%). Conclusion: Although most critical care practitioners report feeling comfortable using ketamine, there are many inconsistencies in practice regarding dose, duration, and reasons to avoid or limit ketamine use. Further educational tools may be targeted at practitioners to improve appropriate ketamine use.

The Association of Norepinephrine Utilization With Mortality Risk in Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: While the pillars of trauma resuscitation are surgical hemostasis and blood product administration, norepinephrine (NE) can be used as an adjunct. The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the maximum dose of NE, timing of NE administration, and mortality in trauma patients. METHODS: Patients admitted between January 2013 and January 2021 treated with NE were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess whether maximum NE dose was independently associated with mortality. Optimal dosage rates for NE were determined via Youden Index. Subgroup analyses comparing those who received NE within versus after the first 24 h of admission were conducted. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-first trauma patients were included, with 217 (62%) surviving. Patients who died received an average maximum dose of 16.7 mcg/min compared to 9.1 mcg/min in survivors (P = 0.0003). Mortality rate increased with dosage (P < 0.0001), with doses greater than 20 mcg/min having 79% mortality. Those who received NE within the first 24 h had an inflection point in mortality at 16 mcg/min (Youden = 0.45) (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.03-1.10). For patients who received NE after the first 24 h, an inflection point in mortality was at 10 mcg/min (Youden = 0.34) (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: Higher maximum doses of NE were associated with increased mortality. Patients initiated on NE more than 24 h into their admission displayed an inflection point at a lower dose than those initiated later. This suggests that trauma patients initiated on NE after 24 h from injury may have a dire prognosis.

Tracheostomy decreases continuous analgesia and sedation requirements.

BACKGROUND: The goals of sedation in the critically ill surgical patient are to minimize pain, anxiety, and agitation without hindering cardiopulmonary function. One potential benefit of tracheostomy during endotracheal intubation is the reduction of sedation and analgesia; however, there are little data to support this supposition. We hypothesized that patients undergoing tracheostomy would have a rapid reduction in sedation and analgesia following tracheostomy. METHODS: A retrospective review of tracheostomies performed at a single Level I trauma center from January 2013 to June 2018 was completed. An evaluation of Glasgow Coma Scale, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit 72 hours pretracheostomy to 72 hours posttracheostomy was performed. The total daily dose of sedation, anxiolytic, and analgesic medications administered were recorded. Mixed-effects models were used to evaluate longitudinal drug does over time (hours). RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-eight patients included for analysis with a mean age of 58.8 ± 18.3 years. There was a significant decrease in propofol and fentanyl utilization from 24 hours pretracheostomy to 24 hours posttracheostomy in both dose and number of patients receiving these continuous intravenous medications. Similarly, total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) use and continuous midazolam significantly decreased from 24 hours pretracheostomy to 24 hours posttracheostomy. By contrast, intermittent enteral quetiapine and methadone administration increased after tracheostomy. Importantly, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, and Confusion Assessment Method scoring were also significantly improved as early as 24 hours posttracheostomy. Total MME use was significantly elevated in patients younger than 65 years and in male patients pretracheostomy compared with female patients. Patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit had significantly higher MME use compared with those in the surgical intensive care unit pretracheostomy. CONCLUSION: Tracheostomy allows for a rapid and significant reduction in intravenous sedation and analgesia medication utilization. Posttracheostomy sedation can transition to intermittent enteral medications, potentially contributing to the observed improvements in postoperative mental status and agitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Multicenter Retrospective Review of Ketamine Use in the ICU.

The response of ICU patients to continuously infused ketamine when it is used for analgesia and/or sedation remains poorly established. OBJECTIVES: To describe continuous infusion (CI) ketamine use in critically ill patients, including indications, dose and duration, adverse effects, patient outcomes, time in goal pain/sedation score range, exposure to analgesics/sedatives, and delirium. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from twenty-five diverse institutions in the United States. Patients receiving CI ketamine between January 2014 and December 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Chart review evaluating institutional and patient demographics, ketamine indication, dose, administration, and adverse effects. Pain/sedation scores, cumulative doses of sedatives and analgesics, and delirium screenings in the 24 hours prior to ketamine were compared with those at 0-24 hours and 25-48 hours after. RESULTS: A total of 390 patients were included (median age, 54.5 yr; interquartile range, 39-65 yr; 61% males). Primary ICU types were medical (35.3%), surgical (23.3%), and trauma (17.7%). Most common indications were analgesia/sedation (n = 357, 91.5%). Starting doses were 0.2 mg/kg/hr (0.1-0.5 mg/kg/hr) and continued for 1.6 days (0.6-2.9 d). Hemodynamics in the first 4 hours after ketamine were variable (hypertension 24.0%, hypotension 23.5%, tachycardia 19.5%, bradycardia 2.3%); other adverse effects were minimal. Compared with 24 hours prior, there was a significant increase in proportion of time spent within goal pain score after ketamine initiation (24 hr prior: 68.9% [66.7-72.6%], 0-24 hr: 78.6% [74.3-82.5%], 25-48 hr: 80.3% [74.6-84.3%]; p < 0.001) and time spent within goal sedation score (24 hr prior: 57.1% [52.5-60.0%], 0-24 hr: 64.1% [60.7-67.2%], 25-48 hr: 68.9% [65.5-79.5%]; p < 0.001). There was also a significant reduction in IV morphine (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 120 [25-400], 0-24 hr: 118 [10-363], 25-48 hr: 80 [5-328]; p < 0.005), midazolam (mg) equivalents (24 hr prior: 11 [4-67], 0-24 hr: 6 [0-68], 25-48 hr: 3 [0-57]; p < 0.001), propofol (mg) (24 hr prior: 942 [223-4,018], 0-24 hr: 160 [0-2,776], 25-48 hr: 0 [0-1,859]; p < 0.001), and dexmedetomidine (µg) (24 hr prior: 1,025 [276-1,925], 0-24 hr: 285 [0-1,283], 25-48 hr: 0 [0-826]; p < 0.001). There was no difference in proportion of time spent positive for delirium (24 hr prior: 43.0% [17.0-47.0%], 0-24 hr: 39.5% [27.0-43.8%], 25-48 hr: 0% [0-43.7%]; p = 0.233). Limitations to these data include lack of a comparator group, potential for confounders and selection bias, and varying pain and sedation practices that may have changed since completion of the study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There is variability in the use of CI ketamine. Hemodynamic instability was the most common adverse effect. In the 48 hours after ketamine initiation compared with the 24 hours prior, proportion of time spent in goal pain/sedation score range increased and exposure to other analgesics/sedatives decreased.

Applying Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics to Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may need continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) due to acute kidney injury or worsening of underlying chronic kidney disease. This will affect their antimicrobial exposure and may have a significant impact on the treatment. We aim to develop a cefepime pharmacokinetic (PK) model in CRRT ICU patients and generate the posterior predictions for a group and assess their therapy outcomes. Adult patients, who were admitted to the ICU, received cefepime, and had its concentration measured while on CRRT were included from three different data sets. In two data sets, samples were collected from the predialyzer, postdialyzer ports, and effluent fluid at different times within the same dosing interval. The third data set had only cefepime plasma concentration measured as part of clinical service. Patients' demographics, cefepime regimens and concentration, CRRT parameters, and therapy outcomes were recorded. NPAG was used for population PK and posterior predictions. A total of 125 patients were included. Cefepime was described by a five-compartment model, and the CRRT flow rates described the rates of cefepime transfer between compartments. The posterior predictions were generated for the third data set and the median (range) fT>MIC was 100% (27%-100%) and fT>4×MIC was 64% (0%-100%). The mortality rate was 53%. There was no difference in target attainment in terms of clinical cure and 30-day mortality. This model can be used as a precision dosing tool in CRRT patients. Future studies may address other PK/PD targets in a larger population.

Ketamine Stability over Six Months of Exposure to Moderate and High Temperature Environments.

Background: All medications should be stored within temperature ranges defined by manufacturers, but logistical and operational challenges of prehospital and military settings complicate adherence to these recommendations. Lorazepam and succinylcholine experience clinically relevant heat-related degradation, whereas midazolam does not. Because ketamine's stability when stored outside manufacturer recommendations is unknown, we evaluated the heat-related degradation of ketamine exposed to several temperature ranges. Methods: One hundred twenty vials of ketamine (50 mg/mL labeled concentration) from the same manufacturer lot were equally distributed and stored for six months in five environments: an active EMS unit in southwest Ohio (May-October 2019); heat chamber at constant 120 °F (C1); heat chamber fluctuating over 24 hours from 86 °F-120 °F (C2); heat chamber fluctuating over 24 hours from 40 °F-120 °F (C3); heat chamber kept at constant 70 °F (manufacturer recommended room temperature, C4). Four ketamine vials were removed every 30 days from each environment and sent to an FDA-accredited commercial lab for high performance liquid chromatography testing. Data loggers and thermistors allowed temperature recording every minute for all environments. Cumulative heat exposure was quantified by mean kinetic temperature (MKT), which accounts for additional heat-stress over time caused by temperature fluctuations and is a superior measure than simple ambient temperature. MKT was calculated for each environment at the time of ketamine removal. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the concentration changes at each time point. Results: The MKT ranged from 73.6 °F-80.7 °F in the active EMS unit and stayed constant for each chamber (C1 MKT: 120 °F, C2 MKT: 107.3 °F, C3 MKT: 96.5 °F, C4 MKT: 70 °F). No significant absolute ketamine degradation, or trends in degradation, occurred in any environment at any time point. The lowest median concentration occurred in the EMS-stored samples removed after 6 months [48.2 mg/mL (47.75, 48.35)], or 96.4% relative strength to labeled concentration. Conclusion: Ketamine samples exhibited limited degradation after 6 months of exposure to real world and simulated extreme high temperature environments exceeding manufacturer recommendations. Future studies are necessary to evaluate ketamine stability beyond 6 months.

Intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection for rib fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Blunt chest wall injury accounts for 15% of trauma admissions. Previous studies have shown that the number of rib fractures predicts inpatient opioid requirements, raising concerns for pharmacologic consequences, including hypotension, delirium, and opioid dependence. We hypothesized that intercostal injection of liposomal bupivacaine would reduce analgesia needs and improve spirometry metrics in trauma patients with rib fractures. METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized placebo-control study was conducted at a Level I trauma center as a Food and Drug Administration investigational new drug study. Enrollment criteria included patients 18 years or older admitted to the intensive care unit with blunt chest wall trauma who could not achieve greater than 50% goal inspiratory capacity. Patients were randomized to liposomal bupivacaine or saline injections in up to six intercostal spaces. Primary outcome was to examine pain scores and breakthrough pain medications for 96-hour duration. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of analgesia on pulmonary physiology. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled, 50 per cohort, with similar demographics (Injury Severity Score, 17.9 bupivacaine 17.6 control) and comorbidities. Enrolled patients had a mean age of 60.5 years, and 47% were female. Rib fracture number, distribution, and targets for injection were similar between groups. While both groups displayed a decrease in opioid use over time, there was no change in mean daily pain scores. The bupivacaine group achieved higher incentive spirometry volumes over Days 1 and 2 (1095 mL, 1063 mL bupivacaine vs. 900 mL, 866 mL control). Hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay were similar and there were no differences in postinjection pneumonia, use of epidural catheters or adverse events bet ween groups. CONCLUSION: While intercostal liposomal bupivacaine injection is a safe method for rib fracture-related analgesia, it was not effective in reducing pain scores, opioid requirements, or hospital length of stay. Bupivacaine injection transiently improved incentive spirometry volumes, but without a reduction in the development of pneumonia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, Level II.

Assessment of Detectable Serum Tobramycin Concentrations in Patients Receiving Inhaled Tobramycin for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled tobramycin can be used for empiric or definitive therapy of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. This is believed to minimize systemic exposure and potential adverse drug toxicities including acute kidney injury (AKI). However, detectable serum tobramycin concentrations have been reported after inhaled tobramycin therapy with AKI. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study evaluated mechanically ventilated adult subjects admitted to ICUs at a large, urban academic medical center that received empiric inhaled tobramycin for VAP. Subjects were separated into detectable (ie, ≥ 0.6 mg/L) or undetectable serum tobramycin concentration groups, and characteristics were compared. Independent predictors for detectable serum tobramycin concentration and new onset AKI during or within 48 h of therapy discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine inhaled tobramycin courses in 53 subjects were included in the analysis, of which 39 (66.1%) courses administered to 35 (66.0%) subjects had detectable serum tobramycin concentrations. Subjects with detectable serum tobramycin concentrations were older (57.1 y ± 11.4 vs 45.9 ±15.0, P = .004), had higher PEEP (9.2 cm H2O [7.0-11.0] vs 8.0 [5.6-8.9], P = .049), chronic kidney disease stage ≥ 2 (10 [29.4%] vs 0 [0%], P = .009), and higher serum creatinine before inhaled tobramycin therapy (1.26 mg/dL [0.84-2.18] vs 0.76 [0.47-1.28], P = .004). Age (odds ratio 1.09 [95% CI 1.02-1.16], P = .009) and PEEP (odds ratio 1.47 [95% CI 1.08-2.0], P =.01) were independent predictors for detectable serum tobramycin concentration. Thirty-seven subjects had no previous renal disease or injury, of which 9 (24.3%) developed an AKI. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (odds ratio 1.72 [95% CI 1.07-2.76], P = .03) was the only independent predictor for AKI. CONCLUSIONS: Detectable serum tobramycin concentrations were frequently observed in critically ill, mechanically ventilated subjects receiving empiric inhaled tobramycin for VAP. Subject age and PEEP were independent predictors for detectable serum tobramycin concentration. Serum monitoring and empiric dose reductions should be considered in older patients and those requiring higher PEEP.

Comparison of Ceftriaxone and Antipseudomonal ß-Lactam Antibiotics Utilized for Potential AmpC ß-Lactamase-Producing Organisms.

Background: Induction of antibiotic resistance is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in AmpC ß-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae. The use of ceftriaxone is controversial for treatment of these organisms due to concerns for inducible resistance. This study was designed to compare treatment failure rates between ceftriaxone and antipseudomonal ß-lactam antibiotics when used as definitive therapy for organisms most commonly associated with chromosomal AmpC ß-lactamase production. Methods: A retrospective, single-center cohort study was performed enrolling patients hospitalized with monomicrobial Enterobacter, Citrobacter, or Serratia spp. infections. The primary objective compared proportion of treatment failure between groups. All patients received either ceftriaxone or an antipseudomonal ß-lactam alone within 24 hours of culture finalization, and with a duration of at least 72 hours for definitive treatment. Treatment failure was defined as either clinical failure (abnormal white blood cell count or temperature on day 7 or 14 post-antibiotics) or microbiologic failure (regrowth of the same organism at same site within 14 or 21 days). Results: Of 192 total patients, treatment failure was observed in 24/71 patients (34%) receiving ceftriaxone and in 42/121 patients (35%) receiving antipseudomonal ß-lactam (P = .98). No difference was observed between clinical or microbiologic failure rates between groups. The ceftriaxone group had significantly more patients undergoing treatment for urinary tract infections (51% vs 17%, P < .001), but treatment failure rates remained similar between groups when comparing infections of all other sources. Conclusion: Ceftriaxone has comparable treatment failure rates to antipseudomonal ß-lactams for susceptible Enterobacteriaceae infections and may be considered as a therapeutic option. Further, prospective research is needed to validate optimal dosing and application in all sites of infection.

Hitting the Vasopressor Ceiling: Finding Norepinephrine Associated Mortality in the Critically Ill.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on what dose of norepinephrine corresponds with futility. The purpose of this study was to investigate the maximum infusion and cumulative doses of norepinephrine associated with survival for patients in medical and surgical intensive care units (MICU and SICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 661 critically ill patients admitted to a large academic medical center who received norepinephrine. Univariate, multivariate, and area under the curve analyses with optimal cut offs for maximum infusion rate and cumulative dosage were determined by Youden Index. RESULTS: The population was 54.9% male, 75.8% white, and 58.7 ± 16.1 y old with 384 (69.8%) admitted to the MICU and 166 (30.2%) admitted to the SICU, including 38 trauma patients. Inflection points in mortality were seen at 18 mcg/min and 17.6 mg. The inflection point was higher in MICU patients at 21 mcg/min and lower in SICU patients at 11 mcg/min. MICU patients also had a higher maximum cumulative dosage of 30.7 mg, compared to 2.7 mg in SICU patients. In trauma patients, norepinephrine infusions up to 5 mcg/min were associated with a 41.7% mortality rate. CONCLUSION: A maximum rate of 18 mcg/min and cumulative dose of 17.6 mg were the inflection points for mortality risk in ICU patients, with SICU patients tolerating lower doses. In trauma patients, even low doses of norepinephrine were associated with higher mortality. These data suggest that MICU, SICU, and trauma patients differ in need for, response to, and outcome from escalating norepinephrine doses.

Cefepime Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment in Critically Ill Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Sepsis causes half of acute kidney injuries in the intensive care unit (ICU). ICU patients may need continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), which will affect their antimicrobial exposure. We aimed to build a cefepime population pharmacokinetic (PK) model in CRRT ICU patients and perform simulations to assess target attainment. Patients who were ≥18 years old, were admitted to the ICU, and received cefepime 2 g every 8 h as a 4-h infusion while on CRRT were enrolled prospectively. Samples were collected from the predialyzer ports, postdialyzer ports, and effluent fluid at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 h after the first dose and at steady state. Age, sex, weight, urine output, and CRRT parameters were recorded. Pmetrics was used for population PK and simulations. The target exposure was 100% of the dosing interval during which the free beta-lactam concentration is above the MIC (fT>MIC). Ten patients were included; their mean age was 53 years, and mean weight was 119 kg. Seventy percent were males. Cefepime was described by a five-compartment model. The downtime was applied to the CRRT flow rates, which were used to describe the rates of transfer between the compartments. At MICs of ≤8 mg/liter, intermittent infusion of 2 g cefepime every 8 h achieved good target attainment both early in therapy and at steady state. Only extended- and continuous-infusion regimens achieved good target attainment at MICs of 16 mg/liter. In conclusion, 2 g cefepime infused over 30 min followed by extended infusion of 2 g every 8 h achieved good target attainment at MICs of ≤16 mg/liter with different CRRT flow rates and may be considered in resistant bacterial infections.

Admission thrombelastography does not guide dose adjustment of enoxaparin in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Enoxaparin is used as chemoprophylaxis to reduce incidence of venous thromboembolism and its complications following trauma. Serum anti-Xa monitoring is used to assess efficacy but requires several doses to be administered. Thrombelastography assesses hypercoagulability and may have utility identifying high-risk patients for venous thromboembolism. The objective was to evaluate whether thrombelastography parameters could identify trauma patients requiring enoxaparin dose adjustment earlier than serum anti-Xa concentrations. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective medical record review evaluated patients admitted to a regional level I trauma center that received an admission thrombelastography and a dose of enoxaparin with a serum trough anti-Xa concentration drawn. Patients were divided into standard-dose or dose-adjusted enoxaparin. Venous thromboembolism incidence between groups and risk factors for enoxaparin dose adjustment and venous thromboembolism development were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. Differences observed between groups included age (standard-dose enoxaparin, 48.5 [29.3-72] vs dose-adjusted enoxaparin, 38.5 [25-55.7] years; P = .005), admission creatinine clearance (standard-dose enoxaparin, 92.9 [67.4-113.4] vs dose-adjusted enoxaparin, 102.1 [83.8-129.2] mL/min; P = .017), and time to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis initiation (standard-dose enoxaparin, 23.8 [11.2-36.4] vs dose-adjusted enoxaparin, 34.5 [18.3-52.7] hours; P = .004). No differences in thrombelastography parameters or venous thromboembolism incidence were observed. No independent risk factors for enoxaparin dose adjustment were identified; however, risk assessment profile score > 10 was an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism development. CONCLUSION: No relationship between admission thrombelastography and need for enoxaparin dose adjustment in trauma patients was observed. As thrombelastography continues growing in clinical use, it is prudent to investigate other potential applications. Currently, thrombelastography should not be used to guide enoxaparin dosing.

Analgesia and Sedation Strategies in Mechanically Ventilated Adults with COVID-19.

Evidence-based management of analgesia and sedation in COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome remains limited. Non-guideline recommended analgesic and sedative medication regimens and deeper sedation targets have been employed for patients with COVID-19 due to exaggerated analgesia and sedation requirements with extended durations of mechanical ventilation. This, coupled with a desire to minimize nurse entry into COVID-19 patient rooms, marked obesity, altered end-organ function, and evolving medication shortages, presents numerous short- and long-term challenges. Alternative analgesic and sedative agents and regimens may pose safety risks and require judicious bedside management for appropriate use. The purpose of this commentary is to provide considerations and solutions for designing safe and effective analgesia and sedation strategies for adult patients with considerable ventilator dyssynchrony and sedation requirements, such as COVID-19.

Retrospective Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Elderly, High-Risk Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk increases with age. Scarce data exist for patients age ≥65 y. This study evaluated VTE incidence in elderly, high-risk trauma patients receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) or enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included trauma patients age ≥ 65 y with risk assessment profile (RAP) ≥ 5 who received UFH or enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome was VTE incidence requiring therapeutic anticoagulation. An age-modified RAP (RAP-AM) was calculated as RAP without age distribution points. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors for VTE development and chemoprophylactic agent selection. Bleeding incidence compared packed red blood cells utilized. RESULTS: A total of 1090 patients were included (UFH, n = 655; enoxaparin, n = 435). VTE occurred in 39 (3.6%) patients with no difference between groups in proximal deep vein thrombosis (2.1% versus 3.0%, P = 0.52) or pulmonary embolism (1.2% versus 1.4%, P = 0.96). Weight ≥125 kg (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.06-16.11) and RAP-AM ≥ 5 (OR 6.52, 95% CI 2.65-16.03) were independently associated with VTE development. Increasing age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), initiation ≤ 24 h (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.66-2.84) and creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21) were independent predictors of receiving UFH whereas increasing ISS (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99) was associated with receiving enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: VTE incidence may be similar for high-risk, elderly trauma patients receiving UFH and enoxaparin chemoprophylaxis. Further research is necessary to determine noninferiority of UFH to enoxaparin in this patient population.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Extended-Infusion Cefepime in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate extended-infusion (EI) cefepime pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, PK study. SETTING: Intensive care units at a large, academic, tertiary-care medical center. PATIENTS: Ten critically ill adults who were receiving cefepime 2 g intravenously every 8 hours as a 4-hour infusion while receiving CVVH (eight patients) or CVVHD (two patients). INTERVENTION: Two sets of five serum cefepime concentrations were collected for each patient to assess pharmacokinetics before and during presumed steady state. Concurrent serum and CRRT effluent samples were collected at hours 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 after the first cefepime dose and after either the fourth, fifth, or sixth (steady-state) cefepime doses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine free cefepime concentrations. PK analyses included CRRT clearance, half-life, and sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient. Cefepime peak (4 hrs) concentrations, trough (8 hrs) concentrations (Cmin ), and minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of 8 µg/ml for the pathogen (MIC8 ) were used to evaluate attainment of pharmacodynamic targets: 100% of the dosing interval that free drug remains above MIC8 (100% fT > MIC8 ), 100% fT > 4 × MIC8 (optimal), percentage of time fT > 4 × MIC8 (%fT > 4 × MIC8 ) at steady state, and ratio of Cmin to MIC8 (fCmin /MIC8 ). Total CRRT effluent flow rate was a mean ± SD of 30.1 ± 5.4 ml/kg/hr, CRRT clearance was 39.6 ± 9.9 ml/min, and half-life was 5.3 ± 1.7 hours. Sieving coefficient or saturation coefficient were 0.83 ± 0.13 and 0.69 ± 0.22, respectively. First and steady-state dose Cmin were 23.4 ± 10.1 µg/ml and 45.2 ± 14.6 µg/ml, respectively. All patients achieved 100% fT > MIC8 on first and steady-state doses. First and steady-state dose 100% fT > 4 × MIC8 were achieved in 22% (2/9 patients) and 87.5% (7/8 patients) of patients, respectively. The mean %fT > 4 × MIC8 at steady state was 97.5%. The fCmin /MIC8 was 2.92 ± 1.26 for the first dose and 5.65 ± 1.83 at steady state. CONCLUSION: Extended-infusion cefepime dosing in critically ill patients receiving CRRT successfully attained 100% fT > MIC8 in all patients and an appropriate fCmin /MIC8 for both first and steady-state doses. All but one patient achieved 100% fT > 4 × MIC8 at steady state. No significant differences were observed in PK properties between first and steady-state doses among or between patients. It may be reasonable to initiate an empiric or definitive regimen of EI cefepime in critically ill patients receiving concurrent CRRT who are at risk for resistant organisms. Further research is needed to identify the optimal dosing regimen of EI cefepime in this patient population.

Continuous Infusion Ketamine for Adjunctive Analgosedation in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist with emerging evidence assessing its use as a continuous infusion agent to provide concomitant analgesia and sedation. The role of ketamine as adjunctive therapy in mechanically ventilated patients is unclear. This study sought to investigate the impact of adjunctive continuous infusion ketamine on concomitant analgesic and sedative dosing while providing goal comfort in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: This retrospective two-center intrapatient comparison study included mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients who received continuous infusion ketamine with at least one other analgesic or sedative infusion. The primary outcome assessed percent relative change in concomitant analgesic-sedative doses 24 hours after ketamine initiation. Secondary outcomes included percent of Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) assessments at goal, adverse effects, and delirium incidence. Exploratory evaluation of independent factors associated with ketamine responders (50% or more relative reduction in analgesic-sedative dosing requirements at 24 hrs) and nonresponders (less than 50% relative reduction) was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included. A total of 160 concomitant analgesic-sedative infusions were used in combination with ketamine, most commonly fentanyl (98 [61.3%]) and propofol (46 [28.8%]). A 20% (interquartile range [IQR] -63.6 to 0.0, p<0.001) relative reduction in total analgesic-sedative infusion pharmacotherapy was achieved at 24 hours after ketamine initiation. Analgesic and sedative infusion doses decreased at 24 hours (fentanyl: pre, 175 µg/hr [IQR 100-200 µg/hr] vs post, 125 µg/hr [IQR 50-200 µg/hr], p<0.001; propofol: pre, 42.5 µg/kg/min [IQR 20.0-60.0 µg/kg/min] vs post, 20.0 µg/kg/min [IQR 3.8-31.3 µg/kg/min], p<0.001). Median percent time within goal RASS improved after ketamine initiation (pre, 7.1% [0-40%] vs post, 25% [0-66.7%], p=0.005). No differences were observed in secondary outcomes between responders and nonresponders, except a longer non-ICU hospital length of stay in responders. Independent factors associated with ketamine response included a lower body mass index, higher starting dose of ketamine, lower severity of illness, and need for multiple concomitant analgesic-sedative infusions before initiation of ketamine. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive continuous infusion ketamine promotes analgesic and sedative dose-sparing effects in mechanically ventilated patients while improving time spent within goal sedation range. Further prospective research is warranted.

Pharmacologic Approach to Management of Clostridium difficile Infection.

Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium that is the leading cause of nosocomial infections in hospitals in the United States. Critically ill patients are at high risk for C. difficile infection (CDI) and face potentially detrimental effects, including prolonged hospitalization, risk of recurrent disease, complicated surgery, and death. CDI requires a multidisciplinary approach to decrease hospital transmission and improve treatment outcomes. This article briefly reviews the current literature and guideline recommendations for treatment and prevention of CDI, with a focus on antibiotic treatment considerations including dosing, routes of administration, efficacy data, adverse effects, and monitoring parameters.

Recognition, Assessment, and Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome in the Intensive Care Unit.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a complex neurologic disorder that develops after an acute reduction in or cessation of chronic alcohol consumption that alters neurotransmitter conduction. The incidence of AWS in the intensive care unit varies, but has been associated with poor outcomes. This is primarily driven by downregulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) leading to autonomic excitability and psychomotor agitation. No clinical assessment tools have been validated to assess for AWS in the intensive care unit, particularly for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. The Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale, Revised, may be considered to gauge the extent of withdrawal, but is not particular with acute presentations in this population. Symptom-triggered use of GABA agonist such as benzodiazepines remains the mainstay of pharmacotherapeutic intervention. Nonbenzodiazepine GABA agonists such as barbiturates and propofol as well as non-GABA adjunctive agents such as dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and antipsychotic agents may help reduce the need for symptom-triggered benzodiazepine dosing, but lack robust data. Agent selection should be based on patient-specific factors such as renal and hepatic metabolism, duration of action, and clearance. Institution-specific protocols directing GABA-acting medications and adjunctive medications for excitatory, adrenergic, and delirium assessments could be considered to improve patient outcomes and caregiver satisfaction.